Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09RANGOON372
2009-06-18 04:51:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rangoon
Cable title:  

BURMA: SWISS ENERGY COMPANY LOSES ONSHORE OIL

Tags:  ECON ENRG PGOV EPET PINR BM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1967
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHGO #0372/01 1690451
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 180451Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY RANGOON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9125
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK 2963
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2321
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 2064
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 5242
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 2166
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 5538
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 9134
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE 0796
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 6712
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU 1832
RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 2210
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA 0680
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 2515
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 4521
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEKJCS/DIA WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000372 

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/MLS; INR/EAP; OES; EEB
PACOM FOR FPA;
TREASURY FOR OASIA:SCHUN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/18/2019
TAGS: ECON ENRG PGOV EPET PINR BM
SUBJECT: BURMA: SWISS ENERGY COMPANY LOSES ONSHORE OIL
CONTRACT

REF: RANGOON 112

RANGOON 00000372 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: Economic Officer Samantha A. Carl-Yoder for Reasons 1.4
(b and d).

Summary
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 RANGOON 000372 SIPDIS STATE FOR EAP/MLS; INR/EAP; OES; EEB PACOM FOR FPA; TREASURY FOR OASIA:SCHUN E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/18/2019 TAGS: ECON ENRG PGOV EPET PINR BM SUBJECT: BURMA: SWISS ENERGY COMPANY LOSES ONSHORE OIL CONTRACT REF: RANGOON 112 RANGOON 00000372 001.2 OF 002 Classified By: Economic Officer Samantha A. Carl-Yoder for Reasons 1.4 (b and d). Summary -------------- ¶1. (C) Focus Energy, a Swiss company and one of Burma's largest onshore oil producers, was unable to extend its contract for its two oil fields in May 2009 because the Minister of Energy wanted to grant sole operating rights to the Myanmar Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE),according to company officials. MOGE has since assumed operation of the two fields, and has retained Focus's equipment. While MOGE still owes Focus more than USD 15 million for oil delivered since 2007, Focus Energy owners and MOGE allegedly negotiated a deal allowing MOGE to settle the debt by paying USD 7 million over a two-year period. End Summary. Minister Opposes all But PRC Investment -------------- ¶2. (C) The GOB encourages foreign companies to invest in the offshore oil and gas sector, but it is far more restrictive in granting rights to foreign companies for onshore drilling. Currently, six foreign companies -- Swiss-owned Focus Energy, Indonesian-French company GoldPetrol, Indian-owned Essar, and Chinese companies Chinese National Petroleum Company (CNPC)/Chinnery Assets, Sinopec, and Chinese National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) -- have contracts for onshore oil and gas blocks. According to Raymond Bona, Acting General Manager of GoldPetrol, the Minister of Energy disapproves of foreign investment in onshore blocks, and has stated openly his desire to cancel certain foreign investment contracts. For example, Bona noted that during the past two years, the Energy Ministry delayed contracts for up to 18 months for GoldPetrol, Focus Energy, and Essar. However, because the GOB needs the support of the Government of China, CNPC and CNOOC have faced no such difficulties. No Contract for You! -------------- ¶3. (C) Focus Energy is the first foreign company to lose its onshore contract, former Focus Energy Technical Coordinator Ye Myat Soe told us. According to its contract with MOGE, Focus had production rights for the MOGE 2 block (located in Magwe Division, Central Burma) for nine years, with the pos
sibility of an additional 11-year extension. Ye Myat Soe confirmed that the original nine-year period expired in May 2009. Although Focus negotiated with MOGE for more than six months for an extension, the Minister of Energy opted to decline the contract renewal. Consequently, Focus Energy closed its Burma operations on May 4, 2009. ¶4. (C) When asked what prompted the Minister's decision, Ye Myat Soe told us the Minister stated his belief that MOGE could run Focus' two oil fields without foreign assistance (Reftel). Indeed, MOGE assumed control over the block in mid-May and continues to produce approximately 2,300 barrels a day, slightly less than Focus' production of 2,500 barrels a day. Ye Myat Soe opined that MOGE will be unable to RANGOON 00000372 002.2 OF 002 sustain high levels of production since the block has areas of extreme high pressure. Companies need special equipment and well-trained geologists to drill the area, and Ye Myat Soe doesn't believe MOGE is up to the task. ¶5. (C) Ye Myat Soe acknowledged "bad blood" between the Minister of Energy and the owners of Focus Energy. According to Ye Myat Soe, the Minister wanted Focus to increase investment levels. The Swiss owners allegedly refused to meet GOB demands, which created friction between the two sides. Ye Myat Soe indicated this issue may have been a factor in the Minister's final decision. So What Happens Now? -------------- ¶6. (C) According to Ye Myat Soe, Focus Energy will divest from Burma, selling off any assets not seized by MOGE. He indicated that the owners met with MOGE officials to discuss outstanding invoices for oil dating back to 2007, worth more than USD 15 million. Allegedly, during meetings in Nay Pyi Taw in late May, MOGE agreed to pay Focus USD 7 million over a two-year period. The amount appears to placate the Swiss owners, who expected MOGE would refuse to pay anything, Ye Myat Soe stated. ¶7. (C) For now MOGE will continue to operate the wells in the MOGE 2 block. Both Ye Myat Soe and Bona told us that regime cronies Tay Za, Steven Law, and Nay Aung have expressed interest in acquiring the rights to this block. It remains unclear whether the Minister will allow either Burmese or foreign investors to operate the block, or whether MOGE will retain all production rights. From MOGE's perspective, there are benefits to both options: private investors would be more likely to have the money and technology necessary to continue operations in high pressure areas. On the other hand, as sole operator of the wells, the GOB would not have to pay for any oil produced. DINGER

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -