The Afghan War Diary (AWD for short) consists of messages from several important US military communications systems. The messaging systems have changed over time; as such reporting standards and message format have changed as well. This reading guide tries to provide some helpful hints on interpretation and understanding of the messages contained in the AWD.
Most of the messages follow a pre-set structure that is designed to make automated processing of the contents easier. It is best to think of the messages in the terms of an overall collective logbook of the Afghan war. The AWD contains the relevant events, occurrences and intelligence experiences of the military, shared among many recipients. The basic idea is that all the messages taken together should provide a full picture of a days important events, intelligence, warnings, and other statistics. Each unit, outpost, convoy, or other military action generates report about relevant daily events. The range of topics is rather wide: Improvised Explosives Devices encountered, offensive operations, taking enemy fire, engagement with possible hostile forces, talking with village elders, numbers of wounded, dead, and detained, kidnappings, broader intelligence information and explicit threat warnings from intercepted radio communications, local informers or the afghan police. It also includes day to day complaints about lack of equipment and supplies.
The description of events in the messages is often rather short and terse. To grasp the reporting style, it is helpful to understand the conditions under which the messages are composed and sent. Often they come from field units who have been under fire or under other stressful conditions all day and see the report-writing as nasty paperwork, that needs to be completed with little apparent benefit to expect. So the reporting is kept to the necessary minimum, with as little type-work as possible. The field units also need to expect questions from higher up or disciplinary measures for events recorded in the messages, so they will tend to gloss over violations of rules of engagement and other problematic behavior; the reports are often detailed when discussing actions or interactions by enemy forces. Once it is in the AWD messages, it is officially part of the record - it is subject to analysis and scrutiny. The truthfulness and completeness especially of descriptions of events must always be carefully considered. Circumstances that completely change the meaning of an reported event may have been omitted.
The reports need to answer the critical questions: Who, When, Where, What, With whom, by what Means and Why. The AWD messages are not addressed to individuals but to groups of recipients that are fulfilling certain functions, such as duty officers in a certain region. The systems where the messages originate perform distribution based on criteria like region, classification level and other information. The goal of distribution is to provide those with access and the need to know, all of the information that relevant to their duties. In practice, this seems to be working imperfectly. The messages contain geo-location information in the forms of latitude-longitude, military grid coordinates and region.
The messages contain a large number of abbreviations that are essential to understanding its contents. When browsing through the messages, underlined abbreviations pop up an little explanation, when the mouse is hovering over it. The meanings and use of some shorthands have changed over time, others are sometimes ambiguous or have several meanings that are used depending on context, region or reporting unit. If you discover the meaning of a so far unresolved acronym or abbreviations, or if you have corrections, please submit them to wl-editors@sunshinepress.org.
An especially helpful reference to names of military units and task-forces and their respective responsibilities can be found at http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/enduring-freedom.htm
The site also contains a list of bases, airfields http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/afghanistan.htm Location names are also often shortened to three-character acronyms.
Messages may contain date and time information. Dates are mostly presented in either US numeric form (Year-Month-Day, e.g. 2009-09-04) or various Euro-style shorthands (Day-Month-Year, e.g. 2 Jan 04 or 02-Jan-04 or 2jan04 etc.).
Times are frequently noted with a time-zone identifier behind the time, e.g. "09:32Z". Most common are Z (Zulu Time, aka. UTC time zone), D (Delta Time, aka. UTC + 4 hours) and B (Bravo Time, aka UTC + 2 hours). A full list off time zones can be found here: http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/military/
Other times are noted without any time zone identifier at all. The Afghanistan time zone is AFT (UTC + 4:30), which may complicate things further if you are looking up messages based on local time.
Finding messages relating to known events may be complicated by date and time zone shifting; if the event is in the night or early morning, it may cause a report to appear to be be misfiled. It is advisable to always look through messages before and on the proceeding day for any event.
David Leigh, the Guardian's investigations editor, explains the online tools they have created to help you understand the secret US military files on the war in Afghanistan: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/datablog/video/2010/jul/25/afghanistan-war-logs-video-tutorial
Reference ID | Region | Latitude | Longitude |
---|---|---|---|
AFG20090801n1981 | RC SOUTH | 32.29875946 | 64.37349701 |
Date | Type | Category | Affiliation | Detained |
---|---|---|---|---|
2009-08-01 05:05 | Explosive Hazard | IED Explosion | ENEMY | 0 |
Enemy | Friend | Civilian | Host nation | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Killed in action | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wounded in action | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
WHEN: 01 0715D AUG 09
WHO: 8TH ESB
WHERE: 41S PR 34124 78457 (IED STRIKE 1) 8.5KM SW OF NOWZAD
41S PR 29317 74380 (IED STRIKE 2)
WHAT: IED STRIKE
EVENT: WHILE CONDUCTING A CONVOY, FROM NOWZAD TO LEATHERNECK, 8TH ESB CONVOY (AMUCK 13) HIT AN IED. THE 2ND VEHICLE SUSTAINED DAMAGE TO AN EET TRAILER AND TRAILER HITCH. WHILE ASSESSING DAMAGE AND WORKING BUMP PLAN, THE CONVOY REPORTED OBSERVING (3) ROUNDS OF IDF THAT WAS 200-300 METERS NORTH OF THEIR POSITION AND A TIC WAS DECLARED AND 8TH ESB REQUESTED AIR SUPPORT. THE CONVOY MOVED SOUTH, OUT OF THE IMPACT AREA OF IDF FIRE. DURING THIS MOVEMENT, AMUCK 13 STRUCK A 2ND IED. THE 15TH VIC, (MAXPRO) SUFFERED SEVERE DAMAGE AND WAS A MOBILITY KILL. AIR REMAINED ON STATION AN COULD NOT FIND ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT TO REPORT AND DECLARED THE TIC CLOSED AT 1043D. BOTH VEHICLES WERE RECOVERED BY ASSETS WITH IN THE CONVOY AND AMUCK 13 CONTINUED MISSION.
BDA: (1) DAMAGED EET TRAILER, (1) MAXPRO MRAP MOBILITY KILL, NO CASUALTIES REPORTED
ISAF REF # 07-0019 (CLOSED)
**ADMIN NOTE, THIS REPORT IS THE SECOND IED STRIKE MENTIONED IN THE SUMMARY ABOVE. DUE TO PROXIMITY AND UNIT INVOLVED THIS REPORT SHARES ISAF NUMBER WITH THE ORIGINAL EVENT** CIDNE TRACKING NUMBER OF ORIGINAL EVENT: 20090801024541RPR3412478457
Report key: D47B2C23-DC43-AC70-BB98E0742FDB894D
Tracking number: 20090801053041SPR2931774380
Attack on: ENEMY
Complex atack:
Reporting unit: 2ND MEB Journal Clerk
Unit name: 8TH ESB USMC
Type of unit: CF
Originator group: 2ND MEB Journal Clerk
Updated by group: J3 ORSA
MGRS: 41SPR2931774380
CCIR:
Sigact:
DColor: RED