Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
08ASHGABAT1308
2008-10-01 08:03:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ashgabat
Cable title:
TURKMENISTAN: OSCE NEEDS ASSESSMENT TEAM DOUBTFUL
how-toVZCZCXRO5818 PP RUEHAG RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPW RUEHROV DE RUEHAH #1308/01 2750803 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 010803Z OCT 08 FM AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1643 INFO RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 4352 RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 2164 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2029 RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL PRIORITY 2600 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0897 RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE PRIORITY 2936 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ASHGABAT 001308
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/CEN; DRL
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/30/2018
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM TX
SUBJECT: TURKMENISTAN: OSCE NEEDS ASSESSMENT TEAM DOUBTFUL
ODIHR WILL MONITOR DECEMBER ELECTIONS
Classified By: Charge Sylvia Reed Curran for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ASHGABAT 001308
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/CEN; DRL
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/30/2018
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM TX
SUBJECT: TURKMENISTAN: OSCE NEEDS ASSESSMENT TEAM DOUBTFUL
ODIHR WILL MONITOR DECEMBER ELECTIONS
Classified By: Charge Sylvia Reed Curran for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) SUMMARY: In advance of meetings with Turkmen
officials, OSCE/ODIHR representatives in Ashgabat on a needs
assessment mission seemed resigned to the notion that
Turkmenistan's election laws will not be revised in advance
of the December 14 parliamentary elections. Therefore, they
are doubtful that ODIHR will monitor the elections, even if
invited to do so. Budget cuts within OSCE will also impact
its decision. The ODIHR representatives planned to meet with
Turkmen government officials and members of the international
community in an attempt to ascertain what the government is
doing to prepare for the elections and what useful role ODIHR
might play. ODIHR should not be surprised at the
sensitivity involving this issue since the Turkmen told them
months ago that ODIHR's draft assessment of Turkmenistan's
current election legislation was "unacceptable." Our
assessment remains that political reform is still the most
difficult area for the Turkmen. END SUMMARY.
2. (C) On September 29, POLOFF met with members of an
OSCE/ODIHR needs assessment team that is in Turkmenistan to
determine what role OSCE might play during the upcoming
parliamentary elections scheduled for December. Election
Adviser Gilles Saphy said OSCE has a tough decision to make
regarding what kind of representation to send during the
lead-up to the election as well as for election day. ODIHR
has also experienced a 25 percent cut in its budget for the
year, which will impact its capacity to support election
missions. Nevertheless, the assessment mission planned to
meet with Turkmen officials at the MFA, Central Election
Commission, Ministry of Justice, Institute for Democracy and
Human Rights, and other agencies to get the current Turkmen
perspective on election planning.
3. (C) The team noted that, in April, officials at the OSCE
Center in Ashgabat delivered an OSCE/ODIHR draft assessment
of the country's current election legislation. In June, OSCE
officials came to Ashgabat expecting to discuss steps forward
in beginning the process of legislative revision. At that
time, delegation members were shocked when Institute for
Democracy and Human Rights Director Shirin Akhmedova told
them the assessment was "unacceptable" and the planned
roundtable to discuss the document was canceled.
4. (C) Since then, OSCE representatives have been unable to
find a way forward in nudging Turkmen officials on election
law reform. Especially problematic are outdated laws
pertaining to the upcoming parliamentary elections. The
newly-adopted constitution contains such substantial changes
regarding this legislative body that existing election laws
no longer contain the necessary provisions to ensure the
legal election of new deputies, according to External
Election Consultant Nikolai Vulchanov. ODIHR would be more
likely to send a monitoring mission if the Turkmen government
were able to revise the laws that would guide the
parliamentary elections, before they get underway. Vulchanov
was certain, however, that the laws could not be revised
before the registration of candidates begins.
5. (C) Vulchanov said OSCE has three options for
organizational representation here. The first option would
be to send a limited election monitoring team to monitor the
conduct of the elections, from the registration of candidates
to the final confirmation of voting results. This, he said,
is currently the least likely to occur, given OSCE's
inability to encourage the Turkmen government to revise any
of its current election-related legislation. It also would
hinge on OSCE/ODIHR receiving a formal invitation from the
government to monitor the elections.
6. (C) The second option that ODIHR has in terms of a role
in Turkmenistan during the elections is to send an election
support team. In this scenario, two or three election
ASHGABAT 00001308 002 OF 002
experts would be detailed to the OSCE Center in Ashgabat to
augment the center's reporting capacity for a ten day period
before the elections. This was considered to be a more
likely option, since it would not hinge on any particular
government action, but ODIHR's budget would still be a
consideration. The third option would be to not send any
representatives during the election period, which is also
still a possibility.
7. (C) COMMENT: Turkmenistan has taken a number of
important steps forward in the more than 1 1/2 years that
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov has been president. They have
revised some legislation and instituted reforms in a number
of spheres, including economic, educational, and cultural.
There even have been improvements in the human rights
situation. No one can doubt that this is a country that is
different from the way it was under former president Niyazov.
It is clear that Turkmenistan's rulers are committed to
moving the country toward "international standards" in many
areas. Nevertheless, the hardest area for reform remains
political reform. They equate control with stability, and
real political reform is still a bridge too far for the
Turkmen. With time we may see some changes, and probably, at
first, only on the margins. END COMMENT.
CURRAN
SIPDIS
STATE FOR SCA/CEN; DRL
E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/30/2018
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KDEM TX
SUBJECT: TURKMENISTAN: OSCE NEEDS ASSESSMENT TEAM DOUBTFUL
ODIHR WILL MONITOR DECEMBER ELECTIONS
Classified By: Charge Sylvia Reed Curran for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (C) SUMMARY: In advance of meetings with Turkmen
officials, OSCE/ODIHR representatives in Ashgabat on a needs
assessment mission seemed resigned to the notion that
Turkmenistan's election laws will not be revised in advance
of the December 14 parliamentary elections. Therefore, they
are doubtful that ODIHR will monitor the elections, even if
invited to do so. Budget cuts within OSCE will also impact
its decision. The ODIHR representatives planned to meet with
Turkmen government officials and members of the international
community in an attempt to ascertain what the government is
doing to prepare for the elections and what useful role ODIHR
might play. ODIHR should not be surprised at the
sensitivity involving this issue since the Turkmen told them
months ago that ODIHR's draft assessment of Turkmenistan's
current election legislation was "unacceptable." Our
assessment remains that political reform is still the most
difficult area for the Turkmen. END SUMMARY.
2. (C) On September 29, POLOFF met with members of an
OSCE/ODIHR needs assessment team that is in Turkmenistan to
determine what role OSCE might play during the upcoming
parliamentary elections scheduled for December. Election
Adviser Gilles Saphy said OSCE has a tough decision to make
regarding what kind of representation to send during the
lead-up to the election as well as for election day. ODIHR
has also experienced a 25 percent cut in its budget for the
year, which will impact its capacity to support election
missions. Nevertheless, the assessment mission planned to
meet with Turkmen officials at the MFA, Central Election
Commission, Ministry of Justice, Institute for Democracy and
Human Rights, and other agencies to get the current Turkmen
perspective on election planning.
3. (C) The team noted that, in April, officials at the OSCE
Center in Ashgabat delivered an OSCE/ODIHR draft assessment
of the country's current election legislation. In June, OSCE
officials came to Ashgabat expecting to discuss steps forward
in beginning the process of legislative revision. At that
time, delegation members were shocked when Institute for
Democracy and Human Rights Director Shirin Akhmedova told
them the assessment was "unacceptable" and the planned
roundtable to discuss the document was canceled.
4. (C) Since then, OSCE representatives have been unable to
find a way forward in nudging Turkmen officials on election
law reform. Especially problematic are outdated laws
pertaining to the upcoming parliamentary elections. The
newly-adopted constitution contains such substantial changes
regarding this legislative body that existing election laws
no longer contain the necessary provisions to ensure the
legal election of new deputies, according to External
Election Consultant Nikolai Vulchanov. ODIHR would be more
likely to send a monitoring mission if the Turkmen government
were able to revise the laws that would guide the
parliamentary elections, before they get underway. Vulchanov
was certain, however, that the laws could not be revised
before the registration of candidates begins.
5. (C) Vulchanov said OSCE has three options for
organizational representation here. The first option would
be to send a limited election monitoring team to monitor the
conduct of the elections, from the registration of candidates
to the final confirmation of voting results. This, he said,
is currently the least likely to occur, given OSCE's
inability to encourage the Turkmen government to revise any
of its current election-related legislation. It also would
hinge on OSCE/ODIHR receiving a formal invitation from the
government to monitor the elections.
6. (C) The second option that ODIHR has in terms of a role
in Turkmenistan during the elections is to send an election
support team. In this scenario, two or three election
ASHGABAT 00001308 002 OF 002
experts would be detailed to the OSCE Center in Ashgabat to
augment the center's reporting capacity for a ten day period
before the elections. This was considered to be a more
likely option, since it would not hinge on any particular
government action, but ODIHR's budget would still be a
consideration. The third option would be to not send any
representatives during the election period, which is also
still a possibility.
7. (C) COMMENT: Turkmenistan has taken a number of
important steps forward in the more than 1 1/2 years that
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov has been president. They have
revised some legislation and instituted reforms in a number
of spheres, including economic, educational, and cultural.
There even have been improvements in the human rights
situation. No one can doubt that this is a country that is
different from the way it was under former president Niyazov.
It is clear that Turkmenistan's rulers are committed to
moving the country toward "international standards" in many
areas. Nevertheless, the hardest area for reform remains
political reform. They equate control with stability, and
real political reform is still a bridge too far for the
Turkmen. With time we may see some changes, and probably, at
first, only on the margins. END COMMENT.
CURRAN