Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09UNVIEVIENNA480
2009-10-20 16:09:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
UNVIE
Cable title:
TEPID RESPONSE TO CHANGING GNEP TO INEF
VZCZCXYZ0004 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHUNV #0480 2931609 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 201609Z OCT 09 FM USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0212 RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 0950 INFO RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 0042 RUEHAR/AMEMBASSY ACCRA PRIORITY 0102 RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS PRIORITY 0088 RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 0140 RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA PRIORITY 0206 RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 0218 RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY 0306 RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST PRIORITY 0160 RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST PRIORITY 0211 RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES PRIORITY 0295 RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 0265 RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0763 RUEHDK/AMEMBASSY DAKAR PRIORITY 0097 RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI PRIORITY 0012 RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA PRIORITY 0014 RUEHKU/AMEMBASSY KUWAIT PRIORITY 0049 RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV PRIORITY 0166 RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA PRIORITY 0243 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1292 RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO PRIORITY 0202 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1027 RUEHMS/AMEMBASSY MUSCAT PRIORITY 0021 RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 0771 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 1159 RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE PRIORITY 0194 RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA PRIORITY 0283 RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 0181 RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0609 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 0435 RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA PRIORITY 0157 RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN PRIORITY 0001 RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI PRIORITY 0020 RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE PRIORITY 0363 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0807 RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS PRIORITY 0182 RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW PRIORITY 0179 RUEHYE/AMEMBASSY YEREVAN PRIORITY 0014 RHEBAAA/USDOE WASHDC RUEANFA/NRC WASHDC
UNCLAS UNVIE VIENNA 000480
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
BEIJING PLS PASS ISN/NESS HUMPHREY
DOE FOR NA-6 MCGINNIS, WELLING
DOE SCHOENBAUER/DASH, EST SEPULVADA
TOKYO FOR PEKO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG KNNP IAEA
SUBJECT: TEPID RESPONSE TO CHANGING GNEP TO INEF
REF: STATE 106834
Sensitive but unclassified -- please protect accordingly.
UNCLAS UNVIE VIENNA 000480
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
BEIJING PLS PASS ISN/NESS HUMPHREY
DOE FOR NA-6 MCGINNIS, WELLING
DOE SCHOENBAUER/DASH, EST SEPULVADA
TOKYO FOR PEKO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG KNNP IAEA
SUBJECT: TEPID RESPONSE TO CHANGING GNEP TO INEF
REF: STATE 106834
Sensitive but unclassified -- please protect accordingly.
1. (U) Under cover of a short letter drawing from REFTEL
background, Ambassador sent IAEA Director General ElBaradei October
19 the non-paper at para 12 of REFTEL. Msnoff concurrently shared
non-paper with IAEA Department of Nuclear Energy officials to
solicit comment.
2. (SBU) Hans Forsstroem, Director of the IAEA Division of Nuclear
Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology (under DDG/Nuclear Energy Sokolov),
told Msnoff he felt the proposed reframing of GNEP could weaken its
mandate and its appeal to countries such as China and France with
advanced nuclear sectors. Forsstroem was personally against the
name change, but he saw its motivation coming from U.S. domestic
politics and acknowledged it was up to USG to make that decision.
More importantly, Forsstroem expressed concern the U.S. proposals
could be perceived as a retreat from a "closed fuel cycle approach."
Nuclear newcomers might be comfortable with a less ambitious
technology agenda than had characterized the original GNEP, he said,
but major technology-holder countries may view it differently.
Finally, Forsstroem said the proposed Mission Statement appeared to
be consistent with the IAEA's goals.
3. (SBU) Separately, an AMCIT Infrastructure Development expert in
the Nuclear Power Engineering Section said the name change was
consistent with what she had heard from USG sources over the past
several months. However, our contact said she did not have a clear
understanding of what INEF intends to accomplish based on the
current non-paper.
4. (SBU) Note for USDEL to GNEP Executive Committee: IAEA
Secretariat confirmed that Deputy Director General for Nuclear
Energy Yury Sokolov would be the senior IAEA official participating
in the GNEP Executive Committee meeting in Beijing on October 23.
Forsstroem shared with us that Sokolov had recently expressed
frustration over not having some proposed edits accepted to the
Joint Statement to be issued by the Executive Committee. End Note.
DAVIES
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
BEIJING PLS PASS ISN/NESS HUMPHREY
DOE FOR NA-6 MCGINNIS, WELLING
DOE SCHOENBAUER/DASH, EST SEPULVADA
TOKYO FOR PEKO
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ENRG KNNP IAEA
SUBJECT: TEPID RESPONSE TO CHANGING GNEP TO INEF
REF: STATE 106834
Sensitive but unclassified -- please protect accordingly.
1. (U) Under cover of a short letter drawing from REFTEL
background, Ambassador sent IAEA Director General ElBaradei October
19 the non-paper at para 12 of REFTEL. Msnoff concurrently shared
non-paper with IAEA Department of Nuclear Energy officials to
solicit comment.
2. (SBU) Hans Forsstroem, Director of the IAEA Division of Nuclear
Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology (under DDG/Nuclear Energy Sokolov),
told Msnoff he felt the proposed reframing of GNEP could weaken its
mandate and its appeal to countries such as China and France with
advanced nuclear sectors. Forsstroem was personally against the
name change, but he saw its motivation coming from U.S. domestic
politics and acknowledged it was up to USG to make that decision.
More importantly, Forsstroem expressed concern the U.S. proposals
could be perceived as a retreat from a "closed fuel cycle approach."
Nuclear newcomers might be comfortable with a less ambitious
technology agenda than had characterized the original GNEP, he said,
but major technology-holder countries may view it differently.
Finally, Forsstroem said the proposed Mission Statement appeared to
be consistent with the IAEA's goals.
3. (SBU) Separately, an AMCIT Infrastructure Development expert in
the Nuclear Power Engineering Section said the name change was
consistent with what she had heard from USG sources over the past
several months. However, our contact said she did not have a clear
understanding of what INEF intends to accomplish based on the
current non-paper.
4. (SBU) Note for USDEL to GNEP Executive Committee: IAEA
Secretariat confirmed that Deputy Director General for Nuclear
Energy Yury Sokolov would be the senior IAEA official participating
in the GNEP Executive Committee meeting in Beijing on October 23.
Forsstroem shared with us that Sokolov had recently expressed
frustration over not having some proposed edits accepted to the
Joint Statement to be issued by the Executive Committee. End Note.
DAVIES