ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

UNCLAS TEL AVIV 001039 STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM NSC FOR NEA STAFF SECDEF WASHDC FOR USDP/ASD-PA/ASD-ISA HQ USAF FOR XOXX DA WASHDC FOR SASA JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR PA CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL FOR POLAD/USIA ADVISOR COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE FOR PAO/POLAD COMSIXTHFLT FOR 019 JERUSALEM ALSO ICD LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL PARIS ALSO FOR POL ROME FOR MFO SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC KMDR IS SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION -------------- SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: -------------- ¶1. U.S.-Israel Relations ¶2. Pope Benedict XVI in Israel -------------- Key stories in the media: -------------- Maariv reported that PA President Mahmoud Abbas declined PM Benjamin NetanyahuQs invitation to meet with him. The media reported that Netanyahu will meet with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in Sharm el-Sheikh today. Leading media expect the Egyptian leader to tell Netanyahu that Israel must restart the talks with the Palestinians. Yediot reported that Netanyahu will stress to Mubarak that peace between the two nations is stable. The Jerusalem Post reported that Netanyahu is keen on discussing Iran. Yediot quoted CBS-TV as saying that the alleged Syrian nuclear reactor bombed by Israel in 2007 has been replace with a biological and chemical plant. The U.S. TV network based its report on American intelligence sources. The media cited President ObamaQs letter to Congress that Syria was "supporting terrorism, pursuing weapons of mass destruction and missile programs, and undermining U.S. and international efforts with respect to the stabilization and reconstruction of Iraq," thus justifying the continuation of U.S. sanctions on Syria. All media reported that Pope Benedict XVI is due to arrive in Israel this morning for what HaQaretz defines as a Qhistoric reconciliation visit.Q The Jerusalem Post noted hat disagreements over the role of the late Pope Pius XII during the Holocaust could cast a shadow over the trip. Yesterday President Shimon Peres invited Gilad ShalitQs family to meet the Pope at the PresidentQs Residence today. Major media quoted U.S. National Security Advisor James Jones as saying yesterday in an interview with ABC-TV that a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians could diminish the Iranian threat. The Jerusalem Post reported that on Thursday Deputy FM Danny Ayalon rejected any such formulas. 
Leading media reported that PM Netanyahu might meet with Jordanian King Abdullah II before visiting Obama. The Jerusalem Post reported that Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL),a Qclose political ally of Obama and a stalwart Israel supporter,Q told the newspaper that the President is not on a collision course with Netanyahu. Wexler was also quoted as saying that Saudi ArabiaQs Qfree rideQ is over. HaQaretz reported that the U.S. has set October as its target for completing the first round of talks with Iran on its nuclear program, according to confidential reports sent to Jerusalem. The Jerusalem Post quoted the Prime MinisterQs Office as saying yesterday that longstanding Israeli government policy regarding the development of East Jerusalem remains unchanged. HaQaretz quoted the NGO Jerusalem Development Authority as saying that the GOI and settler organizations are working to surround the Old City of Jerusalem with nine national parks, pathways, and sites, drastically altering the status quo in the city. PM Netanyahu told a group of Russian-language reporters on Thursday that Israel will never withdraw from the Golan. His comments were published on Friday on several Russian-language Israeli Web sites. HaQaretz reported that the Civil AdministrationQs planning bureau will hold a hearing today on a Peace Now demand that the planned route of the Jerusalem-Tel Aviv railway be altered so as not to cut into privately owned Palestinian land in the West Bank. The planned route passes through 50 dunams (about 12 acres) of land belonging to several Palestinian villages. Israel Hayom quoted senior Israeli political officials as saying that PM Netanyahu would like to enlist Morocco to join the group of moderate countries that might help in the struggle against Iran and, in tandem, to help Israel reach an arrangement with the Palestinians. Leading media quoted Yonatan Bassi, former head of the Disengagement Administration (Sela),the body charged with assisting the Gaza settlers to get reabsorbed into the country, as saying yesterday that the evacuees from Gush Katif are chiefly responsible for the difficulties that befell them as a result of the disengagement from Gaza. Bassi made the statement during a six hour deposition on his role and SelaQs conduct since the disengagement before a ministerial committee examining the disengagement. Leading media reported that Lebanon arrested five people over the weekend suspected of belonging to an intelligence cell transmitting information about Hizbullah to Israel, the most recent arrests in a two-month crackdown apparently aided by what HaQaretz and others said were American training and equipment. HaQaretz reported that Israel has expressed reservations about American aid to the Lebanese army and security services, saying those organizations will ultimately be unable to contend with Hizbullah and that any aid is liable to serve Hizbullah's interests. The Jerusalem Post reported that last month, Attorneys-general from 10 U.S. states defended IsraelQs recent offensive in Gaza, in a letter sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. The Jerusalem Post reported that later this month, five years after placing an order, the Indian Air Force will finally receive the first of three Phantom AWACS developed by Israel Aerospace Industries. HaQaretz quoted European legal experts as saying that 88 percent of prisoners held in Palestinian jails are held without trial. The media reported that the government debate over the budget now mainly revolves around defense items. -------------- ¶1. U.S.-Israel Relations: -------------- Summary: -------------- Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in the independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz: QThe repertoire of pressure available to the President of the United States is extensive and multifaceted. It looks like we will have to learn about it the hard way. Columnist and former intelligence officer Amos Gilboa wrote in the popular, pluralist Maariv: QThis is an administration that in my opinion is still examining and putting out feelers, and may yet make a great deal of mistakes, but there is still enough room to influence it in shaping its policy. Visiting Professor of Political Science at Haifa University Avraham Ben-Zvi, an expert in U.S.