SEOUL - PRESS BULLETIN; July 20, 2009

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 SEOUL 001142 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR ECON KPAO KS US SUBJECT: SEOUL - PRESS BULLETIN; July 20, 2009 TOP HEADLINES -------------- Chosun Ilbo Number of "Working Poor" Reaches 3 Million JoongAng Ilbo Showdown Looms Today as Ruling GNP Pushes to Pass Contentious Media Reform Bills Dong-a Ilbo Ruling GNP Likely to Delay Vote on Media Reform Bills in Face of Former Chairwoman's Opposition to Unilateral Media Bill Passage Hankook Ilbo, Hankyoreh Shinmun, Segye Ilbo Former Chairwoman Opposes GNP's Media Bill Passage Seoul Shinmun Rival Parties' Showdown on Media Bills Enters New Phase DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS -------------- According to a senior ROKG official, the ROKG will soon draw up and implement guidelines on inspecting ships going into and out of North Korea as a full member of the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI),which aims to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction, and in line with UN Security Council Resolution 1874 against North Korea. (Dong-a) INTERNATIONAL NEWS -------------- Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, told reporters after a July 18 meeting in Seoul with ROK Deputy Foreign Minister Lee Yong-joon that, "If North Korea is prepared to take serious and irreversible steps, the U.S., the ROK, Japan, China and others will be able to put together a comprehensive package that would be attractive to North Korea." (All) According to the Italian daily Libero, Italian police have seized two luxury yachts that North Korean leader Kim Jong-il ordered from an Italian shipbuilder, in compliance with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1718, which was passed in 2006 to ban exports of luxury goods to North Korea. (Chosun, Dong-a, Hankook, Segye, Seoul) According to an influential source in Washington, the U.S. has entered into "delicate" negotiations with North Korea over the two U.S. journalists detained in the North, and the next three or four weeks will be crucial in deciding whether the two journalists can walk free. (Chosun) MEDIA ANALYSIS -------------- -N. Korea -------------- All ROK media today gave prominent attention to July 18 press remarks in Seoul by Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, in which he said: "If North Korea is prepared to take serious and irreversible steps, the U.S., the ROK, Japan, China and others will be able to put together a comprehensive package that would be attractive to North Korea." The Assistant Secretary was further quoted as saying: "We believe there have to be consequences. We're looking at a full range of particular steps designed to put pressure on North Korea." SEOUL 00001142 002 OF 010 Conservative Chosun Ilbo interpreted these remarks as suggesting a shift in U.S. policy on North Korea from the previous "step-by-step approach" to an approach to resolve all pending issues at once. Conservative Dong-a Ilbo, meanwhile, wrote in the headline: "Obama Administration Discloses New Approach to Resolve N. Korea's Nuclear and Missile Issues with Sanctions, Not Compensation." Moderate Hankook Ilbo's headline read: "U.S.: A Stick in One Hand, a Signal of Dialogue in the Other" Left-leaning Hankyoreh Shinmun headlined its article: "U.S. Overtures for Dialogue Amid Sanctions" Conservative Chosun Ilbo carried an inside-page report citing an influential source in Washington as saying on July 19 that the U.S. has entered into "delicate" negotiations with North Korea over the two U.S. journalists detained in the North and that the next three or four weeks will be crucial in deciding whether the two journalists can walk free. The report went on to quote another source as saying that Sen. John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Democrats' 2004 presidential nominee, is being mentioned as a possible special envoy to Pyongyang for the journalists' release, as well as former Vice President Al Gore, co-founder of Current TV for which the detained journalists work. Most ROK media replayed a July 17 report by the Italian daily Libero that Italian police have seized two luxury yachts that North Korean leader Kim Jong-il ordered from an Italian shipbuilder, in compliance with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1718, which was passed in 2006 to ban exports of luxury goods to North Korea. Right-of-center JoongAng Ilbo editorialized on Saturday (July 18): "The North Korean nuclear issue... is a regional headache that seriously undermines the international nonproliferation campaign. It poses a risk to the ROK, the U.S., Japan, China and Russia, as well as the entire world. North Korea has been pitching the nuclear issue as a bilateral problem with the U.S. However, even if the U.S. spearheads negotiations with Pyongyang, the problem can only be resolved when the international community is involved. The first key to the solution is China, the North's long-standing ally. The tepid and uncooperative role that China has chosen to play in the call for tougher action against North Korea is partly responsible for the fruitless disarmament talks for the past 20 years. A more active voice from Beijing can determine the success and failure of future negotiations." OPINIONS/EDITORIALS -------------- FEWER DOVES IN WASHINGTON? (Dong-a Ilbo, July 20, 2009, Page 30) By Editorial Writer Lee Jin-nyong People say the doves in