Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09USNATO409
2009-09-25 14:30:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Mission USNATO
Cable title:
NAC STRESSES THAT KFOR DRAWDOWN MUST REMAIN
how-toVZCZCXRO4562 PP RUEHSL DE RUEHNO #0409/01 2681430 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 251430Z SEP 09 FM USMISSION USNATO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3411 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PRIORITY 0011 RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 0424 RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV PRIORITY 0236 RUEHPS/AMEMBASSY PRISTINA PRIORITY 3311 RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 0870 RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO PRIORITY 0191 RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE PRIORITY 3487 RUEHYE/AMEMBASSY YEREVAN PRIORITY 0085 RUDKSR/EUCOM PLANS AND ANALYSIS STUTTGART GE PRIORITY RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY RUEHNO/USDELMC BRUSSELS BE PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RHMFISS/USNMR SHAPE BE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 USNATO 000409
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/25/2019
TAGS: PREL NATO PGOV MOPS MARR KV YI
SUBJECT: NAC STRESSES THAT KFOR DRAWDOWN MUST REMAIN
CONDITIONS-BASED
Classified By: Political Advisor Kelly Degnan. Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 USNATO 000409
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/25/2019
TAGS: PREL NATO PGOV MOPS MARR KV YI
SUBJECT: NAC STRESSES THAT KFOR DRAWDOWN MUST REMAIN
CONDITIONS-BASED
Classified By: Political Advisor Kelly Degnan. Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
.
1. (C) SUMMARY: At a September 23 Council meeting in KFOR
contributing nations format, Chairman of the NATO Military
Committee Admiral Di Paola highlighted the lack of national
pledges to fill key intelligence and reserve requirements
during the KFOR Force Shaping Conference on September 8. He
relayed the concern of the Deputy Supreme Allied Commander
Europe (DSACEUR) that some nations have indicated fixed
end-dates for their participation in KFOR, which could
jeopardize the conditions-based nature of the drawdown.
Ambassador Daalder, with wide backing, reminded Allies that
they had agreed that the move to deterrent presence was to be
conditions-based without fixed timelines, and called on all
to match their commitment in the field with the commitments
they had made in Council. Given the 10.1 million euro
shortfall in the Kosovo Security Force (KSF) stand-up trust
fund, Ambassador Daalder urged all PermReps to go back to
their capitals to seek the necessary resources. Deputy
Secretary General Bisogniero closed by endorsing the
conditions-based nature of KFOR downsizing, saying that the
NAC would control the entire process. END SUMMARY
--------------
KFOR Downsizing Must Remain Conditions-Based
--------------
2. (C) Deputy Secretary General (DSYG) Bisogniero opened
discussion with the Council and non-NATO KFOR contributors by
expressing optimism that KFOR would be able to downsize to a
small reaction force or be withdrawn altogether by the end of
Secretary General's Rasmussen's term (NOTE: SYG Rasmussen's
initial term of office will end in 2013). Turkey, supported
by Hungary and Italy, urged NATO to monitor closely the
situation in Kosovo and broader region, particularly the
Kosovo elections in November and impact of the Kosovo
International Court of Justice (ICJ) case. Hungary added
that the potential for destabilizing political developments
made NAC control of KFOR downsizing critical.
3. (C) Chairman of the NATO Military Committee Admiral Di
Paola highlighted the lack of national pledges during the
September 8 KFOR Force Shaping Conference to fill the Theater
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
battalion, Strategic Reserve Force (SRF) battalion, and one
Operational Reserve Force (ORF) battalion. He indicated that
ISR was particularly critical, given that KFOR's move to
deterrent presence is predicated on shifting toward more
intelligence-driven operations. He relayed the concern of
the Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe (DSACEUR) that
some nations have indicated fixed end-dates for their
participation in KFOR, which could jeopardize the
conditions-based nature of the drawdown (NOTE: We understand
that Belgium and Slovakia and non-NATO KFOR contributors'
Finland, Ireland, Sweden, and Ukraine stipulated at least
tentative end-dates for some or all of their forces).
4. (C) Ambassador Daalder praised non-NATO KFOR troop
contributors for their participation in KFOR and questioned
why Allies weren't stepping up to the plate to fill needed
gaps. He reminded Allies that they had agreed that the move
to deterrent presence was to be conditions-based without
fixed timelines, and called on all to match their commitment
in the field with the commitments they had made in Council.
Germany, Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and
Albania backed U.S. comments.
5. (C) Greece and Slovenia pledged to continue serving in
KFOR. Portugal said it planned no changes to its force
levels for the first phase (i.e., Gate 1). Switzerland
indicated that it intended to maintain full support for KFOR,
cautioning that the delicate situation in Kosovo demanded a
USNATO 00000409 002 OF 002
broad vision for the situation. The Swedish Ambassador said
she had taken note of the agreed approach and would relay
this discussion back to capital.
6. (C) Turkey, supported by Germany, said KFOR's drawdown
should be synchronized with the evolution of the Kosovo
Security Force (KSF). Ambassador Daalder added that building
up indigenous security capabilities was key to creating the
conditions that would allow KFOR to downsize. Italy stressed
the important role the KSF has to play in ensuring Kosovo's
stability. The DSYG closed the discussion by endorsing the
conditions-based nature of KFOR downsizing, saying there
would be no automaticity and that the NAC would control the
entire process.
--------------
Shortfalls Threaten KSF Stand-Up
--------------
7. (C) The DSYG noted that there is a 10.1 million euro
shortfall in the KSF stand-up trust fund. Adm. Di Paola
stressed that national contributions, particularly 1.3
million euros needed in the short-term, are critical to
keeping the KSF on track to reach Full Operating Capability
(FOC) within 2-5 years.
8. (C) Ambassador Daalder, backed by Turkey, urged all
PermReps to go back to their capitals to seek the resources
necessary to fulfill the commitment Allies agreed to
undertake with regard to building up the KSF. Germany added
that NATO should broaden participation in the trust fund
beyond the Alliance and KFOR contributors. Slovenia and
Albania said they were considering new contributions, and the
Swedish Ambassador said she would check with Stockholm about
making an additional pledge.
9. (C) Adm. Di Paola noted that the Senior Resource Board had
agreed to continue common funding for NATO Training Teams
(NTTs) working with the KSF until February 2010. The DSYG
urged nations to volunteer personnel to man the NATO Advisory
Team (NAT) for the Ministry of the KSF as the NAT was only at
66 percent manning. He highlighted the need to fill vacant
slots in the areas of contracts and procurement,
communications, and information systems.
--------------
KFOR Remains Ready to Back EULEX
--------------
10. (C) In response to a Swedish request for an assessment of
KFOR's relationship with the EU Law and Justice Mission in
Kosovo (EULEX),Adm. Di Paola characterized KFOR-EULEX
relations as excellent and said KFOR remains fully capable to
back EULEX. In response to a Greek query concerning the
implications for KFOR of recent violence against EULEX, Adm.
Di Paola assessed that this situation has not fundamentally
challenged the safe and secure environment in Kosovo.
DAALDER
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/25/2019
TAGS: PREL NATO PGOV MOPS MARR KV YI
SUBJECT: NAC STRESSES THAT KFOR DRAWDOWN MUST REMAIN
CONDITIONS-BASED
Classified By: Political Advisor Kelly Degnan. Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)
.
1. (C) SUMMARY: At a September 23 Council meeting in KFOR
contributing nations format, Chairman of the NATO Military
Committee Admiral Di Paola highlighted the lack of national
pledges to fill key intelligence and reserve requirements
during the KFOR Force Shaping Conference on September 8. He
relayed the concern of the Deputy Supreme Allied Commander
Europe (DSACEUR) that some nations have indicated fixed
end-dates for their participation in KFOR, which could
jeopardize the conditions-based nature of the drawdown.
Ambassador Daalder, with wide backing, reminded Allies that
they had agreed that the move to deterrent presence was to be
conditions-based without fixed timelines, and called on all
to match their commitment in the field with the commitments
they had made in Council. Given the 10.1 million euro
shortfall in the Kosovo Security Force (KSF) stand-up trust
fund, Ambassador Daalder urged all PermReps to go back to
their capitals to seek the necessary resources. Deputy
Secretary General Bisogniero closed by endorsing the
conditions-based nature of KFOR downsizing, saying that the
NAC would control the entire process. END SUMMARY
--------------
KFOR Downsizing Must Remain Conditions-Based
--------------
2. (C) Deputy Secretary General (DSYG) Bisogniero opened
discussion with the Council and non-NATO KFOR contributors by
expressing optimism that KFOR would be able to downsize to a
small reaction force or be withdrawn altogether by the end of
Secretary General's Rasmussen's term (NOTE: SYG Rasmussen's
initial term of office will end in 2013). Turkey, supported
by Hungary and Italy, urged NATO to monitor closely the
situation in Kosovo and broader region, particularly the
Kosovo elections in November and impact of the Kosovo
International Court of Justice (ICJ) case. Hungary added
that the potential for destabilizing political developments
made NAC control of KFOR downsizing critical.
