ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

UNCLAS TEL AVIV 001690 STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM NSC FOR NEA STAFF SECDEF WASHDC FOR USDP/ASD-PA/ASD-ISA HQ USAF FOR XOXX DA WASHDC FOR SASA JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR PA CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL FOR POLAD/USIA ADVISOR COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE FOR PAO/POLAD COMSIXTHFLT FOR 019 JERUSALEM ALSO ICD LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL PARIS ALSO FOR POL ROME FOR MFO SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC KMDR IS SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION -------------- SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: -------------- ¶1. Mideast ¶2. Iran -------------- Key stories in the media: -------------- All major media reported that Israel admitted 188 Fatah-aligned Palestinians who fled Gaza after intense fighting with Hamas. The media reported that PA President Mahmoud Abbas refused to admit some of them. Leading media reported that by Sunday evening close to 35 members of the group had been transferred back to Gaza where some of them were immediately arrested by security forces. Maariv wrote: "What started as a gesture ended in an entanglement." Leading media reported that yesterday Association of Civil Rights in Israel petitioned the High Court of Justice not to allow the return to Gaza of those who fled the Strip. This morning electronic media reported that the remainder of the group will eventually arrive in Ramallah. Israel Radio reported that last night Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the mentor of the Shas party, which still belongs to the government coalition, blessed Likud Chairman Benjamin Netanyahu. Over the weekend the media reported that Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz warned on Friday in Washington that Iran is on the verge of a "major breakthrough" in its quest to produce nuclear weapons and that he assessed that Tehran would be able to enrich uranium to military levels as early as the end of 2009. Yesterday The Jerusalem Post reported that Israeli diplomatic officials dismissed as "Syrian spin" intended for Western ears reports that Syrian President Bashar Assad was in Tehran over the weekend trying to persuade Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to provide proof that his country is not pursuing nuclear weapons. The Jerusalem Post reported that today the Lebanese council of ministers is expected to make a draft policy statement that could secure Hizbullah's existence as an armed organization and guarantee its right to "liberate or recover occupied lands.Q The draft will be presented to the parliament in the coming days. The media quoted Arab media that Mohammed Suleiman, a top military aide to Syrian President Bashar Assad whom Israel believes was in charge of arms transfers from Syria to Hizbullah, was killed by a sniper on Friday. Yediot reported that Suleiman was "in charge of the Syrian atom." The media speculated that Israel or Syria, among others, could be behind the assassination. Ha'aretz reported that police arrested a border policeman on suspicion of shooting and killing a 10-year-old boy last week during clashes at Na'alin, west of Ramallah. Electronic media reported that a 17-year-old Palestinian died of wounds sustained last week in Na'alin. Ha'aretz and The Jerusalem Post reported that yesterday the High Court of Justice severely criticized the fact that the state has ignored a last yearQs ruling regarding the route of the security fence on lands of the village of Bil'in. Maariv cited the belief of officials involved in the negotiations between Israel and Hamas for the release of Gilad Shalit that Shalit's kidnappers will demand from Israel a "life insurance policy" to ensure that they will not become targets for assassination after Shalit is released. Ha'aretz and Yediot (lead story in Ha'aretz) reported that Israel has received a specific warning of Hizbullah's intent to attack Israeli citizens in West Africa. All media reported that yesterday the cabinet voted to support a bill proposing a biometric database containing information about all its citizens. Ha'aretz reported that the Association of Civil Rights in Israel wrote to Justice Minister Daniel Friedmann that Qno Western democracy would dare establish such a dangerous database." Yediot reported that PM Ehud Olmert has removed FM Tzipi Livni from the circle of ministers advising about criteria for the release of Palestinian prisoners "with blood on their hands. Ha'aretz reported that the Jerusalem Municipality is working to prevent the evacuation of a seven-story building in an East Jerusalem neighborhood, which was built by settlers without authorization. Media reported that yesterday the cabinet approved the release of five Palestinian prisoners as part of the final stage of a prisoner swap with Hizbullah. Major media reported that yesterday the NGO Physicians for Human Rights charged that the Shin Bet is the arbiter of life and death for gravely ill Gazan Palestinians. The media quoted the Shi Bet as saying that the evaluation process was aimed at eliminating a potential threat or danger posed by the applicant. Yesterday The Jerusalem Post reported that the Pentagon notified Congress over the weekend of a possible $1.9 billion sale of nine brand new C-130 J model Hercules transport aircraft to Israel. Leading media reported that John McCain is considering placing Jewish Congressman Eric Cantor (VA) on his ticket. Maariv noted that his cousin Daniel Cantor Wultz was killed in a terrorist attack in Israel. The media reported that yesterday the cabinet approved a sweeping plan to cut government spending in 2008 by 6 percent, except for defense, education, and local authorities, to free up 740 million shekels (around $243 million). Maariv reported that convicted spy Jonathan Pollard has requested the Tel Aviv District Court to declare that since his arrest and to date, he and his wife have not received any financial help from Israel. -------------- ¶1. Mideast: -------------- Summary: -------------- Professor Eyal Zisser, the Chairman of the Department of Middle Eastern History at Tel Aviv University, wrote in the independent Israel Hayom: "Israel is liable, as usual, to pay the price of this internal Palestinian conflict." The conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized: "Lifting international sanctions on Hamas would be a flagrant reward for Islamist violence and tyranny. At the same time, Hamas is a permanent fixture in Palestinian politics. Rather than closing its eyes to this reality, Israel must more thoroughly integrate awareness of it into its security and diplomatic strategy." The independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized: "Suleiman, Siniora and Nasrallah play with fire in their display of belligerent arrogance. Perhaps this can be attributed to the twilight of the Bush and Olmert administrations. Lebanon must know that these provocations are dangerous, and that it will bear the cost of an unfortunate renewal of violence." Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in Ha'aretz: "It's hard to find an Israeli public figure who damages the country's crucial strategic interests more than candidate Mofaz." Block Quotes: -------------- ¶I. "They're Fighting; We're Going to Pay the Price" Professor Eyal Zisser, the Chairman of the Department of Middle Eastern History at Tel Aviv University, wrote in the independent Israel Hayom (8/3): "The truce agreement that was reached between Israel and Hamas has evidently not produced quiet and tranquility for the residents of the Gaza Strip.... Israel is liable, as usual, to pay the price of this internal Palestinian conflict. When everyone's eyes are turned toward intra-Palestinian fighting, it is difficult to imagine that Hamas will have either the time or energy to invest in promoting a deal for Gilad Shalit's release.... Hamas's assumption is, apparently, that as long as they have the Israeli soldier, Israel will refrain from attacking the Hamas leadership, not to mention staging a comprehensive offensive whose purpose would be to bring about the collapse of HamasQs regime in the Gaza Strip.... The recent turn of events in the Gaza Strip exposed once again FatahQs weakness. This weakness is preventing it from reaching any real agreement with Israel, an agreement that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert would like to complete in the last weeks that remain of his tenure. In any event, any such agreement will have only limited validity. Either way, the vision of a two-state solution, of Israel and Palestine, is fading away; instead, we are probably going to have to begin to accustom ourselves to a new vision of a three-state solution: Israel alongside of two Palestinian states -- a hostile state under Hamas's leadership in the Gaza Strip and a state led by the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank that is dependent on an Israeli military presence defending it for the time being against Hamas." II. "Weekend in Hamastan" The conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized (8/4): "Israel and the West would do well to internalize, given this internecine Palestinian violence, that Hamas's rule in Gaza is the best indicator to date of how Palestinians would run their affairs in a fully independent Palestine. We need also to recognize the failure of institution-building and due process in the Abbas component of the PA thus far, as illuminated by the torture of Hamas functionaries, on Fatah's behalf, by the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. Dismally, despite the brutal nature of its Gaza rule, Hamas remains more popular in the West Bank and Gaza than Abbas. This ongoing triumph of bellicosity and intransigence over relative moderation is greatly assisted by Abbas's abject failure to root out corruption from Fatah. In such a climate, there arn't enough checkpoints in the West Bank Israel ca dismantle to 'help' Abbas. Indeed, IDF pullbacs and eased security conditions in the West Bank wuld simply set the stage for a Hamas takeover an leave Israel more vulnerable to terrorism. Planly, lifting international sanctions on Hamas would be a flagrant reward for Islamist violence andtyranny. At the same time, Hamas is a permanent fxture in Palestinian politics. Rather than closing its eyes to this reality, Israel must more thoroughly integrate awareness of it into its security and diplomatic strategy." III. "Provocation and Responsibility" The independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized (8/3): "In July 2006, [the] Bush administration denied Olmert the chance to follow through on then-IDF chief of staff Dan Halutz's reasonable proposal to respond to Hizbullah's aggression by striking at Lebanese government targets, thus challenging the Siniora government to restrain Hizbullah and move forward in implementing signed agreements calling for the decommissioning of all armed militias in Lebanon. All groups abided by those agreements, with the exception of Hizbullah. Israel thus surrendered to the facade of the good Lebanon headed by Siniora alongside the bad one manipulated by Hassan Nasrallah and his patrons in Tehran. The result was a tie that was depicted as a victory for Hizbullah. Israel should only deal with one address in Lebanon: the government. Siniora's survival was of no benefit to Israel. He has made common cause with Hizbullah. Suleiman, Siniora and Nasrallah play with fire in their display of belligerent arrogance. Perhaps this can be attributed to the twilight of the Bush and Olmert administrations. Lebanon must know that these provocations are dangerous, and that it will bear the cost of an unfortunate renewal of violence." IV. "The Gospel According to Mofaz" Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in Ha'aretz (8/4): "As the United States tries to reach an agreement with Iran via diplomatic channels, Mofaz is announcing that Israel must be prepared to use all options to defend itself. He rejected criticism regarding his statement's influence on the oil market with the crushing argument that Israel's existence is more important than oil prices.... As chief of staff and defense minister, Mofaz did more than Netanyahu to contribute to the fall of the centrist-secular rule in the territories and the strengthening of the settlers' hold on it.... Early last week, Mofaz expressed his vehement opposition to negotiations with the Palestinians over a final-status agreement.... None of the candidates vying to succeed Ehud Olmert has major news to share. They did not initiate a single important project or achieve anything exceptional as ministers or cabinet members. They have all reached the top because they jumped from the Likud to Ariel Sharon's party at the right time. Each is responsible, to some degree, for the failures of the Second Lebanon War, the trampling of the peace process and the spread of the settlements. Middling politicians like them come and go by the dozens without leaving a mark on history, for better or for worse. But it's hard to find an Israeli public figure who damages the country's crucial strategic interests more than candidate Mofaz." -------------- ¶2. Iran: -------------- Summary: -------------- Prof. Uzi Arad, the Director of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center, who was a senior advisor to former prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, wrote in mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot: "The most urgent of efforts must be directed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The investment of diplomatic time on the Palestinian or Syrian channel at the expense of time devoted to the diplomatic effort toward Iran could make us miss all three." Block Quotes: -------------- "A Waste of Time" Prof. Uzi Arad, the Director of the Institute for Policy and Strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center, who was a senior advisor to former prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu, wrote in mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot (8/3): "The approaching end of the Bush administration is what gave rise to the Annapolis process, in which a year was allocated for accomplishing an Israeli-Palestinian final status arrangement. At the same time, Israel opened a channel of dialogue with the Syrians. In both cases, some people among us hoped for quick progress, since after all Qthe prices are already obviousQ and Qthe final result is known in advance.Q All that remains is to pack up recycled formulae from Taba or Geneva, return the deposits to the Syrians and as for the restQgo and learn it.... It turns out that the American administration whose authority is expiring, in cooperation with the Israeli government whose authority is in doubt, with problematic partners, all continue in a limping process that appears divorced from all reality.... It looks like the present exercise in endism is the result of that same naove optimism that led in its time to the Oslo process, at the same time that others announced the end of history.... The most urgent of efforts must be directed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. The investment of diplomatic time on the Palestinian or Syrian channel at the expense of time devoted to the diplomatic effort toward Iran could make us miss all three. Until the radicalizing and oppressive element of Iranian nuclear weapons is removed, we must regulate diplomatic activity. If nothing is accomplished, it is a waste of time." MORENO