U.S.-INDIAN RELATIONS: NEXT STEPS IN THE STRATEGIC

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 NEW DELHI 001649


STATE FOR P (WEST),SCA (BLAKE/OWEN),SCA/INSB (MAHONEY),NSC FOR
GOEL

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL MASS ENRG EFIN CVIS AMGT IN
SUBJECT: U.S.-INDIAN RELATIONS: NEXT STEPS IN THE STRATEGIC
DIALOGUE


1. SUMMARY: (SBU) Following on the August 5 Interagency Policy
Committee meeting to discuss the Strategic Dialogue, Mission offers
its views on next steps in the run up to the Prime Minister's
November visit. We spell out dialogue goals, describe ways to move
forward, flag pitfalls and propose potential deliverables. End
summary.

TURNING THE STRATEGIC DIALOGUE INTO ACTION
--------------


2. (SBU) The U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue announced during
Secretary Clinton's July visit to India highlights the areas we will
focus on to broaden and deepen our strategic partnership. Turning
what is in essence a broad outline into specific action items will
depend on our ability to work with the Government of India to make
existing talks productive and get new dialogues off the ground. One
of the biggest across-the-board constraints we face in the short
term is the lack of funding for activities. We will be seeking
support and resources from parent agencies, but the time before the
Prime Minister's visit is short. The Government of India will judge
our seriousness about the Strategic Dialogue in part by our ability
to match funds that can build real partnerships. In this context,
we need to recognize that while we may seek to incorporate into the
dialogues existing plans for bilateral cooperative programs that
would be launched during this period, we run the risk that the GOI
will hesitate to endorse projects that were not developed through
the bilateral dialogue process, or view "repackaging" of
pre-existing projects as lack of U.S. commitment. We also note that
1) science and technology; 2) women's empowerment; and, 3)
development partnerships are cross-cutting themes in many of the
pillars and need to be consistently addressed in the interagency.

STRATEGIC DIALOGUE: THE NEXT FOUR MONTHS
--------------


3. (SBU)

-- STRATEGIC COOPERATION

Strategic Security Dialogue (SSD): This dialogue addresses India's
strategic weapons program (such as risk reduction measures with
Pakistan),explores areas of nonproliferation cooperation (such as
port security),and gains bilateral coordination on global
nonproliferation issues (such as Fissile Material Cutoff Treaty and
CTBT). The first Strategic Security Dialogue meeting should meet in
early fall 2009 prior to PM Singh's November 24 visit. After
conversations with MEA, the GOI leans towards holding the meetings
in Washington or New York on the margins of UNGA because of the
likely sensitivity of early discussion of issues like
nonproliferation. MEA is also determining who will represent the
GOI because Additional Secretary Katju is moving on to a new
position. The goal of the meeting would be to produce a joint
statement underlining areas of agreement on nonproliferation issues.
Post will also renew its efforts to encourage India to accept a
team to discuss the Secure Freight Initiative/Megaports this fall.


Global and Regional Security Dialogues: This dialogue will focus on
foreign policy issues in South and Southwest Asia, including
Afghanistan-Pakistan and Iran, the Gulf, Indian Ocean and East Asia
including China. Special Representative Holbrooke plans to visit
Delhi in mid-August, if schedules allow. Post supports the MEA's
interest in arranging meetings with Assistant Secretary for East
Asia and Pacific Affairs Kurt Campbell and Special Advisor to the
President and NSC Senior Director Dennis Ross. These meetings could
take place on the margins of other multilateral meetings or the MEA
would consider hosting these visits in Delhi in the next several
months.

Global Issues Forum: The last meeting of the Global Issues Forum
took place in New Delhi in 2008. The Forum is designed to
coordinate U.S. and Indian views on multilateral issues such as the
promotion of democracy, health, environmental protection and human
rights. No date has been set yet for another Forum meeting. The
MEA will provide us with suggested dates in the near future. Post
flags that efforts to promote a publicly coordinated approach to
governance in a third country will have to be carefully handled
because of GOI sensitivities on sovereignty issues.

Defense Policy Group Dialogue: This annual set of dialogues and
working groups focuses on military-to military cooperation,
including training, cooperative operations, doctrinal development
and military sales. The Defense Policy Group (DPG) meeting in Delhi
November 2-3 will seek agreement on humanitarian assistance and

NEW DELHI 00001649 002 OF 007


disaster relief operations, information sharing, maritime security
cooperation through combined operations, repatriation of remains of
U.S. service members, expanded multilateral exercises, and the
signing of two remaining foundational documents regarding
communications equipment interoperability (CISMOA) and logistics
support (LSA). The MEA and Indian MOD are currently consulting on
the GOI agenda for the meetings. The Defense Procurement Policy
Group (DPPG) meeting the week before will be focused on a range of
military hardware sales. Agreement in July on End Use Monitoring
language in Letters of Offer and Acceptance will boost this effort.

Joint Working Group on Counterterrorism: This existing bilateral
mechanism to coordinate counterterrorism efforts has been focused
post-Mumbai on intelligence and law enforcement cooperation and
increased training. A proposed visit by Home Minister Chidambaram
in September (tentative window September 8-13) will facilitate
greater cooperation. The MEA pledged to provide Post with a list of
the specific areas of cooperation the GOI wants to pursue. Post
will encourage GOI participation in a U.S.-sponsored regional CT
conference in Bangladesh in September and the regional conference on
informal money transfers (hawala) scheduled for Mumbai in early FY

2010. The MEA pledged to provide Post with a list of the specific
areas of cooperation the GOI wants to pursue.

High Technology Cooperation Group: This existing dialogue has added
working groups on civil aviation, civil nucler, and strategic
trade. The Group focuses on cooperative steps to create economic,
legal and structural environments for successful trade in high
technology goods and controlled dual-use technologies. According to
the MEA, a full HTCG plenary may not be possible until December, but
the biotech working group should meet on August 26 and the MEA hopes
for discussions on strategic trade in September. Potential
deliverables in the dialogue include several focused trade missions,
resolution of a long-standing dispute over licensing of the export
of zirconium technology, and a discussion of the results of a
top-to-bottom review of the entities list and time bound action
plans from each of the existing and new working groups.

Specific trade promotion initiatives under the HTCG include: a
Commerce Aerospace Supplier Development Trade Mission, November
2009; a Civil Nuclear delegation, December 2009; a USA Pavilion at
Aviation Expo, March 2010; and a Medical Technology Trade Mission,
March 2010. These events are designed to establish new commercial
and joint venture partnerships between U.S. and Indian firms,
especially SMEs. In addition, the events will be used to engage in
policy and regulatory roundtables to offer U.S. ideas on reforms
that will increase bilateral trade and investment and economic
growth. Promising Working Group Action Plans resulting from the
Plenary will focus on cooperating in the development of India's
general and business aviation industry and increased clarity on
India's medical devices and drug regulations, and implementation of
IPR provisions to control counterfeit and spurious drugs.

Information and Communications Technology Dialogue: The purpose of
the ICT Working Group is to serve as a public-private forum to
facilitate bilateral trade and investment in information technology,
telecommunications, and media and broadcasting. It works well --
for both sides. From the U.S. perspective, it has helped persuade
the GOI to increase in the level of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
in the telecommunications sector from 49 to 74 percent; to
liberalize VoIP services, to permit Mobile Virtual Network Operators
and allow competitive carrier selection; eliminate the Access
Deficit Charge on the provision of international long distance
services and move forward with plans for a 3G auction. The GOI
proposed the next WG for September. The MEA has also raised whether
a cyber security dialogue should be incorporated into the ICT. Due
to the delay in confirmation of the U.S. lead, we understand the USG
preference may be to hold the next ICT WG in New Delhi in December
in connection with a trade show. It is not clear to Post whether
this has been communicated officially to the Embassy. Post would
welcome EEB/CIP views on potential deliverables. Real progress on
the 3G auction would be one.

-- ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Energy Dialogue: MEA described this pillar to us as "the star of
the dialogue process." The purpose of this dialogue has been to
facilitate the deployment of clean, low-carbon energy technologies,
promote increased clean energy trade and investment, enhance mutual
energy security, and advance our non-proliferation goals, including
the safe use of nuclear power. This has been one of the most robust
and successful of the ongoing dialogues and has spawned a separate
Dialogue on Global Climate Change.


