DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/27/09

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 11 TOKYO 001198 SIPDIS DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/27/09 INDEX: (1) First party leaders' debate between Prime Minister Aso, DPJ President Hatoyama: Heated exchanges on change of government (Yomiuri) (2) Power struggle continues in the DPJ (Asahi) (3) Amendment to Ministry of Defense Establishment Law passes Diet; Post of special advisor to defense minister established (Yomiuri) (4) President Obama picks Roos as ambassador to Japan, probably taking election contributions into consideration (Sankei) (5) Interview with U.S. Ambassador to APEC Haslach: 2010 summit will look into trade liberalization within region, new goal (Nikkei) (6) North Korea's nuclear test a blow to nuclear inequality that allows only five powers to possess nuclear weapons (Asahi) (7) Behind the scenes of the crisis - North Korea's nuclear test (Part 1): Predominance of military over party in consolidation of the regime (Mainichi) (8) TOP HEADLINES (9) EDITORIALS (10) Prime Minister's schedule, May 26 (Nikkei) ARTICLES: (1) First party leaders' debate between Prime Minister Aso, DPJ President Hatoyama: Heated exchanges on change of government YOMIURI ONLINE (Full) 15:32, May 27, 2009 The first party leaders' debate between Prime Minister Taro Aso and Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) President Yukio Hatoyama was held at the Diet on May 27. To Aso's criticism that "a change of government is a means and not the end," Hatoyama retorted with: "Of course, a change of government is not the end; it is the starting line." Replying to Hatoyama's question about whether "the United States gave advance notice" about North Korea's nuclear test, Aso said: "It is a fact that the U.S. informed us at an early stage," but he also stated: "We do not discuss this kind of subject." This was the first party leaders' debate since last November, when then President Ichiro Ozawa represented the DPJ. (2) Power struggle continues in the DPJ ASAHI (Page 4) (Full) ;May 27, 2009 With the turnover of the president in the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ),moves toward the realignment of groups have begun. While supporters of the new president Yukio Hatoyama and Deputy President Ichiro Ozawa are hastily consolidating forces, forces that supported TOKYO 00001198 002 OF 011 Secretary General Katsuya Okada during the presidential election are looking at the possibility of forming a loose alliance across group borders. Political maneuvering in anticipation of the "post-Hatoyama" era and a "generational change" has already begun at this early stage. "Junin-kai" of Okada supporters On May 26, Okada, former president Seiji Maehara, Deputy Secretary General Yoshihiko Noda, former Policy Research Committee chief Yukio Edano, House of Representatives member Koichiro Genba, and two others had dinner with supreme adviser Kozo Watanabe at a restaurant near the Diet. These seven are termed the "DPJ's seven magistrates" by Watanabe and are the next-generation leaders of the party. They mostly supported Okada in the presidential race. These members, along with the mid-ranking and junior Diet members who supported Okada, are beginning to try new things based on the lesson they learned from their defeat resulting from poor organizational ability compared to the Hatoyama and Ozawa groups. The core Okada supporters have formed the "Junin-kai (Group of 10)." On the evening of May 12, Genba and Noda, plus the "group of four deputies" under the new Hatoyama leadership - including Jun Azumi, deputy chairman of the Diet Affairs Committee, and Tetsuro Fukuyama, deputy chairman of the Policy Research Committee - who have come to support Okada, and a few others making a total of 10 people, had dinner with Okada. The group's name came from that gathering. They intend to meet regularly from now on. With the core consolidated, the next step is to find a framework for collaboration across group borders. The Maehara and Noda groups, which form the core supporters of Okada, are known to be loose alliances. On the other hand, the Ozawa and Hatoyama groups are known for their strong unity. This difference was reflected in the outcome of the presidential election. For this reason, there was a suggestion at the party of the Okada camp to mark the end of the election on the evening of May 20 that "the Okada group should be a holding company-type of organization in the party." This means that the core members will unite the various groups to build a new support base. Some 50 people attended this party. The group came to be called the "95 Kai," from the 95 votes Okada won in the presidential race. One mid-ranking Diet member says: "95 (pronounced kyugo) means kyugo (post-Hatoyama, the first character of Hatoyama's name is also pronounced as kyu and go is "after"),with succession to Hatoyama in mind. However, the Diet members participating in this group have not necessarily decided to support Okada in the next election. Okada himself is not keen on forming this group. Nevertheless, a veteran lawmaker who is wary of Ozawa's influence called for the strengthening of his political base. He said: "The only way to counter the Ozawa group is to unite the groups in the Okada camp." Consolidating the "Kobato alliance" TOKYO 00001198 003 OF 011 The united front between the Ozawa and Hatoyama groups in the presidential election was called the "Kobato alliance" in the DPJ. After the election, they have been making efforts at intraparty harmony while also consolidating their position in the party as individual groups. At a dinner party on the evening of May 25, Ozawa expressed his gratitude to eight members of the group of former members of the (defunct) Japan Socialist Party, including Azuma Koshiishi, chair of the DPJ House of Councillors caucus, and Hirotaka Akamatsu, chairman of the Election Campaign Committee. He said: "I have put you through a great deal of trouble. Thank you for holding this party for me today." This group was divided in their support in the presidential election, but those who supported Okada were also invited to the party. A participant who is close to Ozawa said: "The party to say 'thanks for a job well done' to Mr. Ozawa is more important than the parties of Mr Hatoyama or Mr Okada to mark the end of the election." At the party of the Hatoyama camp attended by around 70 people on the evening of May 21, people talked about "no side" and "let us unite and fight as one in the general election." There was strong concern about being divided into the Hatoyama and Okada factions. They made every effort to create a mood of party unity. (3) Amendment to Ministry of Defense Establishment Law passes Diet; Post of special advisor to defense minister established YOMIURIO Online (Full) 11:50a.m., May 27, 2009 A bill amending the Ministry of Defense (MOD) Establishment Law, featuring the establishment of a political appointee post of special advisor to the defense minister, was passed and enacted on the morning of May 27 by a majority vote of members of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP),the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the New Komeito. The amendment includes a measure to strengthen the system of assisting the defense minister as part of reform of the ministry in the wake of scandals involving the ministry, such as a corruption case caused by former vice minister Takemasa Moriya. The defense minister can appoint up to three special advisors from among experts in the private sector. Following the enactment of the bill, the current defense counselor system of MOD bureaucrats assisting the defense minister will be abolished. The amendment stipulates that the Defense Council, which was set up in accordance with an official instruction, is the MOD's highest-level deliberative body. (4) President Obama picks Roos as ambassador to Japan, probably taking election contributions into consideration SANKEI (Page 6) (Full) May 27, 2009 U.S. President Barack Obama will officially appoint California lawyer John Roos, 54, as the next ambassador to Japan. Roos started raising funds for Obama in the presidential election campaign last year when Hillary Clinton (now secretary of State) was still viewed TOKYO 00001198 004 OF 011 as the most prospective winner in the Democrat nomination race. The nomination of Roos as ambassador is viewed as a reward for such contributions. Compared with Mike Mansfield and other past U.S. ambassadors to Japan, Roos is relatively unknown in Japan, but his strong point is that he is personally close to President Obama. Roos was watching the process of counting the ballots cast in the presidential election in last November in Chicago - Obama's electoral state. After listening to the address Obama delivered after winning the U.S. presidency, Roos emotionally said in an interview with an ABC TV-affiliated station at a hotel where he was staying: "I believe that Mr. Obama's victory will change not only the U.S. but also the world as a whole." Through Obama's favor, Roos and his colleagues from Silicon Valley were able to secure seats in front of the U.S. Capital Historical Society for the presidential inaugural held Jan. 20. Roos has supported Democratic candidates in presidential elections, starting with former vice president Walter Mondale. He met Obama in 2005 for the first time. He also arranged fund-raising parties, in addition to collecting donations from individuals. He is one of the top 50 election contributors for Obama, according to a survey by a U.S. government monitoring group. Obama reportedly expressed to Roos his intention to run in the presidential race in Washington in January 2007 and sought his cooperation. Asked about how he felt at that time, he replied in an interview with a monthly magazine issued in San Francisco, from where he comes: "He is like a person who keeps everything including energy inside." Just before Obama declared his candidacy, Roos hosted a fund-raising party at his home in February 2007, collecting approximately 300,000 dollars (about 28 million yen). In a party he held