Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
08ISLAMABAD1826 | 2008-05-12 12:41:00 | SECRET | Embassy Islamabad |
VZCZCXRO1774 PP RUEHLH RUEHPW DE RUEHIL #1826/01 1331241 ZNY SSSSS ZZH P 121241Z MAY 08 FM AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6899 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY INFO RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 8557 RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI PRIORITY 9705 RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE PRIORITY 5450 RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR PRIORITY 4189 RUMICEA/USCENTCOM INTEL CEN MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RHWSMRC/USCINCCENT MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY |
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 ISLAMABAD 001826 |
1. (S/NF) Summary: On the morning of April 23, Pakistani
Frontier Corps and Afghan Border Police clashed during an Afghan effort to counter an insurgent attack into Konar province (Afghanistan). During that incident and subsequent engagements, five Afghan Border Police and one Pakistan Frontier Corps soldier were killed. Although the situation was defused following two senior military commander meetings, the circumstances surrounding the incident clearly demonstrate the potential for similar incidents to escalate and create problems for bilateral relations. 2. (C) On 2 May, Chief of the Office of Defense Representative Pakistan (ODRP), Major General Helmly, met with Chief of General Staff, Lieutenant General Satti Sallahuddin, to share concerns about the increased intensity of close combat along the border, which raises the chance of incidents with Pakistani security forces. Sallahuddin stressed the significance of maintaining the sovereignty of Pakistan territory and that further incursions by ISAF and/or Afghani forces would no longer be "accepted." Separately, MFA Foreign Secretary Khan expressed similar concerns to Ambassador. Helmly urged consideration of conducting a tabletop exercise to stress communications and expose weaknesses in combined procedures. Sallahuddin further emphasized the importance of the upcoming Combined Border Planning Session at Bagram on 10 May. End Summary. "Hot Pursuit" -------------------------- 3. (S/NF) During the morning of April 23, a CJTF-101 task force reported receiving small arms fire and mortars from an unknown number of insurgents near Forward Operating Base (FOB) Serkani in Konar province (Afghanistan) who had crossed the border from Bajaur Agency, Pakistan. As the insurgents withdrew toward the border region, U.S. and Afghan forces followed in "hot pursuit" with the help of U.S. AH-64's and artillery support. 4. (S/NF) Ensuing engagements led U.S. and Afghan forces to follow the insurgents across the Pakistan border. Under darkness and perhaps unknown to the U.S. and Afghan forces, Pakistani Frontier Corps (FC) became caught in the middle of the ensuing fire-fights. 5. (S/NF) Because of safety concerns regarding possible Taliban in the area, the Afghan forces elected not to exfiltrate back across the border into Afghanistan and temporarily occupied several Pakistani border posts that had been abandoned during the engagement. 6. (S/NF) A meeting between the ETT commander and commander of the FC Bajaur Scouts was hastily arranged in the late morning of the April 23. During this meeting, another skirmish erupted between Afghan Border Police and the FC during which one FC troop was killed. (Comment: Whether that skirmish was precipitated by militant activity or simply tensions between the Afghan and Pakistani troops remains unclear. End Comment) On 24 April, two subsequent meetings were held - between the ODRP Chief and Pakistani DGMO in Rawalpindi and between the Deputy Commanding General for Operations of CJTF-101 and the Commandant of the Bajaur Scouts at Nawa Pass - to resolve the situation. 7. (S/NF) As a result, Afghan forces vacated all Pakistani border posts on April 24, and the stand off between Afghan and Pakistani forces was defused. As a result of all engagements from April 22-24, five Afghani Border Police were killed, one Pakistani Frontier Corps soldier was killed, and 10 Afghani Border Police were injured. Pakistani Reaction -------------------------- 8. (S/NF) Initial press indicated that Pakistan launched a protest with International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the Afghan government over the border incident. Pakistan Army DGMO also indicated that, although Afghani forces held a Pakistani border post in the vicinity of Nawa Pass temporarily, they would be "evicted." Additionally, an MFA spokesman stated "Afghanistan has been told in clear terms ISLAMABAD 00001826 002 OF 002 that such incidents must not be repeated." 9. (S/NF) During a meeting on April 24, MFA Foreign Secretary Khan raised with Ambassador the GOP's concern with the cross-border incident. Although exact details of the incident were still under investigation, Khan stated unequivocally that occupation was not acceptable, especially when the Afghan forces knew they were in Pakistan and refused to leave. According to Khan, this was not Pakistan's understanding of the rules of engagement (ROE), and it was not helpful. U.S. - Pakistan Discussion -------------------------- 10. (C) On 2 May, ODRP Chief, Major General Helmly, met with Chief of General Staff, Lieutenant General Satti Sallahuddin, to share concerns about the increased intensity of close combat along the Afghanistan/Pakistan border, raising the chance of incidents with Pakistani security forces. DGMO, Major General Pasha, DGMI, Major General Asif, and D/ODRP, Col Shapiro, were also in attendance. 11. (C) Helmly emphasized that neither side could afford failures in communication and situational awareness, particularly given the new Pakistani civilian administration's unfamiliarity with security issues. He reiterated current CJTF ROE regarding border incursions and acknowledged that, although the Pakistani side had never accepted the validity of the ROE, U.S. forces were operating under this guidance. 12. (C) Sallahuddin stressed that orders have been issued to all Pakistan Army and Frontier Corps troops that incursions by ISAF and/or Afghani forces will no longer be "accepted." He added that forces would continue to do their best to prevent militant cross-border movement, but the significance of maintaining sovereignty of Pakistan territory could not be overstated. Furthermore, Sallahuddin asserted that inadvertent border incursions would not be treated as hostile actions, but deliberate border crossings that endangered Pakistani troops were "intolerable." Need for Increased Training and Cooperation -------------------------- 13. (C) Helmly conveyed that the U.S. and Pakistan had ignored the possibility for such incidents for too long and that we must face the potential for "friendly fire" engagements or for a coalition aircraft downing in the FATA during night/bad weather in which the rescue operations may commence under combat conditions. He strongly urged consideration of conducting a tabletop exercise with coalition forces simulating a scenario of escalation from a close border engagement in Afghanistan through "hot pursuit" and engagement in Pakistan, followed by a simulated aircraft downing in Pakistan. 14. (C) Helmly explained that if U.S. air forces were to encounter a catastrophic malfunction just inside the border that forced them down inside Pakistan, the U.S. would launch a search/rescue operation that could be perceived by Pakistani forces in the area as "hostile intent." Limited means of communication and troops ill-equipped with night surveillance gear would only increase the chances that such a cross-border incident would spiral out of control. 15. (C) Both Helmly and Sallahuddin agreed that such an exercise would stress communications and expose weaknesses in combined procedures, helping to strengthen mutual trust and understanding. They also concurred that communications and verification of Pakistani border positions by International Security Assistance Forces (ISAF) would greatly assist in avoiding unnecessary confrontations. Lastly, Sallahuddin stressed the importance of the upcoming Combined Border Planning Session at Bagram on 10 May. PATTERSON |