Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
10ASHGABAT46
2010-01-13 12:31:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ashgabat
Cable title:
MARATHON OIL EYEING TURKMENISTAN
how-toVZCZCXRO6754 PP RUEHAG RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHNEH RUEHPW RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR DE RUEHAH #0046 0131231 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 131231Z JAN 10 FM AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4061 INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 6120 RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 3810 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 3669 RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL 4362 RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1409 RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 4294
C O N F I D E N T I A L ASHGABAT 000046
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/CEN; EEB;
ENERGY FOR EKIMOFF/BURPOE/COHEN
COMMERCE FOR DSTARKS/EHOUSE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/13/2020
TAGS: EPET ECON PGOV EINV BTIO TX
SUBJECT: MARATHON OIL EYEING TURKMENISTAN
Classified By: Charge Sylvia Reed Curran for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
C O N F I D E N T I A L ASHGABAT 000046
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/CEN; EEB;
ENERGY FOR EKIMOFF/BURPOE/COHEN
COMMERCE FOR DSTARKS/EHOUSE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/13/2020
TAGS: EPET ECON PGOV EINV BTIO TX
SUBJECT: MARATHON OIL EYEING TURKMENISTAN
Classified By: Charge Sylvia Reed Curran for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) Marathon Oil, the fourth largest U.S. oil company, is
trying to establish a foothold in the Turkmen energy market.
The company has yet to open an office in Turkmenistan, but it
does have a locally-employed representative based in
Ashgabat. The company first appeared in Turkmenistan in July
2007, when it proposed a project to convert natural gas into
easily transportable fuels, including gasoline. In 2009, the
company began testing the commercial feasibility of this
Gas-to-Fuel technology (GTF) in the company's traditional
markets before presenting the Government of Turkmenistan with
an official GTF proposal.
2. (C) According to a company rep, Marathon plans to parlay a
GTF project into a potential gas development deal. The rep
noted that Marathon is actively seeking agreements for
developing onshore fields, despite the Turkmen Government's
numerous recommendations for a proposal to develop one of the
offshore blocks located in the Caspian Sea. She added that
Marathon does not consider offshore blocks as attractive as
onshore fields, based on geological data that the Turkmen
Government provided to potential investors.
3. (C) The company rep reported some traction with the
Turkmen Government regarding an onshore gas development
proposal submitted in November 2009, on the margins of the
Turkmenistan International Oil and Gas Exhibition (TIOGE).
She reported that during TIOGE they were able to meet with
Deputy Chairman Baymyrat Hojamuhammedov, who reportedly was
very supportive of Marathon's proposal. The project would
involve the development of an underdeveloped onshore gas
field other than the much sought after South Yoloten gas
fields. She could not provide further details on the
project, but indicated that Marathon would not agree to a
service contract to develop gas fields. Instead, the company
planned to pursue a production sharing agreement.
4. (C) COMMENT: Like most international oil companies (IOC),
Marathon's current proposal is aimed at securing a
partnership to develop proven onshore gas deposits, rather
than an onshore service contract or on offshore agreement.
At the same time, Marathon's approach is different than other
IOCs eyeing Turkmenistan in that it is pursuing a
value-adding gas to fuel project as part of the process.
Marathon hopes that a willingness to pursue this project
might also result in a future onshore deal. END COMMENT.
CURRAN
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/CEN; EEB;
ENERGY FOR EKIMOFF/BURPOE/COHEN
COMMERCE FOR DSTARKS/EHOUSE
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/13/2020
TAGS: EPET ECON PGOV EINV BTIO TX
SUBJECT: MARATHON OIL EYEING TURKMENISTAN
Classified By: Charge Sylvia Reed Curran for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) Marathon Oil, the fourth largest U.S. oil company, is
trying to establish a foothold in the Turkmen energy market.
The company has yet to open an office in Turkmenistan, but it
does have a locally-employed representative based in
Ashgabat. The company first appeared in Turkmenistan in July
2007, when it proposed a project to convert natural gas into
easily transportable fuels, including gasoline. In 2009, the
company began testing the commercial feasibility of this
Gas-to-Fuel technology (GTF) in the company's traditional
markets before presenting the Government of Turkmenistan with
an official GTF proposal.
2. (C) According to a company rep, Marathon plans to parlay a
GTF project into a potential gas development deal. The rep
noted that Marathon is actively seeking agreements for
developing onshore fields, despite the Turkmen Government's
numerous recommendations for a proposal to develop one of the
offshore blocks located in the Caspian Sea. She added that
Marathon does not consider offshore blocks as attractive as
onshore fields, based on geological data that the Turkmen
Government provided to potential investors.
3. (C) The company rep reported some traction with the
Turkmen Government regarding an onshore gas development
proposal submitted in November 2009, on the margins of the
Turkmenistan International Oil and Gas Exhibition (TIOGE).
She reported that during TIOGE they were able to meet with
Deputy Chairman Baymyrat Hojamuhammedov, who reportedly was
very supportive of Marathon's proposal. The project would
involve the development of an underdeveloped onshore gas
field other than the much sought after South Yoloten gas
fields. She could not provide further details on the
project, but indicated that Marathon would not agree to a
service contract to develop gas fields. Instead, the company
planned to pursue a production sharing agreement.
4. (C) COMMENT: Like most international oil companies (IOC),
Marathon's current proposal is aimed at securing a
partnership to develop proven onshore gas deposits, rather
than an onshore service contract or on offshore agreement.
At the same time, Marathon's approach is different than other
IOCs eyeing Turkmenistan in that it is pursuing a
value-adding gas to fuel project as part of the process.
Marathon hopes that a willingness to pursue this project
might also result in a future onshore deal. END COMMENT.
CURRAN