Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10ROME117
2010-02-02 11:02:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Rome
Cable title:
ITALY'S PUBLIC DEBT - NO PIIGS HERE
VZCZCXRO3965 OO RUEHRN DE RUEHRO #0117/01 0331102 ZNR UUUUU ZZH O 021102Z FEB 10 FM AMEMBASSY ROME TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3206 RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC IMMEDIATE INFO RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 0452 RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 4235 RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 4005 RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY RUEHSS/OECD COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 000117
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SECSTATE FOR EB/IFD/OMA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON PGOV IT
SUBJECT: ITALY'S PUBLIC DEBT - NO PIIGS HERE
ROME 00000117 001.2 OF 002
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 000117
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SECSTATE FOR EB/IFD/OMA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON PGOV IT
SUBJECT: ITALY'S PUBLIC DEBT - NO PIIGS HERE
ROME 00000117 001.2 OF 002
1. Summary -- The 2008 financial crisis and ensuing recession have
strained many Western European governments' finances, including
Italy's. While the Italian debt picture is troubling, it is Post's
view that the problem is manageable in the foreseeable future, and
unlikely to deteriorate in the manner of the ongoing emergency in
Greece and similar ones in Portugal, Ireland and Spain (PIIGS).
Trends in the maturity and interest rate cost of Italy's debt are
favorable, as is the profile of Italy's creditors. In the long run,
however, Italy's debt load will sap investment and stifle growth,
contributing further to decades-old Italian economic malaise. End
Summary.
Public Debt Balloons
--------------
2. Italy's public debt, at 1.75 trillion euros (2.45 trillion USD)
is the third largest in the world, after the US and Japan.
Officially estimated at 115.1 percent of GDP at end-2009, it is the
highest of any major economy in the euro zone and almost double the
60 percent limit stipulated by the EU's Maastricht treaty.
3. Throughout the eighties Italy's public debt almost doubled, from
about 60 percent of GDP in 1980 to a record high of 122 percent in
1994. Between 1994 and 2000 Italy's public debt fell back to 100
percent of GDP, in large part due to a broad economic privatization
program, but anemic economic growth pushed it up again to 105.8
percent in 2008, the eve of the financial crisis. The crisis and
the ensuing recession pushed this ratio to 115.1 percent at
end-2009, now projected to increase further to 117 percent in 2010.
4. Despite this bleak trend, the Italian government appears capable
of servicing existing obligations and of raising additional funds in
capital markets to meet expected budget deficits of around 5 percent
of GDP in 2010 and 2011. (Note: Greece's 2009 budget deficit by
comparison, exceeded 12 percent of GDP). Capital markets and
sovereign credit rating agencies seem to concur in this assessment.
Just 84 Easy Payments
--------------
5. There are a number of factors suggesting that the GOI's debt
problem will be manageable in the foreseeable future. The first is
the average maturity of the debt stock, currently at seven years.
Throughout 2009, in fact, average maturity increased from 6 years
and 8 months, as the GOI resorted to issuing longer term securities.
Second, Italy's debt servicing capacity remains stable, as in 2009
the GOI astutely continued to issue bonds beyond its immediate
needs, capitalizing on favorable market conditions. According to
Bank of Italy officials, the Italian Treasury currently has 31.7
billion euros (about two percent of GDP) on reserve in the Bank.
6. The third factor in the GOI's favor is the declining interest
cost of its debt. The average interest rate Italy pays is five
percent and falling, with recent (2009) 1-year Treasury notes
yielding (based on the initial discount) less than one percent on
average (a negative real interest rate),and new longer term issues
yielding on average 3.5 percent. Finally, forty-five percent of
Italy's debt is held by foreign investors, which suggests the GOI
has a broad and diversified pool to tap for funds.
The Market Agrees
--------------
7. The international capital market appears to concur in this
moderately favorable assessment, given the spread between the
interest rate the German government pays on its benchmark 10 year
bonds, and that paid by the GOI. While the "Bund" spread widened to
a post-euro record 159 basis points in January 2009, it narrowed to
75 basis points by early 2010. In fact, in the secondary market,
Italian debt was the best-performing of the 16-nation euro region
this year, gaining 8.1 percent, according to Bloomberg/EFFAS
indexes.
8. The credit rating agencies throughout 2009 similarly maintained
Italy's sovereign ratings well in the investment-grade range, with
Standard and Poor's assigning a "stable" outlook. While the cost of
credit default swaps on Italian debt rose slightly in mid December
2009 from 86 to 94 basis points, it remains well below the recent
390 basis points cost to insure against Greek default.
Some Cause for Concern
--------------
ROME 00000117 002.2 OF 002
9. (SBU) Central bank officials told econoffs on January 14 that
only 10 percent of Italy's debt is short-term, i.e. due in one year
or less. That 10 percent, however, comes to 170 billion euros.
Fortunately, the massive liquidity injection by central banks
world-wide means that short-term investment funds remain plentiful,
and the GOI should be able to roll over its short-term debt fairly
easily, barring a new shock to the international financial system.
10. (SBU) Another development to watch is the growth of Central Bank
lending to the GOI, which during 2009 increased from 20.3 billion
euro to 49.4 billion euro, according to Bank officials.
Comment: A Permanent Drag on Growth
--------------
11. (SBU) Notwithstanding the international press' smug new acronym
(PIIGS) that lumps together assorted highly indebted Euro-zone
nations, Italy's situation is decidedly not/not another Greece in
the making. The likelihood of a similar short-term debt crisis here
is very small.
12. (SBU) Still, Italy's massive debt hangover augurs badly in the
medium and long run. Absent fundamental economic structural
reforms, Italy will continue to struggle under a huge debt burden.
In the best of cases, it will constitute a permanent drag on growth,
whether by crowding out productive private investment, or dampening
GDP as a result of higher taxes and/or lower spending to control
deficits. Italy's only option is to grow its way out of its debt
load, but already-high taxes, excessive regulation and disincentives
to investment make this an unlikely prospect.
THORNE
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SECSTATE FOR EB/IFD/OMA
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EFIN ECON PGOV IT
SUBJECT: ITALY'S PUBLIC DEBT - NO PIIGS HERE
ROME 00000117 001.2 OF 002
1. Summary -- The 2008 financial crisis and ensuing recession have
strained many Western European governments' finances, including
Italy's. While the Italian debt picture is troubling, it is Post's
view that the problem is manageable in the foreseeable future, and
unlikely to deteriorate in the manner of the ongoing emergency in
Greece and similar ones in Portugal, Ireland and Spain (PIIGS).
Trends in the maturity and interest rate cost of Italy's debt are
favorable, as is the profile of Italy's creditors. In the long run,
however, Italy's debt load will sap investment and stifle growth,
contributing further to decades-old Italian economic malaise. End
Summary.
Public Debt Balloons
--------------
2. Italy's public debt, at 1.75 trillion euros (2.45 trillion USD)
is the third largest in the world, after the US and Japan.
Officially estimated at 115.1 percent of GDP at end-2009, it is the
highest of any major economy in the euro zone and almost double the
60 percent limit stipulated by the EU's Maastricht treaty.
3. Throughout the eighties Italy's public debt almost doubled, from
about 60 percent of GDP in 1980 to a record high of 122 percent in
1994. Between 1994 and 2000 Italy's public debt fell back to 100
percent of GDP, in large part due to a broad economic privatization
program, but anemic economic growth pushed it up again to 105.8
percent in 2008, the eve of the financial crisis. The crisis and
the ensuing recession pushed this ratio to 115.1 percent at
end-2009, now projected to increase further to 117 percent in 2010.
4. Despite this bleak trend, the Italian government appears capable
of servicing existing obligations and of raising additional funds in
capital markets to meet expected budget deficits of around 5 percent
of GDP in 2010 and 2011. (Note: Greece's 2009 budget deficit by
comparison, exceeded 12 percent of GDP). Capital markets and
sovereign credit rating agencies seem to concur in this assessment.
Just 84 Easy Payments
--------------
5. There are a number of factors suggesting that the GOI's debt
problem will be manageable in the foreseeable future. The first is
the average maturity of the debt stock, currently at seven years.
Throughout 2009, in fact, average maturity increased from 6 years
and 8 months, as the GOI resorted to issuing longer term securities.
Second, Italy's debt servicing capacity remains stable, as in 2009
the GOI astutely continued to issue bonds beyond its immediate
needs, capitalizing on favorable market conditions. According to
Bank of Italy officials, the Italian Treasury currently has 31.7
billion euros (about two percent of GDP) on reserve in the Bank.
6. The third factor in the GOI's favor is the declining interest
cost of its debt. The average interest rate Italy pays is five
percent and falling, with recent (2009) 1-year Treasury notes
yielding (based on the initial discount) less than one percent on
average (a negative real interest rate),and new longer term issues
yielding on average 3.5 percent. Finally, forty-five percent of
Italy's debt is held by foreign investors, which suggests the GOI
has a broad and diversified pool to tap for funds.
The Market Agrees
--------------
7. The international capital market appears to concur in this
moderately favorable assessment, given the spread between the
interest rate the German government pays on its benchmark 10 year
bonds, and that paid by the GOI. While the "Bund" spread widened to
a post-euro record 159 basis points in January 2009, it narrowed to
75 basis points by early 2010. In fact, in the secondary market,
Italian debt was the best-performing of the 16-nation euro region
this year, gaining 8.1 percent, according to Bloomberg/EFFAS
indexes.
8. The credit rating agencies throughout 2009 similarly maintained
Italy's sovereign ratings well in the investment-grade range, with
Standard and Poor's assigning a "stable" outlook. While the cost of
credit default swaps on Italian debt rose slightly in mid December
2009 from 86 to 94 basis points, it remains well below the recent
390 basis points cost to insure against Greek default.
Some Cause for Concern
--------------
ROME 00000117 002.2 OF 002
9. (SBU) Central bank officials told econoffs on January 14 that
only 10 percent of Italy's debt is short-term, i.e. due in one year
or less. That 10 percent, however, comes to 170 billion euros.
Fortunately, the massive liquidity injection by central banks
world-wide means that short-term investment funds remain plentiful,
and the GOI should be able to roll over its short-term debt fairly
easily, barring a new shock to the international financial system.
10. (SBU) Another development to watch is the growth of Central Bank
lending to the GOI, which during 2009 increased from 20.3 billion
euro to 49.4 billion euro, according to Bank officials.
Comment: A Permanent Drag on Growth
--------------
11. (SBU) Notwithstanding the international press' smug new acronym
(PIIGS) that lumps together assorted highly indebted Euro-zone
nations, Italy's situation is decidedly not/not another Greece in
the making. The likelihood of a similar short-term debt crisis here
is very small.
12. (SBU) Still, Italy's massive debt hangover augurs badly in the
medium and long run. Absent fundamental economic structural
reforms, Italy will continue to struggle under a huge debt burden.
In the best of cases, it will constitute a permanent drag on growth,
whether by crowding out productive private investment, or dampening
GDP as a result of higher taxes and/or lower spending to control
deficits. Italy's only option is to grow its way out of its debt
load, but already-high taxes, excessive regulation and disincentives
to investment make this an unlikely prospect.
THORNE