Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08THEHAGUE900
2008-10-27 13:42:00
SECRET
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:
CWC: COORDINATION MEETING AND OPCW DESTRUCTION
VZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHTC #0900/01 3011342 ZNY SSSSS ZZH O 271342Z OCT 08 ZDK FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 2150 INFO RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1788 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1829 RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 2351 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY RHMFISS/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC//OSAC PRIORITY
S E C R E T THE HAGUE 000900
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CB, VCI/CCA, L/NPV, IO/MPR,
SECDEF FOR OSD/GSA/CN,CP>
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (ROBERTS AND DENYER)
NSC FOR FLY
WINPAC FOR WALTER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2018
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CWC: COORDINATION MEETING AND OPCW DESTRUCTION
INFORMALS
Classified By: Ambassador Eric M. Javits for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
This is CWC-52-08
-------
SUMMARY
-------
S E C R E T THE HAGUE 000900
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CB, VCI/CCA, L/NPV, IO/MPR,
SECDEF FOR OSD/GSA/CN,CP>
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (ROBERTS AND DENYER)
NSC FOR FLY
WINPAC FOR WALTER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2018
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CWC: COORDINATION MEETING AND OPCW DESTRUCTION
INFORMALS
Classified By: Ambassador Eric M. Javits for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
This is CWC-52-08
--------------
SUMMARY
--------------
1. (U) On October 13, the U.S. delegation
participated in the Donor Coordination Meeting hosted
by the Dutch MFA to review progress in international
contributions to Russia's chemical weapons
destruction program. Del also participated in the EC
Chairperson's Destruction Informals meeting, at which
the Technical Secretariat (TS) and States Parties
(SP) provided a detailed update of destruction
activities, conversion of former chemical weapons
(CW) production facilities, and other declarations-
related information.
--------------
DONOR COORDINATION MEETING
--------------
2. (U) The meeting was held at the Dutch MFA and was
chaired by Henk Cor van der Kwast, head of the MFA's
Nonproliferation Department, and attended by the
Netherlands, Russia, UK, U.S., Germany, Canada,
Sweden, Finland, Czech Republic, and Italy. Russia,
the UK, the U.S., and Germany provided program status
briefings on CW destruction in Russia.
3. (U) Germany provided a quick recap of its previous
efforts at Gorniy (Euro 50 million),Kambarka (Euro
150 million),and an update on their efforts at
Pochep, the largest of the Russian CW storage sites
(EUR 140 Million). The German delegation also gave a
slide presentation on the status of construction
activities at Pochep. German support focuses on
provision of a turn-key thermal treatment building,
contracted to Eisenmann and being assembled in
Germany, although a Russian subcontractor will
oversee construction of the building itself. Next
steps include shipping of the equipment to Pochep and
installation beginning this December. Target for
startup is spring 2010.
4. (U) UK MOD rep James Harrison, speaking on behalf
of the UK and smaller donors that contribute to UK
assistance efforts, gave an overview of recent
progress at Shchuchye. Harrison confirmed that with
the installation of equipment in Building 1A, and
completion of the railway between the storage and
destruction facilities, Russia still planned to begin
operations in late 2008. The completion of the
electricity supply system, however, has been plagued
by problems with unexpected (by FAI or the UK)
changes in price and design from the Russian
contractor. Harrison stated that all donor funds
should be expended by the end of November 2008, and
that a visit will be arranged in early 2009 for
donors to the electricity project. In total, 80
million pounds have been contributed to the Shchuchye
project.
5. For the U.S, Dr. Hopkins noted that almost all of
the money pledged to the U.S. Shchuchye project had
been committed ($1.1 billion) with $774 million spent
in Russia. He said the trilateral approach to
contracting had greatly improved progress in U.S.
assistance at Shchuchye.
6. (U) Russian rep Elena Rodyushkina started the
Russian update on a pleasant note, expressing
appreciation to donors for improved patterns of
timely and predictable assistance, noting in
particular the significant improvement in U.S.
assistance efforts since implementation of the new
trilateral arrangement last year. True to form,
however, she noted that only a small percentage of
the expected 1.7 billion U.S. dollars had arrived
during the critical construction phase, when it would
have had the greatest impact. Rodyushkina also
referred to a critical piece of equipment missing
from the Metal Parts Furnace, despite Russia's having
requested it, and all but directly blamed the UK for
this omission. She went on to describe other delays
for which Russian clearly held the UK responsible,
and noted that lack of advance payment to contractors
continues to cause delays.
7. (U) The tour de table also highlighted the
following:
-- Sweden stated that it would have funding for Green
Cross in 2009.
-- Finland noted that they contributed Euro 750k for
the electrical supply at Shchuchye and are
considering additional funding for Green Cross.
-- The Czech Republic also noted its contribution to
the electricity supply project.
-- In response to the tone of the Russian
intervention, the UK highlighted the difficulty of
administering the multi-national assistance program
from a distance, particularly when faced with a lack
of reasonable bids for projects. Harrison also
announced that the UK would host the CW Demil
Conference 18 May 2009.
-- Italy described continuing difficulties in its
efforts to provide bilateral assistance to Russia,
noting that it was unable to agree a work plan with
Russia in time to take advantage of previously
committed funding and was now looking for a new
project. An agreement to provide assistance at
Pochep had not yet been ratified by Parliament.
-- Canada noted that the destruction process line and
public address system at Shchuchye are now completed,
and the railway is nearing completion; its 100
million Euro contribution should be complete by the
next donors meeting. Its bilateral agreement for
assistance at Kizner should be signed in October, and
details for funding the two catalytic reactors were
negotiated in September. Canada is also considering
funding for a public outreach office at Kizner.
-- The Netherlands reported on progress in electrical
equipment installation.
8. (U) The next donors meeting will be held on 20
April 2009. Draft minutes from the March 2008
meeting were also circulated.
--------------
DESTRUCTION INFORMALS
--------------
9. (U) Executive Council Chairperson Oksana Tomova
(Slovakia) chaired Monday afternoon's session of the
destruction informals, which was divided into two
parts: presentations by the Technical Secretariat
(TS) and presentations by the possessor states.
10. (S) Horst Reeps, Director of the Verification
Division, introduced the TS presentations (hard
copies forwarded separately to Washington) with an
update on verification activities since the last EC.
In addition to an overview of the number of
QIn addition to an overview of the number of
operational destruction facilities, current
campaigns, and number of inspections conducted, he
noted that India is having problems with the H-heel
in bulk storage containers and continues to work to
resolve the problem.
11. (SBU) At Maradykovsky, Reeps noted that the
Thermal Destruction Unit is operational and draining
and incineration of the reaction mass is on-going. At
Leonidovka, catalyst and reagents are being
introduced to aerial bombs and the Final Engineering
Review at Shchuchye is planned for the second half of
November. In Libya, the initial visit was conducted
to the Ruwagha chemical reloading facility September
1-7, and on September 10 the TS held discussions in
Tripoli on the facility agreement and verification
plan for Ruwagha and the Rabta Toxic Chemical
Disposal Facility.
12. (U) Reeps noted the TS was ready to conduct a
challenge inspection or investigation of alleged use
in relation to traditional agents under Article IX,
but suggested that the TS should also be prepared to
react to "substances of special interest," such as
industrial chemicals and pesticides. He said the TS
was preparing a list of such chemicals, and sought
States Parties contributions. The samples for
Designated Laboratory proficiency test 24 went out on
October 10 to States Parties. Electronic declaration
software for declaration of OCPFs and Aggregate
National Data is now available for States Parties to
test.
13. (S) Stephen Wade, Head of the Declarations
Branch, noted that between June 23 and October 13 the
following official documents relating to verification
issues were received: Article III: 65; Article VI 162
with the total of 2195 pages. These included
amendments to initial declarations (Russia),annual
destruction reports (Russia, Korea (ASP),India),
detailed facility information (Libya),facility
agreement and verification plan (Libya),90 day
reports, new discoveries of OACW (Italy, Japan,
Canada),notification of CWPF changes (Korea (ASP)),
and an Annual CWPF Report (India).
14. (S) Dominique Anelli, Head of the Chemical
Demilitarization Branch, presented the status of
demilitarization activities. On CW Production
Facilities, Anelli highlighted the fact that Russia
will soon issue a destruction certificate for the
Dzerzhinsk Lewisite Facility. On destruction, he
noted that the Republic of Korea completed
destruction on July 10, 2008. Overall as of September
30, 2008, 29,557 MT (41.44%) of the 71,331 MT
declared CW agents have been destroyed. The
possessor States Parties had destroyed the following
percentages of category 1 chemical agents by
September 30, 2008: Albania 100%, Korea (A State
Party) 100%, India 97%, USA 55.4%, Russia 29%, Libya
0%.
15. (U) Dr. Hopkins reported that the U.S. had been
destroying CW for 12 years before Entry into Force of
the Convention and had now destroyed 55.4% of its CW
agents. He then outlined the status of destruction of
agent and the construction of new CW Destruction
Facility sites in the U.S. Hopkins noted that
destruction has not gone as rapidly as desired due to
a number of technical issues, Congressionally
mandated introduction of new destruction
technologies, and unanticipated problems such as
Qtechnologies, and unanticipated problems such as
mercury contamination in bulk stored mustard. He
announced that the United States would host the next
EC visit to Pueblo and Umatilla CWDFs in June 2009.
As in the last session of the destruction informals,
Iran again asked the U.S. to give start-up dates for
operations at Pueblo and Blue Grass. Hopkins
answered that due to the fact that the sites would
use new technologies to destroy assembled chemical
weapons, the U.S. would be in a better position to
provide this information once construction and
testing had reached a more advanced stage.
16. (U) Russia presented data similar to that of the
Secretariat on its destruction operations at
Maradykovsky, Leonidovka and Kambarka. It noted the
successful EC visit to Shchuchye in September and
that vertical construction was underway at Pochep and
the site was being prepared for construction at
Kizner.
17. (U) For Libya, Dr. Hesnawy presented an update on
the conversion of the Rabta CW Production Facilities.
He indicated that Libya was on target to meet its
intended deadline of December 31, 2009. Buildings
1,2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 26,
27, 28, 30, and 31 are now operational. Ten buildings
are under conversion. Six simply require civil
engineering work. Four buildings (14, 15, 17 and 25)
require chemical engineering construction and
installations and are approximately 60% complete. Of
the 500 units involved, roughly 400 are in place.
Hesnawy noted that the UK and U.S. had visited the
site earlier in the year and that Italy would visit
within a month. He further reported that the TS had
made its initial visit to Ruwagha September 1-7 and
that the Final Engineering Review would take place in
December. The Libyan delegation also presented
slides detailing the conversion progress, indicating
that Libya had met the 80% conversion target of the
end of October 2008 and that it fully expected to
meet its deadline of December 31, 2009 for 100%
conversion.
18. (S) Korea presented the history of its CW
destruction efforts leading up to the completion of
destruction on July 10, 2008. It indicated that the
ROK still needed to be referred to as "A State Party"
when discussing past or current possession of
chemical weapons.
19. (U) Japan presented an update on its progress in
conjunction with China on progress towards beginning
destruction of Japanese Abandoned Chemical Weapons,
focusing on trial excavations and mobile destruction
facilities (MDFs). After reiterating the difficulties
associated with excavation and recovery of old
munitions, the Japanese delegation explained that it
will be necessary to perform two trial excavations at
Haerba-Ling. The first could be as early as this
October, and the second some time in 2009. In
relation to the MDFs, Japan noted that the framework
for planning, construction, and contracting for the
MDFs was agreed to by the Premier of China and the
Japanese PM in April of 2001. The tender has been
issued by Japan this October with a contract that is
expected to be let by end of 2008. The MDFs are
planned to be operational by 2010 near Nanjing.
20. (S) India: India noted that it was very close to
completing destruction of its Category 1 CW, with 97%
now destroyed, but that it was encountering some
difficulties with containers with H heel. (DEL
COMMENT: On the margins of EC-53, India indicated to
Delreps that it had solved this problem by use of
QDelreps that it had solved this problem by use of
high pressure sparging with chloroethanol followed by
thermal treatment of the containers. END COMMENT.)
