Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08BERLIN951
2008-07-18 12:26:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Berlin
Cable title:  

GERMAN MOD REQUESTS MORE INFORMATION REGARDING A

Tags:  GM NATO PREL IO AF 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0850
OO RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHPW RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHRL #0951 2001226
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 181226Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1682
INFO RUCNAFG/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0548
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 9119
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1129
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 9686
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 1297
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1580
RUEHRL/USDAO BERLIN GE PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0609
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 0270
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L BERLIN 000951 

SIPDIS
STATE FOR EUR/CE

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/18/2018
TAGS: GM NATO PREL IO AF
SUBJECT: GERMAN MOD REQUESTS MORE INFORMATION REGARDING A
PROPOSAL FOR INCREASED ANA FORCE SIZE

REF: A (STATE 71479) B (BERLIN 00909)

Classified By: DEPUTY POL MC STAN OTTO. REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L BERLIN 000951 SIPDIS STATE FOR EUR/CE E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/18/2018 TAGS: GM NATO PREL IO AF SUBJECT: GERMAN MOD REQUESTS MORE INFORMATION REGARDING A PROPOSAL FOR INCREASED ANA FORCE SIZE REF: A (STATE 71479) B (BERLIN 00909) Classified By: DEPUTY POL MC STAN OTTO. REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D) ¶1. (C) Following the meeting with German MFA officials on July 10 reported in reftel B, PolOff delivered reftel A points to COL Bernd Schtt, Armed Forces Staff at the German MOD, on July 14, 2008. Schtt appeared surprised about the timing of the current proposal for an ANA force size increase, since it was only in February 2008 that the decision was made to increase the ANA to 80,000 military personnel. He stated that quickly modifying that decision could create a credibility problem and would also make benchmarking more difficult. The new benchmark would need good justifications. ¶2. (C) Schtt also voiced a number of specific questions and concerns regarding the proposed ANA force size increase: -- Is the force size increase in the context of the discussion of bringing the ANP into the ANA command structure? He added that this would be politically very sensitive. -- What kind of new capabilities would be added to the ANA: Infantry, Special Forces, PSYOPS, and/or other special capabilities? -- How is the enlarged ANA going to be sustained financially? -- Who is to provide OMLTs for the new ANA units? ¶3. (C) Post will follow up on this issue, but would appreciate more details on the proposal for an increased ANA force size in order to respond to contacts in the MFA and MOD. TIMKEN JR

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -