Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08SAOPAULO503
2008-09-24 10:35:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Consulate Sao Paulo
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHSO #0503 2681035 ZNR UUUUU ZZH O 241035Z SEP 08 ZDK FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8544 INFO RHEHNSC/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHDC IMMEDIATE RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY 9676 RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO PRIORITY 8862 RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 3177
UNCLAS SAO PAULO 000503
SIPDIS
STATE INR/R/MR; IIP/R/MR; WHA/PD
DEPT PASS USTR
USDOC 4322/MAC/OLAC/JAFEE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KMDR OPRC OIIP ETRD XM XR BR
SUBJECT: SOUTH AFRICA
Mbeki leaves the scene
Editorial in center-right O Estado de S. Paulo (09/24) says:
"Mandela's successors do not maintain the pattern he established.
... Mbeki's obsession with racial issues is inseparable from what he
has done worst, maybe, for South Africa: the refusal to give the
population free access to retroviral drugs under the allegation that
HIV does not cause AIDS; to say the contrary meant fomenting
prejudice against blacks. ... Considering the nonsense that Zuma has
been saying about prevention of the syndrome, he does not seem to be
more informed than his rival. Mbeki's foreign policy was also
execrable. His administration was the major supporter of the longest
lasting African dictatorship, that of Robert Mugabe in neighboring
Zimbabwe. At the end of the day, Mbeki ended up mediating an
agreement of power division between Mugabe and the opposition leader
Morgan Tsvangirai. In addition to that, in partnership with China,
South Africa helped to veto the debate about violations of human
rights in Myanmar. In short, Nelson Mandela did not deserve to have
a successor like Mbeki. Neither does his country deserve to run the
risk of having another autocrat replacing him."
Story