with his friends in San Francisco in August 2008, as much as about 8 million dollars (approximately 760 million yen) was reportedly collected. Some observers attribute Obama's victories over Clinton in the primary election and over the Republican candidate McCain in the main election to his financial strength. It is said in a sense that Roos supported Obama's victory as a key person of Obama's "Amazing Money Machine" that attracts donors. Some calling for career diplomats for political appointee ambassadorial posts The post of U.S. ambassador to Japan has been filled by influential politicians since Michael Mansfield, who had served as Democratic Senate floor leader, was appointed to the post (in 1977). Mansfield called Japan-U.S. relations "the most important bilateral relationship in the world, bar none." The previous president, George Bush, emphasized in an inaugural speech for former Republican Senate majority leader HOWARD Baker's inauguration as ambassador to Japan in 2001 that the U.S. government has sent figures with a "brilliant career." Bush said: "A total number of years of service as members of Congress (by four successive ambassadors to Japan, including Mansfield and Baker) is more than 100 years. The Japanese media call these influential politicians "heavyweights." TOKYO 00001198 005 OF 011 Roos is not categorized as a "heavyweight," but he is close to the incumbent president, like previous ambassador to Japan Thomas Schieffer, who became acquainted with Bush in Texas and managed a major U.S. baseball club jointly with him, Schieffer reportedly was able to pick up the phone and call Bush even in his bedroom. At present, one third of the posts of U.S. ambassadors are "political appointees." Some of the political appointees do not have enough knowledge about foreign policy. Given this, there are American diplomatic experts who have been calling for career diplomats to assume the ambassadorship in Japan, Britain and other countries. President Obama had also indicated his desire to pick diplomats for the posts of ambassador as much as possible. As shown in the appointment of Roos, he has succeeded to the practice of awarding an ambassadorship to a political contributor (5) Interview with U.S. Ambassador to APEC Haslach: 2010 summit will look into trade liberalization within region, new goal NIKKEI (Page 4) (Full) May 27, 2009 It has been 20 years this year since the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum (APEC) was launched. APEC will hold a summit in Yokohama in 2010 with Japan serving as the host nation. The organization is gradually losing its identity with the Group of 20 Countries and Areas (G-20),which has the participation of both industrialized and newly emerging countries, increasing its presence. This newspaper asked Ambassador to APEC Patricia Haslach of the U.S. Department of State, now visiting Japan, about the U.S. approach. -- Has the Obama administration firmed up its trade policy toward Asia? "Only about 100 days have passed since the inauguration of the administration. It is now reviewing trade-related policies, such as a policy toward APEC, under the initiative of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) Ronald Kirk. The U.S. has committed itself to APEC during the previous and current administration. It will host an APEC meeting in 2011, following Japan." -- The APEC summit held last November focused on the prevention of protectionism. "APEC at the G-20 made commitment to preventing protectionism. It at the summit last year right after the G-20 strengthened that commitment. It also made the case at the G-20 held in London in April that protectionist measures will only prolong the economic crisis. Preventing protectionism will also be on the table of the APEC trade ministerial meeting in July and the summit in November. Those meetings will issue a statement calling on its members not to take protectionist measures again." -- Even though such statements have been issued at various conferences, some countries have protectionist measures. The U.S. has adopted the Buy-American Clause (mandating the use of U.S. products in public works)." "The Buy-American Clause is part of our stimulus measures. It has been set in accordance with the World Trade Organization's (WTO) rules. The WTO is currently examining protectionist measures adopted TOKYO 00001198 006 OF 011 by various countries. This issue will be discussed at the trade ministers' meeting in July." -- What will top the agenda of the 2009 APEC summit to be held in Singapore? "Main agenda items will include the integration of regional economies, food safety, energy efficiency, the environment, the social impact of the financial crisis, and the new influenza strain." -- The deadline to achieve the Bogor goal adopted in 1994 for liberalization of trade and investment in the region is drawing near. "Industrialized countries are making headway to achieve the goal in ¶2010. Some developing countries whose deadline to achieve that goal comes in 2020 will be able to do so before that year. The 2010 APEC summit will presumably be discussing the next step." -- In Japan, some take the view that the Democratic administration attaches importance to China because of the image they had built during the Clinton administration. Secretary of State Clinton visited Japan first. However, Treasury Secretary Geithner will visit China first, and that is making headlines. "Japan is one of the most important countries with which the U.S. has bilateral relations. Secretary Clinton chose Japan as the first country to visit in her Asian trip. I do not know about the treasury secretary's schedule for foreign visits. Isn't it better not to overinterpret which country he will visit first? What is important is that he visits the country. He might visit China first simply because of his schedule." Interviewer: Editorial board member Akio Fujii (6) North Korea's nuclear test a blow to nuclear inequality that allows only five powers to possess nuclear weapons ASAHI (Page 2) (Abridged) May 27, 2009 Tetsuya Hakoda in Seoul, Toru Tamagawa in Vienna North Korea's second nuclear test has sparked international condemnation, as seen in the UN Security Council's DECISION on May 25 to aim toward a new resolution. Even so, North Korea is hell-bent to become a nuclear power. This offers a glimpse into a paradox in the international framework that is supposed to prevent nuclear proliferation. "The nuclear test and the launch of ballistic missiles are the natural option taken by our country to defend peace on the Korean Peninsula from military threats, such as the United States." The Rodong Sinmun, the Korean Workers Party organ paper, reportedly carried this argument on May 25, the day the North conducted the second nuclear test. Becoming a nuclear power has been North Korea's long-held dream since the days of the late president Kim Il Sung. The country has been following the path in the belief that nuclear development would TOKYO 00001198 007 OF 011 help remove hardships from the country, a minor power. In his New Year speech in 1992, then President Kim Il Sung said, "Turning the Korean Peninsula into a nuclear-free peaceful zone has been our consistent position." The day before, on December 31, 1991, Kim signed the South-North Joint Declaration on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. General Secretary Kim Jong Il, too, said in 2005 to the then South Korean unification minister: "Denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula was President Kim's last instruction. Resolving the nuclear issue through dialogue has been our consistent standpoint." In 2007, the year after the North conducted its first nuclear test, Kim Jong Il reportedly told then South Korean President Roh Moo Hyun who was visiting Pyongyang that the North had no intention of possessing nuclear weapons. Pyongyang's logic was that although its desire was to denuclearize the peninsula, it had to pursue the nuclear option due to the need to counter the United States that upheld hostile policy toward the North. But in reality, North Korea has long been aiming at becoming a nuclear power. The country reportedly began research in the early 1960s after the Korean WAR and has accelerated it since the 1980s. The country acceded to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1985 and announced its withdrawal from the pact in 1993. This was followed by the United States' step to consider using force against the North, which had refused nuclear inspections. The North again announced in January 2003 its DECISION to pull out of the treaty due to its standoff with the United States over the question of enriching uranium. The situation remains the same since. After the first nuclear test in 2006, the North Korean Foreign Ministry announced, "We are no longer a signatory to the NPT and are not subject to any constraints under international law." In an attempt to justify its nuclear programs, North Korea cited the double standards of the United States, which has effectively condoned the possession of nuclear weapons by India and Pakistan without joining the NPT. The Rodong Sinmun said: "The United States has promoted nuclear proliferation. The NPT and other arms-control agreements exist only in name because of the double standards of the United States. The United States has set aside its duties and even fabricated information on offending countries." To begin with, the North joined the NPT in compliance with a strong request from the Soviet Union, which offered significant cooperation in developing nuclear reactors. Now that such a restriction no longer exists, the North thinks it can gain nothing from returning to the NPT, according to a South Korean government official. A South Korean official formerly responsible for North Korea policy took this view: "North Korea thinks IRAQ collapsed because it did not have nuclear weapons. Pyongyang believes that nuclear development is the bargaining chip that ensures the security of the North Korean regime." NPT regime on the brink of collapse North Korea's second nuclear test has dealt a blow to the NPT regime that is supposed to halt nuclear proliferation. If