Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08CANBERRA439
2008-04-30 08:04:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Canberra
Cable title:  

AUSTRALIA RESPONDS TO GERMAN OBSTINACY ON CLUSTER

Tags:  PARM PREL MOPS PGOV AS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBY #0439 1210804
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 300804Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY CANBERRA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9475
INFO RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 0998
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1813
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 2165
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 1434
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 3042
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1926
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 0795
C O N F I D E N T I A L CANBERRA 000439 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
NOFORN
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR PM/WRA K. BAKER, EAP FOR ANP

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/01/2018
TAGS: PARM PREL MOPS PGOV AS
SUBJECT: AUSTRALIA RESPONDS TO GERMAN OBSTINACY ON CLUSTER
MUNITIONS NEGOTIATIONS

REF: SECSTATE 45302

Classified By: Political Counselor James F. Cole for reasons 1.4(b) and
(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L CANBERRA 000439 SIPDIS SENSITIVE NOFORN SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR PM/WRA K. BAKER, EAP FOR ANP E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/01/2018 TAGS: PARM PREL MOPS PGOV AS SUBJECT: AUSTRALIA RESPONDS TO GERMAN OBSTINACY ON CLUSTER MUNITIONS NEGOTIATIONS REF: SECSTATE 45302 Classified By: Political Counselor James F. Cole for reasons 1.4(b) and (d) ¶1. (C/NF) Reftel demarche was delivered on April 30 to Dr. Ada Cheung, Executive Director, Arms Control and Counter-Proliferation Branch of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). She advised that the GOA shares the U.S. frustration and concern with Germany's obstinacy over its proposed language changes made at both the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) and the Oslo Process meetings. Dr. Cheung indicated that the like-minded Group wants to take to Dublin's Oslo meeting only two proposals for language on interoperability. If Germany continues to insist that its language remain one of those options, it severely reduces the flexibility of the Like-minded Group to offer something better. Further, it poses a significant risk to the Like-minded countries if it is agreed to by the Core Group, as it does not acceptably resolve the interoperability issue. ¶2. (C/NF) As an aside, Dr. Cheung reported that a shouting match erupted over Germany's Wellington proposal between the Germans and the new U.K. representative during a lunch held on the margins of CCW. The Germans were confused as to why its proposed language seemed to have been accepted in Wellington but was subsequently rejected. The Dutch Ambassador intervened, explaining to the Germans that while the proposals made at Wellington provided needed placeholders at the meeting, the Like-minded Group needed to move on to final language that is acceptable to all. ¶3. (C/NF) According to Dr. Cheung, the U.S. Embassy approached the Australian Embassy in Berlin on April 25 (ANZAC Day, a holiday) seeking its assistance in demarching the German government on this issue. However, the GOA preferred to wait for the specific demarche points before responding to the U.S. request for help. Dr. Cheung was not aware of the NATO discussions on interoperability (reftel). She acknowledged, however, that the support and cooperation of the Germans is still critical in both cluster munitions negotiating forums. MCCALLUM

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -