FIFTH IOM STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROGRAMS AND

UNCLAS GENEVA 001021 SIPDIS DEPT FOR PRM E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PREF PREL PHUM SMIG SUBJECT: FIFTH IOM STANDING COMMITTEE ON PROGRAMS AND FINANCES ¶1. (U) Summary: The fifth session of the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Standing Committee on Programs and Finance (SCPF) took place October 27-28 in Geneva with Ambassador Mudaran (Venezuela),SCPF Chair, presiding. Member states continued discussion of the 2010 administrative budget in advance of the 98th IOM Council scheduled for November 23-26; recommended the Council approve the revised 2009 budget; agreed to add the proposed Structural Review to the Council's agenda, and to raise the funding cap on projects under Line 1 of the 1035 Facility. Member states rejected a proposal from the Chair to hold a preliminary vote during the SCPF among the six candidates for External Auditor. Unless a consensus forms around a single candidate before the Council meeting, members agreed to hold a formal vote at that time. IOM staff gave presentations on the organization,s oversight and evaluation mechanisms and its border management programs. IOM also reported on an initiative in New York to included IOM in periodic UNGA reporting on cooperation betwen international organizations and UN agencies. End Summary. -------------- Director General's Statement -------------- ¶2. (U) IOM Director General (DG) William Swing opened the SCPF by welcoming newly elected Deputy Director General Laura Thompson, who took office September 1. Swing then outlined the aggressive agenda for IOM he has undertaken in his first year in office: Budget Reform (including the Program and Budget for 2010),Staff Rotation, and an ambitious Structural Review. Swing said he understood the current global economic environment was not the best time to be asking for additional resources. However, in the same spirit of openness and dialogue under which he campaigned for the Director General position, he wanted the 2010 Budget presentation to accurately reflect the needs of the organization in view of the unprecedented growth in projects and staffing IOM has experienced in recent years. -------------- Discussion of Agenda Items -------------- ¶3. (U) Program and Budget for 2010: Ovais Sarmad, Director for Resources Management, presented the 2010 Program and Budget Report in a new, user-friendly format intended to more clearly set out the needs of the organization, the Administration,s best judgment on the resources necessary to accomplish strategic objectives, and the decisions member states needed to take at Council. ¶4. (U) The presentation document included two alternate scenarios for the 2010 administrative budget. Under scenario one, the administrative budget would rise 2.55 percent over the 2009 level to account for statutory increases in core staffing costs mandated by the UN Common system. Scenario two includes those same statutory increases as well as an additional 5.5 million Swiss francs (CHF) to fund IOM participation in the UN combined security mechanism, CHF 3.3 million for maintenance of IOM,s new financial and human resources management system (PRISM),and CHF 200,000 to mainstream IOM,s responsibilities as UN cluster lead for camp coordination and camp management. Including these items would increase the administrative budget by 25.74 percent over 2009 levels. Mr. Sarmad noted the need for broader, long-term budget reform to simplify the IOM budget structure. ¶5. (U) A majority of countries who spoke at the session supported scenario one. However, a number of member states, including Canada, Spain, France, Japan, Portugal, Switzerland, Turkey, the UK, and Italy, supported a zero nominal growth 2010 budget. Only a single delegation (Ecuador) supported scenario two. Member States agreed on the importance of reaching consensus on an overall budget level before Council, and undertaking informal discussions toward that end. ¶6. (U) Outstanding Contributions to the Budget: Mr. Sarmad also reported that the 2009 outstanding assessed contributions have decreased to CHF 2.8 million; twelve Member States have entered into repayment plans; but twelve others are still in arrears. The Africa Group reported that discussion of arrearages has been upgraded to the Ambassadorial level. Brazil reported the legislative process for ratification of its membership is continuing. ¶7. (U) Appointment of the External Auditors for the period 2010-2012: At the suggestion of the Chair, this item was moved up in the agenda. Member States discussed a variety of methods to narrow down the current list of six candidates, but rejected the Chair,s suggestion to hold a straw poll during the SCPF. As no consensus on a preferred process for making a final decision emerged from the discussions, the chair asked the six candidates to meet in the weeks before Council to try to narrow the number of candidates. If no consensus emerges from that process, Member States will hold a formal vote at the Council session. ¶8. (U) Proposed Structure Review: Discussion of this agenda item took up almost half of the two-day SCPF meeting. Chairman of the ad-hoc Structure Review Team (SRT),Gervais Appave, presented a brief overview of the comprehensive process the team undertook. After his presentation, nearly forty member states took the floor to comment on the proposal. Member States were generally supportive, though many asked IOM to share a timeline for implementation and conduct a review of the implementation process as it proceeds over the next 2-3 years. Some member states voiced concerns about the proposed location of some of the eight new Regional Offices. Kenya and many other members of the Africa Group were particularly worried about a perceived downgrading of IOM's Nairobi office. Likewise, member states around the Mediterranean felt there needed to be a more formal mechanism to coordinate efforts in that region -- possibly a regional or sub-regional office -- given its importance in migratory flows and the fact that it falls under the responsibility of two of the proposed new regional offices. ¶9. (U) Exchange of Views on Items Proposed by Membership: Christophe Franzetti, Evaluation Officer in the Office of the Inspector General, gave a very brief overview of IOM,s oversight and evaluation processes. The Netherlands noted the review was superficial and recommended that the discussion continue in more detail during the next SCPF. ¶10. (U) David Knight, Head of the Technical Cooperation Division, discussed IOM,s global efforts to enhance individual country capacity for effective border management. IOM,s work in this area includes border management assessments conducted in cooperation with the applicable state, and technical advice and training on border management systems. IOM also recently contributed a chapter to a World Bank publication on Border Modernization. ¶11. (U) Support for Developing Member States and Member States with economy in transition (1035 Facility): Mr. Knight also presented briefly on the 1035 Facility, noting the administration's request to increase the funding cap for projects funded under 1035 line one from USD 50,000 to USD 100,000. Many member states, including the United States, supported the increase. ¶12. (U) Staff Association Committee Statement: Richard Danziger, Chairman of the Staff Association Committee (SAC), urged the administration to consider the impact of the rotation and the restructuring on IOM staff, to ensure equitable treatment of staff during the implementation of the rotation policy, and to address taxation issues for those staff members living in France and working in Geneva. Mr. Danziger also voiced SAC,s concern with modifications to the staff rules and regulations that could impact taxation on IOM income and allowances. DG Swing thanked the SAC for their statement; noted efforts made on the part of the administration to address these concerns and to actively consult with SAC during the structure review process; and explained that the text of concern to the SAC has been part of the staff rules and regulations since 2006. ¶13. (U) Report on Human Resources: New IOM Director of Human Resources Michael Veltman briefed member states on the progress made in Human Resource Management (HRM) over the past year, including improvements in the transparency of staff rotations, the review of staff rules and regulations, and the extension of health insurance to local staff worldwide. ¶14. (U) UN Reporting Mechanism: Bob Paiva, Director of External Relations, described the efforts of the IOM administration to work more closely with the United Nations (UN),including pursuing pooled funds and participating in relevant working groups, while maintaining its separate observer status. Recently, IOM has undertaken an initiative in New York to add IOM to a UN-produced report on cooperation between observer organizations and UN organizations. This report, produced every two years, provides a brief description of UN cooperation with various organizations. IOM hopes inclusion in the report would raise IOM's profile among New York-based missions and organizations, and disseminate information on IOM's range of activities more widely. Mr. Paiva emphasized that participation in this report would in no way affect IOM,s current observer relationship with the UN. GRIFFITHS