-Israeli relations, wrote in the independent Israel Hayom: QHistory shows that ... the United States has not succeeded in shaping an infrastructure of internal support for such moves [against IsraelQs interests]. Defense commentator Amir Oren wrote in Ha'aretz: QAfter more than 50 years of investments in what is seen as Israel's insurance policy [nuclear ambiguity], it is possible to pay a little less in the coming era while reaping political dividends in the process. Block Quotes: -------------- ¶I. "What Are We, Arabs?" Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in the independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz (5/11): QIn his first days at the White House [President Obama] has made clear that whether a two-state solution is acceptable to a Likud government or not, that is the only formula up for negotiation. Moreover, according to Quartet envoy Tony Blair, the establishment of a Palestinian state is considered a U.S. national interest in Obama's eyes. This means that pressure on Israel to end the conflict with the Arabs will certainly not disrupt efforts to pressure Iran to halt its nuclear program, and may even contribute to it.... The question is not whether Obama will pressure Israel; the pressure is already there.... The repertoire of pressure available to the President of the United States is extensive and multifaceted. It looks like we will have to learn about it the hard way. II. "Nothing Is Finalized" Columnist and former intelligence officer Amos Gilboa wrote in the popular, pluralist Maariv (5/11): QI doubt whether the Obama administration has indeed had the time to formulate a policy already, but some of its basic assumptions, which arise publicly in the policymaking process, are troubling and surprising. Following are two of them. The first is the double statement: QThe ability of the United States to stand against Iran depends on its ability to achieve progress on the Palestinian front, and resolving the conflict will enable progress in dealing with the Iranian threatQ; QFailure to make progress on the Palestinian issue will weaken the moderate Arab states in their battle against IranQ.... The real ability of the U.S. to cope with Iran with any success lies in organizing an operative coalition with Russia (as of now, no Russian willingness for this is evident) and with China.... The Iranian centrifuges will not be overly impressed by one kind of movement or another on the Palestinian front, or by one Israeli concession or another; and what is of primary concern to Saudi Arabia and Egypt is for the U.S. not to make any deal with Iran at their expense, and for it to take their side against Iran in all matters.... The second troubling basic assumption is the belief-the almost messianic belief, it should be said-that the magic solution is based on the idea of two states. This, of course, is a highly important principle (and must always emphasize the state of the Jewish people versus the Palestinian people),but it is still not a policy. Obama can whisper to Bibi to accept the magic formula, and Bibi for his part can pronounce the formula -- this will still not cause water to flow from the stone, and will not promote the solution.... So what will be the strategy and the policy (not the slogans) of Obama on the Palestinian issue, as well as the Syrian issue? This is an administration that in my opinion is still examining and putting out feelers, and may yet make a great deal of mistakes, but there is still enough room to influence it in shaping its policy. III. "DonQt Let Obama Worry You" Visiting Professor of Political Science at Haifa University Avraham Ben-Zvi, an expert in U.S.-Israeli relations, wrote in the independent Israel Hayom (5/11): QThe aim of QreassessmentQ [in U.S.-Israel relations], which was shaped in 1975 by Henry Kissinger, the Secretary of State in the Ford administration, was to force Yitzhak RabinQs government to agree to an IDF withdrawal to the SinaiQs Mitla and Gidi passes as the Egyptians would not give anything in exchange.... It turned out that the administrationQs efforts were unable to erode sympathy for Israel among the [American] public.... The interim agreement] included an American commitment not to recognize the PLO or negotiate with it -- as long as the latter refuses to recognize Israel and accept Security Council Resolution 242, as well as commitments to Israel regarding procurement and energy.... History shows that ... the United States has not succeeded in shaping an infrastructure of internal support for such moves. IV. QTsunami in a Test Tube Defense commentator Amir Oren wrote in Ha'aretz (5/11): Q[U.S. officials] expressed hope that sometime in the future -- in this case, the distant future -- when wolf and sheep cohabitate, Israel, India and Pakistan would join the NPT. This was and remains a vision for the distant future, not an actual process with a timetable and threats of punishment in the event of noncompliance. [Ehud] Barak, who said [Assistant Secretary of State Rose] Gottemoeller had for the first time specified which countries ought to sign onto the NPT and that Israel was among them, did not do his homework as he should have. The excitement that gripped the Israeli establishment was a tsunami in a test tube, a tempest in a heavy-water teapot.... The importance that Obama places in moving toward that difficult goal of a nuclear weapons-free world provides Israel with a rare opportunity for launching a unilateral, nonbinding initiative: an independent decision, borne of sovereign calculations, whereby Israel slashes a considerable portion, say one-tenth, of the budget allotted to its nuclear research center at Dimona and the other bodies under the purview of the Atomic Energy Commission. This would be a gift from Netanyahu.... The sanctified policy of ambiguity would not be harmed, and Israel would continue to champion a Middle East free of nuclear weapons Qtwo years after a comprehensive peace is reachedQ.... After more than 50 years of investments in what is seen as Israel's insurance policy, it is possible to pay a little less in the coming era while reaping political dividends in the process. -------------- ¶2. Pope Benedict XVI in Israel: -------------- Summary: -------------- The independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized: QDespite the controversy he sparked, Pope Benedict XVI is a welcome guest. Block Quotes: -------------- "An Opening for New Relations" The independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized (5/11): QDespite the controversy he sparked, Pope Benedict XVI is a welcome guest. His speech two days ago in Jordan at what is believed to be the Biblical Mount Nebo, in which he spoke of the "inseparable bond" between the Catholic Church and Jewish people and called for reconciliation between Jews and Arabs, was a worthy beginning to his journey in the Middle East. We can hope that this tone, and not a shrill cacophony, will characterize his visits to Israel and the Palestinian Authority, which would serve as one more step in healing the rifts and strengthening the ties between Jews and Christians and between Israel and the Vatican. CUNNINGHAM