Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09ROME173
2009-02-12 14:32:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

IRAN: ITALY FAULTS GERMANS FOR DELAYS OF EU

Tags:  PREL KNNC ETTC EFIN IT 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0245
PP RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHRO #0173 0431432
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 121432Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1613
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 3460
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 9841
RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 3633
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 4748
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 000173 

NOFORN
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/12/2019
TAGS: PREL KNNC ETTC EFIN IT
SUBJECT: IRAN: ITALY FAULTS GERMANS FOR DELAYS OF EU
DESIGNATIONS

Classified By: Acting DCM Barbara A. Leaf for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 000173 NOFORN SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/12/2019 TAGS: PREL KNNC ETTC EFIN IT SUBJECT: IRAN: ITALY FAULTS GERMANS FOR DELAYS OF EU DESIGNATIONS Classified By: Acting DCM Barbara A. Leaf for reasons 1.5 (b) and (d). ¶1. (C/NF) Summary. Italy faults Germany for postponing recent EU-level experts meetings on new Iran proliferation-related designations that were scheduled for February 11. The MFA is concerned the EU is losing momentum while waiting for US policy announcements and highlighted that every small delay now will only magnify the delays later and could damage successful end results. End summary. ¶2. (C/NF) According to Italian MFA Office Director for Disarmament and Arms Control, Emanuele Farruggia (protect), Italy submitted in good faith additional entities and individuals for consideration with the full intent that, after the required 14 review days, the EU member states would consider adding these entities to the sanctions designation list. Farruggia said the German request to postpone the Council working group on non-proliferation and the regional experts meeting (scheduled for February 11) was news to Italy, suggesting Berlin was using the GOI submission as a pretext simply to halt further work on sanctions. He noted that the Iranian entities Italy had submitted had approached Italian firms and that Italy had wanted to address this issue promptly. ¶3. (C/NF) Farruggia expressed his concern that there was not agreement within the EU4 on the list itself and again highlighted Germany's delay as unhelpful. According to Farruggia, Italy had anticipated moving forward but found that along with Germany, Cyprus, Portugal, Spain and to a lesser degree Sweden, resisted moving forward - claiming to want additional guidance on US policies. He relayed that the EU4 were discussing holding a meeting in March (location and date to be determined) to attempt to gain more agreement on next steps and to build consensus. Farruggia stressed that with every small delay, the end results would only be further delayed. ¶4. (C/NF) Comment: Our MFA interlocutor was discouraged by Germany's move. The GOI appears serious to us about wanting to move ahead on EU measures, and shares our sense of concern that now is not the time to suspend this type of activity. They have taken seriously our message, most recently conveyed by U/S Burns at the February 2 G8 Political Directors Meeting in Venice, that the US policy review on Iran should not delay further movement on EU or National measures. DIBBLE

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -