Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09NEWDELHI1668
2009-08-10 15:18:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:  

INDIA DETAINS SUSPICIOUS DPRK VESSEL FOR

Tags:  PREL PARM KNNP KN IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO8773
OO RUEHAST RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHNEH RUEHPW RUEHSK RUEHSL
DE RUEHNE #1668 2221518
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 101518Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7652
INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 7872
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 3602
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1521
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 6440
RHMCSUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 1780
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 8365
UNCLAS NEW DELHI 001668 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PARM KNNP KN IN
SUBJECT: INDIA DETAINS SUSPICIOUS DPRK VESSEL FOR
INVESTIGATION

UNCLAS NEW DELHI 001668 SENSITIVE SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PREL PARM KNNP KN IN SUBJECT: INDIA DETAINS SUSPICIOUS DPRK VESSEL FOR INVESTIGATION ¶1. (SBU) The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) confirmed August 8 that the Indian Coast Guard intercepted the DPRK-flagged merchant vessel MUSAN and detained its 39 crew members after the vessel unexpectedly dropped anchor off Hut Bay at Little Andaman Island August 5, failed to respond to attempts to hail it, and then evaded a Coast Guard patrol vessel for six hours in the early hours of August 6. The Coast Guard vessel fired a warning shot to force the MUSAN to comply with its order to sail to Port Blair. As of August 10, the vessel and its crew were in Coast Guard custody in Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, while under investigation by Indian security agencies. The Indian Government dispatched a special team of officials from the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and Army intelligence, including translators, to assist with the investigation. ¶2. (SBU) Navy Chief Sureesh Mehta reportedly told media August 9 that the vessel had "no business" being at the location where it anchored, but that the preliminary investigation had shown that it was carrying "genuine merchandise." According to media reports, the ship set sail from a port in Thailand on July 27 with a cargo of 16,000 tons of sugar. According to Coast Guard contacts, the crew claimed the vessel was carrying sugar bound for Iraq, but changed course when it received new instructions to offload instead in Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh. Media reported August 9 that the ship's captain, Yun Jonge Sun, claimed a mechanical problem led to its illegal entry of India's territorial waters. ¶3. (U) The Times of India August 9 portrayed the incident as a failure of India's coastal defense and "the most sensational security breach since the Mumbai attacks". A front page article claimed that the North Korean vessel went unnoticed for two days after it dropped anchor. A passenger on a ferry reportedly spotted the vessel in an isolated stretch of sea and alerted the ferry captain, who informed the harbor master, who tipped off the Indian Coast Guard and the Navy. The article reported that investigators found that the ship had made several voyages between North Korea and China without maintaining proper records, as well making an unscheduled stop in Singapore, though the crew's passports were not stamped there. ¶4. (SBU) Post will continue to seek further details. Regardless of the manner in which the vessel's presence came to light and the outcome of the on-going investigation, Post views India's decisive action as a positive sign of its intention to enforce UNSCR 1874 and its continuing cooperation on counter-proliferation. ROEMER

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -