Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
09LJUBLJANA68 | 2009-03-13 17:27:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Ljubljana |
VZCZCXYZ0000 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHLJ #0068/01 0721727 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 131727Z MAR 09 FM AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7214 INFO RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC |
C O N F I D E N T I A L LJUBLJANA 000068 |
1. (C) CDA discussed with Slovenian Minister of Economy Matej Lahovnik on March 11 the Global Economic Crisis, Slovenia's economic position, and opportunities for U.S. investments in Slovenia. CDA urged Slovenia, as part of the EU, to address the financial vulnerabilities in Central and Eastern Europe (Ref C). CDA reiterated that the U.S. is committed to working with our international partners to address the financial shocks faced by countries requiring assistance. Lahovnik talked about Slovenia's dependence on its export markets, calling the situation in foreign markets "devastating" due to the global economic crisis. He expressed concern that liquidity could become a problem in Slovenia as soon as May or June if banks do not start lending again. He stressed the desire of the Slovenian Government to diversify energy sources and routes, and invited U.S. companies to invest in Slovenia - especially if they can help Slovenia meet the goal of diversifying energy. He admitted that Slovenia would likely fail in its effort to gain 51 percent ownership of the Slovenian portion of the proposed South Stream gas pipeline. It would likely settle for a 50% share, but would wait to sign until after a feasibility study is completed before signing. He stated that Slovenia would scrupulously observe EU rules regarding transparency and competitiveness in its dealings with Gazprom. End summary. Energy -------------------------- 2. (C) Lahovnik agreed that, although Slovenia weathered the January gas crisis well, it must ensure diversity of sources and routes. According to Lahovnik, "What arms were in the past, energy is in the future." He commented that Slovenia is taking a conservative approach to South Stream. He stated that both sides needed to resolve many open issues, and that a feasibility study should be done before Slovenia signs anything. While still publicly maintaining the position that Slovenia will not sign on for less than 51%, Lahovnik admitted that it will probably settle for 50%, but will insist that Slovenia gets to appoint the project General Manager. Lahovnik noted that the state will maintain ownership of Slovenia,s share, because dubious private investors could give Russia de facto majority control. He answered CDA that any deal that is signed with Gazprom would strictly follow EU rules on, for example, transparency and competitiveness. He said it is important that the EU speak with one voice, and Slovenia will not break ranks. He believes that Hungary, Bulgaria and Greece were too hasty in signing, and the European Commission could act against them because of it. 3. (SBU) CDA pushed Lahovnik to consider U.S. companies to invest in Slovenian power, suggesting U.S. companies that have expressed interest in Slovenia's coal, nuclear and natural gas industries. Lahovnik was especially interested in bringing GE Energy together with an aging power plant in Trbovlje. Trbovlje is rapidly running out of capacity to efficiently generate electricity from coal, but proximity to Ljubljana makes it desirable to maintain if an outside investor can figure out how to update the facility. (Note: Post arranged a meeting between GE Energy and Trbovlje in September 2008, and continues to contact both GE Energy and Trbovlje to follow-up. End Note.) Lahovnik also confirmed that a second unit will be constructed at the existing nuclear plant in Krsko in the uncertain future. Westinghouse will almost certainly be invited to bid on the project, but Lahovnik did not indicate when it would move forward. 4. (C) The Minister said that Slovenia is very interested in Nabucco, but has qualms. He expressed doubts that it would be able to tap sufficient sources due to restrictions on trade with Iran, and Russian influence over the Caspian Basin countries. He stated: "Nabucco is just wishful thinking for now." He discussed Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), wistfully saying that it would have been the best, most eco-friendly way to diversify. He conceded, however, that it will not happen in Slovenia because the government would be unable to overcome the strong local opposition to installing LNG terminals on the coast. Liquidity could run out by May -------------------------- 5. (C) Slovenia is hurt by the global recession, but Lahovnik was matter-of-fact about the economic future. He explained that 70 percent of Slovenia,s GDP derives from exports, so Slovenia,s prosperity is directly tied to the prosperity of its European trading partners. Lahovnik said global economic recovery depends on the quick recovery of the U.S. economy, but in his opinion it will take time for the measures passed by the Obama administration to have an impact. He claimed the markets are not realistic, expecting too much, too soon from the U.S. stimulus packages. Instead, the world should look to improvements in 2010. Acknowledging that confidence was an issue, he echoed the words of Minister of Finance Krizanic (ref A): "Everyone is overreacting to the situation." 6. (C) Lahovnik reviewed Slovenian measures to counter the financial crisis, mentioning two packages the Government has adopted with the goal of keeping Slovenia competitive on the global market. Lahovnik asserted that the conservative approach of Slovenia,s state-owned banks "proved to be the right thing." In the years leading up to the crisis, Slovenian banks avoided sub-prime lending, credit default swaps and other risky financial offerings that had gotten other countries' banks into such trouble. He views the EU plan as a toolbox, and Slovenia should only use the tools that are most appropriate for Slovenia. He said the three most important "tools" for Slovenia are: 1) reducing taxes on the labor force, 2) subsidizing reduced work hours, and 3) increasing investment in research and development. He pointed out that the third tool is designed to keep Slovenia competitive in the long-term. He noted that Slovenia's ability to fund these projects is restricted by Maastricht criteria (the budget deficit limit of three percent of GDP). He left the door open to possibly increasing the budget deficit to fund projects should the crisis deepen. 7. (C) Lahovnik said that due to the "devastating situation in foreign markets," banks are reluctant to lend. As a result, liquidity could become a problem in Slovenia as soon as May or June. Lahovnik reiterated that Slovenian banks are strong and have no toxic assets; the problem is in lack of confidence, even in interbank lending. Although most of Slovenia,s trade is with Western Europe, Russia - especially the greater Moscow region - is also an important trading partner. Lahovnik he is even more concerned about a possible devaluation of the ruble that would reduce demand for Slovenian goods. He also emphasized concern about the liquidity situation in Croatia (27% of Slovenian FDI is in Croatia.) 8. (U) Another concern for Slovenia is the auto industry. Cars and car parts make up Slovenia's biggest exports, and the 90 companies in the industry employ roughly 13,000 people. Lahovnik noted that Slovenia is anxiously watching the special meeting in Brussels about how to deal with General Motors and it's affiliates. The largest automotive company in Slovenia is Revoz, which sells cars exclusively to Renault; Lahovnik stated that Renault is still doing fine, which is good for Slovenia. Comment -------------------------- 9. (C) Lahovnik, like other senior government officials dealing with the Global Economic Crisis, starts with the position that "Slovenia is a small and open economy," and thus is both anti-protectionist and limited in its choice of tools. He claims to be a strong proponent of foreign direct investment, albeit with a bias toward greenfield investments. Lahovnik explained with pride that he personally fought to bring in Renault when he was Minister of Economy for just six months in 2004. According to Lahovnik, he battled former Prime Minister Janez Jansa, who argued against large-scale foreign investments. The Minister of Economics boasted that Renault is now the biggest manufacturer in Slovenia. He agreed to meet with new U.S. companies interested in investing in Slovenia, and requested that EmbOffs also meet again with the Director General of the Energy Directorate (who reports directly to Lahovnik). FREDEN |