Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
08NAIROBI2768 | 2008-12-11 14:47:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Nairobi |
VZCZCXRO3835 PP RUEHROV DE RUEHNR #2768/01 3461447 ZNR UUUUU ZZH P 111447Z DEC 08 FM AMEMBASSY NAIROBI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7890 INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE RUEHDR/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM 6224 RUEHDJ/AMEMBASSY DJIBOUTI 5471 RHMFIUU/CJTF HOA RUZEFAA/CDR USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE RUZEFAA/HQ USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE |
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 NAIROBI 002768 |
1. On November 28, President Mwai Kibaki signed into law the Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Act (the Act). The Act creates a Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission (TJRC) to establish a complete record of violation of human and economic rights from the time of Kenya's independence in December 1963 until February 28, 2008, the date of the signing of the power-sharing agreement that ended Kenya's post-election crisis. The TJRC is empowered to grant amnesty to individuals who make a complete, truthful admission of wrongdoing, and to recommend prosecution where evidence warrants. It has the power to order reparations and the Act creates a reparation fund. The TJRC will operate for two years, with a possible six-month extension. The TJRC's broad mandate and the short time to complete its work is problematic, and the track record for similar commissions is mixed. The inclusion of a reparations mechanism within the TJRC threatens to overwhelm the body. We are concerned about aspects of the Act that may permit undue government influence of the TJRC. Also, the Act's amnesty provisions do not preclude amnesty in cases of crimes against humanity, providing a potential escape route for high-level organizers and financiers of the 2007 post-election violence who will be tried in a special tribunal, which Parliament is expected to establish imminently (Septel). End Summary. -------------------------- THE TRUTH, JUSTICE, AND RECONCILIATION ACT -------------------------- 2. The Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation Act (the Act) is a product of the Kofi Annan-led mediation process which resolved Kenya's post-election crisis. The Orange Democratic Movement and the Party of National Unity both recognized that unresolved historical grievances contributed greatly to the severity of the post-election violence. The stated goal of the Truth, Justice, Reconciliation Commission (TJRC) is to foster national unity by providing Kenyans a forum in which to air their grievances and be compensated for injustices suffered. 3. The Act was passed by parliament in early November and signed into law by President Mwai Kibaki on November 28. The Act does not vary significantly from the bill submitted to Parliament in May. There will be nine commissioners. The six Kenyan Commissioners will be selected through a public application process. The Act establishes a selection panel comprised of representatives of religious groups, trade unions, the Law Society of Kenya and other groups, which will rank applicants and provides its rankings to Parliament. Parliament will nominate the six Kenyans to be Commissioners. The three international Commissioners will be nominated by the African Union Panel of Eminent Personalities. All commissioners will be appointed by President Mwai Kibaki. The TJRC will have a two year mandate in which to examine violations of human and economic rights dating from Kenya's independence in December 1963 until February 28, 2008. -------------------------- AN AMNESTY MILL? -------------------------- 4. The TJRC is entitled to recommend that the President of Kenya grant amnesty in exchange for complete, honest admissions of human rights violations and economic crimes. It may also recommend prosecutions where evidence warrants. The TJRC may recommend amnesty only after the victim(s) of the crime(s) have been heard. Additionally, the TJRC may only recommend grants of amnesty for economic crimes if restitution is made. The TJRC may not recommend grants of amnesty for gross violations of human rights, defined as violation of fundamental rights, such as torture, killing, abduction, rape and other forms of gender-based violence, and other crimes. Controversially, the Act as written does not preclude amnesty for crimes against humanity and genocide, in violation of Kenya's obligation under international law. Upon receipt of an application for amnesty, TJRC may request that pending criminal proceedings arising from the acts in the amnesty application be suspended until the application is NAIROBI 00002768 002 OF 002 considered. This opens a potential conflict between the TJRC and the Special Tribunal that Parliament is expected to establish to try high-level organizers of post-election violence (Ref a and Septel). Because the TJRC's mandate includes the period of post-election violence also covered by the Waki Commission report, a defendant at the Special Tribunal not charged with gross violations of human rights may apply to the TJRC for amnesty, which, if granted, could allow suspects to be pardoned by President Kibaki. -------------------------- REPARATIONS AVAILABLE -------------------------- 5. The Act establishes a reparations process allowing anyone who has suffered from a gross violation of human rights to apply to the TJRC for reparations. Reparations are to be made from a reparations fund, which is also created by the Act and which will be financed through the budget. Victims of economic crimes are not eligible to apply to the reparations fund. The Act requires perpetrators of economic crimes to pay restitution as a condition of receiving amnesty. However, the Act does not clarify to whom restitution should be made nor does it create a process for persons whose economic rights have been violated to be compensated. -------------------------- CIVIL SOCIETY FAULTS LAW -------------------------- 6. Civil society groups have criticized the Act. Their basic concern is that the Act emphasizes amnesty to the detriment of justice. One civil society leader termed the TJRC an "amnesty commission." Some civil society leaders have also observed that the TJRC will rely on police assistance to investigate acts coming under its mandate. They fear that the police will be unwilling to undertake transparent investigations where powerful persons or police personnel are involved. Civil society leaders also fear that the Act allows room for political interference. They point to a clause that allows the President to appoint the Chairperson of the TJRC. International best practice, they argue, is to allow commissioners to elect a Chairperson from amongst themselves. They also fear that the role of the Minister of Justice, National Reconciliation, and Constitutional Affairs in setting TJRC salaries and approving the annual operating budget might allow for political interference in the work of the TJRC. -------------------------- COMMENT -------------------------- 7. As is often the case with commissions in Kenya, the success of the TJRC will depend on the quality of the commissioners selected. The transparent selection process for commissioners is commendable. However, the TJRC has been given an over-broad mandate and a short time in which to do its work. Inclusion of a reparations process within the TJRC will tax the resources of the TJRC, allowing less time for it to focus on its truth-finding and restorative justice goals. The government previously stated that the TJRC will be funded without donor support and the Act states that the TJRC will be funded through the consolidated fund of the budget. However, the government has not provided any cost estimates for the TJRC and the reparations fund. The Act includes a provision allowing donations to be made toward the operation of the TJRC and the reparations fund, an acknowledgment that the government may be unable to finance the TJRC fully. We will continue to follow closely developments related to the TJRC. End Comment. RANNEBERGER |