Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
08MONTEVIDEO65 | 2008-02-08 15:30:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Montevideo |
1) (U) Summary: The GOU fulfilled campaign promises to reform healthcare with the launch of the National Integrated Health System (SNIS) on January 1, 2008. The re-worked health system is funded by mandatory income taxes between 3% and 6% for most employees, replaced the standard 3% payroll deduction in effect under the old regime. Employers will continue to pay a 5% payroll tax. While the new system was designed to increase access to coverage for Uruguay's poor and working class, some members of the middle and upper-classes who continue to use private contract healthcare complain that they are forced to pay taxes for a services they will not use. By the end of January, more than 800,000 Uruguayans (245,000 children and 4,700 senior citizens) enrolled in the system. END SUMMARY. HEALTHCARE REFORM - THE CONCEPT -------------------------- 2) (U) During the 2004 presidential elections, healthcare reform was a centerpiece of the Frente Amplio (FA) platform. Presidential candidate, Tabare Vazquez, a practicing oncologist, was a natural to preside over one of the key objectives in the FA's first opportunity at governance. His and his party's efforts yielded the National Integrated Health System (SNIS) that was launched in January 2008. The governing Frente Amplio party considered the previous health care model unfair and inequitable. Many middle-class Uruguayans, ineligible for public health services, were technically covered by health insurance but unable to afford the associated co-payments. The government sought to develop a new system that would serve a greater portion of the population and expand coverage to a greater percentage of the population, promote health and equity, and improve quality of life. In a recent radio interview, Minister of Health Maria Julia Munoz said "the government prefers a system where sanitary regulation replaces market rules." Munoz said, "the new plan will not include comfort elements such as individual rooms, cable TV or Internet. It will provide all the services according to the scientific and technological advances available in or accessible to Uruguay to make the system sustainable." THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM - BEFORE -------------------------- 3) (U) Both public and private health care services are available in Uruguay. Public hospitals and clinics provide healthcare to Uruguay's poorest citizens. Many were built over 30 years ago and have been poorly maintained, but offers no cost, one-stop healthcare to those determined eligible by the Ministry of Health (MOH). The MOH issues a "poverty carnet," granting service, to those with a monthly salary less than 4,438 pesos ($212 dollars), which includes the unemployed, many who work in the informal sector, and many pensioners. 4) (U) Private, but closely regulated, health care providers, known as "mutualistas", function similar to HMOs in the U.S. Under the previous model, employees paid a 3% payroll tax to a healthcare distribution fund (DISSE) which would enroll them in an HMO of their choice. Despite the mandatory 3% deduction from their salaries lower and middle-class employees often could not afford the additional co-payments charged by HMOs for individual services. Those employees were ineligible for public healthcare because their salary was above the poverty line, leaving them without affordable access to medical treatment. THE FRENTE AMPLIO FIX -------------------------- 5) (U) When the Frente Amplio government took office in March 2005 MOH authorities described the "mutualista" situation as critical, claimed that politicians had failed to solve the problem and set about to build on existing foundations to offer quality health care to all sectors of the Uruguayan society while fostering regulated competition. 6) (U) In August 2007, DISSE became FONASA (Fondo Nacional de Salud). FONASA is part of the newly-formed SNIS and functions to collect payroll taxes and pay each health MONTEVIDEO 00000065 002 OF 002 provider according to the number of affiliated patients it covers and the services rendered to each. SNIS will regulate the nature and timing of healthcare services offered by these HMOs and how they can be reimbursed, effectively increasing government control over healthcare decision, according to many critics. HMOs will also receive a monthly allocation for each registered patient that varies depending on the patient's sex and age. Under the new system FONASA will continue to collect 3% payroll tax from workers who earn less than 4,438 pesos ($212 dollars) a month, while taxes for those who earn more will increase to 4.5% or 6% (those without and with dependents respectively). Employers will also continue to be subject to a 5% payroll tax. 7) (U) Private medical providers not affiliated with SNIS will continue to operate subject to general MOH oversight. FONASA will pay them the monthly allocation per patient. Those patients would then pay the rest of their healthcare premium costs and co-payments directly to their chosen provider. 8) (U) Supporters of the revised system argue that those who participate will benefit from better services with fewer co-payments and reduced co-payments for prescriptions. Certain no-cost benefits are directed towards women and children, expecting mothers and senior citizens, including: pre- and post-natal care, early detection of breast and cervical cancers, and at least three free consultations or urgent care visits per month for many senior citizens. Co-payments are expected to be substantially reduced for people suffering from chronic conditions. The plan envisions significant long-term savings due to an increased focus on and attention to early diagnosis and intervention. MIXED REACTION -------------------------- 9) (U) While the plan and its associated tax increase were launched in January, many of the details and actual costs and services offered have yet to be determined. Promised reductions of co-payments and other benefits have yet to materialize. Some critics count the plan as a Leftist attempt to shift the burden on the middle and upper-classes while providing little or no new benefit to the population. They argue that most of the benefits offered under the new system were already in place and that the increase in taxes really results in minimal increase in services. In addition, some groups such as Parliamentary employees, have complained that their privileged benefits were being degraded under the new mandatory system and would result in a net loss of pay. 10) (SBU) Many others however, believe the new regime will be a net benefit for Uruguay. The GOU has undertaken a public awareness campaign to encourage workers to enroll in HMOs and utilize services available. Meanwhile, a senior leader in the Colorado Party told Ambassador he considered healthcare reform would be successful and play well for the Frente Amplio as it prepares for 2009 presidential elections. Baxter |