Washington have disappeared. In international politics, doves refer to those who favor dialogue and negotiations in diplomacy. On North Korea, only U.S. special envoy to Pyongyang Stephen Bosworth and special U.S. envoy for the Six-Party Talks Sung Kim are doves. The U.S. State Department convened a news conference Wednesday on North Korea and major figures from the State Department, the Treasury, and the White House National Security Council attended. Conspicuously absent were the two envoys, vividly attesting to the disappearance of doves. North Korea must initially have viewed the Obama Administration as a dove. In the beginning, U.S. President Barack Obama suggested dialogue with North Korea within the bounds of never allowing Pyongyang to possess nuclear weapons. Though the U.S. extended a hand, Pyongyang slapped Washington in the face by conducting missile launches and its second nuclear test. North Korea must have thought that if it got tough, the U.S. would propose negotiations and concessions and reward it for its threats. This has turned out to be a grave miscalculation, however. President Obama has clearly ruled out rewards for wrong behavior. Under such circumstances, it is no surprise that doves have no leg to stand on. North Korea SEOUL 00001142 003 OF 010 asked for it. The Obama Administration is firming up its stance against North Korea. Washington took the lead in passing U.N. Security Council Resolution 1874, which imposes harsh sanctions on Pyongyang for its nuclear test. U.S. intelligence also tailed a North Korean ship suspected of carrying weapons, forcing it to change course and return home. The U.N. Security Council also slapped tough sanctions on North Korea Thursday, including on five North Korean individuals. This was possible because the international community, including North Korea's traditional allies China and Russia, agreed. North Korea has nobody to turn to. Kurt Campbell, Assistant U.S. Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs, visited Seoul yesterday and said, "If North Korea is prepared to take serious and irreversible steps, the U.S., South Korea, Japan, China and others will be able to put together a comprehensive package that would be attractive to North Korea." This means the U.S. is still trying to keep the door open for North Korea. In Washington, however, voices are rising that North Korea should be re-included on the U.S. terrorism blacklist. If Pyongyang continues to reject dialogue and threaten the international community with its nuclear program, it will only see hawks fly in the skies over Washington. (This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is identical to the Korean version.) ¶S. KOREA MUST CLEAR THE WAY BEYOND UNSC SANCTIONS (Hankyoreh Shinmun, July 18, 2009, Page 27) The day before yesterday, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) confirmed a plan for sanctions against North Korea in connection with its second nuclear test. The UNSC's decision, which serves as the core element of multilateral sanctions, was essentially settled 34 days after the adoption of a resolution. Now is the time to come up with a basic solution for the nuclear problem that goes beyond sanctions. These UNSC sanctions target five North Korean individuals, five companies and institutions, and two types of goods, including high-tech materials. This represents a considerably smaller range of targets from those initially presented by the U.S. and other Western countries, but it does appear likely to apply some pressure on North Korea, as the decision was adopted unanimously with China and Russia also voting in favor. This is the first time sanctions, including travel restrictions, have been applied against North Korean individuals. North Korean society is already isolated from the international community; the possibility that these sanctions will deal a decisive blow is slim. North Korea has shown no change in its stance of refusing to acknowledge the UNSC resolution. Kim Yong-nam, President of the Presidium of the Supreme People's Assembly and the second most powerful person in North Korea, said at a Non-Aligned Movement summit a few days ago that "the Six-Party Talks are over for good." This statement reiterated the policy of absolute refusal to participate in the Six-Party Talks announced back in April by North Korean authorities. This kind of stance from North Korea is helpful to no one, even North Korea itself, as it deepens the country's international isolation. One hopes these sanctions help North Korea realize how the international community is taking the North's unilateral actions. It goes without saying that North Korea must refrain from measures that make the situation worse. Still, this does not mean that the current situation is simply going the way of haphazard confrontation. North Korea-U.S. contacts are being achieved through New York channels, and the U.S. has presented its analysis that North Korea seems to be searching for a way back to the negotiation table. The U.S. has begun discussions with related countries to find a solution to the nuclear issue. For instance, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell is heading to South Korea today for SEOUL 00001142 004 OF 010 the first time since his confirmation by Congress. In addition, a few days ago, Wu Dawei, China's Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, toured the nations participating in the Six-Party Talks and made efforts to clear the way for the talks' resumption. As Campbell has stated, the most effective means of denuclearizing North Korea is through diplomacy, and pressure alone is not enough to bring the country back into negotiations. For this reason, even if sanctions must inevitably be maintained for a certain period of time, they must be preceded by efforts to devise an effective framework for discussions and a comprehensive solution. At times such as these, the position of the South Korean government is all the more important. If, as it is doing now, it focuses on the role of spearheading pressure against North Korea, it will not only go against the greater flow, but will also lead to the further deterioration of inter-Korean relations. At this point, the administration's position is in urgent need of change. (This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is identical to the Korean version.) A REGIONAL HEADACHE (JoongAng Ilbo, July 18, 2009, Page 34) The stakes have gotten higher in the head-on confrontation between the United States and North Korea, sending the Korean Peninsula into turmoil. We saw U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton step up the rhetoric against North Korea last week, warning of "tougher joint efforts" from the United States and its allies toward disarming the emerging nuclear weapons state. The United Nations Security Council proved faithful to its June resolution of stringent actions against North Korea in response to the May nuclear test. It revealed the names of North Korean individuals and companies facing penalties and sanctions. And Pyongyang's No. 2, Kim Young-nam, President of the Supreme People's Assembly, condemned the UN action, saying the Six-Party Talks on denuclearization are "now gone forever," adding that North Korea has now no choice but to "take decisive action to strengthen its nuclear deterrence." The North Korean disarmament is critical to all Korean people. That's why we cannot emphasize more that the ongoing efforts to denuclearize North Korea should not in any way impair or reverse the peace and prosperity of the Korean Peninsula. Not under any circumstances should the international community indulge North Korea as a nuclear weapons state. North Korea should not own nuclear weapons. If it does, they should be destroyed. In the 20-year process of the North Korean nuclear negotiations, there was not a substantial consensus on this principle among the international community. Before North Korea conducted its second nuclear test, there may have been lack of urgency. However, due to the second nuclear test and series of missile tests, North Korea's threat to peace in the world and Northeast Asia is getting more and more realistic. The North Korean nuclear issue cannot be taken lightly. It's a regional headache that seriously undermines the international nonproliferation campaign. It poses a risk to South Korea, the United States, Japan, China and Russia, as well as the entire world. The North has been pitching the nuclear issue as a bilateral problem between the United States. However, even if the United States spearheads negotiations with Pyongyang, the problem can only be resolved when the international community is involved. The first key to the solution is China, the North's long-standing ally. The tepid and uncooperative role that China has chosen to play in the call for tougher action against North Korea is partly responsible for the fruitless disarmament talks. A more active voice from Beijing could determine the success and failure of future negotiations. The South Korean government should employ a more tight-knit, more SEOUL 00001142 005 OF 010 sophisticated diplomatic effort. It must concoct countermeasures for a host of possible scenarios, considering recent North Korean bellicosity has been spurred by the ailing health of its leader Kim Jong-il. (We have compared the English version on the website with the Korean version and added some sentences to make them identical.) FEATURES -------------- U.S., N. KOREA NEGOTIATE OVER DETAINED JOURNALISTS (Chosun Ilbo, July 20, 2009, Page 4) By Washington Correspondent Lee Ha-won The U.S. and North Korea have started delicate negotiations over two American journalists who were detained and sentenced to hard labor in North Korea, an influential source in Washington said Sunday. The next three or four weeks will be crucial in deciding whether the two women can walk free. The U.S. House of Representatives intended last week to adopt a resolution urging the North to release reporters Euna Lee and Laura Ling, and the Senate intended to follow suit, but their plans have been postponed at the State Department's request, the source said. The State Department made the request to Congress because it fears that a resolution could anger the North at a time when the two countries have entered sensitive negotiations, the source added. Earlier, on July 10, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked the North to grant the two amnesty and allow them to return home to their families. John Kerry, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee - who was the Democratic presidential candidate in 2004 - and former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, the founder of the TV station the two reporters work for, are being mentioned as possible special envoys to Pyongyang, other sources said. The U.S. government treats the release of the journalists as a separate issue from the North's nuclear provocations, but their release could lead to fresh nuclear talks. Gary Samore, a non-proliferation expert and WMD coordinator at the White House, said, "All the sort of straws in the wind vindicate that North Koreans are probably looking for a way to get back to the bargaining table." (This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is identical to the Korean version.) U.S. ENVOY URGES N. KOREA TO REENGAGE IN DIALOGUE (Yonhap News, July 18, 2009) By Reporters Lee Chi-dong and Tony Chang A senior U.S envoy urged North Korea Saturday to take "serious and irreversible steps" to end its stand-off with the U.S. and other regional powers, saying it is a precondition for a "comprehensive package" of incentives. Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and Pacific Affairs, also emphasized that it is important to have patience and keep the door open for dialogue with North Korea, while enforcing U.N. sanctions on the communist nation for its provocative actions. "I would say at this juncture the most important quality that the U.S., South Korea, Japan, China and Russia can demonstrate is patience," he told reporters after a closed-door meeting with Deputy Foreign Minister Lee Yong-joon here. Campbell flew into South Korea SEOUL 00001142 006 OF 010 from Japan earlier in the day for his first trip to South Korea since assuming his post last month. He pointed out that U.S. officials have made clear that, "If North Korea is prepared to take serious and irreversible steps the U.S., South Korea, Japan, China and others will be able to put together a comprehensive package that would be attractive to North Korea. But in this respect, North Korea really has to take some of the first steps." All of the countries are participants in the Six-Party Talks aimed at scrapping the North's nuclear program. The last formal session of the Beijing-based negotiations was held in December. North Korea announced after a long-range rocket launch in April that it would quit the often-troubled talks. The North also conducted a second nuclear test in May, prompting the U.N. Security Council to adopt a resolution imposing a robust set of sanctions on it. In the latest measure against the North, a U.N. Security Council committee imposed a travel ban on five North Korean officials and asset freezes on five more entities for their involvement in missile and nuclear weapons development. "We believe there have to be consequences," Campbell said, citing the U.S. efforts to implement the resolution. "We're looking at a full range of particular steps designed to put pressure on North Korea." He said sanctions are already proving to be effective. He said the recent turnback of a North Korean cargo ship, Kang Nam 1, is an example. The Kang Nam 1 was suspected of carrying illegal weapons to be exported, probably to Myanmar. After its voyage was closely monitored by the U.S. Navy for weeks, the ship reversed its course and returned to North Korea. The U.N. Security Council Resolution 1874, adopted after the North's nuclear test on May 25, authorizes member countries to take measures to stop the North's arms trade by air, land, and sea. Campbell said it sent a message to North Korea and "caused some pain to the leadership." He said it is North Korea that should change its course as it has chosen "lies, greater tensions, greater hardship for its people, more isolation and a lack of engagement in the international economy." On a proposed five-way meeting without North Korea, meanwhile, Campbell said it is unlikely to be held in the near future. "I think the U.S. and South Korea have explored the option of a five-party meeting at some point. Preparations need to be taken for such a meeting. I'm not sure we'll be ready to do it in Phuket," he said. Some said that the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) to be held in the Thai resort island next week may set the stage for such a five-way event. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her counterparts from South Korea, Japan, China, and Russia are scheduled to attend the ARF. "But the U.S. and South Korea are busy coordinating our respective positions and ensure that all the members have an opportunity to interact, if not in a collective setting, then bilaterally in Thailand," he added. South Korea supports such a five-way gathering for discussions on how to bring the North to the disarmament talks but China, which chairs the negotiations, takes a lukewarm stance apparently due to concerns that it will make the North Koreans feel more isolated and have a negative impact on the Six-Party format. The U.S. official plans to hold a series of meetings with other top South Korean officials including Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan and SEOUL 00001142 007 OF 010 Unification Minister Hyun In-taek, on Monday before heading to Thailand later in the day. Campbell said he will "consult on a wide range of issues, particularly relating to North Korea to make sure of our common strategy." His trip comes as the North shows no signs of bowing to the international pressure. On Saturday, Pyongyang's official news agency KCNA belatedly reported comments by the country's number two leader Kim Yong-nam at the Non-Aligned Movement summit of 118 nations in Egypt earlier this week. "Noting that not only the peace and security of the country but also the dignity of the nation and sovereignty of the DPRK (North Korea) have been grossly violated by the high-handed acts of the U.S., Kim asserted that if such acts of the U.S. are allowed to go on, the DPRK would be totally deprived of the legitimate right to use space," the KCNA said, referring to the international condemnation of its failed satellite launch in April. "The DPRK can never accept dialogue or negotiations minus the principle of respect for sovereignty and equal sovereignty," Kim was quoted as saying. "The prevailing situation compelled the DPRK government to take decisive steps to bolster up its nuclear deterrence." KURT CAMPBELL CALLS ON NORTH KOREA TO ABANDON ITS NUCLEAR PROGRAM AS (PRECONDITION) FOR PROVIDING ATTRACTIVE PACKAGE (JoongAng Ilbo, July 20, page 13; EXCERPTS) By Reporter Ye Yong-joon On his visit to the ROK, Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, said that (the U.S.) will pursue a "two-track strategy" as a framework of its North Korea policy. Under the strategy, the U.S. will attempt to sanction North Korea, while seeking to hold talks with the North. Campbell's remarks are significant in that the U.S. North Korea policy, which the Obama Administration has reviewed for six months since its inauguration, was revealed. Previously, on July 17, when questioned by foreign reporters about whether now is the time to change the U.S. approach to North Korea, Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs Philip J. Crowley said that the U.S. has what could be called a "new approach." Assistant Secretary Campbell's remarks about providing a "comprehensive package" in return for North Korea's abandoning its nuclear ambitions are not much different from the North Korea policy which the U.S. has espoused so far. However, he made it clear that the U.S. will draw the line between (the current approach) and the "pattern" of the second term of the former Bush Administration in terms of strategies or negotiation styles. Campbell noted that it is important to continue to sanction North Korea, put pressure on the North through international cooperation, and bring North Korea back to the negotiating table. In particular, it is noteworthy that Campbell called on North Korea to take some steps first, stressing that North Korea should be the first to take action. This approach is different from the "action for action" principle underscored by North Korea in the Six-Party Talks and accepted by the U.S. This indicates that (the previous) phased approach to resolve North Korean issues and to provide rewards to the North could be under review. His emphasis on irreversible steps is starkly different from the negotiation pattern of the second term of the Bush Administration. The Obama Administration is reviving the terms that have disappeared from the Six-Party Talks for quite a while. This is interpreted to SEOUL 00001142 008 OF 010 mean that (the Obama Administration) cool-headedly evaluated the Six-Party Talks process of the previous government, which focused on rewarding North Korea in return for its disablement of the Yongbyon nuclear facilities. Since North Korea's second nuclear test, criticism has been mounting in the U.S. that North Korea often delayed the nuclear disablement or reversed course by returning to the original status. This led to five countries, including the ROK and the U.S., being dragged (about) by North Korea. U.S. MAY PROVIDE "COMPREHENSIVE PACKAGE" (TO NORTH KOREA) (Hankyoreh Shinmun, July 20, page 6; EXCERPTS) By Reporter Lee Yong-in It is, in fact, the first time since North Korea's long-range rocket launch and its second nuclear test, that a high-ranking U.S. official officially said that (the U.S.) may provide a "comprehensive package." Assistant Secretary Campbell's remarks on a comprehensive package that would be "attractive" to North Korea could be interpreted as an indication of the U.S.' strong overtures for dialogue. It seems that Campbell's approach is in the planning stage. A senior ROK official said that the U.S. has not yet laid out detailed plans or road maps, adding that it will take time. Also, while stating that (the U.S.) could put together a comprehensive package that would be attractive to North Korea, Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, called on North Korea to take sincere steps first. This should be coordinated between the U.S. and North Korea. It is not yet known what first steps Campbell demanded the North take. However, there is a high possibility that the first steps will include North Korea's promise not to aggravate the situation further and stop developing nuclear programs such as the reprocessing of plutonium. The Obama Administration pursues dialogue and pressure at the same time, and will take resolute action against North Korea's provocations. Therefore, it seems too early to expect that the U.S. and North Korea will (soon) enter into negotiations. U.S. SEEKS COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION FOR N. KOREA NUKES (Chosun Ilbo, July 20, 2009, Page 1, 4) By Reporter Lim Min-hyul The U.S. is looking for a comprehensive solution to the North Korean nuclear problem instead of the step-by-step approach previously favored. The new approach was suggested by Kurt Campbell, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs, who visited Seoul on Saturday. After meeting Deputy Foreign Minister Lee Yong-joon on Saturday, he told reporters, "If North Korea is prepared to take serious and irreversible steps, the U.S., the ROK, Japan, China and others will be able to put together a comprehensive package that would be attractive to North Korea." Asked about incentives for North Korea to return to the Six-Party Talks, Campbell said none are necessary and that North Korea has to pay the price for provocations. He said the North will find its isolation and economic plight unbearable and eventually come to dialogue. At the same time, he added, it is important to convey a message to the North that the door is open when it wants to return to the negotiation table. Prior to this, Philip J. Crowley, Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs at the U.S. Department of State, said during a July 17 (local time) press briefing in Washington, "If North Korea wants to return to the denuclearization process, we'll be supportive of that," adding, "We are not waiting for North Korea. We are aggressively doing things where (the North Koreans) pay a price for this recalcitrance." He also noted, "We have what I would call a SEOUL 00001142 009 OF 010 new approach." These statements suggest that Washington's North Korea strategy is to create a situation, through tough sanctions under UN Security Council Resolution 1874, where Pyongyang has no choice but to return to the table and, when dialogue starts, to find a swift and complete resolution through a comprehensive package deal. The U.S. seems to have in mind a package settlement in which all available bargaining chips are placed on the same table: From the U.S., the establishment of diplomatic relations with the North, a security guarantee to the North, economic and energy assistance to Pyongyang; and from the North, nuclear weapons, programs and facilities, and missiles. It was reported that the U.S. has not devised the details of the comprehensive package yet. An ROKG official said on July 19, "Because the current situation is still focused on sanctions, rather than on dialogue, the U.S. has just provided a large framework. As to what may be included in the package or how to approach it, consultations with related nations are necessary." However, the ROK and the U.S. seem to have discussed this issue in advance. An (ROK) foreign policy and security official said, "When I met with key Blue House officials after the ROK-U.S. summit last month, they told me, 'President Lee Myung-bak said that he was interested in a package deal to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue and asked me what I thought of the deal,'" adding, "There seemed to be some kind of proposal from the U.S." An ROKG official noted, "The comprehensive package stemmed from a reconsideration of the phased approach led by former U.S. Chief Negotiator to the Six-Party Talks Christopher Hill." In other words, the current USG intends to shorten the timeframe (to resolve the nuclear issue) while taking a direct approach to "nuclear dismantlement." Although the September 19, 2005, Joint Statement, produced by former Assistant Secretary Hill, set the goal, it did not have agreement on specific ways to implement it. Therefore, (the related parties) had to reach an agreement at every stage on how to implement the steps. Consequently, whenever specific roadmaps, such as the February 13, 2007 Agreement and the October 4, 2007 Agreement, were created, North Korea changed its words and made new demands. Furthermore, after the North rolled back its disablement process, (the September 19 Joint Statement) became a mere scrap of paper. In this context, the term "CVID (Complete, Verifiable, and Irreversible Nuclear Dismantlement)" is carrying more weight these days. The CVID, the early Bush Administration's principle on the North Korean nuclear issue, was once considered as exclusively belonging to the neo-cons and thus was almost excluded from the Six-Party Talks, but the current Democratic administration in the U.S. is actively raising the need for the principle. Of course, there is a long way to go before the comprehensive package plan is realized. To date, under the phased approach, Pyongyang has successfully pretended to join the negotiations, pocketed benefits, and then retracted its promises. However, under the comprehensive package, it is impossible to renege on promises later. Therefore, although North Korea's "intention of abandoning nuclear programs" is absolutely needed for the comprehensive package, it does not appear easy for the North to make such a decision in the current situation. A diplomatic source said, "Due to uncertainty over North Korean leader Kim Jong-il's health and the growing influence of the North Korean military leadership, the situation may become more difficult." (Editor's Note: We have compared the English version on the website with the Korean version and added some paragraphs to make them identical. The same story was also reported by the Dong-a Ilbo and the Hankook Ilbo. Under the headline, "With 'Sticks' in One Hand, Washington Sends Pyongyang Signal for Dialogue," the Hankook Ilbo reported: "There is still a pessimistic view on the possibility that U.S.-North Korea negotiations may resume in the near future. SEOUL 00001142 010 OF 010 Washington's position is that North Korea should first take steps toward denuclearization, and Pyongyang cannot easily accept this. Some observers say that Washington's "new approach" is a "more direct and tough" response based on the judgment that North Korea is pursuing nuclear programs in order to become a nuclear-possessing state, instead of gaining an edge over the U.S. at the negotiation table.") STEPHENS