EXPAT FUR INTELLECTUAL URGES ROOM FOR CIVIL SOCIETY IN

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KHARTOUM 000358

DEPT FOR AF A A/S CARTER, AF/SPG, AF/C
NSC FOR MGAVIN AND CHUDSON
ADDIS ABABA FOR USAU
DEPT PLS PASS USAID FOR AFR/SUDAN

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ASEC PGOV PREL KPKO SOCI AU UNSC SU
SUBJECT: EXPAT FUR INTELLECTUAL URGES ROOM FOR CIVIL SOCIETY IN
DARFUR


1. (SBU) Summary: Darfuris can solve the crisis in their homeland if
the international community presses the GOS to allow Darfuri civil
society to operate there, according to Dr. El Tigani Sesei, one of
Darfur's preeminent expatriate intellectuals. El Tigani
characterized Abdul Wahid as "catastrophic," and Khalil Ibrahim is
"finished;" he said that the international community should not
rely on them to achieve peace. Instead, El Tigani advises a
concerted civil society effort, saying, "The people of Darfur can
frustrate the Sudanese strategy of dividing Darfur by conducting
dialogue with the Arabs." El Tigani urged the U.S. to exert
"tremendous pressure" on Sudan to force it to reverse its decision
to expel major NGOs. El Tigani intends to return to Sudan, but did
not offer a concrete date for his return. End summary.


2. (SBU) Deputy Director of the UN Economic Commission for Africa
and senior advisor at the Partnership for African Development, El
Tigani has lived in Addis Ababa since fleeing Sudan in 1990, where
he was jailed while serving as the governor of North Darfur. El
Tijani organized a large meeting of Darfuri civil society leaders in
Addis Ababa in late 2008 and is recognized as one of the more vocal
members of the Darfuri Diaspora. Currently in London engaging with
the Sudanese community there, El Tigani met with POLOFF on February
27 in Addis Ababa, and has continued to offer his views on events in
Darfur over the last turbulent month.


3. (SBU) Speaking with POLOFF by telephone after the GOS to expelled
thirteen international NGOs from Sudan, El Tigani called this a
further example of official "bullying," with Darfuri IDPs suffering,
as a result, at the hands of the Government of Sudan (GOS). "I
don't believe this move was based on the ICC - it was timed to it,
but not related," he said. Disappointed that the UN Security
Council was unable to agree on a unified position regarding the
expulsions, he added of the GOS, "They consider this an opportunity
to kick out the aid agencies knowing that China and Russia will
support them in the Security Council." He advised the U.S. of the
need for "tremendous pressure" to force the GOS to reverse the
decision before the Darfur rainy season begins in the summer.

--------------
REGIONAL ACTORS UNHELPFUL, BASSOLE "FINISHED"
--------------


4. (SBU) El Tigani did not hide his disdain for regional Arab
leaders, having returned to Addis from Libya at the end of February
after witnessing Libyan President Moammar Qaddafi blame Israel for
the destruction in Darfur. "Qaddafi entered the meeting only to
tell us that Israel was to blame for the problems in Darfur. He
looked right at me when he was speaking!" El Tigani dismissed the
Qataris and the February talks in Doha as a useless exercise in
deal-making between two parties bent on each other's destruction,
consequently undermining the credibility of the Joint Chief
Mediator. "Bassole is finished," he said unhesitatingly, adding that
JEM's participation in the talks also compromised the Islamist rebel
group in the eyes of Darfuris. By negotiating with the NCP, El
Tigani said, "JEM made a mistake at Doha, and Darfuris will not
accept JEM. Even now all JEM soldiers are in Chad, and if the
Chadian rebels take N'Djamena, JEM is finished." He also cautioned
the international community from negotiating with armed actors, and
urged that political legitimacy in Darfur should not be defined by
the use of force. "It is a mistake to think that every rebel should
be recognized," he reasoned.

-------------- --------------
ABDUL WAHID CATASTROPHIC, FUR TRIBE NEEDS TO ENGAGE ARABS
-------------- --------------


5. (SBU) Describing himself as one of the harshest critics of Fur
rebel leader-in-exile Abdul Wahid el Nur, El Tigani called Abdul
Wahid's presence at peace talks in Abuja "catastrophic." "I have
been saying since 2006 that he is a waste of time. He is using the
plight of the IDPs to advance his own agenda." El Tigani sees Abdul
Wahid's recent public embrace of Israel as a mistake. He added
that the latter seemed unaware that the implications of his actions
would reverberate through an Arab world, which was unprepared for
such a move. "He did what every other Sudanese opposition
politician does in secret," El Tigani added. Questioning the power
and influence of Abdul Wahid's faction of the Sudanese Liberation
Army, he urged the international community not to engage with him
seriously, claiming his movement is strongly anti-intellectual and
unprepared for political negotiations.


6. (SBU) Instead of relying solely on Abdul Wahid and his failed
movement, El Tigani instead is advising the Fur people in Darfur to
engage directly with Darfuri Arabs. . "The people of Darfur can

KHARTOUM 00000358 002 OF 002


frustrate the Sudanese strategy of dividing Darfur by conducting
dialogue with the Arabs," he said. Unity among the Fur and the Arab
tribes in Darfur, he claimed, has long been a GOS "stumbling block"
for what he called the "expansionist Islamist agenda" of the NCP in
Africa, much as the Kobe Zaghawa of Chadian President Idris Deby has
kept Khartoum's Islamists from connecting with their Arab brethren
resident in West Africa. Yet as much as the NCP has marginalized
the Fur tribe, El Tigani also remains concerned that Khartoum may
act against the Arabs in Darfur in a similar fashion as it seeks to
establish dominance in the restive region. "Since 1987, the
National Islamist Front has tried to undermine the Arabs in Darfur,
and soon they will use them again, as they consider that they are
expendable." He believes Fur civil society can isolate the warring
Arabs easily to reach the Arab tribes, who are as much at risk as
the Fur themselves.

--------------
MORE ROOM NEEDED FOR DARFURI CIVIL SOCIETY
--------------


7. (SBU) El Tigani urged the international community, and the U.S.
in particular, to reach out to Darfuri civil society for
comprehensive solutions, a move which would require the U.S. to
pressure the GOS to provide more room for non-violent actors to
operate in Darfur. Saying the West has underestimated the power of
those who scorn violent action, he boasted in complete seriousness,
"I could start a battalion now if I want, and we would have funding,
with enough men from my family coming to fight with me." In concert
with other civil society leaders in 2008, El Tijani's plan is to
gather Darfuri groups and tribes together to establish a set of
common negotiation positions, then put the agenda to the rebels.


8. (SBU) POLOFF asked El Tigani whether he intends to return to
Darfur, and he unhesitatingly answered "yes." However, in numerous
conversations, El Tigani has been unable to say exactly when. "Now
the Darufri community is too polarized, but I promise I will return,
because I cannot do my work from here in Addis." After traveling to
London in late March, he will return to Ethiopia to resume his
position with the UN Economic Commission for Africa. (Note: In a
recent meeting in February with two young Fur leaders, Nasredeen
Abdulbari and Ismail Abdullah, both junior professors at Khartoum
universities, said they regard El Tigani's return as imperative for
the Fur community. "Dr. El Tigani is one of the best, very
well-respected in Darfur and Sudan," said Abdulbari. "All Fur are
talking about unity now. We would advise him to come back to Sudan."
Recently, El Tigani has been in frequent contact with Abdulbari and
Abdullah. End note.)


9. (SBU) Comment: The UN/AU Chief Mediator would gain much from
consulting with Fur civil society leaders such as El Tigani, and
ultimately any peace deal arrived at in Darfur would have more
legitimacy if it included the input of El Tijani and his colleagues.
In most conflicts there is no substitute for a ceasefire between
the government and the rebels. Darfur, though, is an unusual
conflict in that some of the rebel groups have little legitimacy in
the eyes of Darfuris, and the strongest rebel group (JEM) doesn't
control any territory. SLA/AW controls swaths of Jebel Mara. It
lately has been left untouched by the GOS because it does not
threaten the government in a significant way, and has not attacked
government installations in the recent past. Given the reality in
Darfur, a political solution should include input from civil society
leaders such as El Tijani as well as consultations among tribal
leaders. As El Tijani suggests, direct discussions between unarmed
Fur and Arab leaders would contribute dramatically to the peace
process in Darfur, but could also unify the region against Khartoum.
For this reason, the NCP regime often tries to block such
initiatives as its hold on Arab tribes is tenuous. End comment.

FERNANDEZ