Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08TASHKENT371
2008-03-28 02:24:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:
EU CONSENSUS FORGED IN TASHKENT ON HEADS OF
how-toVZCZCXYZ0004 RR RUEHWEB DE RUEHNT #0371 0880224 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 280224Z MAR 08 ZFF4 FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9441 INFO RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 3854 RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA 0067 RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 4469 RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 0347 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
C O N F I D E N T I A L TASHKENT 000371
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/27/2018
TAGS: PREL PHUM EU UZ
SUBJECT: EU CONSENSUS FORGED IN TASHKENT ON HEADS OF
MISSION REPORT
REF: (A) TASHKENT 352 (B) TASHKENT 315
Classified By: Amb. Richard Norland for reasons 1.4 (b) and (c)
C O N F I D E N T I A L TASHKENT 000371
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/27/2018
TAGS: PREL PHUM EU UZ
SUBJECT: EU CONSENSUS FORGED IN TASHKENT ON HEADS OF
MISSION REPORT
REF: (A) TASHKENT 352 (B) TASHKENT 315
Classified By: Amb. Richard Norland for reasons 1.4 (b) and (c)
1. (C) The on-again, off-again consensus (reftels) among EU
heads of mission (HOM's) in Tashkent on a report to EU
ministers regarding human rights and sanctions on Uzbekistan
is apparently back on. French Ambassador Hughes Pernet and
British Ambassador Iain Kelly (protect) told Ambassador March
27 that agreement was reached after intense diplomacy by the
Frenchman. Amb. Pernet found middle ground between the
Germans, who did not want to reopen the original report on
the principle that a HOM report is just that -- a report from
the ground, not influenced by political considerations in
capitals -- on the one hand, and the British on the other --
who saw no point in forwarding a report that would be
dead-on-arrival in London if not other EU capitals.
2. (C) The report will still call on the GAERC to maintain
the suspension of sanctions in order to support "the
breathing space that everybody seems to need." It still
refers to the idea of working with the Uzbeks to shape an
"exit strategy" (from sanctions) by the ministerial in
November in order to support what HOM's see as "an emerging
positive tendency" on human rights, as well as real interest
in "rapprochement" with the West. It expresses the belief by
HOM's "that balance needs to shift away from pressure toward
engagement so long as the Uzbeks continue to make progress."
3. (C) Comment: We got a quick look at the text of the new
HOM report, but without being able to analyze the differences
between it and the earlier version, we can't say for sure how
the two differ. The main lines are the same: maintain
suspension of sanctions and pursue engagement, as long as the
Uzbeks continue to deliver some progress and don't take
egregious steps backward. What appears to have restored EU
consensus are three factors: (a) the British Ambassador's
willingness to argue with London that the principle of HOM
reports filed from the field needed to be maintained; (b) the
realization by all concerned that a unanimous report would
carry far more weight; and (c) the fact that the report is in
no way binding. Amb. Kelly made no bones that he still
thinks it highly unlikely that London will buy on to keeping
the suspension of sanctions in place.
NORLAND
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/27/2018
TAGS: PREL PHUM EU UZ
SUBJECT: EU CONSENSUS FORGED IN TASHKENT ON HEADS OF
MISSION REPORT
REF: (A) TASHKENT 352 (B) TASHKENT 315
Classified By: Amb. Richard Norland for reasons 1.4 (b) and (c)
1. (C) The on-again, off-again consensus (reftels) among EU
heads of mission (HOM's) in Tashkent on a report to EU
ministers regarding human rights and sanctions on Uzbekistan
is apparently back on. French Ambassador Hughes Pernet and
British Ambassador Iain Kelly (protect) told Ambassador March
27 that agreement was reached after intense diplomacy by the
Frenchman. Amb. Pernet found middle ground between the
Germans, who did not want to reopen the original report on
the principle that a HOM report is just that -- a report from
the ground, not influenced by political considerations in
capitals -- on the one hand, and the British on the other --
who saw no point in forwarding a report that would be
dead-on-arrival in London if not other EU capitals.
2. (C) The report will still call on the GAERC to maintain
the suspension of sanctions in order to support "the
breathing space that everybody seems to need." It still
refers to the idea of working with the Uzbeks to shape an
"exit strategy" (from sanctions) by the ministerial in
November in order to support what HOM's see as "an emerging
positive tendency" on human rights, as well as real interest
in "rapprochement" with the West. It expresses the belief by
HOM's "that balance needs to shift away from pressure toward
engagement so long as the Uzbeks continue to make progress."
3. (C) Comment: We got a quick look at the text of the new
HOM report, but without being able to analyze the differences
between it and the earlier version, we can't say for sure how
the two differ. The main lines are the same: maintain
suspension of sanctions and pursue engagement, as long as the
Uzbeks continue to deliver some progress and don't take
egregious steps backward. What appears to have restored EU
consensus are three factors: (a) the British Ambassador's
willingness to argue with London that the principle of HOM
reports filed from the field needed to be maintained; (b) the
realization by all concerned that a unanimous report would
carry far more weight; and (c) the fact that the report is in
no way binding. Amb. Kelly made no bones that he still
thinks it highly unlikely that London will buy on to keeping
the suspension of sanctions in place.
NORLAND