Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
09MEXICO896 | 2009-03-26 15:37:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Mexico |
1. (SBU) SUMMARY: The U.S. plan announced March 24 to reinforce security at its southwest border was largely praised by officials in Mexico. The Foreign Secretary said the move hailed a new period of cooperation between the two countries, and the leader of the Senate indicated that it sends a very positive signal. Scattered criticism of the measures was registered by opposition legislators and some independent security analysts, who opined that they were insufficient. In some cases it was noted that they represented a further "militarization" of the U.S. southern border; others commented that long term economic growth in Mexico was the answer to Mexico's crime problem. Most coverage and commentary noted the U.S. announcement came in the advent of the visit by Secretary of State Clinton. END SUMMARY. 2. (SBU) GOM reaction and comments from members of the political class have been generally positive -- notwithstanding some partisan sniping from expected quarters. Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa told reporters that she welcomed the measures as a "sign of a new era of cooperation," and lauded the USG's recognition of the anti-crime efforts being undertaken by President Calderon. She also noted "the determination of both governments to stamp out the trafficking of weapons, chemical precursors and cash from the United States to Mexico." National Action Party (PAN) Senate President Gustavo Madero echoed her positive comments, saying the new border plan "sends a magnificent signal." While not addressing the effort directly, President Calderon reiterated in a broadcast interview the night of the announcement that the U.S. needed to do more to curb arms and money flows across the border into Mexico, but said he was optimistic about a changed U.S. attitude toward narcotics trafficking and its impact in both countries. 3. (SBU) Ivan Rodrigo Cortes, Foreign Policy Advisor for PAN Senator Adriana Gonzalez, described the U.S. announcement on additional resources to fight organized crime on the U.S. border to Poloff as "positive" and a "good sign" in connection with the visit of Secretary Clinton. Cortes hoped the U.S. would complement its stepped up law enforcement measures with strengthened efforts to fight the demand for drugs in the U.S. and attack the flow of drug money, which he described as at the root of the problem. Mexico for its part needed to do more to address the social needs of its population and create greater economic opportunities. The Institutional Revolution Party (PRI) described the announcement in generally positive terms, especially in the area of greater intelligence-sharing. One PRI Deputy we contacted, however, bristled at what he perceived as a link drawn by DHS Secretary Napolitano between illegal immigration and the threat of terrorism. 4. (SBU) Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) Diputado Cuauhtemoc Sandoval, who is affiliated with the more radical faction of the party, told Poloff that, while he supported attempts to stop arms trafficking from the U.S., he believed it was an error to militarize the border, and reiterated his opposition to "building walls between the two countries." Instead, the focus should be on economic development to increase employment in Mexico. Without an increase in economic activity, unemployed youth would be drawn into the drug trade. In the meantime, he emphasized the need for Mexico to combat corruption, including making the Secretaria de la Funcion Publica (akin to an Inspector General) completely autonomous from the executive branch. 5. (SBU) Some worried that an increased law enforcement presence along the border would be harmful to undocumented migrants. Cecile Lumer, director of a migrant resource center in the State of Sonora, asserted that an increase in agents in Arizona could lead to more human rights abuses. However, others praised the approach to be more strategic in combating drugs and violence. 6. (SBU) COMMENT: The generally favorable reaction to the plan, and absence for the most part of angry rhetoric about militarizing the border, is an indication that most in Mexico agree that the situation is grave and desire to see the USG take stronger measures to combat the illicit arms trade they believe fuels Mexico's drug war. Commentators also believed MEXICO 00000896 002 OF 002 that Secretary Clinton's visit in the aftermath of the announcement would result in even deeper cooperation on security matters between the two countries. END COMMENT. Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity and the North American Partnership Blog at http://www.intelink.gov/communities/state/nap / BASSETT |