BRAZIL,S HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY: FOLLOWING THE

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 BRASILIA 001003 SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR DRL AND IO E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/11/2018 TAGS: PHUM PREL BR SUBJECT: BRAZIL,S HUMAN RIGHTS POLICY: FOLLOWING THE LEADERS Classified By: Charge d'Affaires Lisa Kubiske for reasons 1.4 b and d Summary -------------- ¶1. (SBU) Bolstered by economic success, the GOB demands equal footing with all nations, especially when it comes to foreign policy, and its human rights policy is no exception. Brazil's Constitution mandates that the second prevailing principle of its international relations is human rights. Even so, from the top down the GOB avoids taking a stance on its own and refuses to confront a derelict state directly if there is potential for negative fallout. Ministry of Exterior Relations (MRE) officials stick to a party line that does not accept the legitimacy of a single state (usually implying the U.S.) to criticize another state's human rights situation. The GOB believes that human rights issues should be addressed only in international fora (the UN and the OAS), but even in these arenas Brazil has a reputation for not taking a controversial stand. Despite a contradictory policy, the good news is that Brazil is working on its human rights failings, albeit slowly, as with any change across this continent-nation. End Summary. Only in the U.N., and Not Too Much There, Either -------------- --- ¶2. (SBU) Brazil is a strong advocate of working issues in the United Nations, including through the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC). It is critical of what it perceives as the United States' go-it-alone approach to human rights. Brazilians on the whole are extremely critical of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, which they see as typical of the U.S. approach to resolving problems. At the same time, the GOB believes that the UNHRC will continue to flounder without more active USG participation. MRE Director of the Human Rights and Social Themes Division Minister Ana Lucy Cabral Petersen has repeatedly stated to USG officials that the GOB wants to see the U.S. become an active member of the UNHRC in order to give it greater legitimacy. She expressed her regret that the USG has withdrawn from the UNHRC although understands our reasoning. ¶3. (SBU) Despite previous calls for the U.S. to openly support the UNHRC, the GOB itself does not show leadership in UN plenaries. In fact, it has refused to support measures against countries with grave human rights situations, such as Sudan and Zimbabwe. In large part, this refusal to criticize stems from its aspirations for a permanent UNSC seat, an effort which will require African support. In addition, according to MRE Human Rights Division Deputy Carlos Eduardo da Cunha de Oliveira, Brazil is against country-specific resolutions for the most part, unless there is a particularly heinous crime being perpetrated in a member state, because such resolutions tend to be "politically motivated." However, any review of its voting record shows that Brazil tends to speak out more forcefully against egregious human rights violations when there is no Brazilian interest involved. University of Brasilia Human Rights Professor Simone Rodgues explained that Brazil does not have a culture of looking outward. She said that even though the GOB position on human rights may seem weak to outsiders, it is moving forward significantly beyond previous foreign policies of isolationism. Maintain dialog at all costs -------------- ¶4. (C) Last year MRE's Under Secretary for Political Affairs, Ambassador Everton Vargas, clearly stated Brazil's oft-repeated rationale for its policy toward abuses of human rights when discussing Cuba with U/S Dobriansky: "Brazil believes that it is much better to have dialog than no dialog. In the case of Cuba, Brazil can pressure Cuba to do the right thing behind closed doors, but cannot do so in the open because then the dialog stops." Vargas has also repeatedly stated that MRE is under enormous domestic pressure to challenge the human rights scenarios in various parts of the world, expecially Cuba. However, the GOB has rarely bowed to this pressure, notably in statements on Tibet and most recently on Zimbabwe's runoff election. Da Cunha de Oliveira praised Cuba for adopting two UN covenants on civic, educational and cultural rights, but when told that activists in Havana were beaten by police for passing out copies of the UN Declaration on Human Rights, he said that signing and implementation are different and the GOB expects Cuba to adhere to its new obligations. BRASILIA 00001003 002 OF 003 When challenged, hold the line -------------- ¶5. (SBU) In a recent interview on the "Roda Viva" program on TV Cultura, Foreign Minister Celso Amorim was challenged by professor of human geography at the University of Sao Paulo, Demetrio Magnoli. Magnoli said that Brazilian foreign policy has "turned a blind eye" to human rights violations of many countries, in particular to African crises, and praises violators. He also said that MRE's Secretary General Samuel Guimaraes' book says that "international human rights protection is a tactical action employed by the great powers in defense of their own strategic interests," and asked Amorim if this is why Brazilian foreign policy neglects human rights. (Note: the book that Magnoli referred to is one of four with significant anti-American overtones that until 2006 were required reading for all Brazilian diplomats. End Note.) Amorim responded that Brazil has contributed greatly to the development of the current Human Rights Council, which is in the process of conducting a universal review of human rights for all countries. A poor record, but working on it -------------- ¶6. (SBU) Brazil has seen every kind of human rights violation within its borders. Recent international press articles have brought to light slave labor in the charcoal industry (for pig iron) as well as in sugar cane (for ethanol), extrajudicial police killings, deplorable prison conditions leading to frequent riots, and even minor females being incarcerated in the same cells as men. The truth is that none of this is new. MRE Illicit Transnational Crimes General Coordination Office Secretary Eric Sogocio points out that forced labor has existed in Brazil since its inception, but only in the last few years has the GOB addressed the problem in its criminal code. He acknowledged that there is still work to be done, particularly since until recently only women were seen as victims of trafficking from a legal standpoint. Acclaimed reporter and editorialist MIRIAM Leitao pointed out that there have been more deaths in Brazil due to rural violence over the past 20 years (including police actions) than the total number of American soldiers killed in action over the entire history of the U.S. Marco Antonio de Almeida, General Director of the Federal District's Prison system says that prison riots are common in Brazil because the GOB does not budget enough to bring them up to the standards in developed countries -- he prays that the 2006 Sao Paulo riots, when 43 prisons rebelled simultaneously, has made GOB officials cognizant of the deficiencies so that funding will continue to increase. UNIFEM Director Ana Fallu points out that Brazil is the most unequal society in the world. She says that women in poverty, particularly women of color, are the most vulnerable to human rights abuses in Brazil. ¶7. (SBU) Despite these problems, the GOB has indeed made some real progress in dealing with many of its human rights issues. Da Cunha de Oliveira notes that Brazil is a newborn democracy compared to the U.S. and that it is still learning how to implement its constitution in the right way. He notes that sometimes it gives too many freedoms and protects the rights of human rights abusers from serving proper prison sentences. He believes this is a result of over-reactions in the constitution from fear of another repressive military regime. But, he says, the GOB's strong point is that it works closely and openly with civil society. Indeed, NGOs have a great deal of reach within Brazil, and in evaluation of the UNHRC's Universal Periodic Review process PolOffs discovered that those groups that participated with the GOB said that it was transparent and effective. Da Cunha de Oliveira also says that the federal government can only develop the policy, but that individual states and municipalities often are ineffective at implementation. Although this is somewhat true, the GOB fails also to offer a "carrot and stick" approach to aid in the implementation of most of its human rights legislation. There is, however, a notable exception, the Ministry of Labor's "dirty list" which places users of forced labor in the public eye until corrective action is taken. Comment -------------- ¶8. (SBU) Extensive conversations with Brazilian officials reveal that there really is no concrete aim of its human rights policies beyond merely ensuring that it has a voice in international fora. The GOB's tenacity to claim that only the UN has true authority on human rights issues really only BRASILIA 00001003 003 OF 003 serves to subordinate GOB thinking on such issues, the opposite of what MRE seems to want. Morality is a double-edged sword for Brazil's stated policy because of the clear hypocrisy when it steadfastly refuses to condemn a violator-state with its UN votes if that country can provide some tangible support for a Brazilian interest. Eventually as Brazil spreads its wings and moves toward becoming a "developed" nation, it will be forced to make tougher statements that it will have to defend publicly in the international court of public opinion. KUBISKE