Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09RANGOON329
2009-06-04 05:52:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rangoon
Cable title:
BURMA: ASSK CLOSING ARGUMENTS LIKELY TO BE
how-toVZCZCXRO0268 PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH RUEHTRO DE RUEHGO #0329 1550552 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 040552Z JUN 09 FM AMEMBASSY RANGOON TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9057 INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 2012 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 5487 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 9083 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 6659 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 4470 RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 2463 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L RANGOON 000329
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP AND IO; PACOM FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/03/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM BM
SUBJECT: BURMA: ASSK CLOSING ARGUMENTS LIKELY TO BE
POSTPONED AGAIN
REF: RANGOON 324
Classified By: Political Officer Sean K. O'Neill for Reasons 1.4 (b) &
(d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L RANGOON 000329
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP AND IO; PACOM FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/03/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM BM
SUBJECT: BURMA: ASSK CLOSING ARGUMENTS LIKELY TO BE
POSTPONED AGAIN
REF: RANGOON 324
Classified By: Political Officer Sean K. O'Neill for Reasons 1.4 (b) &
(d)
1. (SBU) Aung San Suu Kyi's (ASSK) lawyers have told us they
expect closing arguments in her trial, currently scheduled
for June 5, to be postponed; the session had already been
delayed once from its original June 1 date. Lawyers
confirmed that the Rangoon Divisional Court (an appeals
court) has agreed to consider the appeal by ASSK's lawyers of
the District Court's denial of three defense witnesses, thus
requiring a further postponement. ASSK's lawyers will appear
at the Divisional Court June 5 to argue their appeal. They
did not speculate as to when the Divisional Court would rule
or when closing arguments would eventually take place.
2. (C) ASSK's personal attorney, Kyi Win (aka Neville),has
told us that the he still does not know why authorities
initially postponed the closing arguments, but noted that the
delay will actually help defense attorneys strengthen their
case.
Comment
--------------
3. (C) We have been struck from the beginning of the
ASSK/Yettaw trial by the effort of the court to follow
reasonably rigorous criminal-procedure rules, a rigor which
we hear is seldom the case in most politically-sensitive
criminal trials here. The Divisional Court's acceptance of
an appeal could be simply more evidence of such procedural
rigor in this high-visibility case. Another possibility is
that the sudden slow-down in the trial's pace, after an
earlier effort to speed toward conclusion, is intended to
give the regime's senior leadership time to reevaluate
options, given the extent of global outcry. Cynical
observers still figure the most likely result is some sort of
continued detention for ASSK; but the delay does offer a
glimmer of hope.
DINGER
SIPDIS
STATE FOR EAP AND IO; PACOM FOR FPA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/03/2019
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM BM
SUBJECT: BURMA: ASSK CLOSING ARGUMENTS LIKELY TO BE
POSTPONED AGAIN
REF: RANGOON 324
Classified By: Political Officer Sean K. O'Neill for Reasons 1.4 (b) &
(d)
1. (SBU) Aung San Suu Kyi's (ASSK) lawyers have told us they
expect closing arguments in her trial, currently scheduled
for June 5, to be postponed; the session had already been
delayed once from its original June 1 date. Lawyers
confirmed that the Rangoon Divisional Court (an appeals
court) has agreed to consider the appeal by ASSK's lawyers of
the District Court's denial of three defense witnesses, thus
requiring a further postponement. ASSK's lawyers will appear
at the Divisional Court June 5 to argue their appeal. They
did not speculate as to when the Divisional Court would rule
or when closing arguments would eventually take place.
2. (C) ASSK's personal attorney, Kyi Win (aka Neville),has
told us that the he still does not know why authorities
initially postponed the closing arguments, but noted that the
delay will actually help defense attorneys strengthen their
case.
Comment
--------------
3. (C) We have been struck from the beginning of the
ASSK/Yettaw trial by the effort of the court to follow
reasonably rigorous criminal-procedure rules, a rigor which
we hear is seldom the case in most politically-sensitive
criminal trials here. The Divisional Court's acceptance of
an appeal could be simply more evidence of such procedural
rigor in this high-visibility case. Another possibility is
that the sudden slow-down in the trial's pace, after an
earlier effort to speed toward conclusion, is intended to
give the regime's senior leadership time to reevaluate
options, given the extent of global outcry. Cynical
observers still figure the most likely result is some sort of
continued detention for ASSK; but the delay does offer a
glimmer of hope.
DINGER