Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08COLOMBO1023
2008-11-13 13:27:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Colombo
Cable title:
SRI LANKA AND MALDIVES: POSITION ON UNGA THIRD
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 OO RUEHWEB DE RUEHLM #1023 3181327 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 131327Z NOV 08 FM AMEMBASSY COLOMBO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8893 INFO RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 0043 RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ASTANA 0015 RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 0021 RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 1136 RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 0001 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 8138 RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 1378 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 6345 RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 2392 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0853
C O N F I D E N T I A L COLOMBO 001023
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR DRL AND SCA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/13/2011
TAGS: PHUM PREL CE
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA AND MALDIVES: POSITION ON UNGA THIRD
COMMITTEE HUMAN RIGHTS RESOLUTIONS ON IRAN, BURMA AND DPRK
REF: STATE 117901
C O N F I D E N T I A L COLOMBO 001023
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR DRL AND SCA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/13/2011
TAGS: PHUM PREL CE
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA AND MALDIVES: POSITION ON UNGA THIRD
COMMITTEE HUMAN RIGHTS RESOLUTIONS ON IRAN, BURMA AND DPRK
REF: STATE 117901
1. (U) On November 6, Ambassador conveyed reftel points to
Sri Lankan Foreign Secretary Palitha Kohona. Ambassador
sought Sri Lanka's support and vote for upcoming human rights
resolutions in the United Nations General Assembly's Third
Committee and stated U.S. opposition to "no-action" motions
as a matter of principle. He encouraged the Sri Lankan
delegation to join the U.S. in opposing these no-action
motions or, at a minimum, to abstain or absent itself during
those votes.
2. (C) With Kohona out of the country, DCM followed up with
MFA Director General for Multilateral Affairs Aurni
Wijewardena on November 13. Wijewardena acknowledged that
Sri Lanka is reluctant to vote on country-specific human
rights resolutions due to the problems it has encountered in
international fora on human rights issues. She stated that
no decision has been taken on Sri Lanka's vote on the Iran,
Burma, and DPRK resolutions. When pressed, she predicted
that Sri Lanka will vote the no-action motion on Iran and
against the substance of the resolution, as was the case last
year. She said that Sri Lanka's ties to Burma as a Buddhist
nation would make it hard to oppose Burma in the vote. (Sri
Lanka abstained on the substance of the resolution last year
in both the Third Committee and the General Assembly.) She
did not predict how Sri Lanka would vote on the DPRK
resolution, but indicated that Sri Lanka's vote in favor of
the substance of the DPRK resolution in the UNGA last year
was "unusual" and said she "wasn't sure" if it would be
repeated.
3. (U) Due to the change in government on November 11 in
the Maldives, it has not yet been possible to raise the issue
of the country's Third Committee votes with the new foreign
minister.
4. (C) Comment and Recommendtion: Due to Sri Lanka's
traditionally close commercial ties and warming political
relations with Iran, we assess that there is no prospect of
getting even an abstention on the Iran resolution. We do not
anticipate doing better than an abstention on Burma. Due to
Sri Lanka's own bruising experience on human rights in
international fora, we assess,for Sri Lankan support for
no-action motions on Iran and Burma as highly likely again
this year. Sri Lanka has less at stake with the DPRK, and it
is conceivable that they could again vote in favor of the
substance of a resolution on the DPRK. If last year is a
guide, Sri Lanka will, however, abstain in the Third
Committee. A call from a senior Department official could be
useful prior to the DPRK vote in the General Assembly. We do
not believe a call would change Sri Lanka's votes on Iran or
Burma.
Blake
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR DRL AND SCA
E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/13/2011
TAGS: PHUM PREL CE
SUBJECT: SRI LANKA AND MALDIVES: POSITION ON UNGA THIRD
COMMITTEE HUMAN RIGHTS RESOLUTIONS ON IRAN, BURMA AND DPRK
REF: STATE 117901
1. (U) On November 6, Ambassador conveyed reftel points to
Sri Lankan Foreign Secretary Palitha Kohona. Ambassador
sought Sri Lanka's support and vote for upcoming human rights
resolutions in the United Nations General Assembly's Third
Committee and stated U.S. opposition to "no-action" motions
as a matter of principle. He encouraged the Sri Lankan
delegation to join the U.S. in opposing these no-action
motions or, at a minimum, to abstain or absent itself during
those votes.
2. (C) With Kohona out of the country, DCM followed up with
MFA Director General for Multilateral Affairs Aurni
Wijewardena on November 13. Wijewardena acknowledged that
Sri Lanka is reluctant to vote on country-specific human
rights resolutions due to the problems it has encountered in
international fora on human rights issues. She stated that
no decision has been taken on Sri Lanka's vote on the Iran,
Burma, and DPRK resolutions. When pressed, she predicted
that Sri Lanka will vote the no-action motion on Iran and
against the substance of the resolution, as was the case last
year. She said that Sri Lanka's ties to Burma as a Buddhist
nation would make it hard to oppose Burma in the vote. (Sri
Lanka abstained on the substance of the resolution last year
in both the Third Committee and the General Assembly.) She
did not predict how Sri Lanka would vote on the DPRK
resolution, but indicated that Sri Lanka's vote in favor of
the substance of the DPRK resolution in the UNGA last year
was "unusual" and said she "wasn't sure" if it would be
repeated.
3. (U) Due to the change in government on November 11 in
the Maldives, it has not yet been possible to raise the issue
of the country's Third Committee votes with the new foreign
minister.
4. (C) Comment and Recommendtion: Due to Sri Lanka's
traditionally close commercial ties and warming political
relations with Iran, we assess that there is no prospect of
getting even an abstention on the Iran resolution. We do not
anticipate doing better than an abstention on Burma. Due to
Sri Lanka's own bruising experience on human rights in
international fora, we assess,for Sri Lankan support for
no-action motions on Iran and Burma as highly likely again
this year. Sri Lanka has less at stake with the DPRK, and it
is conceivable that they could again vote in favor of the
substance of a resolution on the DPRK. If last year is a
guide, Sri Lanka will, however, abstain in the Third
Committee. A call from a senior Department official could be
useful prior to the DPRK vote in the General Assembly. We do
not believe a call would change Sri Lanka's votes on Iran or
Burma.
Blake