NEW DELHI 00001649 003 OF 007



Moving forward, the Energy Dialogue will continue to expand private
sector participation to promote a green economic recovery, seek to
engage in transformational activities such as carbon capture and
storage (CCS),and place an increased emphasis on civil nuclear
power, renewables, and clean coal technologies as well as energy
efficiency. Several USTDA and Commerce initiatives actively support
Energy Dialogue cooperation priorities. The Steering Committee (SC)
held its last meeting in April 2008 in New Delhi during a week when
all four non-nuclear WGs held meetings. It is the United States'
turn to host the next meeting. The SC has historically met on an
almost annual basis but there is no fixed schedule. The five
Working Groups meet twice a year to chart progress, discuss and
launch new activities and engage in policy dialogue.

a. Power and Energy Efficiency WG. The WG last met in April 2008 in
New Delhi. It is likely the next meeting will be held in New Delhi
this November in conjunction with the Nov. 16-17 Energy Efficiency
Conference and Trade Mission cosponsored by DOE, USAID, Commerce,
India's Ministry of Power, USIBC, CII, and others. Actions could
include: an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle feasibility
study; R&D cooperation on an R&D technology center; an exchange
program with India's Ministry of the Environment and Forests and
DOE's NETL; and India joining the International Partnership for
Energy Efficiency Cooperation (IPEEC).

b. Oil and Gas Working Group. This WG last met in April 2008 in New
Delhi although there was also a Ministry of Petroleum and Natural
Gas (MPNG) Secretary visit to DOE in the spring of 2009. The next
WG has not yet been scheduled. Actions could include: a Roundtable
on Increasing U.S. Participation in India's Upstream Oil and Gas
Sector; additional cooperation on methane hydrates; USTDA grants to
introduce advanced safety, inspection and maintenance technologies
in India's refinery sector; a USTDA grant to promote oil rig safety
and spill avoidance; India's participation in the October 2009 IEA
Ministerial, including the IPEEC and steps towards coordinating its
strategic petroleum reserve within the IEA emergency response
framework.


c. Coal WG. The WG last met in April 2008 and is expected to meet
in the fall, likely in the United States. Actions could include:
an MOU between DOE's NETL and India's Central Institute for Mining
and Fuel Research on underground coal gasification; dry coal
beneficiation programs; cooperation on assessment of reserves and
enhanced energy recovery; a USTDA-funded grant with Reliance for a
feasibility study and pilot project for co-processing of lignite and
refinery bottoms to produce high grade liquid fuel in Gujarat; and a
USEPA/USTDA Coal Mine/Coal bed Methane Clearinghouse to encourage
the recovery and utilization of coal mine methane.

d. New Technology/Renewable WG. The WG last met in April 2009.
Plans are underway for a September meeting; DOE staff will visit
Delhi in August to lay the groundwork. The MEA has stressed the
importance of the working group "thinking big," particularly in the
areas of solar energy and biofuels, with solar being a top priority
for the Singh government with huge potential for public benefit and
a strong funding commitment from the GOI. The GOI is keeping a
close eye on our Strategic and Economic Dialogue with China to
determine whether India is receiving similar treatment. Actions
could include: next steps on Biofuels MOU; possible MOU on advanced
solar development; DOE/Commerce plans for a February 2010 Solar
Energy Trade mission; a possible Wind energy MOU; exchanges in
municipal waste and waste-to energy; demo geothermal projects with
DOE's Oak Ridge National Lab; promotion of zero energy buildings and
communities; and India taking steps to be an "active partner" in
President Obama's renewable energy initiatives. India's Minister of
Renewable Energy plans to visit the United State in the fall.


e. Civil Nuclear WG. The WG last met at DOE's Idaho Lab in April

2009. The next meeting is planned for the week of December 14, 2009
in Mumbai. In order for India's 123 Agreement to become effective,
it needs to declare those civilian facilities it will make subject
to IAEA safeguards. These actions will open the door to deeper U.S.
commercial and scientific engagement, with India and DOE is engaging
India on these issues. The goal of the December meeting is to
complete an Action Plan to guide further collaboration in areas such
as: materials for high temperature reactors; passive safety features
in reactor design; TRISO fuel development; nuclear hydrogen
generation technologies; and fusion energy research. DOE is also
seeking to expand cooperation on nuclear and radiological security.
In order to promote opportunities for U.S. firms in India's nuclear
power sector, the GOI needs to notify Parliament of the designation

NEW DELHI 00001649 004 OF 007


of two nuclear parks where U.S. firms could build nuclear power
plants; it has already designated parks for France and Russia. U.S.
nuclear suppliers also insist that India ratify the Convention on
Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage before they do
business in India, which may take place in the next session of
Parliament. Finally, U.S. technology transfer requirements may
impact business development.

Global Climate Change Dialogue: This new dialogue is designed to
intensify collaboration on combating climate change by fostering
increased cooperation in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and
promoting sustainable, efficient, low-carbon development. The GOI
considers the meeting between Special Envoys Stern and Saran on July
21 as the first meeting of the dialogue, but are looking forward to
a continuing conversation. The MEA leans to having at least one
meeting in conjunction with the Energy Dialogue. Post recommends
establishing an Indo-U.S. Partnership for Climate Change Cooperation
to be funded jointly by both countries as a climate change
deliverable for President Obama's meeting with PM Singh.
Encompassing all aspects of climate change cooperation, the
partnership would serve as an umbrella for a wide range of projects
and programs such as agricultural research, renewable energy
projects, cultural exchanges, and black carbon reduction through use
of efficient cook stoves. In order to meet a compressed deliverable
deadline, initial USG funding for the partnership could be in the
range of a relatively modest USD 5 million in FY2010 to be matched
by GOI funding. As USG funding for climate change ramps up in out
years, the Indo-U.S. Partnership for Climate Change Cooperation
could serve as an already established vehicle to promote bilateral
interests under the Global Climate Change Dialogue. USAID will
support the Dialogue goals of reducing the negative impacts of
climate change through innovations in clean and renewable energy,
agriculture, and better environmental impact analysis. In the
short-term, USAID will launch: 1) a 6 MW solar project in Andaman
and Nicobar (October 2009); and a private sector loan guarantee for
a 25 MW biomass power plant in Maharashtra (September 2009). Two
additional opportunities to further develop the climate change
dialogue with India ahead of the Singh visit are: 1) Minister of
Environment and Forests Jairam Ramesh plans to travel to New York to
attend the September 22 UN Climate Change Conference and requested
meetings with S/E Stern in Washington the same week, and 2) the GOI
has invited Energy Secretary Chu to attend the "Delhi High Level
Conference & Exposition on Climate Change: Technology Development
and Transfer" October 22-23. Post recommends an early decision on
his participation. If Secretary Chu is unable to attend, we quickly
should identify appropriate USG representation.

-- EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Education Dialogue: The dialogue will focus on the desire of both
nations to prepare coming generations for the knowledge economies of
the future and to address issues of shared priority, with
participation from government, educators and the private sector. No
date has been set yet for the first Dialogue meeting. The MEA would
welcome a visit from the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and
Public Affairs before November. MEA reports Human Resources
Development Minister Kapil Sibal will not be able to engage on the
education issue bilaterally until January because of his
responsibility to shepherd an education bill through the Indian
Parliament in November-December. Activities within this dialogue
could include: cooperation in the development and support of the
Higher Education Council under the aegis of our existing bilateral
U.S.-India Education (Fulbright) Foundation to connect U.S. and
Indian universities; convening of an Education meeting at the time
of the annual U.S.-India CEO Forum to explore partnerships
supporting U.S.-India education programs, including the use of
corporate offset programs to promote cooperation; and enhancing the
2008 Fulbright-Nehru agreement to support direct university to
university partnerships and faculty development in priority fields
for the bilateral relationship. Potential deliverables could
include establishing a joint USD 10 million (USD 5 million each)
fund to support university linkages and junior faculty development
in areas of shared priority, additional USD 2 million (USD 1 million
each) in funding for Fulbright exchanges, and proposed private
contributions to Fulbright exchanges. USAID would strongly support
basic education being included within the Dialogue to improve the
quality and relevance of education for India's marginalized children
and youth. In the short-term, USAID plans to launch a new Education
and Skill Development for Disadvantaged Program (October 2009) and
fund research into the variables determining school dropouts and the
development of "pilot" projects to address this major drag on
India's development (October 2009).

Women's Empowerment Dialogue: This new dialogue led on the U.S.

NEW DELHI 00001649 005 OF 007


side by Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's Issues is designed to
foster relationships with the government and civil society on common
interests involving women. No date has been set yet for the first
Dialogue meeting. The MEA is working with the Ministry of Women and
Child Development to get a sense of the Ministry's plans for
co-chairing this dialogue. USAID can support the Dialogue in its
efforts to address gender inequalities in India through promoting
transparent policies and legal frameworks that protect the rights of
women. To this end, USAID will be launching a new Rule of Law and
Reproductive Health Program for Women (October 2009).

-- ECONOMICS, TRADE AND AGRICULTURE

U.S.-India Economic Dialogue: This was conceived as the umbrella
mechanism under which the other economic dialogues would be
coordinated. There has been no stand-alone meeting under this
dialogue for a number of years. Post recommends that Principals and
deputies (when possible post-confirmation) meet early to
reinvigorate and set priorities for all the economic dialogues. The
MEA is also interested in reactivating the discussions. Along these
lines, one issue Washington agencies need to determine is whether or
not Commerce still wants to pursue its Commercial Dialogue, which we
understand was not included within the new Strategic Dialogue
structure.

Trade Policy Forum: The purpose of the Forum is to reduce and
remove barriers to bilateral investment and trade. The Forum has
largely succeeded at getting the right players to the table from
both the USG and GOI sides - except in the agricultural sector where
we are concerned that the GOI is not taking seriously our requests
for an Agriculture Focus Group dialogue at the appropriate level.
Achievements have been a mixed bag, and progress has waned since the
TPF last met in February 2008. There has been some progress on IPR.
The first round of bilateral investment treaty negotiations takes
place in New Delhi in early August. The GOI, however, did not
address any of the tariff concerns in its recent budget that we had
raised and, despite hopes that the new government would take action,
the insurance law was not taken up during the summer parliament
session. We will work to encourage Minister of Industry and
Commerce Sharma to accompany Prime Minister Singh in November in
order to convene a TPF with Ambassador Kirk. We look to utilize the
upcoming visit of DUSTR Marantis to encourage a November TPF and to
establish a tentative agenda for the TPF so both sides can work to
lay the groundwork for real progress. Holding the TPF itself could
be seen as a deliverable. We would encourage USG TPF participants
to identify any potential policy successes that could be announced
during the PM's visit, including progress on the afore-mentioned
issues and or other initiatives that could enhance bilateral
cooperation generally and in specific sectors.

Finance and Economic Forum: The purpose of the FEF is to provide a
forum for bilateral discussion of economic and financial sector
regulatory issues, and from the USG perspective, to encourage India
to be a constructive and responsible player in global financial
fora. This forum is considered by both sides to be an effective
dialogue. It has also achieved some success in improving a level
playing field for American financial firms. Treasury has proposed to
add macroeconomic issues to the FEF to broaden our bilateral
engagement to the full range of current discussions that occur
within the G20 process. In addition to infrequent senior-level
meetings, the FEF regularly includes technical-level exchanges every
year between the United States and India on issues affecting the
banking, securities, commodities, insurance, and pension markets, as
well as financial regulatory matters facing U.S. firms doing
business in India. The next meeting is proposed for late October

2009. The MEA is looking at dates. Possible deliverables could be
assurances of progress in the Indian insurance, banking, and pension
sectors promoting greater liberalization, bilateral technical
cooperation on regulatory matters, and identification of common
objectives in the G-20 Finance Ministers agenda.

CEO Forum: The purpose of the CEO Forum is to provide senior-level
private sector input to the U.S.-India economic relationship through
recommendations for action by each government to improve the
bilateral trade and investment relationship. The CEO forum has been
very successful at getting senior-level MNC private sector and
government officials together. The follow-through on these
recommendations has been limited and some private sector
participants have criticized the government participants for
dominating the proceedings with speeches - and not following through
on recommendations. The CEO Forum has not been as effective in
providing a voice for SMEs and its current composition is seen as
heavy on the financial services sector. The GOI has recommended
that CEO Chair and Forum membership be reconstituted before the next

NEW DELHI 00001649 006 OF 007


meeting. While ordinarily the CEO Forum has been held in September
in New York on the margins of the UN General Assembly, we understand
that timing could be difficult this year due to NSC's concurrent
involvement in the G-20 meetings in September in Pittsburgh and
possible delays in reconstituting the Forum under new USG
requirements for Forum membership. The CEO Forum should strive to
meet either ahead of the PM's visit - so that recommendations could
be presented during the visit - or use the visit to jump-start a
revitalized CEO Forum with mechanisms to ensure follow-through on
recommendations.

Agriculture Dialogue: The Dialogue aims to develop a productive,
internationally competitive and diversified agriculture sector in
India that maximizes opportunities for food security, poverty
alleviation and income generation. To this objective in the
short-term, relevant USG agencies and departments will: sign a
Memorandum of Understanding with National Horticulture Mission of
the Ministry of Agriculture (September, 2009); launch the
Revitalizing Education for Agriculture Development Program with U.S.
and Indian universities (October 2009); convene a seminar between
bodies regulating international standards and Indian partners as
part of the Indian Horticulture Knowledge Network (November 2009);
release the first biotechnology crop - eggplant (March 2010); and
sign a new bilateral Agriculture Project Agreement with GOI
(September 2010); identify new opportunities for expanding the
prestigious Norman Borlaug Fellowship program (September 2009) and
co-host a seminar with the Indian private sector on international
norms (UN/CODEX) for food safety standards (August 2009).

In the long-term, this assistance will alleviate hunger; improve
agricultural productivity; improve soil and water resource
management; and, improve the flow of goods and services through
strengthened value chains. To achieve these ambitious results,
there will need to be a major increase in funding for USAID and USDA
agricultural programs. There is a concern that the Indian Council
for Agriculture Research, which manages India's research and
education agenda, may try to orient the science, technology and
education working group solely towards pure agricultural research.
Next steps at Post include development ("flesh on the bones") of the
five key working groups: a) Farm-to-Market Links; b) Regional and
Global Food Security Cooperation; c) Science, Technology and
Education; d) Environmental Sustainability; and e) Rural Financial
Systems (i.e. rural savings, credit, insurance and micro-finance).
The MEA will be exploring with Post possible dates in
September-October for an invitation to the Under Secretary of State
for Economic, Energy and Agricultural Affairs to visit India and
begin discussions. The MEA is also interested in inviting Secretary
Vilsack to India and will look for dates.

-- SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, HEALTH AND INNOVATION
Science and Technology Dialogue: The Dialogue will assist in
harnessing the great potential for S&T collaboration between the
U.S. and India in areas of scientific endeavor ranging from outer
space to nanotechnology. A cornerstone of this collaboration is the
recently signed Indo-U.S. S&T Endowment, a highly visible vehicle
intended to boost bilateral cooperation efforts. While we do not
envision a major S&T Endowment deliverable for the Singh visit, it
is imperative that the Endowment rapidly become fully functional.
Both countries are in the process of filling the 18 member Endowment
Board with qualified individuals from government, academia and the
private sector. Ideally, the President and PM would be able to
refer to the constitution of the Board as tangible demonstration of
progress in S&T cooperation.
Health Dialogue: This dialogue will allow for greater cooperation on
health issues between the U.S. and GOI. No date has been set yet
for the first Dialogue meeting, but the MEA is interested in getting
the dialogue going as soon as possible. Currently, the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services maintains 10 bilateral
agreements with the Ministries of Health and Family Welfare and
Science and Technology, through its agencies: National Institutes of
Health (NIH),Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). HHS's key objectives are to
conduct and promote collaboration in the areas of science and
technology, health sciences, product safety, and public health
programs. Working with academia, government, civic society, and
industrial partners, HHS's objectives are realized through "Four D's
of Global Health, which involves focus on Discovery, Development,
Delivery, and (health) Diplomacy". Two possible deliverables from
HHS are: 1) establishment of a Global Disease Detection (GDD)
program with the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare by CDC. The
GDD program will promote collaborations in emerging infectious
diseases, influenza, zoonotic diseases, influenza, laboratory
systems strengthening, and communication; and 2) establishment of a
bilateral agreement with the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

NEW DELHI 00001649 007 OF 007


on cancer bioinformatics by NIH. The agreement will allow
collaboration in detection, treatment, and prevention of cancers
using information exchange via electronic grid that connects Indian
and U.S. cancer specialists. HHS/NIH will host four Joint Working
Group meetings with the Ministries of Health and Family Welfare and
Science and Technology during the week of November 16, 2009 which
can be highlighted during the Prime Minister's visit. USAID's goal
in support of the Health Dialogue is to assist the Government of
India (GOI) in achieving the health Millennium Development Goals.
In the near term to support the Health Dialogue, USAID will launch a
new Health of the Urban Poor Program (October 2009).

ROEMER