Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10OSLO65
2010-02-06 07:58:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:  

NORWAY AGREES WITH SHARK PROTECTION, WORRIES ABOUT FINANCING

Tags:  SENV EFIS PHSA NO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8101
RR RUEHBZ
DE RUEHNY #0065 0370758
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 060758Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY OSLO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0018
INFO RUEHAR/AMEMBASSY ACCRA 0001
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK 0001
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 0001
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0001
RUEHBZ/AMEMBASSY BRAZZAVILLE 0001
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0001
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 0001
RUEHJL/AMEMBASSY BANJUL 0001
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 0001
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 0001
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0001
RUEHLU/AMEMBASSY LUANDA 0001
RUEHMV/AMEMBASSY MONROVIA
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0001
RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO
RUEHOS/AMCONSUL LAGOS
RUEHPL/AMEMBASSY PORT LOUIS 0001
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT 0001
RUEHRY/AMEMBASSY CONAKRY 0001
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 0001
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO
RUEHSJ/AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA 0001
UNCLAS OSLO 000065 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV EFIS PHSA NO
SUBJECT: NORWAY AGREES WITH SHARK PROTECTION, WORRIES ABOUT FINANCING
MECHANISM

REF: SECSTATE 010014

UNCLAS OSLO 000065 SENSITIVE SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: SENV EFIS PHSA NO SUBJECT: NORWAY AGREES WITH SHARK PROTECTION, WORRIES ABOUT FINANCING MECHANISM REF: SECSTATE 010014 ¶1. (SBU) Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management Senior Advisor Oystein Storkensen told PolOff February 4 that Norway agrees in principle with U.S. efforts to control and protect shark resources per reftel. However, Storkensen noted that the new Memorandum of Understanding should include a clearly defined financing mechanism, to ensure that funds would be available for implementation. Noting that he was a member of the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) standing committee, Storkensen said that he knew no trust funds would be available for implementation. He suggested that the legally-binding Agreement on Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP) served as a good example to address financing concerns. He said he looked forward to a debate on financing during the February 8 CMS meeting, adding that it would be important to bear in mind the financial difficulties faced by many CMR members. ¶2. (SBU) Storkensen said the he disagreed with the MOU's points which opened debate on which species would included in the MOU, as a decision on including seven species had been taken during the 2008 CMS meeting in Rome. He said that new discussions could result in an increased number of shark species included in the MOU, possibly reducing the overall impact given the limited financing likely available. ¶3. (SBU) Storkensen mentioned that the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) had made progress on addressing shark management, and does not believe CMR should duplicate the on-going FAO efforts. He concluded by noting that the MOU discussions should focus on developing good ideas that could then be brought into the FAO program. MINIMIZE CONSIDERED WHITE

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -