Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08ISLAMABAD1936
2008-05-25 06:47:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Islamabad
Cable title:  

NO IMF PROGRAM FOR PAKISTAN RIGHT NOW

Tags:  EFIN ECON EINV PGOV PREL PK 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2867
RR RUEHLH RUEHPW
DE RUEHIL #1936/01 1460647
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 250647Z MAY 08
FM AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7074
INFO RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEHDO/AMEMBASSY DOHA 1537
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 3278
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 8611
RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 5499
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 9760
RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 4241
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ISLAMABAD 001936 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/19/2018
TAGS: EFIN ECON EINV PGOV PREL PK
SUBJECT: NO IMF PROGRAM FOR PAKISTAN RIGHT NOW


Classified by: DCM Peter W. Bodde for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


Summary
-------

!. (C) Summary: Economic Counselor met with Henri Lorie (strictly
protect),IMF Resident Representative, May 23 for a readout on the
progress of the visiting IMF Mission. The GOP has no plans at this
time to request an IMF stabilization program. The team is looking at
the GOP budget assumptions, projected expenditures and revenues, and
new economic policies for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, which begins
July
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ISLAMABAD 001936

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/19/2018
TAGS: EFIN ECON EINV PGOV PREL PK
SUBJECT: NO IMF PROGRAM FOR PAKISTAN RIGHT NOW


Classified by: DCM Peter W. Bodde for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)


Summary
--------------

!. (C) Summary: Economic Counselor met with Henri Lorie (strictly
protect),IMF Resident Representative, May 23 for a readout on the
progress of the visiting IMF Mission. The GOP has no plans at this
time to request an IMF stabilization program. The team is looking at
the GOP budget assumptions, projected expenditures and revenues, and
new economic policies for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, which begins
July 1. The IMF estimates a USD 3 to 6 billion current account
financing gap. The magnitude will depend on the target price set for
oil imports; the GOP's ability to phase out fuel and electricity
subsidies; and the level of foreign inflows. End summary.

No IMF Program
--------------


2. (C) Economic Counselor met with Henri Lorie (strictly protect),
IMF Resident Representative, May 23 for a readout on the progress of
the visiting IMF Mission, here for postponed routine Article IV
consultations. In response to Economic Counselor's question, Lorie
explained that the GOP has no intention to seek an IMF stabilization
program at this time. While the decrease in the GOP's foreign
exchange reserves is a concern, neither the GOP nor the IMF considers
that Pakistan is quite ready for an IMF program.

Drop in reserves a concern
--------------


3. (C) Lorie expressed concern regarding the continuous drop in
Pakistan's foreign exchange reserves, which currently stand USD 9.1
billion (reserves held by the State Bank of Pakistan). The GOP spent
down its reserves by USD 3.7 billion since July 2007 to finance its
growing oil import bill and to maintain the value of the rupee.
Lorie commented that many countries are in a similar situation due to
rapidly increasing oil and other commodity prices, and expressed
surprise that the IMF has not provided a facility for commodity
financing, similar to what was done in the 1970s during a similar oil
price increase.

Budget assumptions
--------------


4. (C) Lorie then explained the budget assumptions currently under
discussion within the GOP. Currently the GOP anticipates a 5.5
percent fiscal deficit for FY 2008-2009, compared to the current
projected deficit of 6.5 percent. However, this reduction is
dependent on the complete phase out of fuel and electricity
subsidies. (Comment: As fuel price increases begin to affect growth
and continue to fuel inflation, we are not sure that the GOP will
succeed in completely phasing out subsidies over the next year. End
Comment.) Development expenditures will decrease significantly,
although some relief on food and fuel prices for the most vulnerable
populations is likely to be included in the budget.


5. (C) Lorie remarked that the Mission considers the GOP's revenue
projections for the next fiscal year optimistic. The GOP expects to
collect USD 18 billion in tax revenue. Some additional tax measures
contemplated include a capital gains tax and sales tax increases.
The measures contemplated fall short of broadening Pakistan's tax
base.


6. (C) The IMF estimates the current account deficit at 7.9 percent
of GDP, compared to 8.8 percent for the current year. The projected
per barrel price for oil imports is the subject of considerable
discussion, as oil prices have increased significantly in recent
weeks. In addition, the dramatic increase in oil prices has led to
significant off-budget expenditures. Oil imports represent 27.7 of
total imports, and rose 32.9 percent (July 2007 - April 2008)
compared to the same period last year. The IMF estimated that the
financing gap for the current account could be as high as USD 6
billion for the 2008-2009 fiscal year.


7. (C) Foreign inflows are not expected to be sufficient to finance
the current account gap. Foreign direct investment is estimated at
USD 4.8 billion for FY 2008-2009, while portfolio investment is
estimated at USD 1.5 billion. Econ Counselor agreed with Lorie's

ISLAMABAD 00001936 002 OF 002


observation that the portfolio investment figure is optimistic.
Estimates for total FDI for FY2007-2008 are USD 4.5 billion, while
portfolio investment will total USD 350 million. This represents a
drop in income from privatization and decreased investment confidence
stemming from political uncertainty over the past year.


Comment
--------------


8. (C) Comment: The IMF Mission shares our concern over the
significant fiscal and current account deficits and inflation. The
GOP is hampered by the fact that approximately 40 percent of the
import bill is made up oil, food and textiles inputs, and, as a
result, is relatively inelastic.


9. Comment continued: The budget measures under discussion will not
decrease either deficit significantly. Foreign inflows will not make
up the difference, and are based on the assumption that the
privatization program -- currently stalled by a Supreme Court
decision -- will resume and investor confidence will remain. Exports
are holding their own, perhaps in part due to the rupee depreciation.
However, the gap is too large to be bridged by increased exports
alone. We will watch to see how the GOP handles this dilemma in the
new budget. End comment.

PATTERSON

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -