Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08BOGOTA3006
2008-08-15 16:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Bogota
Cable title:  

CONSTITUTIONAL COURT LIMITS DISCRETIONARY

Tags:  PHUM PGOV KJUS CO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBO #3006 2281656
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 151656Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY BOGOTA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4192
INFO RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 0875
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ AUG 9607
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA PRIORITY 6453
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO PRIORITY 7145
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL PRIORITY 4541
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L BOGOTA 003006 

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/16/2017
TAGS: PHUM PGOV KJUS CO
SUBJECT: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT LIMITS DISCRETIONARY
AUTHORITY TO DISMISS SECURITY FORCES

Classified By: Political Counselor John S. Creamer. Reason: 1.4(b,d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L BOGOTA 003006 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/16/2017 TAGS: PHUM PGOV KJUS CO SUBJECT: CONSTITUTIONAL COURT LIMITS DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO DISMISS SECURITY FORCES Classified By: Political Counselor John S. Creamer. Reason: 1.4(b,d) ¶1. (U) On August 11, the Constitutional Court announced a ruling limiting the Ministry of Defense's (MOD) discretional authority to dismiss police and military personnel without cause. In its ruling on the case of a career navy infantry officer fired after nine years of service, the court ordered the MOD to provide clear reasons for his dismissal. The officer had provided the court with evidence of positive evaluations by his commanders, including one month before his dismissal. The court ruled that the discretional authority was not meant to be "arbitrary" nor give "unlimited powers" to the state. The court also ruled that the Ministry must provide the individual subject to dismissal an opportunity to present his defense. The ruling also applies to the Department of Administrative Security (intelligence agency) and INPEC (prison officials). ¶2. (C) MOD officials said the ruling will lead to the loss of a valuable tool used to purge the security forces of corrupt personnel, human rights abusers, and other criminal elements without waiting for the results of often lengthy, inconclusive administrative or criminal investigations. MOD Human Rights Unit Director Colonel Juan Carlos Gomez told us the decision has raised "serious concerns" and would negatively impact efforts to root out corruption and human rights abuses. He acknowledged that human rights groups claim the MOD used the discretional authority to head off formal investigations of wrongdoing, but noted that application of the authority did not preclude separate criminal or disciplinary actions. Some military have criticized the MOD for allegedly applying the authority to punish personal enemies. Gomez said the MOD will not challenge the court's decision. ¶3. (SBU) MOD statistics show that between 2004 and 2006, it dismissed 150 Army officers and nearly 200 non-commissioned officers under the discretional authority. In 2004 alone, the MOD fired 300 professional soldiers. Post's Human Rights Certification includes information that in 2007, the commander of the Colombian Armed Forces used his discretionary authority to remove 282 members of the military (59 officers and 223 non-commissioned officers). In the first four months of 2008, the commander used his discretional authority to remove 55 members of the military (8 officers and 47 non-commissioned officers). The court said its ruling will not be retroactive, but the MOD worries the decision will lead to the reinstatement of corrupt personnel as well as potentially costly civil suits brought by dismissed military personnel seeking damages. BROWNFIELD

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -