MEDIA REACTION: US-CHINA RELATIONS; US ECONOMY;

UNCLAS HONG KONG 000202


DEPT FOR INR/R/MR, INR/IC/CD, I/FW
DEPT FOR EAP/PD, EAP/CM, EAP/P
DEPT FOR VOA/BRF, TV-WPA
WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC
PRC POSTS FOR PA
AIT
USPACOM FOR FOR CIS PD ADVISER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: US-CHINA RELATIONS; US ECONOMY;
US-RUSSIA RELATIONS; CLIMATE CHANGE

TOPICS:

1. U.S.-China relations

2. U.S. economy

3. U.S.-Russia relations

4. Climate change

HEADLINES AND EXCERPTS:


1. U.S.-China relations

"Premier Wen says no to U.S. bonds"

The independent Chinese-language Hong Kong Economic Times said in an
editorial (2/2): "Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao visited Europe. In
contrast to his sober and modest attitude in the past, Premier Wen's
remarks displayed his straightforwardness. Yesterday, he revealed
that U.S. President Obama was concerned about whether China would
buy more U.S. bonds, but he said that China might not necessarily
buy more. His remarks have not only highlighted the rise of Chinese
international influence, but it also showed that Premier Wen wanted
to stress the importance of equal diplomatic relations. Europe and
the U.S. should not bully Beijing.... Premier Wen's remarks during
his 'trip of confidence' is incisive. On the one hand, he has to
protect Chinese interests and to strive for a better international
environment; on the other hand, he has to avoid adding to China's
trouble in dealing with the financial tsunami. It also shows that
China's international influence and its right to speak have been
increasing and it will not allow Europe and the U.S. to bully it.
The financial tsunami has redistributed national power worldwide.
How will the Chinese government make friends with the west in a
manner neither haughty nor humble, and how to safeguard national
interests, secure equality, mutual benefit, and mutual respect?
Premier Wen's Europe trip has provided a signal."

"U.S. puts pressure on China, Premier Wen skillfully deflects the
question"

The working-class Chinese-language Hong Kong Daily News wrote in an
editorial (1/15): "Premier Wen Jiabao, who is visiting Britain,
said that whether China will buy more U.S. bonds will depend on its
nation's needs and the need to safeguard the value of its foreign
reserves. Under the influence of the financial tsunami, the global
economic situation is shaky. Europe and the U.S. all covet China's
foreign reserves. They use both soft and tough measures to try and
force China to 'pay the bill' for the financial crisis caused by
Europe and the U.S. Premier Wen's remarks on the purchase of U.S.
bonds conveys two messages: first, China has the right to use
foreign reserves. The decision whether to buy U.S. bonds will be
made according to its actual needs. Secondly, the U.S. has the
responsibility to maintain the stability of the exchange rate of the
U.S. dollar. It should reduce the fluctuation of the U.S. dollar to
cast off uncertainty in the world economy. It will then attract
China to buy U.S. bonds.... The global economic system has changed.
The U.S. needs to face the fact of Sino-U.S. economic interaction.
The U.S. should adopt an equal and mutually beneficial approach to
promote economic cooperation. Only in this way can an environment
of healthy economic development be created."

"Broader focus to Sino-U.S. ties will be welcome"

The independent English-language South China Morning Post said in an
editorial (2/1): "When two new partners find themselves locked in a
complex dance, missteps are inevitable. It takes time for both
sides to find their footing. This appears to be the case with
Beijing and the new White House under Barack Obama. Sino-U.S.
relations are among the most complex and important bilateral ties in
the world today. The new U.S. president has gotten off to a rocky
start. But he has now made an overture to mend fences with his
counterpart Hu Jintao in their first telephone conversation on
Friday.... Despite their pledge to cooperate, it is significant
that the two sides presented different versions of what was actually
said on Friday. Mr. Hu, according to the official news agency,
Xinhua, cited the importance of mutual respect, especially in
relation to core national interests. He also repeated his
opposition to trade protectionism. However, the White House said
Mr. Obama focused, during the conversation, on trade and economic
imbalances that need to be addressed to solve the global financial
crisis. The difference in their statements reflects the two
countries' conflicting views of what caused the financial
meltdown.... The rise of China presents challenges and
opportunities for the nation and the world. As its wealth grows,
its global influence will necessarily increase. This has caused
alarm in many capitals, but it need not be a threat. Sino-U.S. ties
will be key to managing China's rise. But they involve many parts;
problems in one area, such as trade, should not be allowed to
undermine the whole. Successful relations with the U.S. will help
China play a more positive and productive role in world affairs."

"There are reasons for the up and down of Sino-U.S. relations"

The independent Chinese-language Ming Pao Daily News had an
editorial (2/1): "...U.S. Treasury Secretary Geithner made remarks
about 'China manipulating the exchange rate of the yuan'. And
almost at the same time, Defense Secretary Gates said the U.S. 'has
the capability to deal with China's threat'. Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton also complained about the Bush administration only
having economic dialogue with China. She hopes to start a
'comprehensive dialogue' with China. Tough remarks on China
policies by three heads of Obama's cabinet have triggered people's
concern over the direction Sino-U.S. relations are taking in light
of a second wave of financial tsunami.... China should handle the
remarks by the Obama team in the following way: deal with the
remarks calmly and observe the situation with a cool head.' Judging
from the telephone conversation between Chinese President Hu Jintao
and President Obama last Friday, present Sino-U.S. relations are
still good. Although they may have small arguments from time to
time, big confrontation is unlikely."


2. U.S. economy

"Obama has to guard against protectionism"

The independent English-language South China Morning Post said in an
editorial (2/2): "World leaders have agreed that turning inwards
does not offer nations a way out of severe economic difficulties.
One of the biggest mistakes in the 1930s Depression was the U.S.'
adoption of trade-protection policies. The summit of the Group of
20 largest economies in November underscored 'the critical
importance of rejecting protectionism' in dealing with the present
crisis. It is worrying therefore, and worthy of condemnation, that
such a discredited, 'beggar thy neighbor' approach should have been
supported in the U.S. Congress.... The world awaits the Obama
administration's response to all this. The U.S. president needs to
get his stimulus package approved quickly. Hopes of global economic
recovery hinge on it. But this should not stop him making an
unambiguous reaffirmation of America's support for free trade, and
using all his powers of persuasion and the prestige of his office to
rest the 'buy American' provisions. We hope that when the Senate
considers them, common sense and the lessons of the past will
prevail. History shows that global prosperity depends on
international co-operation, not economic isolationism."
"Obama has to be courageous and quick in rescuing the economy"

The independent Chinese-language Hong Kong Economic Times commented
in an editorial (1/31): "...The rapid worsening of unemployment has
heavily hit consumption and the economy. The increasing loss of
financial institutions may trigger a second wave of the financial
tsunami. Both of the above may push the U.S. economy from recession
to depression. The situation is critical and it does not allow
Obama, who took office just 10 days ago, to have any time for
hesitation. He must take tough measures to rescue the economy....
The U.S. economy and market confidence, obviously, plunge more
quickly than the U.S. administration can act. If Obama is to turn
the tide and avoid a second round of the financial tsunami, as well
as keep the recession from worsening, he must be courageous enough
to act quickly."

"The bad health of the U.S. economy is revealed in the 'shameful'
behavior of Wall Street"

The working-class Chinese-language Hong Kong Daily News wrote in an
editorial (1/31): "...[Looking at] the differences in the consumer
models between eastern and western societies, the world economic
development models can be briefly divided into two major types: the
first one is the high consumption and widely expanding economy, as
in the case of the U.S.; the second one is the huge savings and
domestic demand-led economy as in China. Which of these development
models is better? It is difficult to find the answer on a quiet
day. However, when the world economy takes an unfavorable turn, it
is much easier to tell which is better.... As a lesson from the
failure, should the future world economic development model follow
the Asian example, moving towards the direction of more savings by
keeping expenditures below income, or should they follow the old
economic development model of the west and let the world economy
panic from time to time? The answer is pretty obvious."

"Obama should stop greedy Wall Street"

The pro-PRC Chinese-language Wen Wei Po had this editorial (1/31):
"While the U.S. administration is using taxpayer money to save the
finance industry, Wall Street executives, surprisingly, earned
USD18.4 billion in bonuses last year. President Obama is outraged
and described the payouts as 'shameful' and having reached the
height of irresponsibility. Obama rebuked the bank executives for
receiving bonuses while their banks lost money because he is, on one
hand, angry, and on the other hand, he has to secure the
understanding of the U.S. public and the international community to
continue supporting Washington's bailout plan. However, Obama
should not stop short at condemning bank executives, he should also
adopt effective and forceful measures to stop the greediness of Wall
Street. He should stop Wall Street executives from getting bonuses
when banks are losing money. Only in this way can he restore the
confidence of the public and the international community in
Washington's bailout plan."


3. U.S.-Russia relations

"Russia tests Obama's attitude on anti-missile again"

The pro-PRC Chinese-language Macau Daily News remarked in an
editorial (1/31): "A Russian military official said recently that
since Russia feels that the new Obama administration is not rushing
ahead with the plan to set up an anti-missile system in Poland and
the Czech Republic, Russia will temporarily shelve its missile plan
in Kaliningrad. This is Russia's goodwill gesture towards the new
U.S. administration.... Any favorable turn in the anti-missile
dispute will depend on a clear stance from the U.S. side. Russian
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov revealed that Obama and Medvedev may
hold their first talks at the G20 summit in London on April 4. A
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson also said that Russia has
great expectations for the meeting of the two presidents. It seems
that it will still take a while to see if the anti-missile dispute
between Russia and the U.S. can be resolved."


4. Climate change

"Hope the U.S. will do something on the climate"

The pro-PRC Chinese-language Macau Daily News remarked in an
editorial (2/1): "...Obama took several actions over the climate
issue immediately after he took office. It shows that Obama will
adopt a relatively more pragmatic attitude than the Bush
administration toward climate policy.... Obama will face many
obstacles when he implements his policies: the weak domestic
economy; differences of opinion in the Congress and inside the
Democratic Party; an American public less focused on the climate
change issue than the financial crisis, etc. These are all
stumbling blocks that will hinder the implementation of Obama's
policies. Under the prerequisite of safeguarding U.S. interests and
coordinating the domestic interests of all sides, we have to wait
and see how the Obama administration will make any progress in
dealing with climate change."

DONOVAN