Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09OSLO389
2009-06-10 14:21:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:
NORWAY AGREES PIRACY COURT A BAD IDEA
VZCZCXYZ0017 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHNY #0389 1611421 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 101421Z JUN 09 ZDK FM AMEMBASSY OSLO TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7566
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000389
SIPDIS
FOR PM/PPA DAVID FORAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2019
TAGS: EWWT MARR PGOV PHSA PHUM PREL
SUBJECT: NORWAY AGREES PIRACY COURT A BAD IDEA
REF: STATE 58579
Classified By: Political Counselor Kristen Bauer for reasons 1.4(b) and
(d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000389
SIPDIS
FOR PM/PPA DAVID FORAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2019
TAGS: EWWT MARR PGOV PHSA PHUM PREL
SUBJECT: NORWAY AGREES PIRACY COURT A BAD IDEA
REF: STATE 58579
Classified By: Political Counselor Kristen Bauer for reasons 1.4(b) and
(d)
1. (C) Poloff discussed reftel demarche with Deputy Director
Anita Nergard of the MFA Section for Global Security on June
10. Nergard said that Norway agreed with the US that the
idea of an international tribunal to prosecute piracy
suspects was a bad idea for the reasons we listed in reftel
non-paper. Nergard especially noted the long-life, wind up
and wind down costs, and possible reduction in magnitude of
the problem off Somalia, all of which suggested an
international tribunal was not the way to go. She said she
had gathered this from discussions she has already had with
the legal department on this issue, and promised to forward
our non-paper to them. Poloff encouraged Norway to be
"outspoken in its position" in the ongoing discussions, as
indicated in reftel paragraph 3.
WHITNEY
SIPDIS
FOR PM/PPA DAVID FORAN
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/10/2019
TAGS: EWWT MARR PGOV PHSA PHUM PREL
SUBJECT: NORWAY AGREES PIRACY COURT A BAD IDEA
REF: STATE 58579
Classified By: Political Counselor Kristen Bauer for reasons 1.4(b) and
(d)
1. (C) Poloff discussed reftel demarche with Deputy Director
Anita Nergard of the MFA Section for Global Security on June
10. Nergard said that Norway agreed with the US that the
idea of an international tribunal to prosecute piracy
suspects was a bad idea for the reasons we listed in reftel
non-paper. Nergard especially noted the long-life, wind up
and wind down costs, and possible reduction in magnitude of
the problem off Somalia, all of which suggested an
international tribunal was not the way to go. She said she
had gathered this from discussions she has already had with
the legal department on this issue, and promised to forward
our non-paper to them. Poloff encouraged Norway to be
"outspoken in its position" in the ongoing discussions, as
indicated in reftel paragraph 3.
WHITNEY