21. (S) China congratulated Korea on its successful
completion of its CW destruction and noted its
contribution to stability in the Korean peninsula and
the region. It also encouraged Japan to accelerate
its progress towards destruction of its ACW on
Chinese territory. It noted that there had been
delays in the Haerba-ling excavations due to delays
in the Japanese completion of related infrastructure.
22. (U) JAVITS SENDS.
CULBERTSON
SIPDIS
STATE FOR ISN/CB, VCI/CCA, L/NPV, IO/MPR,
SECDEF FOR OSD/GSA/CN,CP>
JOINT STAFF FOR DD PMA-A FOR WTC
COMMERCE FOR BIS (ROBERTS AND DENYER)
NSC FOR FLY
WINPAC FOR WALTER
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2018
TAGS: PARM PREL CWC
SUBJECT: CWC: COORDINATION MEETING AND OPCW DESTRUCTION
INFORMALS
Classified By: Ambassador Eric M. Javits for reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
This is CWC-52-08
--------------
SUMMARY
--------------
1. (U) On October 13, the U.S. delegation
participated in the Donor Coordination Meeting hosted
by the Dutch MFA to review progress in international
contributions to Russia's chemical weapons
destruction program. Del also participated in the EC
Chairperson's Destruction Informals meeting, at which
the Technical Secretariat (TS) and States Parties
(SP) provided a detailed update of destruction
activities, conversion of former chemical weapons
(CW) production facilities, and other declarations-
related information.
--------------
DONOR COORDINATION MEETING
--------------
2. (U) The meeting was held at the Dutch MFA and was
chaired by Henk Cor van der Kwast, head of the MFA's
Nonproliferation Department, and attended by the
Netherlands, Russia, UK, U.S., Germany, Canada,
Sweden, Finland, Czech Republic, and Italy. Russia,
the UK, the U.S., and Germany provided program status
briefings on CW destruction in Russia.
3. (U) Germany provided a quick recap of its previous
efforts at Gorniy (Euro 50 million),Kambarka (Euro
150 million),and an update on their efforts at
Pochep, the largest of the Russian CW storage sites
(EUR 140 Million). The German delegation also gave a
slide presentation on the status of construction
activities at Pochep. German support focuses on
provision of a turn-key thermal treatment building,
contracted to Eisenmann and being assembled in
Germany, although a Russian subcontractor will
oversee construction of the building itself. Next
steps include shipping of the equipment to Pochep and
installation beginning this December. Target for
startup is spring 2010.
4. (U) UK MOD rep James Harrison, speaking on behalf
of the UK and smaller donors that contribute to UK
assistance efforts, gave an overview of recent
progress at Shchuchye. Harrison confirmed that with
the installation of equipment in Building 1A, and
completion of the railway between the storage and
destruction facilities, Russia still planned to begin
operations in late 2008. The completion of the
electricity supply system, however, has been plagued
by problems with unexpected (by FAI or the UK)
changes in price and design from the Russian
contractor. Harrison stated that all donor funds
should be expended by the end of November 2008, and
that a visit will be arranged in early 2009 for
donors to the electricity project. In total, 80
million pounds have been contributed to the Shchuchye
project.
5. For the U.S, Dr. Hopkins noted that almost all of
the money pledged to the U.S. Shchuchye project had
been committed ($1.1 billion) with $774 million spent
in Russia. He said the trilateral approach to
contracting had greatly improved progress in U.S.
assistance at Shchuchye.
6. (U) Russian rep Elena Rodyushkina started the
Russian update on a pleasant note, expressing
appreciation to donors for improved patterns of
timely and predictable assistance, noting in
particular the significant improvement in U.S.
assistance efforts since implementation of the new
trilateral arrangement last year. True to form,
however, she noted that only a small percentage of
the expected 1.7 billion U.S. dollars had arrived
during the critical construction phase, when it would
have had the greatest impact. Rodyushkina also
referred to a critical piece of equipment missing
from the Metal Parts Furnace, despite Russia's having
requested it, and all but directly blamed the UK for
this omission. She went on to describe other delays
for which Russian clearly held the UK responsible,
and noted that lack of advance payment to contractors
continues to cause delays.
7. (U) The tour de table also highlighted the
following:
-- Sweden stated that it would have funding for Green
Cross in 2009.
-- Finland noted that they contributed Euro 750k for
the electrical supply at Shchuchye and are
considering additional funding for Green Cross.
-- The Czech Republic also noted its contribution to
the electricity supply project.
-- In response to the tone of the Russian
intervention, the UK highlighted the difficulty of
administering the multi-national assistance program
from a distance, particularly when faced with a lack
of reasonable bids for projects. Harrison also
announced that the UK would host the CW Demil
Conference 18 May 2009.
-- Italy described continuing difficulties in its
efforts to provide bilateral assistance to Russia,
noting that it was unable to agree a work plan with
Russia in time to take advantage of previously
committed funding and was now looking for a new
project. An agreement to provide assistance at
Pochep had not yet been ratified by Parliament.
-- Canada noted that the destruction process line and
public address system at Shchuchye are now completed,
and the railway is nearing completion; its 100
million Euro contribution should be complete by the
next donors meeting. Its bilateral agreement for
assistance at Kizner should be signed in October, and
details for funding the two catalytic reactors were
negotiated in September. Canada is also considering
funding for a public outreach office at Kizner.
-- The Netherlands reported on progress in electrical
equipment installation.
8. (U) The next donors meeting will be held on 20
April 2009. Draft minutes from the March 2008
meeting were also circulated.
--------------
DESTRUCTION INFORMALS
--------------
9. (U) Executive Council Chairperson Oksana Tomova
(Slovakia) chaired Monday afternoon's session of the
destruction informals, which was divided into two
parts: presentations by the Technical Secretariat
(TS) and presentations by the possessor states.
10. (S) Horst Reeps, Director of the Verification
Division, introduced the TS presentations (hard
copies forwarded separately to Washington) with an
update on verification activities since the last EC.
In addition to an overview of the number of
QIn addition to an overview of the number of
operational destruction facilities, current
campaigns, and number of inspections conducted, he
noted that India is having problems with the H-heel
in bulk storage containers and continues to work to
resolve the problem.
11. (SBU) At Maradykovsky, Reeps noted that the
Thermal Destruction Unit is operational and draining
and incineration of the reaction mass is on-going. At
Leonidovka, catalyst and reagents are being
introduced to aerial bombs and the Final Engineering
Review at Shchuchye is planned for the second half of
November. In Libya, the initial visit was conducted
to the Ruwagha chemical reloading facility September
1-7, and on September 10 the TS held discussions in
Tripoli on the facility agreement and verification
plan for Ruwagha and the Rabta Toxic Chemical
Disposal Facility.
12. (U) Reeps noted the TS was ready to conduct a
challenge inspection or investigation of alleged use
in relation to traditional agents under Article IX,
but suggested that the TS should also be prepared to
react to "substances of special interest," such as
industrial chemicals and pesticides. He said the TS
was preparing a list of such chemicals, and sought
States Parties contributions. The samples for
Designated Laboratory proficiency test 24 went out on
October 10 to States Parties. Electronic declaration
software for declaration of OCPFs and Aggregate
National Data is now available for States Parties to
test.
13. (S) Stephen Wade, Head of the Declarations
Branch, noted that between June 23 and October 13 the
following official documents relating to verification
issues were received: Article III: 65; Article VI 162
with the total of 2195 pages. These included
amendments to initial declarations (Russia),annual
destruction reports (Russia, Korea (ASP),India),
detailed facility information (Libya),facility
agreement and verification plan (Libya),90 day
reports, new discoveries of OACW (Italy, Japan,
Canada),notification of CWPF changes (Korea (ASP)),
and an Annual CWPF Report (India).
14. (S) Dominique Anelli, Head of the Chemical
Demilitarization Branch, presented the status of
demilitarization activities. On CW Production
Facilities, Anelli highlighted the fact that Russia
will soon issue a destruction certificate for the
Dzerzhinsk Lewisite Facility. On destruction, he
noted that the Republic of Korea completed
destruction on July 10, 2008. Overall as of September
30, 2008, 29,557 MT (41.44%) of the 71,331 MT
declared CW agents have been destroyed. The
possessor States Parties had destroyed the following
percentages of category 1 chemical agents by
September 30, 2008: Albania 100%, Korea (A State
Party) 100%, India 97%, USA 55.4%, Russia 29%, Libya
0%.
