Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
09KATHMANDU728
2009-08-05 01:30:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:
NEPAL: INITIATIVES TO COUNTER TORTURE
how-toVZCZCXRO4858 OO RUEHCI DE RUEHKT #0728 2170130 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 050130Z AUG 09 FM AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0592 INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 7063 RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO PRIORITY 7380 RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 2711 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 5423 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 6551 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 3159 RUEHCI/AMCONSUL KOLKATA PRIORITY 4695 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 3607 RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHMFISS/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L KATHMANDU 000728
SIPDIS
FOR DRL/MLGA KRISTEN MCGEENY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/13/2017
TAGS: DRL NP PGOV PHUM UN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: INITIATIVES TO COUNTER TORTURE
REF: SECSTATE 70129
Classified By: Charge de Affaires Jeffrey Moon, a.i. Reasons 1.4 (b/d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L KATHMANDU 000728
SIPDIS
FOR DRL/MLGA KRISTEN MCGEENY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/13/2017
TAGS: DRL NP PGOV PHUM UN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: INITIATIVES TO COUNTER TORTURE
REF: SECSTATE 70129
Classified By: Charge de Affaires Jeffrey Moon, a.i. Reasons 1.4 (b/d)
1. (U) In response to reftel request for mechanisms in Nepal
that aim to prevent torture and protect victims, post is
aware of the following mechanisms:
2. (C) The Nepali government has several institutions that
have responsibility for working to prevent torture: the Prime
Minister's (PM's) Office, the Law Ministry, and the Home
Ministry. The PM's Office is the lead governmental
institution and its role is to coordinate with the Law and
Home Ministries, which are responsible for torture related
legislation (drafting and amending laws) and following up on
allegations of torture and other human rights abuses.
According to Gauri Pradhan, a Commissioner on the National
Human Rights Commission (NHRC),there is a lack of
coordination among government wings and the government has
not responded to NHRC's recommendations. According to
Pradhan, the three most recent Prime Ministers made public
commitments to deal with torture but despite NHRC
recommendations to prosecute cases, the government has not
prosecuted a single case of torture against any perpetrators.
3. (SBU) NHRC is a national, independent Nepali
constitutional body, with a mandate to safeguard human
rights. NHRC has legal authority to conduct investigations,
file complaints, monitor jails and detention centers, review
legal provisions and safeguards against torture, and
publicize human rights education. NHRC is hampered by
infighting among at least two of the five commissioners, in
addition to perceived competition from OHCHR, which just
received a mandate extension to operate in Nepal through June
2010.
4. (U) OHCHR is the most prominent entity in Nepal that
reviews allegations of torture, and other human rights
abuses, and conducts investigations to determine their
validity and scope. OHCHR provides a wide array of technical
assistance and advocacy for civil society organizations that
lobby the Nepali government to enact transparent and
consultative legislation to criminalize torture. OHCHR also
provides human rights training to Nepal's police and armed
forces, some of which is focused on abuse and torture
prevention. Additionally, OHCHR operates in a capacity
building relationship with NHRC.
5. (U) Nepali nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and civil
society organizations are in the nascent stages of advocacy
and have yet to achieve widespread success outside of the
Kathmandu Valley. The two principal NGOs working on
countering torture are the Center for Victims of Torture
(CVICT) and the Advocacy Forum. CVICT's activities
emphasize: fact finding/investigation, legal intervention,
and rehabilitation of torture victims. Advocacy Forum's
primary focus is on victims. Gathering and maintaining a
database of torture incidents is also a priority. Advocacy
Forum assists victims in filing lawsuits, visits and monitors
government detention facilities, documents abuse claims, and
provides psychological and legal aid to victims of torture.
6. (SBU) The Government of Nepal has yet to pass legislation
that criminalizes torture. Criminal legislation has been
introduced several times, but the legislature has failed to
enact a law. Nepal could clearly benefit from innovative
initiatives that lead to the criminalization of torture and
effective mechanisms to protect victims.
MOON
SIPDIS
FOR DRL/MLGA KRISTEN MCGEENY
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/13/2017
TAGS: DRL NP PGOV PHUM UN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: INITIATIVES TO COUNTER TORTURE
REF: SECSTATE 70129
Classified By: Charge de Affaires Jeffrey Moon, a.i. Reasons 1.4 (b/d)
1. (U) In response to reftel request for mechanisms in Nepal
that aim to prevent torture and protect victims, post is
aware of the following mechanisms:
2. (C) The Nepali government has several institutions that
have responsibility for working to prevent torture: the Prime
Minister's (PM's) Office, the Law Ministry, and the Home
Ministry. The PM's Office is the lead governmental
institution and its role is to coordinate with the Law and
Home Ministries, which are responsible for torture related
legislation (drafting and amending laws) and following up on
allegations of torture and other human rights abuses.
According to Gauri Pradhan, a Commissioner on the National
Human Rights Commission (NHRC),there is a lack of
coordination among government wings and the government has
not responded to NHRC's recommendations. According to
Pradhan, the three most recent Prime Ministers made public
commitments to deal with torture but despite NHRC
recommendations to prosecute cases, the government has not
prosecuted a single case of torture against any perpetrators.
3. (SBU) NHRC is a national, independent Nepali
constitutional body, with a mandate to safeguard human
rights. NHRC has legal authority to conduct investigations,
file complaints, monitor jails and detention centers, review
legal provisions and safeguards against torture, and
publicize human rights education. NHRC is hampered by
infighting among at least two of the five commissioners, in
addition to perceived competition from OHCHR, which just
received a mandate extension to operate in Nepal through June
2010.
4. (U) OHCHR is the most prominent entity in Nepal that
reviews allegations of torture, and other human rights
abuses, and conducts investigations to determine their
validity and scope. OHCHR provides a wide array of technical
assistance and advocacy for civil society organizations that
lobby the Nepali government to enact transparent and
consultative legislation to criminalize torture. OHCHR also
provides human rights training to Nepal's police and armed
forces, some of which is focused on abuse and torture
prevention. Additionally, OHCHR operates in a capacity
building relationship with NHRC.
5. (U) Nepali nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and civil
society organizations are in the nascent stages of advocacy
and have yet to achieve widespread success outside of the
Kathmandu Valley. The two principal NGOs working on
countering torture are the Center for Victims of Torture
(CVICT) and the Advocacy Forum. CVICT's activities
emphasize: fact finding/investigation, legal intervention,
and rehabilitation of torture victims. Advocacy Forum's
primary focus is on victims. Gathering and maintaining a
database of torture incidents is also a priority. Advocacy
Forum assists victims in filing lawsuits, visits and monitors
government detention facilities, documents abuse claims, and
provides psychological and legal aid to victims of torture.
6. (SBU) The Government of Nepal has yet to pass legislation
that criminalizes torture. Criminal legislation has been
introduced several times, but the legislature has failed to
enact a law. Nepal could clearly benefit from innovative
initiatives that lead to the criminalization of torture and
effective mechanisms to protect victims.
MOON