Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09STATE57898
2009-06-04 22:37:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Secretary of State
Cable title:
GUIDANCE ON EAPC MEETING INVITATION TO BELARUS
how-toO P 042237Z JUN 09 FM SECSTATE WASHDC TO USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE INFO NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY 8231 USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY 3481
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 057898
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/04/2019
TAGS: BO NATO PREL
SUBJECT: GUIDANCE ON EAPC MEETING INVITATION TO BELARUS
DEFMIN
REF: A. (A) USNATO 230
B. (B) JUNE 3 HAMILTON (EUR/RPM) - GREANEY E-MAILS
Classified By: EUR/RPM Bruce Turner Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 057898
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/04/2019
TAGS: BO NATO PREL
SUBJECT: GUIDANCE ON EAPC MEETING INVITATION TO BELARUS
DEFMIN
REF: A. (A) USNATO 230
B. (B) JUNE 3 HAMILTON (EUR/RPM) - GREANEY E-MAILS
Classified By: EUR/RPM Bruce Turner Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
1. (C) While the Department understands Post's concerns as
outlined in REF A, Department does NOT/NOT authorize the
transmission of the proposed text. The Department requests
USNATO to stand by previous instructions (REF B) -- we
support Belarusian participation in the EAPC Defense
Ministerial at the deputy defense minister level. An
invitation at the Defense Minister level would imply a return
to business as usual with Belarus, which should not be on the
table.
2. (C/NF) Department understands that Allies are interested
in reaching out to Belarus but also notes that Belarus has
not requested to attend the EAPC meetings. We are prepared
to make limited gestures to the Belarusians without
reciprocity, including going ahead with the NATO Security
Information Agreement. However, inviting the Defense
Minister now would be a major step at a time when the
Belarusians have to date shown no sign of taking any positive
steps to address others' concerns. Several Allies' capitals
admit that positive change in the past year has been
extremely limited. In short, such a step is not yet
justified.
3. (SBU) USNATO is requested to share the expanded points
below with NATO allies as necessary:
-- The United States appreciates our Allies' concerns about
Belarus and shares Allies' interest in engaging Belarus.
-- We remain concerned about the Belarusian regime's hostile
comments about NATO and believe it is premature to move
forward with an invitation to Belarus at the defense minister
level for the EAPC Defense Ministerial.
-- An invitation to the deputy defense minister -- a break
from NATO's past practice of inviting Belarus at the O-6
equivalent level and below -- will allow us to gauge Belarus'
interest in substantively engaging with NATO.
-- At this stage an invitation appears unjustified, as
Belarus has neither sought an invitation nor indicated an
interest in taking steps to encourage one.
-- We have made clear to the Belarusian authorities that we
are open to discussions with them and we will adjust our
policy toward Belarus as appropriate.
CLINTON
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/04/2019
TAGS: BO NATO PREL
SUBJECT: GUIDANCE ON EAPC MEETING INVITATION TO BELARUS
DEFMIN
REF: A. (A) USNATO 230
B. (B) JUNE 3 HAMILTON (EUR/RPM) - GREANEY E-MAILS
Classified By: EUR/RPM Bruce Turner Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
1. (C) While the Department understands Post's concerns as
outlined in REF A, Department does NOT/NOT authorize the
transmission of the proposed text. The Department requests
USNATO to stand by previous instructions (REF B) -- we
support Belarusian participation in the EAPC Defense
Ministerial at the deputy defense minister level. An
invitation at the Defense Minister level would imply a return
to business as usual with Belarus, which should not be on the
table.
2. (C/NF) Department understands that Allies are interested
in reaching out to Belarus but also notes that Belarus has
not requested to attend the EAPC meetings. We are prepared
to make limited gestures to the Belarusians without
reciprocity, including going ahead with the NATO Security
Information Agreement. However, inviting the Defense
Minister now would be a major step at a time when the
Belarusians have to date shown no sign of taking any positive
steps to address others' concerns. Several Allies' capitals
admit that positive change in the past year has been
extremely limited. In short, such a step is not yet
justified.
3. (SBU) USNATO is requested to share the expanded points
below with NATO allies as necessary:
-- The United States appreciates our Allies' concerns about
Belarus and shares Allies' interest in engaging Belarus.
-- We remain concerned about the Belarusian regime's hostile
comments about NATO and believe it is premature to move
forward with an invitation to Belarus at the defense minister
level for the EAPC Defense Ministerial.
-- An invitation to the deputy defense minister -- a break
from NATO's past practice of inviting Belarus at the O-6
equivalent level and below -- will allow us to gauge Belarus'
interest in substantively engaging with NATO.
-- At this stage an invitation appears unjustified, as
Belarus has neither sought an invitation nor indicated an
interest in taking steps to encourage one.
-- We have made clear to the Belarusian authorities that we
are open to discussions with them and we will adjust our
policy toward Belarus as appropriate.
CLINTON