3. (C) Chairman of the NATO Military Committee Admiral Di
Paola highlighted the lack of national pledges during the
September 8 KFOR Force Shaping Conference to fill the Theater
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
battalion, Strategic Reserve Force (SRF) battalion, and one
Operational Reserve Force (ORF) battalion. He indicated that
ISR was particularly critical, given that KFOR's move to
deterrent presence is predicated on shifting toward more
intelligence-driven operations. He relayed the concern of
the Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe (DSACEUR) that
some nations have indicated fixed end-dates for their
participation in KFOR, which could jeopardize the
conditions-based nature of the drawdown (NOTE: We understand
that Belgium and Slovakia and non-NATO KFOR contributors'
Finland, Ireland, Sweden, and Ukraine stipulated at least
tentative end-dates for some or all of their forces).
4. (C) Ambassador Daalder praised non-NATO KFOR troop
contributors for their participation in KFOR and questioned
why Allies weren't stepping up to the plate to fill needed
gaps. He reminded Allies that they had agreed that the move
to deterrent presence was to be conditions-based without
fixed timelines, and called on all to match their commitment
in the field with the commitments they had made in Council.
Germany, Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia and
Albania backed U.S. comments.
5. (C) Greece and Slovenia pledged to continue serving in
KFOR. Portugal said it planned no changes to its force
levels for the first phase (i.e., Gate 1). Switzerland
indicated that it intended to maintain full support for KFOR,
cautioning that the delicate situation in Kosovo demanded a
USNATO 00000409 002 OF 002
broad vision for the situation. The Swedish Ambassador said
she had taken note of the agreed approach and would relay
this discussion back to capital.
6. (C) Turkey, supported by Germany, said KFOR's drawdown
should be synchronized with the evolution of the Kosovo
Security Force (KSF). Ambassador Daalder added that building
up indigenous security capabilities was key to creating the
conditions that would allow KFOR to downsize. Italy stressed
the important role the KSF has to play in ensuring Kosovo's
stability. The DSYG closed the discussion by endorsing the
conditions-based nature of KFOR downsizing, saying there
would be no automaticity and that the NAC would control the
entire process.
--------------
Shortfalls Threaten KSF Stand-Up
--------------
7. (C) The DSYG noted that there is a 10.1 million euro
shortfall in the KSF stand-up trust fund. Adm. Di Paola
stressed that national contributions, particularly 1.3
million euros needed in the short-term, are critical to
keeping the KSF on track to reach Full Operating Capability
(FOC) within 2-5 years.
8. (C) Ambassador Daalder, backed by Turkey, urged all
PermReps to go back to their capitals to seek the resources
necessary to fulfill the commitment Allies agreed to
undertake with regard to building up the KSF. Germany added
that NATO should broaden participation in the trust fund
beyond the Alliance and KFOR contributors. Slovenia and
Albania said they were considering new contributions, and the
Swedish Ambassador said she would check with Stockholm about
making an additional pledge.
9. (C) Adm. Di Paola noted that the Senior Resource Board had
agreed to continue common funding for NATO Training Teams
(NTTs) working with the KSF until February 2010. The DSYG
urged nations to volunteer personnel to man the NATO Advisory
Team (NAT) for the Ministry of the KSF as the NAT was only at
66 percent manning. He highlighted the need to fill vacant
slots in the areas of contracts and procurement,
communications, and information systems.
--------------
KFOR Remains Ready to Back EULEX
--------------
10. (C) In response to a Swedish request for an assessment of
KFOR's relationship with the EU Law and Justice Mission in
Kosovo (EULEX),Adm. Di Paola characterized KFOR-EULEX
relations as excellent and said KFOR remains fully capable to
back EULEX. In response to a Greek query concerning the
implications for KFOR of recent violence against EULEX, Adm.
Di Paola assessed that this situation has not fundamentally
challenged the safe and secure environment in Kosovo.
DAALDER