15. (U) Dr. Hopkins reported that the U.S. had been
destroying CW for 12 years before Entry into Force of
the Convention and had now destroyed 55.4% of its CW
agents. He then outlined the status of destruction of
agent and the construction of new CW Destruction
Facility sites in the U.S. Hopkins noted that
destruction has not gone as rapidly as desired due to
a number of technical issues, Congressionally
mandated introduction of new destruction
technologies, and unanticipated problems such as
Qtechnologies, and unanticipated problems such as
mercury contamination in bulk stored mustard. He
announced that the United States would host the next
EC visit to Pueblo and Umatilla CWDFs in June 2009.
As in the last session of the destruction informals,
Iran again asked the U.S. to give start-up dates for
operations at Pueblo and Blue Grass. Hopkins
answered that due to the fact that the sites would
use new technologies to destroy assembled chemical
weapons, the U.S. would be in a better position to
provide this information once construction and
testing had reached a more advanced stage.
16. (U) Russia presented data similar to that of the
Secretariat on its destruction operations at
Maradykovsky, Leonidovka and Kambarka. It noted the
successful EC visit to Shchuchye in September and
that vertical construction was underway at Pochep and
the site was being prepared for construction at
Kizner.
17. (U) For Libya, Dr. Hesnawy presented an update on
the conversion of the Rabta CW Production Facilities.
He indicated that Libya was on target to meet its
intended deadline of December 31, 2009. Buildings
1,2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 26,
27, 28, 30, and 31 are now operational. Ten buildings
are under conversion. Six simply require civil
engineering work. Four buildings (14, 15, 17 and 25)
require chemical engineering construction and
installations and are approximately 60% complete. Of
the 500 units involved, roughly 400 are in place.
Hesnawy noted that the UK and U.S. had visited the
site earlier in the year and that Italy would visit
within a month. He further reported that the TS had
made its initial visit to Ruwagha September 1-7 and
that the Final Engineering Review would take place in
December. The Libyan delegation also presented
slides detailing the conversion progress, indicating
that Libya had met the 80% conversion target of the
end of October 2008 and that it fully expected to
meet its deadline of December 31, 2009 for 100%
conversion.
18. (S) Korea presented the history of its CW
destruction efforts leading up to the completion of
destruction on July 10, 2008. It indicated that the
ROK still needed to be referred to as "A State Party"
when discussing past or current possession of
chemical weapons.
19. (U) Japan presented an update on its progress in
conjunction with China on progress towards beginning
destruction of Japanese Abandoned Chemical Weapons,
focusing on trial excavations and mobile destruction
facilities (MDFs). After reiterating the difficulties
associated with excavation and recovery of old
munitions, the Japanese delegation explained that it
will be necessary to perform two trial excavations at
Haerba-Ling. The first could be as early as this
October, and the second some time in 2009. In
relation to the MDFs, Japan noted that the framework
for planning, construction, and contracting for the
MDFs was agreed to by the Premier of China and the
Japanese PM in April of 2001. The tender has been
issued by Japan this October with a contract that is
expected to be let by end of 2008. The MDFs are
planned to be operational by 2010 near Nanjing.
20. (S) India: India noted that it was very close to
completing destruction of its Category 1 CW, with 97%
now destroyed, but that it was encountering some
difficulties with containers with H heel. (DEL
COMMENT: On the margins of EC-53, India indicated to
Delreps that it had solved this problem by use of
QDelreps that it had solved this problem by use of
high pressure sparging with chloroethanol followed by
thermal treatment of the containers. END COMMENT.)
21. (S) China congratulated Korea on its successful
completion of its CW destruction and noted its
contribution to stability in the Korean peninsula and
the region. It also encouraged Japan to accelerate
its progress towards destruction of its ACW on
Chinese territory. It noted that there had been
delays in the Haerba-ling excavations due to delays
in the Japanese completion of related infrastructure.
22. (U) JAVITS SENDS.
CULBERTSON