such countries as Iran, which is pursuing uranium enrichment, follow in the footsteps of North Korea, the international nonproliferation framework wrapped TOKYO 00001198 008 OF 011 in a paradox is certain to collapse. The NPT that went into force in 1970, at the height of the Cold War, allows only the five UN Security Council members - the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China - to possess nuclear weapons, while prohibiting other countries from manufacturing and possessing nuclear arms. The treaty's purpose was to stop the nuclear arms race amid growing concerns over a nuclear war. The inequality of the treaty has continued to elicit discontent from non-nuclear weapon states (NNWS) regarding the logic of the five nuclear powers. Even so, signatories have winked at its inequality because they believed that nuclear nonproliferation would contribute to their security. They can also obtain international cooperation for the peaceful use of nuclear energy in return for accepting inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),the nuclear watchdog. But the five nuclear powers have not fulfilled the obligation specified in the treaty to earnestly conduct talks on nuclear disarmament. Discord between the nuclear powers and the NNWS became evident at the NPT review conferences that take place every five years. The previous 2005 NPT Review Conference failed to adopt an accord specifying a clear pledge for eliminating nuclear weapons. The NPT does not envisage the possession of nuclear weapons by countries other than the five powers. The international community does not recognize North Korea, which has repeatedly conducted nuclear tests, as a nuclear power because of this rule. In reality, North Korea is not the only one that aims at becoming a nuclear power outside the international rule. India conducted a nuclear test in 1998 and Pakistan followed suit as its rival. They possess nuclear weapons today while remaining outside the NPT regime. The international community, including the United States, imposed economic sanctions on the two countries but they did not last long. The United States concluded a civilian nuclear agreement with India last year paving the way for nuclear power generation for commercial use in India. The possession of nuclear weapons by Pakistan has effectively not been called into question, either, as an ally playing a role in the WAR on terror. The United States has also turned a blind eye to Israel as its backer. If the NPT becomes an empty shell, many countries might opt for possessing nuclear weapons, like North Korea, after withdrawing from the treaty. Iran has accelerated uranium enrichment in defiance of UN Security Council resolutions, while remaining in the framework of the NPT. (7) Behind the scenes of the crisis - North Korea's nuclear test (Part 1): Predominance of military over party in consolidation of the regime MAINICHI (Top play) (Full) May 27, 2009 TOKYO 00001198 009 OF 011 Shoji Nishioka, Beijing "Cholmun taejang" in Korean is translated as "wakadaisho (young master)" in Japanese. This year North Korea's General Secretary Kim Jong Il, 67, began to use a nickname he had never used before. He used the word "young master" repeatedly before his close aides in such phrases as: "Good job, good job, young master," or, "The young master is working very hard," or, "the young master is showing an impressive presence." A close aide said he felt that "The Great General (General Secretary Kim) is using it intentionally." A source close to the North Korean leadership explains: "'Young master' is a nickname that the Great General has begun using for his third son. The trend of the succession process is moving in favor of the 'young master'." Soon after Kim began referring to his third son Jong Un, 26, in this manner, information has been leaked to the outside world that "Jong Un is the successor." After Kim had a stroke last August, moves relating to the succession of power began to surface in North Korea. The three potential successors to the general secretary are Jong Un, his older brother Jong Chol, 28, and his half brother Jong Nam, 38. It is believed that Jong Chol is involved with party affairs in the Workers Party of Korea, while Jong Un deals with military affairs in the National Defense Commission (NDC). At this point, the successor has not been named. However, the above-mentioned source observes that, "Jong Un is a bold and big-hearted person. He looks like the late leader (President Kim Il Song). Jong Chol is an introvert. Apparently, the Great General himself has commented that he is 'too delicate'." The DPRK enhanced the authority of the NDC significantly at its Supreme People's Assembly in April. Some experts say that it has "placed the NDC above the party." It is believed that this is also an indication of the trend of the succession process. A scholar of North Korean affairs in Beijing points out that, "The reversal in the relation between the party and the military means that Jong Un has an advantage over Jong Chol." How does the underground nuclear test