Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09PARIS1170
2009-08-26 15:31:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Paris
Cable title:
FRANCE SUPPORTS MIDDLE EAST CONSENSUS RESOLUTION
VZCZCXRO1711 PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR DE RUEHFR #1170 2381531 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 261531Z AUG 09 FM AMEMBASSY PARIS TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7038 INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE RUEHII/VIENNA IAEA POSTS COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 001170
SIPDIS
ISN/RA FOR JDANIEL AND RNEPHEW
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/26/2019
TAGS: AORC PREL PARM KNNP IAEA EG IS UK FR
SUBJECT: FRANCE SUPPORTS MIDDLE EAST CONSENSUS RESOLUTION
AT IAEA
REF: STATE 85128
Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Young for Reasons 1.4(b),(d)
.
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 001170
SIPDIS
ISN/RA FOR JDANIEL AND RNEPHEW
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/26/2019
TAGS: AORC PREL PARM KNNP IAEA EG IS UK FR
SUBJECT: FRANCE SUPPORTS MIDDLE EAST CONSENSUS RESOLUTION
AT IAEA
REF: STATE 85128
Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Young for Reasons 1.4(b),(d)
.
1. (C) During an August 25 meeting, IAEA desk officer in the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs' Disarmament and
Non-proliferation Department Francois Revardeaux said France
was in full agreement on the need to return to consensus on
Middle East issues at the IAEA, both for the sake of the
important work to be done there, and to avoid poisoning the
atmosphere prior to the 2010 NPT Review Conference.
Consequently, France is strongly in support of creating a
new, single consensus resolution. Revardeaux had no specific
ideas for language for a consensus resolution, but expressed
his hope that the GC President's current efforts would bear
fruit. However, he cautioned Egypt had not given any signs
that it will be willing to show flexibility. On the
contrary, as Egypt seems to want to use the IAEA as a
diplomatic launch pad for similar initiatives at the 2010 NPT
Review Conference, there is likely very little motivation for
them to negotiate at the IAEA.
2. (C) Revardeaux said that since the Egyptians have not yet
presented their resolution, it is difficult to speak
concretely about a "Plan B." However - with the strong
proviso that he was speaking purely hypothetically -
Revardeaux suggested two possible scenarios: in the event
(which Revardeaux admitted was highly unlikely) that the
Egyptian resolution is largely acceptable, it may be worth
agreeing to the entire draft in exchange for an Egyptian
commitment to hold the Arab League as a whole to an informal
consensus. Another possibility is that a Presidency
Statement acknowledging some of Egypt's more controversial
draft elements would give Egypt the diplomatic and public
relations victory it seeks while keeping any resolution to
more widely acceptable language and allowing a quiet return
to consensus.
3. (C) In a separate August 20 meeting, MFA NEA
DAS-equivalent Ludovic Pouille confirmed France agreed in
principle with the U.S. approach to the Middle East issue at
the IAEA. According to Pouille, France and UK have been
consulting closely and will work for EU consensus. However,
he said he doubted whether maintaining EU unity will be
possible, and added that Egypt has delivered very strong
demarches throughout Europe over last several years on this
issue. He expected that the issue will be discussed further
at the August 26 French ambassadors' conference in Paris.
RIVKIN
SIPDIS
ISN/RA FOR JDANIEL AND RNEPHEW
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/26/2019
TAGS: AORC PREL PARM KNNP IAEA EG IS UK FR
SUBJECT: FRANCE SUPPORTS MIDDLE EAST CONSENSUS RESOLUTION
AT IAEA
REF: STATE 85128
Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Young for Reasons 1.4(b),(d)
.
1. (C) During an August 25 meeting, IAEA desk officer in the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs' Disarmament and
Non-proliferation Department Francois Revardeaux said France
was in full agreement on the need to return to consensus on
Middle East issues at the IAEA, both for the sake of the
important work to be done there, and to avoid poisoning the
atmosphere prior to the 2010 NPT Review Conference.
Consequently, France is strongly in support of creating a
new, single consensus resolution. Revardeaux had no specific
ideas for language for a consensus resolution, but expressed
his hope that the GC President's current efforts would bear
fruit. However, he cautioned Egypt had not given any signs
that it will be willing to show flexibility. On the
contrary, as Egypt seems to want to use the IAEA as a
diplomatic launch pad for similar initiatives at the 2010 NPT
Review Conference, there is likely very little motivation for
them to negotiate at the IAEA.
2. (C) Revardeaux said that since the Egyptians have not yet
presented their resolution, it is difficult to speak
concretely about a "Plan B." However - with the strong
proviso that he was speaking purely hypothetically -
Revardeaux suggested two possible scenarios: in the event
(which Revardeaux admitted was highly unlikely) that the
Egyptian resolution is largely acceptable, it may be worth
agreeing to the entire draft in exchange for an Egyptian
commitment to hold the Arab League as a whole to an informal
consensus. Another possibility is that a Presidency
Statement acknowledging some of Egypt's more controversial
draft elements would give Egypt the diplomatic and public
relations victory it seeks while keeping any resolution to
more widely acceptable language and allowing a quiet return
to consensus.
3. (C) In a separate August 20 meeting, MFA NEA
DAS-equivalent Ludovic Pouille confirmed France agreed in
principle with the U.S. approach to the Middle East issue at
the IAEA. According to Pouille, France and UK have been
consulting closely and will work for EU consensus. However,
he said he doubted whether maintaining EU unity will be
possible, and added that Egypt has delivered very strong
demarches throughout Europe over last several years on this
issue. He expected that the issue will be discussed further
at the August 26 French ambassadors' conference in Paris.
RIVKIN