Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08STATE69339
2008-06-27 15:56:00
SECRET
Secretary of State
Cable title:  

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IRISL CARGO INSPECTION

Tags:  AG AS AJ BE CH CY EG FR GM IN IR IT JA LY MY MT 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5221
OO RUEHTRO
DE RUEHC #9339/01 1791556
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O P 271556Z JUN 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI IMMEDIATE 1463
RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS IMMEDIATE 1448
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA IMMEDIATE 4882
RUEHKB/AMEMBASSY BAKU IMMEDIATE 6945
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING IMMEDIATE 1358
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN IMMEDIATE 5434
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS IMMEDIATE 0783
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO IMMEDIATE 6785
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA IMMEDIATE 1646
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD IMMEDIATE 4733
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR IMMEDIATE 9207
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON IMMEDIATE 8255
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID IMMEDIATE 9083
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI IMMEDIATE 8706
RUEHNC/AMEMBASSY NICOSIA IMMEDIATE 4012
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO IMMEDIATE 6197
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 9692
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH IMMEDIATE 8028
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME IMMEDIATE 6879
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 7895
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE IMMEDIATE 8673
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM IMMEDIATE 5502
RUEHTI/AMEMBASSY TIRANA IMMEDIATE 1647
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 4907
RUEHVT/AMEMBASSY VALLETTA IMMEDIATE 6497
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI IMMEDIATE 2522
RUEHTRO/AMEMBASSY TRIPOLI IMMEDIATE 1428
INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 2307
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 06 STATE 069339 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/27/2018
TAGS: AG AS AJ BE CH CY EG FR GM IN IR IT JA LY MY MT
NO, PK, SA, SN, KS, SP, SW, TW, TU, TC, UK, ECON, EFIN, EWWT, ETRD,
PARM, PINR, PREL, KNNP, EUN
SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IRISL CARGO INSPECTION
PROVISION OF UNSCR 1803

Classified By: ISN MARY ALICE HAYWARD FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D).

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 06 STATE 069339 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/27/2018 TAGS: AG AS AJ BE CH CY EG FR GM IN IR IT JA LY MY MT NO, PK, SA, SN, KS, SP, SW, TW, TU, TC, UK, ECON, EFIN, EWWT, ETRD, PARM, PINR, PREL, KNNP, EUN SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IRISL CARGO INSPECTION PROVISION OF UNSCR 1803 Classified By: ISN MARY ALICE HAYWARD FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D). ¶1. (U) This is an action request. Please see paragraph 4. -------------- SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND -------------- ¶2. (U) On March 3, 2008, the U.N. Security Council adopted Resolution 1803, which imposed further Chapter VII sanctions on Iran in response to its failure to comply with its obligations under UN Security Council resolutions (UNSCRs) 1737 and 1747, including the obligation to suspend its uranium enrichment-related, reprocessing, and heavy water-related activities. Paragraph 11 of the resolution "(c)alls upon all States, in accordance with their national legal authorities and legislation and consistent with international law, in particular the Law of the Sea and relevant international civil aviation agreements, to inspect the cargoes to and from Iran, of aircraft and vessels, at their airports and seaports, owned or operated by Iran Air Cargo and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Line (IRISL), provided there are reasonable grounds to believe that the aircraft or vessel is transporting goods prohibited under resolution (1803) or resolution 1737 (2006) or resolution 1747 (2007)". ¶3. (C) We would like to discuss with key countries the importance of implementing robustly this UNSCR 1803 provision and warn them of the risks of doing business with IRISL. We would specifically like to direct this message to those countries that allow IRISL vessels to make port calls and are home to third-party companies that conduct business with IRISL, and may be unwittingly facilitating WMD-related activities. We would also like to remind these countries of the requirements imposed by UNSCRs 1737, 1747, and 1803 to prevent the transfer, directly or indirectly from their territories or by their nationals, to or for the benefit of Iran, of specified nuclear and missile-related goods, as well as the provision of financial assistance related to such transfers. -------------- OBJECTIVES/ACTION REQUEST -------------- ¶4. (S) Washington requests Posts deliver the non-paper in paragraph 5 to appropriate host government officials in the foreign affairs and finance ministries, and other appropriate &#x
000A;government agencies, including those responsible for shipping and customs activities. Posts should pursue the following objectives: -- Emphasize UNSCR 1803's call for member states, in accordance with national and international law, to inspect the cargoes to and from Iran, of aircraft and vessels, at their airports and seaports, owned or operated by Iran Air Cargo and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Line (IRISL), STATE 00069339 002 OF 006 SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IRISL CARGO INSPECTI provided there are reasonable grounds to believe that the aircraft or vessel is transporting goods prohibited under resolution 1803 or resolution 1737 (2006) or resolution 1747 (2007). -- Recall that UNSCRs 1737, 1747 and 1803 also establish a requirement for states to prevent the transfer, directly or indirectly from their territories or by their nationals, to or for the benefit of Iran, of specified nuclear and missile-related items (including Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)-controlled items). -- Encourage governments to carefully monitor the financial activity with regard to IRISL, noting that UNSCR 1737 also calls for states to prevent the provision to Iran of financial assistance and transfer of financial resources or services related to the supply, sale, transfer, manufacture, or use of prohibited items. UNSCR 1803 calls for vigilance in providing financial support for any trade with Iran, including the granting of export credits, guarantees, or insurance to entities involved in such trade. -- Inform governments that cargo on four IRISL vessels was interdicted in 2007 because they were transporting dual-use items to entities that had been sanctioned by the UN Security Council for their role in Iran's missile, nuclear or conventional weapons programs, or to entities acting on their behalf. -- Highlight that IRISL is increasingly employing deceptive measures to disguise the end-user, the destination of its cargo, or IRISL's involvement, which suggests such transfers could be of a sensitive nature and possibly proliferation-related. -- Inform governments that IRISL has continued to carry cargoes for entities including Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group (SBIG),Defense Industries Organization (DIO),and the Sanam Industrial Group (SIG),all of which have been designated by the UN Security Council under resolutions 1737 or 1747 and by the United States under domestic authority (Executive Order 13382). -- Remind governments of the risk that companies doing business with IRISL could, even inadvertently or unwittingly, facilitate the proliferation of items for use in a WMD or missile program. Note in particular the possibility that IRISL vessels will be searched (due to the call in UNSCR 1803),resulting in increased costs to businesses shipping through IRISL. These inspections could lead to delays in shipments of legitimate cargoes. Stress the reputational difficulties that may fall upon those entities found to be associated, even inadvertently, with IRISL's proliferation activities. -- Note that companies that continue conducting business with IRISL could facilitate - unwittingly - transfers to or from Iran of WMD-related items that violate UNSCRs 1737, 1747 and ¶1803. -- FOR PSI PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES (all addressees except Algeria, Azerbaijan, China, ROK, Pakistan, India, Malaysia, and Taiwan): Emphasize that we are providing this information in the spirit of our cooperation as Proliferation STATE 00069339 003 OF 006 -- FOR AIT TAIPEI: When delivering this non paper, please make appropriate adjustments to nomenclature to take into account Taiwan's status. ¶5. (SECRET/ REL Albania, Algeria, Australia, Azerbaijan, Belgium, China, Cyprus, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Libya, Malaysia, Malta, Norway, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and United Kingdom) -- In light of our commitment to share information with your government on proliferation-related activities, we would like to raise concerns about Iran's Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL). -- As you know, IRISL was named in United Nations Security Council Resolution 1803. Operative paragraph 11 of this resolution calls upon all UN Member States, in accordance with national and international law, to inspect the cargoes going to or from Iran, of aircraft and vessels, at their airports and seaports, owned or operated by Iran Air Cargo and Iran's Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), provided there are reasonable grounds to believe that the aircraft or vessel is transporting prohibited items under UNSCR 1803 or UNSCRs 1737 or 1747. EXERCISE VIGILANCE REGARDING IRISL ACTIVITIES -- We urge you to take into account and emphasize to companies in your jurisdiction the significant risks of conducting business with IRISL. -- Specifically, we urge you to exercise vigilance with regard to all IRISL-related transport of goods through your jurisdiction, and any financial support for those transfers, in light of paragraphs 9 and 11 of UNSCR 1803. This vigilance will also facilitate your implementation of the provisions of UNSCRs 1737 and 1803 that require states to take steps to prevent the transfer through or from their territories of items to or for the benefit of Iran. -- We urge you to issue an advisory to companies involved in the shipping industry in your jurisdiction to encourage them to practice enhanced due diligence when dealing with IRISL, since companies conducting business with IRISL could facilitate - unwittingly - transfers prohibited by UNSCRs 1737, 1747, and 1803. -- We would note that potential delays caused by inspections conducted in response to the call in UNSCR 1803 or cargo seizure aboard IRISL vessels could add costs to businesses that choose to continue to ship legitimate cargoes through IRISL. -- We also request that you not share the following interdictions-related information with any third parties. INTERDICTIONS OF IRISL CARGO INVOLVING DESIGNATED ENTITIES -- Cargoes on four IRISL vessels were interdicted in 2007 because they were transporting dual-use items to entities that have been sanctioned by the UN Security Council for STATE 00069339 004 OF 006 SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IRISL CARGO INSPECTI their role in Iran's missile or nuclear programs, or to entities acting on their behalf. All of the following activities occurred after the UNSC imposed sanctions on the entities involved, through the adoption of UNSCRs 1737 (December 2006) and 1747 (March 2007): - An IRISL vessel in late 2007 was carrying potassium perchlorate destined for Iran's Defense Industries Organization (DIO). Potassium perchlorate can be used as a propellant for artillery rockets and can potentially be used to produce the solid rocket propellant oxidizer ammonium perchlorate. - An IRISL vessel in mid-2007 was attempting to ship electronic parts and machine tools, for possible use in Iran's missile program, to a front company for the Sanam Industrial Group (SIG) and an entity that has procured for the Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group (SBIG). SIG and SBIG have been designated in UNSCRs 1747 and 1737, respectively, for their involvement in Iran's missile program. - Another IRISL vessel in mid-2007 was carrying cargo of electronic parts and lathes that could contribute to Iran's nuclear or ballistic missile program to a front company for the Sanam Industrial Group (SIG) and an entity that has procured for the Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group (SBIG). - An IRISL vessel in mid-2007 was carrying aluminum sheets and plates intended for Iran that could be used in Iran's missile program. Documentation associated with this shipment indicated a connection to Iran's Defense Industries Organization (DIO) and a DIO subsidiary. DIO was designated in UNSCR 1737 as an entity involved in Iran's nuclear program. IRISL EMPLOYING DECEPTIVE MEASURES -- IRISL is increasingly employing deceptive measures to disguise the end user, and/or destination of its cargo, and IRISL's involvement in the transaction. - During the period 2003 to 2006, we are aware of IRISL ships diverting or attempting to divert from their originally scheduled port calls, probably in order to avoid possible inspection or seizure of missile-related cargo. Although ships occasionally skip port calls for commercial reasons, we have evidence these diversions were in response to perceived threats of interdiction. - In mid-2003 an IRISL vessel departed from North Korea carrying missile-related and other military items destined for Iran. Instead of going to its original destined port in Iran, it changed course and deviated to the nearest available Iranian port. We believe the change in course was due to fear of being interdicted during its voyage. - In early 2006, another IRISL vessel attempted to skip one of its destined ports of call. We believe this ship was carrying material for possible use in Iran's missile program. - In mid-2006, another IRISL ship diverted course and avoided making a scheduled port call, after becoming aware that it might be inspected and its cargo seized in port. We believe this ship was also carrying material for possible use in Iran's missile industry. STATE 00069339 005 OF 006 SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IRISL CARGO INSPECTI -- Skipping port calls where cargo needs to be unloaded probably costs IRISL tens of thousands of dollars, concerns its customers, and from a business perspective makes no sense for IRISL, which is a profit-making venture. It is also likely that the ship captains are not aware of the nature of the cargo that they are carrying, but know only that it is of a special interest to the government of Iran. -- We also know that IRISL directed its international offices to obtain and use deceptive documents - including false bills of lading that remove references to IRISL and the Iranian recipient - to negotiate letters of credit with banks refusing