on May 25 relate to the consolidation of the succession process? This scholar offers the following analysis: "The ballistic missile launch in April and this nuclear test are part of the process to enhance the authority of the NDC and facilitate a smooth transition to 'Jong Un's leadership'." Most diplomatic practitioners offer the explanation that North Korea's motive in conducting the second nuclear test was to engage in negotiations with the U.S. on an equal footing as a "nuclear power" in order to draw major concessions. However, in reality, one view of the situation is that the international community has been made to suffer the consequences of North Korea's "internal circumstances." Right now, the DPRK has mobilized the whole country for a "150-day struggle" to rehabilitate the economy. It is said that Jong Un is at the head of this campaign. The purpose of this struggle is to build a "big and powerful country" by 2012, which marks the 100th birth anniversary of Kim Il Song. It can be said that the development of nuclear arms and TOKYO 00001198 010 OF 011 missiles is a means for consolidating the succession process and normalizing relations with the U.S., which are prerequisites for a "big and powerful country." The repeated use of the term "young master" has also become common among senior military officers. Behind the promotion of missile and nuclear experiments is the military's thinking that "the Kim Jong Un regime will succeed Kim Jong Il" and they are taking a tough stance to consolidate the new regime. "The military is rushing to produce results." This statement by a source close to the DPRK leadership points to the possibility of the military "staging another crisis." The international community has been scrambling to come up with a response to North Korea's nuclear test, which is regarded as part of its "brinkmanship diplomacy." We examined the developments behind this new situation. (8) TOP HEADLINES Asahi: Pension benefits are less than half of working generations' average income in some cases, according to government estimate for fiscal 2009 Mainichi: North Korea prioritizing solidifying military over party Yomiuri: NTT Docomo ties up with Mizuho to enter financial services business Nikkei: Japanese automakers expanding hybrid vehicle lineups Sankei: UN Security Council to adopt new resolution against North Korea; China stiffening stance toward the North Tokyo Shimbun: Welfare Ministry official arrested over postal scam Akahata: LDP, DPJ trying to preserve subsidy system while reducing reflection of public opinion in politics by decreasing proportional representation seats (9) EDITORIALS Asahi: (1) UNSC resolution: Unified stance needed in dealing with North Korea (2) Concept of sports agency: Thoroughly discuss how to promote sports first Mainichi: (1) Idea of splitting Health and Welfare Ministry: Full discussion necessary before reaching conclusion (2) We expect social business to move society Yomiuri: (1) UNSC: Map out effective sanctions against North Korea (2) Economic assessment: Uncertainty still looming over economy TOKYO 00001198 011 OF 011 Nikkei: (1) Offer assistance to developing countries to contain new strain of flu infections (2) Press Japan Post President Nishikawa to carry through reform Sankei: (1) Diet resolution against North Korea: Discussion with focus on threat imperative (2) Split plan for Health and Welfare Ministry: More discussion necessary Tokyo Shimbun: (1) Urgently enact bill revising the Law on Organ Transplantation (2) New Indian government expected to fulfill responsibility as big power Akahata: (1) Monthly economic report upward assessment, making family budgets a sacrifice (10) Prime Minister's schedule, May 26 NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) May 27, 2009 08:32 Attended a cabinet meeting. Education Minister Shionoya stayed on. 08:51 Placed a telephone call to U.S. President Obama. 09:24 Signed a condolence book for the late South Korean president Roh Moo Hyun at the South Korean Embassy in Tokyo. 09:39 Returned to the Kantei. 13:24 Attended an LDP Lower House members meeting held in the Diet building. Afterward met LDP Secretary General Hosoda. 13:32 Attended a Lower House plenary session. 13:54 Met Lower House member Nobuhide Minorikawa at the Kantei. 15:12 Received a telephone call from Australian Prime Minister Rudd. Afterward met Public Security Intelligence Agency Director-General Kitada. 16:26 Taped a video for a Junior Chamber International Asia-Pacific region convention. Afterward met former prime minister Abe, LDP Election Strategy Council Deputy Chairman Suga, and other members of the study group to turn Japan into a resource and energy major power, followed by the education minister and Vice Education Minister Zeniya. 17:58 Recorded a radio message for the LDP Kanagawa chapter, in the presence of Suga. 18:46 Dined at a Japanese restaurant in Kioicho with Japan Business Federation Chairman Mitarai, Nippon Steel Chairman Mimura, Toyota senior adviser Okuda, and others. 20:30 Met MAFF Minister Ishiba at his official residence. ZUMWALT