Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09NEWDELHI1668
2009-08-10 15:18:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:
INDIA DETAINS SUSPICIOUS DPRK VESSEL FOR
how-toVZCZCXRO8773 OO RUEHAST RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHNEH RUEHPW RUEHSK RUEHSL DE RUEHNE #1668 2221518 ZNR UUUUU ZZH O 101518Z AUG 09 FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7652 INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP COLLECTIVE RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7872 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 3602 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1521 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 6440 RHMCSUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 1780 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 8365
UNCLAS NEW DELHI 001668
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PARM KNNP KN IN
SUBJECT: INDIA DETAINS SUSPICIOUS DPRK VESSEL FOR
INVESTIGATION
UNCLAS NEW DELHI 001668
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PARM KNNP KN IN
SUBJECT: INDIA DETAINS SUSPICIOUS DPRK VESSEL FOR
INVESTIGATION
1. (SBU) The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed
August 8 that the Indian Coast Guard intercepted the
DPRK-flagged merchant vessel MUSAN and detained its 39 crew
members after the vessel unexpectedly dropped anchor off Hut
Bay at Little Andaman Island August 5, failed to respond to
attempts to hail it, and then evaded a Coast Guard patrol
vessel for six hours in the early hours of August 6. The
Coast Guard vessel fired a warning shot to force the MUSAN to
comply with its order to sail to Port Blair. As of August
10, the vessel and its crew were in Coast Guard custody in
Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, while under
investigation by Indian security agencies. The Indian
Government dispatched a special team of officials from the
Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and ARMY intelligence,
including translators, to assist with the investigation.
2. (SBU) Navy Chief Sureesh Mehta reportedly told media
August 9 that the vessel had "no business" being at the
location where it anchored, but that the preliminary
investigation had shown that it was carrying "genuine
merchandise." According to media reports, the ship set sail
from a port in Thailand on July 27 with a cargo of 16,000
tons of sugar. According to Coast Guard contacts, the crew
claimed the vessel was carrying sugar bound for Iraq, but
changed course when it received new instructions to offload
instead in Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh. Media reported August 9
that the ship's captain, Yun Jonge Sun, claimed a mechanical
problem led to its illegal entry of India's territorial
waters.
3. (U) The Times of India August 9 portrayed the incident as
a failure of India's coastal defense and "the most
sensational security breach since the Mumbai attacks". A
front page article claimed that the North Korean vessel went
unnoticed for two days after it dropped anchor. A passenger
on a ferry reportedly spotted the vessel in an isolated
stretch of sea and alerted the ferry captain, who informed
the harbor master, who tipped off the Indian Coast Guard and
the Navy. The article reported that investigators found that
the ship had made several voyages between North Korea and
China without maintaining proper records, as well making an
unscheduled stop in Singapore, though the crew's passports
were not stamped there.
4. (SBU) Post will continue to seek further details.
Regardless of the manner in which the vessel's presence came
to light and the outcome of the on-going investigation, Post
views India's decisive action as a positive sign of its
intention to enforce UNSCR 1874 and its continuing
cooperation on counter-proliferation.
ROEMER
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PARM KNNP KN IN
SUBJECT: INDIA DETAINS SUSPICIOUS DPRK VESSEL FOR
INVESTIGATION
1. (SBU) The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed
August 8 that the Indian Coast Guard intercepted the
DPRK-flagged merchant vessel MUSAN and detained its 39 crew
members after the vessel unexpectedly dropped anchor off Hut
Bay at Little Andaman Island August 5, failed to respond to
attempts to hail it, and then evaded a Coast Guard patrol
vessel for six hours in the early hours of August 6. The
Coast Guard vessel fired a warning shot to force the MUSAN to
comply with its order to sail to Port Blair. As of August
10, the vessel and its crew were in Coast Guard custody in
Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, while under
investigation by Indian security agencies. The Indian
Government dispatched a special team of officials from the
Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and ARMY intelligence,
including translators, to assist with the investigation.
2. (SBU) Navy Chief Sureesh Mehta reportedly told media
August 9 that the vessel had "no business" being at the
location where it anchored, but that the preliminary
investigation had shown that it was carrying "genuine
merchandise." According to media reports, the ship set sail
from a port in Thailand on July 27 with a cargo of 16,000
tons of sugar. According to Coast Guard contacts, the crew
claimed the vessel was carrying sugar bound for Iraq, but
changed course when it received new instructions to offload
instead in Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh. Media reported August 9
that the ship's captain, Yun Jonge Sun, claimed a mechanical
problem led to its illegal entry of India's territorial
waters.
3. (U) The Times of India August 9 portrayed the incident as
a failure of India's coastal defense and "the most
sensational security breach since the Mumbai attacks". A
front page article claimed that the North Korean vessel went
unnoticed for two days after it dropped anchor. A passenger
on a ferry reportedly spotted the vessel in an isolated
stretch of sea and alerted the ferry captain, who informed
the harbor master, who tipped off the Indian Coast Guard and
the Navy. The article reported that investigators found that
the ship had made several voyages between North Korea and
China without maintaining proper records, as well making an
unscheduled stop in Singapore, though the crew's passports
were not stamped there.
4. (SBU) Post will continue to seek further details.
Regardless of the manner in which the vessel's presence came
to light and the outcome of the on-going investigation, Post
views India's decisive action as a positive sign of its
intention to enforce UNSCR 1874 and its continuing
cooperation on counter-proliferation.
ROEMER