Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10GUANGZHOU34
2010-01-21 09:07:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Consulate Guangzhou
Cable title:  

(C) South China Sea - Hainan-Based Think Tank Probes DATT

Tags:  PREL MARR PHSA PGOV CH 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3805
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHGZ #0034/01 0210907
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 210907Z JAN 10
FM AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1308
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE 0442
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC 0410
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC 0406
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC 0118
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 GUANGZHOU 000034 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/CM, S/P, INR/EAP

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2035/01/21
TAGS: PREL MARR PHSA PGOV CH
SUBJECT: (C) South China Sea - Hainan-Based Think Tank Probes DATT
for Official Policy Positions

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 GUANGZHOU 000034 SIPDIS STATE FOR EAP/CM, S/P, INR/EAP E.O. 12958: DECL: 2035/01/21 TAGS: PREL MARR PHSA PGOV CH SUBJECT: (C) South China Sea - Hainan-Based Think Tank Probes DATT for Official Policy Positions ¶1. (U) Classified by Economic/Political Section Chief Steve Lang for reason 1.4 (d). ¶2. (C) SUMMARY: During a visit to the National Institute for South China Sea Studies (NISCS),Defense Attach (DATT) Rear Admiral Gehrke was treated to more than a generic overview of the institute's history and current activities. Researchers at the Hainan-based think tank -- purportedly the only strategic oceanographic institute backed by the State Council -- peppered the DATT with questions concerning official USG policy positions on controversial issues related to China's claims to sovereignty in the South China Seas. The researchers asked about comments made by U.S. Senator Jim Webb on the need to balance China's influence in Southeast Asia, USG motivations for improving ties with countries like Cambodia and U.S. non-ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Seas (UNCLOS). In turn, the DATT inquired about China's position on overlapping claims over exclusive economic zones (EEZs) in the South China Sea and the status of the maritime dispute with Japan over the median line separating each country's EEZ in the East China Sea. END SUMMARY. Seeking a "Sea of Peace, Friendship and Cooperation" -------------- -------------- ¶3. (SBU) The two primary functions of NSCIS are to provide intellectual and legal support to the peaceful settlement of disputes in the South China Seas and to promote the economic and social development of Hainan province, according to NISCS President Wu Shicun. The institute's promotional video identifies its mission as the "promotion of a [South China] Sea of peace, friendship and cooperation." Kang explained to the DATT that the institute conducted research on the application of international law in the South China Sea, measures for the peaceful resolution of the Spratly Island disputes and the cooperative development of natural resources. NSCIS also hosts international seminars, publishes an annual report and a monthly South China Seas Journal, and engages in academic exchanges with other oceanographic institutions. In addition, Kang said the institute had provided policy consulting services to the central government on the development of marine resources and maritime economic development and is working to promote the creation of a South China Seas eco
nomic cooperation organization. Top Challenge: Prove China's Sovereignty -------------- ¶4. (C) Proving from a "historic and legal point of view" Chinese sovereignty in the South China Seas over the U-shaped line and the islands delineated by this line was the top challenge facing NISCS, according to Kang. She also identified figuring out how to work together with neighboring countries to jointly develop maritime resources and settle disputes as another major challenge. She noted that this would involve the creation of a political and economic cooperation mechanism that would ensure "peace, stability, mutual development, and the final resolution of disputes." Kang also told the DATT that since 30% of Hainan's economy is based on marine or "blue" resources, the future development of the province depended on a peaceful South China Sea. Probing DATT for Official Positions -------------- ¶5. (C) As soon as Kang concluded her presentation, a junior researcher asked the DATT whether or not he believed remarks made by U.S. Senator Jim Webb, which called on the United States to do more to balance Chinese influence in Southeast Asia, reflected the official USG position. The researcher also wanted to know if the DATT was familiar with a group known as the Southeast Asian Anti-China Spratly Group and if he could confirm rumors that the United States, Japan, and Australia were members of the group. As a follow-up question, the same researcher asked the DATT to explain why the United States was making efforts to improve relations with countries in Southeast Asia like Cambodia. Moments later, the Director of the NISCS Research Center for Oceans Law and Policy, Zhao Wei, mentioned the incident involving the USNS Impeccable as one of multiple instances in which U.S. Navy ships had allegedly crossed into China's EEZ before asking the DATT to clarify the U.S. position regarding ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Seas. (Comment: The line of questioning researchers launched immediately after the introductory remarks sheds light on PRC sensitivity to potential U.S. involvement in the resolution of territorial disputes in the South China Sea. End comment.) NISCS: China's Position Supported by International Law -------------- -------------- -- ¶6. (C) Given the researchers' apparent willingness to engage in open discussion, the DATT inquired about China's interpretation of the GUANGZHOU 00000034 002 OF 002 limits of their EEZ in the South China Sea and competing claims made by other countries. NISCS Deputy Director Li Jianwei responded that although China claimed historical sovereignty over the area delineated by the U-shaped, or nine-dotted line, it did not consider the EEZ to be part of its national territorial integrity. Without elaborating Li added that the historical and legal bases supporting the Chinese claim include a 1947 map containing the nine-dotted line, a 1958 declaration that defines China's territorial seas, and the codification of China's claims into domestic law in 1992. (Note: Li referred to additional historical support of the claim from 1998 but did not clarify the reference. End Note.) When asked about the dispute between China and Japan over their respective EEZs and the median line in the East China Sea, Zhao replied that this dispute was "strictly bound by current international laws" and that China's claim of 200 nautical miles from its continental shelf, although it extended into the EEZ claimed by Japan, had a clear basis in international law. ¶7. (U) This cable was coordinated with Embassy Beijing. GOLDBECK

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -