MEDIA REACTION: AFGHANISTAN, AFGHANISTAN MIDEAST, IRAN, EU,

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 07 BERLIN 001364 STATE FOR INR/R/MR, EUR/PAPD, EUR/PPA, EUR/CE, INR/EUC, INR/P, SECDEF FOR USDP/ISA/DSAA, DIA FOR DC-4A VIENNA FOR CSBM, CSCE, PAA "PERISHABLE INFORMATION -- DO NOT SERVICE" SIPDIS E.0. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO AF AF XF IR EU GM KGHG SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: AFGHANISTAN, AFGHANISTAN MIDEAST, IRAN, EU, U.S.-GERMANY, ENVIRONMENT;BERLIN ¶1. Lead Stories Summary ¶2. (Afghanistan) Bomb Attack, U.S. Strategy ¶3. (Afghanistan) Karzai Brother on CIA Payroll ¶4. (Mideast) Clinton Visit ¶5. (Iran) Nuclear Conflict ¶6. (EU) Future President ¶7. (U.S.-Germany) Relations ¶8. (Environment) Climate Talks ¶1. Lead Stories Summary Primetime newscasts and most newspapers opened with Chancellor Merkel's re-election, noting that not all CDU/CSU and FDP politicians voted in favor of her. Die Welt led with a story on Postbank's data security problem. Editorials focused on Merkel's second term and the election of the first woman to head the most senior office in the Evangelical church. ¶2. (Afghanistan) Bomb Attack, U.S. Strategy Many papers carried reports on the attacks on UN officials in Kabul and on the bomb attack in Peshawar. Frankfurter Rundschau (10/29) headlined: "Attack For a Welcome," while Sueddeutsche (10/29) wrote: Taliban Killing UN officials in Kabul Ten days before run-off elections in Afghanistan. As under the headline: "Dissonance in the Clinton-Holbrooke-Kerry Triangle, Frankfurter Allgemeine (10/29) reported that "while Secretary Clinton is trying to improve confidence between Washington and Islamabad, special envoy Holbrooke and Senator Kerry are sending different signals. While Clinton praised the Pakistani offensive in South Waziristan as a turning point in Islamabad's fight against the Taliban, Holbrooke expressed his skepticism saying that one has to find out first of all whether the Pakistan armed forces really want "to destroy or only disperse" the Taliban this time. Kerry's name, in turn, is linked to a law, which will allocate $7.6 billion in civil aid for Pakistan provided that its use corresponds with U.S. requests. In this Clinton-Holbrooke-Kerry triangle, one can hardly make out the U.S. policy towards Pakistan." ARD-TV's primetime newscast Tagesschau (10/28) noted: "A nuclear Pakistan is caught in between terrorism and the hope of defeating 
it. Pakistanis show determination in the fight against extremists because they have realized that the Taliban and al Qaida fighters do not just pose a danger to the Afghan-Pakistani border region, but threaten the entire country." Deutschlandfunk (10/28) broadcast the following commentary: "It is painstaking to see how long it takes to develop a strategy (for Afghanistan) and then implement it. It is simply not enough to send BERLIN 00001364 002 OF 007 more soldiers; then the Taliban will become even stronger. Everywhere that economic recovery is in the offing, the Taliban are losing their base. And if the international community finally implements the things it agreed upon before, the Taliban's influence would be considerably weakened. But the international community is doing too little, and thus the Taliban maintain their bases, and in turn the international community does even less. It is a downward spiral. And all this is also, to a great extent, destabilizing Pakistan, a country with nuclear weapons. What we are missing is a clearly visible counter strategy from the international community, which first of all looks to the United States." FAZ (10/29) editorialized: "[Following the attacks in Peshawar and Kabul], one thing has become clear: the security situation in the Af/Pak region has become precarious. Those calling for a withdrawal from Afghanistan or who consider support for Pakistan one matter among many others have not understood what is at stake. Af/Pak should not become an address for Taliban, Jihadists, and al-Qaida. The international organizations and states which are engaged in Afghanistan with military and civil projects should not allow anyone to intimidate them - as difficult as this might be. That is why President Obama must finally make up his mind and say which means he wants to use against whom in Afghanistan and in the Afghan-Pakistani border region. The longer he hesitates, the more the opponents of the West will feel encouraged to launch new terrorist attacks." Under the headline: "Trial Balloon," Frankfurter Rundschau (10/29) argued: "We are excited to see how the Americans will react to the White House's trial balloon with respect to the future Afghanistan strategy. The offensive, launched early this year with much ado, has obviously failed. Afghanistan has not become safer. This shows that the military card alone will not lead to success. If the international community does not ultimately intensify the reconstruction of the country and does not integrate neighboring countries such as Pakistan and Iran into this process, it will fail. Then the withdrawal from the region will resemble the start of the withdrawal from Afghanistan." In an editorial Hannoversche Allgemeine Zeitung (10/29) opined: "It is absurd that the attack in Kabul was directed against the UN.... Who is backing democratic elections and the development of the country more than the UN? The Taliban are wrong to think that they can wage war against the rest of the world. They do not know the impact of their blind hatred. The attempt to prompt the West to give up via increasing violence could backfire. The leading powers in the world will not leave Pakistan or Afghanistan to the Taliban." BERLIN 00001364 003 OF 007 ¶3. (Afghanistan) Karzai Brother on CIA Payroll Under the headline: Al Capone in Kandahar," Frankfurter Rundschau (10/29) reported: "For President Karzai, the latest report on the activities of his brother Ahmed Wali Karzai in the New York Times, which refers to CIA sources, is very unfortunate. On November 7, he will enter run-off elections which will not improve his chances of winning if his brother turns out to be a U.S. puppet. A U.S. general in Afghanistan said about Ahmed Karzai's role in Kandahar: 'If we wanted to clear Chicago, it would be necessary to get rid of Al Capone.' The former U.S. ambassador to Kabul, Ronald Neumann, called Ahmed Karzai a 'political embarrassment.''' "Karzai Compromised by His Own Family," headlined Die Welt (10/29) and added: "[In view of all the bad news], the revelation that President Karzai's brother Ahmed Wali Karzai, has been on the payroll of the CIA, could compromise the entire U.S. strategy for Afghanistan. The new debate is now overshadowing President Obama's expected decision about the future U.S. strategy for Afghanistan. The impression that the United States applied double standards in Afghanistan will make it even more complicated for President Obama to convey a convincing strategy for Afghanistan." Die Welt (10/29) opined: "This news is not surprising. The camaraderie between the CIA and Afghan drug lord Ahmed Wali Karzai follows a simple logic: 'If he is a bastard, he is at least our bastard.' The debate over the meaning of the Afghanistan mission has once again been fueled. In this situation, Barack Obama appears to be acting too hesitantly. In addition, the pre-emptive award of the Nobel Peace Prize is now turning into a burden for him that will strengthen the Taliban. If the mountainous and rugged landscape cannot be safeguarded, Obama and NATO must concentrate on the important centers of the country while politicians must hope that stone-age Islamic extremists delegitimize themselves in the remote areas of the country. There is no doubt that when looking at the overall situation, Pakistan is more important. The large neighboring country with its nuclear arms arsenal should by no means turn into a failed state." ¶4. (Mideast) Clinton Visit According to Sueddeutsche (10/29),"Since January, Hillary Clinton has been at the top of the State Department but only now is she concentrating on the two biggest chunks of U.S. foreign policy. On Wednesday, she will travel to Pakistan. The fact that the trip remained secret until her arrival in Islamabad and coincided with a horrible slaughter in Peshawar shows how dramatic the situation is. The second trouble spot is the Mideast: Over the past few months, BERLIN 00001364 004 OF 007 she sent two special envoys to the region unsuccessfully, resulting in a lot of wasted time. Only now is Clinton apparently realizing that there are problems in foreign policy which the secretary of state should take care of herself - nine months too late." ¶5. (Iran) Nuclear Conflict Frankfurter Rundschau (10/29) reported under the headline: "Iran Will Only Accept Portion of Enriched Uranium Plan and wrote: "Iran will accept the 'framework' of the draft treaty that was signed last week in Vienna on the enrichment of Iranian uranium, but demands a few 'amendments.' With this statement the planned conference between the P5 plus Germany and Iran, scheduled to take place in Geneva this Thursday, has been thwarted." Sueddeutsche (10/29) opined in an editorial that "The most important rule in the nuclear conflict with Iran is as follows: if all sides involved want to achieve a solution via negotiations, Iran's justified security interests must be respected. At the same time, no one should be so naQve to insinuate that Tehran has only defensive motifs for its nuclear armament. It is true that Tehran is still a few years away from possessing the bomb, but it would hardly be so senseless as to attack Israel. The regime is interested in preserving its power, not in committing suicide. However, there is one path upon which all sides could embark. First of all, Iran should stop the enrichment of uranium and re-apply the NPT additional protocol. [IAEA] inspectors could then search for secret facilities. Like in the case of Libya, Iran's violations from the past should be revealed but it should not be punished for them. Then the West should back a lifting of sanctions and keep its promise to cooperate on the civil use of nuclear energy - and guarantee Iran's security. But the much lauded security system for the Middle East or a nuclear-free Israel should not be preconditions for this. If a basis of confidence were to be established, it would be enough to give Iran a non-aggression promise. However, if the talks fail, the only option that remains will be to impose tough sanctions." ¶6. (EU) Future President Tagesspiegel (10/29) headlined: "Britons are at odds over EU office for Blair" and Die Welt noted in a lengthy piece on the former British Prime Minister that "Tony Blair's candidature for the EU presidency is raising skepticism from Europe's capitals. The Britons are even plunging into an identity crisis." Die Welt added: "A Tory BERLIN 00001364 005 OF 007 government in Downing Street and an EU President Blair in Brussels: this would mean nothing good for the island's relationship with the continent. Only those who want a strained relationship would like to see such a pair. It would not be to Europe's benefit... Tony Blair should instead take the time to write his memories." FT Deutschland (10/29) headlined: "Merkel will choose the council's president," adding: "The Chancellor's candidate will be important for deciding who will get what post within the EU." The paper wrote: "The camps are clear prior to the summit in Brussels. Larger EU countries such as Britain, France and Italy support Blair's candidature for the new office of EU council president. Smaller countries like Belgium, Austria and Luxemburg have forged a front against Blair. Nobody yet knows the decisive answer: who is Merkel's candidate?" Frankfurter Rundschau (10/29) headlined: "Juncker competes against Blair - Luxemburg's head of government wants to become EU council president and defeat former British Prime Minister Blair." Under the headline "One for all," weekly Die Zeit wrote on the EU's efforts to pursue a common foreign policy: "Can 27 countries really pursue a common foreign policy. The European Union is attempting the impossible by creating a European Foreign Office for the first time.... EU diplomats will not achieve much in the beginning. Progress could be made if the Europe speaks with one voice. " According to Sueddeutsche, "Sarkozy's peacock-like style usually does not have a lasting effect - one example is the Mediterranean Union, while Merkel's owl-like stoicism does not meet with great public applause. That is why the pair compliments each other in the best possible way. Next to this European leadership duo, there is little room for a third guiding star, yet Tony Blair wants to be this star. He would like to be European president, and with a gloriole, as Newsweek sees him. It would be a laudable act for the Franco-German alliance to bury Blair's hopes." ¶7. (U.S.-Germany) Relations In a front page article, Die Zeit remarked on Chancellor Merkel's visit to Washington and address to the Congress: "The invitation is a demonstrative honor for the chancellor and a gesture of respect for all Germans 20 years after the fall of the wall. However, the core of U.S.-German relations must be unearthed again: for Germany, America BERLIN 00001364 006 OF 007 represents the revolutionary, egalitarian and democratic principle and an unprecedented power of change. Twice, the U.S. was the midwife of Germany's freedom, not just during the foundation of the Federal Republic in 1949 but also after the downfall of communism in 1989. The European powers, France and Britain, as well as many West Germans were not keen on overthrowing the post-war world, in which many lived comfortably. East Germans forced German unity-and it was the United States that calmly responded: 'Why not? And 'If not that, then what?' The reception of Merkel will be an unmistakable reminder of this interplay of forces. The chancellor would not be in the position she is today without the last democratic revolution, inspired by the ideals of the West, and she will start down the path paved by the first revolution, the American Revolution. Germany never had an epochal revolution of its own. Its revolution was America's. The old authoritarian state could not survive without its alliance with the U.S. after the Second World War. The U.S. was not perfect at the time, and neither is it perfect today. However, U.S. society is based on equal rights for all people-and the pursuit of happiness.... In the conservative time of Konrad Adenauer, President John F. Kennedy was the model for social democratic reformers like Willy Brandt. Student protests against the Vietnam War originated in the United States. And today? It is not a pilgrimage to the temples of democracy when the German chancellor travels to Washington. The model has since been tainted. Despite the great tuning point of President Obama's election, the pathological features of U.S. policies are obvious: the excessive role money plays as well as the polarized and hateful debate over the President's reform projects. Barack Obama has not come very far with his project to return to reason and to change the political culture of his country. The state of Europe's democracy is different, but not much better. Populists and pseudo-cesarean leaders like Sarkozy and Berlusconi pose the greatest threat." ¶8. (Environment) Climate Talks Center-left, weekly Die Zeit of Hamburg (10/29) carried a lengthy article on the upcoming Copenhagen climate talks and opined: "The hundreds of high-ranking diplomats, almost 200 ministers, and even some government leaders will bid each other farewell after two weeks of talks in Copenhagen, but they will hardly have agreed on a treaty to protect the earth from human-induced global warming. That is why they will not declare the end of the conclave but will continue it in a different theater. For more than two years, all those who feared for the fate of the blue planet, have awaited this event. And now? BERLIN 00001364 007 OF 007 They must wait and see, have a cup of tea, and not lose patience, although the fight against global warming cannot tolerate one postponement after the other. As of next Monday, environmental experts will try to find a common denominator at a meeting in Barcelona. But why should more come of it than during the previous meetings in Bonn and Bangkok? Too much is at stake. Primarily... chances of development in the 21st century. Once this century was called the century of the environment but it could also turn out to be the century of environmental disasters if the agreement on global climate protection continues to be long in waiting." MURPHY