to deal with Iranian entities. -- We are also aware that Iranian entities designated under United Nations Security Council resolutions are using deceptive tactics to obtain materials such as chemicals that could be used in missile fuel. Again, these deceptive tactics include concealing the true identity of the intended Iranian recipient. This is done by changing the name of the recipient to one that is not designated by the United Nations Security Council and changing the dates on paperwork in an attempt to provide cover for the shipment to avoid seizure while in transit through other states' ports. -- We are also aware that IRISL is likely adapting to increased scrutiny of its sensitive cargoes. In late 2007, IRISL officially changed the policy of one of its shipping lines to avoid refueling while en route to Iran, thus preventing the possibility of inspection and seizure of sensitive cargo. This is the same line that had two of its ships inspected in 2007. Both of these ships were carrying materials, including chemicals prohibited by UNSCR 1737, for Iran's ballistic missile entities that are designated by the UN Security Council. CONTINUED TRANSPORT OF ITEMS FOR DESIGNATED ENTITIES -- IRISL continues to carry cargoes for entities designated by the UN Security Council. As stated previously, four shipments were interdicted in 2007 from IRISL vessels that were carrying dual-use goods destined for entities designated by the UN Security Council, including Sanam Industrial Group, Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group, and the Defense Industries Organization. -- Other SBIG-related shipments include: - In early 2008, an IRISL vessel was en route from Dalian, China, to Bandar Khomeini, Iran, carrying a cargo of materials that are useful in the production of solid-fuel for ballistic missiles. The intended recipients were cover companies for Iran's Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group (SBIG). SBIG is responsible for Iran's solid-fueled ballistic missile program, and was designated in UNSCR 1737. - In mid-2007, an IRISL vessel was en route from Dalian, China, to Bandar Abbas, Iran, carrying a cargo to a cover company for Iran's Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group (SBIG). The cargo is useful in the production of solid-fuel for ballistic missiles. -- Other Defense Industries Organization (DIO)-related shipments include: STATE 00069339 006 OF 006 SUBJECT: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE IRISL CARGO INSPECTI - In late 2007, an IRISL vessel was carrying a variety of military-related goods from China to Iran that were consigned to a known front company for Iran's Defense Industry Organization (DIO). - In late 2007, an IRISL vessel loaded military-related material supplied by Iran's DIO through a company using a cover name at Bandar Abbas, Iran, for delivery to Syria's defense industries. - In mid-2007, an IRISL vessel also loaded military-related cargo supplied by the DIO for Syria's defense industries. -- We would note that, in addition to the designation under UNSCRs 1737 and 1747, Sanam Industrial Group (SIG),Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group (SBIG),and the Defense Industries Organization, have been designated by the United States under domestic authority (Executive Order (E.O.) 13382). - Sanam Industrial Group was designated under E.O. 13382 on July 18, 2006, for its ties to missile proliferation. SIG is a subordinate of Iran's Aerospace Industries Organization, previously designated by the United States under domestic authorty (E.O. 13382),that has purchased millions of dollars worth of equipment on behalf of AIO from entities associated with missile proliferation. - The Shahid Bakeri Industrial Group (SBIG) was designated under E.O. 13382 on June 29, 2005. SBIG is an affiliate of Iran's AIO and is also involved in Iran's missile programs. Among the weapons SBIG produces are the Fateh-110 missile, with a range of 200 kilometers, and the Fajr rocket systems, a series of North Korean-designed rockets produced under license by SBIG with ranges of between 40 and 100 kilometers. Both systems are capable of being armed with at least chemical warheads. - The Defense Industries Organization was designated under E.O. 13382 on March 30, 2007, for engaging in activities that materially contributed to the development of Iran's nuclear and missile programs. DIO has been identified by the IAEA as involved in centrifuge component production for Iran's nuclear program. END SECRET NONPAPER. -------------- REPORTING DEADLINE -------------- ¶6. (U) Post should report results within one week of receipt of this cable. Please slug replies for ISN, T, TREASURY, IO, INR and NEA. Please include SIPDIS in all replies. -------------- POINT OF CONTACT -------------- ¶7. (U) Washington point of contact for follow-up information is Jennifer Chalmers, ISN/CPI, (202) 647-9715, CHALMERSJA@STATE.SGOV.GOV, or Anthony Ruggiero, ISN/CPI, (202) 647-5181, RUGGIEROAJ@STATE.SGOV.GOV. ¶8. (U) Department thanks Posts for their assistance. RICE

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -