UNAMID LEADERSHIP WARY OF JEM'S RISE

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KHARTOUM 000651

DEPT FOR SE GRATION, S/USSES, AF A/S CARSON, AF/C
NSC FOR MGAVIN
DEPT PLS PASS USAID FOR AFR/SUDAN
ADDIS ABABA ALSO FOR USAU

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL KPKO SOCI ASEC AU UNSC SU CD
SUBJECT: UNAMID LEADERSHIP WARY OF JEM'S RISE


1. (SBU) Summary: The Justice and Equality Movement's (JEM)
Doha-talks monopoly has created a peace process that guarantees war,
as JEM seeks to destroy or co-opt all rival factions, UNAMID JSR
Rodolphe Adada and Political Affairs Chief Abdul Mohammed told CDA
Fernandez on May 13. They noted that if not checked, JEM would
expect to be crowned as Darfur's ruling elite, eliminating any
chance that elections might take place. They argued for the revival
of the 2005 Declaration of Principles (DoP) signed by JEM, SLA/M,
and the GOS, which affirmed commitments to democracy and political
pluralism. They also told the CDA that Sudanese expatriate telecom
magnate Mo Ibrahim and his representatives were in frequent contact
for weeks with senior GOS officials about his planned "Mandate
Darfur" conference in Addis. l The GOS pulled the plug on the
conference at the last minute, apparently at the behest of Darfuri
Arab tribal leaders who have been regaining influence with the
regime. Mohammed also maintained that aside from the ceremonial
aspects, the conference had been poorly planned, with a weak agenda
and little substance. End Summary.


2. (SBU) Adada stated that the opportunity to take advantage of the
lull in fighting was fleeting as a result of JEM's incursion into
North Darfur. He noted that JEM leader Khalil Ibrahim's goal over
the next one to two months is to absorb or otherwise destroy all
other rebel movements. Since Minni Minnawi "will never give in to
JEM," more fighting in North Darfur is inevitable, according to
Adada. He mused that JEM could be reined in by a counterweight
among other rebel groups, and advocated re-forging ties between
SLA/Minnawi and SLA/Abdul Wahid. CDA noted that while a personal
rapprochement between Minnawi and Abdul Wahid is possible, it would
be much more difficult to integrate their forces on the ground.
Speaking of Abdul Wahid, Adada noted that Suleiman Marjan, a Maidob
SLA/AW commander based in far North Darfur (outside SLA/AW's
mountainous stronghold of Jebel Marra),was then in Nairobi. Marjan
was seeking help to travel to Paris to meet with Abdul Wahid and
convince him to engage constructively in the peace process, Adada
said, and he urged that the USG provide assistance. CDA agreed this
is a worthwhile idea and agreed to explore the issue. (Note: POLOFF
spoke with Suleiman Marjan shortly thereafter, who reiterated his
request for travel assistance to see Abdul Wahid. Marjan is now in
Kampala. End Note.)


3. (SBU) UNAMID Political Affairs Chief Abdul Mohamed stated that if
JEM's monopoly on peace talks continues, JEM will continue to try
and absorb rivals by force or co-optation. "We've created a
peace-process formula that necessitates war," he lamented. If left
unchecked and without a counterbalance, JEM's negotiating strategy
will be to try to emulate the CPA model by seeking both senior
positions in the GNU in Khartoum and control of a part of Sudan, in
this case Darfur (and possibly Southern Kordofan.) This has
significant implications for the democratic process, he said,
because "if you go down this road with JEM, you can forget about
elections." This in turn puts JEM in direct conflict with Abdul
Wahid and the ethnic Fur, because "Abdul Wahid's involvement in the
peace process is predicated on elections being the final result."
Mohammed asserted that the only realistic way of checking JEM's
ambitions is to return to the Declaration of Principles (DoP) it
signed along with the GOS and SLA/M in Abuja on July 5, 2005, which
affirmed their commitment to democracy and political pluralism.
"Ignoring the DoP is how the current peace process got derailed,"
said Mohammed. He urged that SE Gration revisit this document and
work in tune with the JMST to resurrect it.


4. (SBU) Adada and Mohamed expressed concern that JEM's rise could
put it in direct conflict with Darfur's other power centers, the Fur
and the Arab tribes. "The next big war is a Fur and Arab war
against the Zaghawa," predicted Mohamed. Adada added that what
happened in Gereida locality in South Darfur, which was emptied of
Zaghawa when non-Zaghawa tribes reasserted control of these areas
following the fighting between JEM and SLA/Minnawi in January, is a
microcosm of what the future could hold, though he predicted it
would be much worse. "The stability of Darfur depends on these three
tribes," he said. Mohamed also noted that Darfuri Arab tribal
leaders such as Safi Al Nur and Musa Hilal, once marginalized in
Khartoum, are again gaining influence with the regime. "[Assistant
to the President] Nafie will not take any decisions on Darfur
without consulting these leaders," he asserted.


5. (SBU) Adada and Mohamed also addressed the search for an elusive
avenue for Darfuri civil society to imprint its views on the peace
process. The cancellation of the recent "Mandate Darfur"
conference, allegedly because the GOS refused to allow invitees to
travel from Darfur to Addis Ababa to take part, means that the
search for a civil society initiative must continue, they said.
Mohammed said the conference's organizer, Sudanese expatriate
telecom magnate Mo Ibrahim, had raised the suspicions of the GOS

KHARTOUM 00000651 002 OF 002


elite. "They would have preferred the Darfur-Darfur Dialogue and
Consultation (DDDC) or JMST organize something like this-not a
Sudanese living abroad," he said, noting that Ibrahim was perceived
by some in the regime as a tool of the West. Mohamed further stated
that the GOS decision to derail the conference came after several
weeks of discussions with Ibrahim and his representatives. "It was
a last minute decision," he said, which apparently resulted
following Nafie's consultations with the aforementioned Arab tribal
leaders who were unhappy with the participant list.


6. (SBU) Mohammed also alleged that for all the money Mo Ibrahim had
invested in the initiative, the conference was poorly planned, with
a lack of preparations for anything beyond the ceremonial aspects.
"The agenda was very weak, with little thought going into the
substance of the workshops and the desired outcomes," he said,
noting that Tijane Sese called him only a few days before the event
was to take place to help produce an outline. (Note: Abdul Mohammed
rarely misses an opportunity to criticize any initiative in which he
is not prominently involved. End Note.)


7. (SBU) Comment: We agree with some of what JSR Adada said; for
example, JEM has been attacking Minni Minnawi's positions in North
Darfur with ever greater aggression over the last week, and we
expect this to continue or increase over the next week, with a
greater number of GOS bombing raids against JEM's new positions.
However, we do not expect JEM to attack SLA/AW positions in Jebel
Marra. JEM cannot control Jebel Marra, for one thing, but also
cannot afford to generate ill-will among the Fur if JEM's Khalil
Ibrahim hopes to become the leading rebel figure in Darfur. The
chances of a viable rebel counterweight to JEM appear slim, as none
of the other movements--SLA/Minnawi, SLA/Abdul Wahid, the "Tripoli
Group" and other bit players--has the military strength, capacity,
vision or political will to mount a challenge to JEM's primacy. They
also lack a patron to provide them with military, logistical and
financial support. The primary danger of a bilateral peace
agreement signed with JEM is the tension this would cause with the
Fur and Arab communities. A ceasefire with JEM would be highly
beneficial in advancing an improvement in Chad-Sudan relations,
since Sudan would no longer have a pretext to support Chadian
rebels. However, a broader peace agreement will require buy-in from
Arab and Fur tribal groups.

ASQUINO