Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07USUNNEWYORK490
2007-06-15 20:41:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
USUN New York
Cable title:  

UNSC/DARFUR: GNU ACCEPTANCE OF HYBRID DEEPENS

Tags:  PGOV PREL SU UNSC KPKO 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7025
PP RUEHBC RUEHBZ RUEHDE RUEHDU RUEHGI RUEHJO RUEHKUK RUEHMA RUEHMR
RUEHPA RUEHRN RUEHROV RUEHTRO
DE RUCNDT #0490/01 1662041
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 152041Z JUN 07
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2086
INFO RUEHEE/ARAB LEAGUE COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZO/AFRICAN UNION COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNFUR/DARFUR COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHDS/AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA PRIORITY 1355
RUEHAE/AMEMBASSY ASMARA PRIORITY 1122
RUEHKH/AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM PRIORITY 0769
RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI PRIORITY 0620
RUEHNJ/AMEMBASSY NDJAMENA PRIORITY 0298
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0742
RUEHTRO/AMEMBASSY TRIPOLI PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 USUN NEW YORK 000490 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL SU UNSC KPKO
SUBJECT: UNSC/DARFUR: GNU ACCEPTANCE OF HYBRID DEEPENS
COUNCIL DIVISIONS

REF: SECSTATE 81958

USUN NEW Y 00000490 001.2 OF 003


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 USUN NEW YORK 000490 SIPDIS SENSITIVE SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV PREL SU UNSC KPKO SUBJECT: UNSC/DARFUR: GNU ACCEPTANCE OF HYBRID DEEPENS COUNCIL DIVISIONS REF: SECSTATE 81958 USUN NEW Y 00000490 001.2 OF 003 ¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY. During his June 13 briefing to the Security Council, Department of Peacekeeping Operations Under-Secretary-General Guehenno confirmed Sudanese acceptance of the hybrid operation for Darfur after "comprehensive clarifications" on the June 5 UN-African Union (AU) report. The Sudanese delegation that had met with the AU-UN team in Addis Ababa June 11-12 outlined areas of concern on the eventual hybrid mandate, including a legal distinction between the UN Mission in the Sudan (UNMIS) and the hybrid operation. Guehenno appealed to the Council to provide a hybrid mandate as soon as possible so that the process of mobilizing troop and police contributors could begin. Guehenno clarified that the Sudanese delegation in Addis had not objected to seeking non-African contributors for the hybrid force's composition. In updating on assistance to the AU Mission in the Sudan (AMIS),Guehenno highlighted as a priority the need to construct camps for the two additional battalions required by the Heavy Support Package. Members were divided in their interpretations of Sudanese acceptance of the hybrid, with China, South Africa, Congo, Russia and Qatar seeking to welcome Khartoum's "positive" step, and the U.S., UK, Italy, Peru, Panama expressing doubts about Khartoum's intentions. Belgium, France and Slovakia advocated the Council's keeping an open mind about the acceptance ahead of its June 17 visit to Khartoum. END SUMMARY. DPKO READ-OUT OF JUNE 11-12 ADDIS DISCUSSIONS AND NEXT STEPS -------------- -------------- ¶2. (SBU) During his June 13 briefing to the Security Council, Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) Under-Secretary-General (U/SYG) Guehenno confirmed Sudanese acceptance of the hybrid operation for Darfur after "comprehensive clarifications" on the June 5 UN-AU report. Guehenno described the "constructive atmosphere" of discussions between the teams of the AU (led by Commissioner for Peace and Security Said Djinnit),the UN (led by DPKO Africa Division Director Dmitry Titov) and the Government of National Unity (GNU; led by Foreign Ministry Undersecretary Mutrif Siddiq) during their June 11-12 technical consultations in Addis Ababa on the revised hybrid report (S/2007/307/Rev.1). In addition to accepting the hyb
rid, the Sudanese delegation had reaffirmed the need for an effective cease-fire and for an inclusive political process. ¶3. (SBU) According to U/SYG Guehenno, the Sudanese team had outlined areas of concern on the eventual hybrid mandate, none of which represented "roadblocks," in Guehenno's estimation. They included assurances that monitoring and reporting on the western border by the force would not compromise Sudanese sovereignty; that the force would not take any "pre-emptive measures" in violation of Sudanese sovereignty; and that UNMIS and the hybrid operation would be legally separate entities. DPKO told Poloff privately before Guehenno's consultations that the Sudanese had also objected to provisions providing for police and judicial reform, along the lines of OP8(j) and (k) of UNSCR 1706 (2006). When asked by UKUN Deputy Permanent Representative Karen Pierce about Sudan's reported insistence that all hybrid troops be African, Guehenno said "the door is not closed" and quoted Siddiq as having said that if sufficient African troops were unavailable, then troops from non-African countries could be recruited per existing agreements. He reported there had been no Sudanese objection during discussions to this approach. ¶4. (SBU) Guehenno urged the UNSC to provide a hybrid mandate as soon as possible so that the process of mobilizing troop and police contributors could begin. Guehenno stressed the need for contributors to send personnel fully equipped and meeting UN standards. He noted that the UNSC mandate would be complemented by a parallel one from the AU Peace and Security Council (PSC),given the joint AU-UN nature of the hybrid. Given the complex nature of the hybrid, Guehenno mentioned the possibility that DPKO would create a third Assistant-SYG position (Hedi Annabi and Jane Holl Lute USUN NEW Y 00000490 002.2 OF 003 currently serve as two) to oversee the financial and administrative aspects of the operation. He assured that a financial annex to the June 5 hybrid report would be issued imminently and urged that funding be forthcoming. Guehenno also stressed that AMIS required urgent funding until the hybrid was established. ¶5. (SBU) Guehenno also updated the Council on the Light Support Package, saying that 154 of 184 personnel had deployed and that UN discussions with Egypt continued over the 36 armored personnel carriers still needed to implement the Package. On the Heavy Support Package (HSP),Guehenno said that six of the 11 preliminary units (including engineering units) had confirmed contributors. Guehenno said that preference had been given to African countries and that the list of contributors had been submitted to the GNU (NOTE: DPKO asked USUN privately if the USG could raise the issue of Sudanese sign-off on this list to come to closure on this issue. END NOTE). He noted commitments by 47 police contributors, with Nigeria, Bangladesh and Pakistan pledging the three requested formed police units. Guehenno made clear that HSP deployment would occur in waves and would not be tied to pending consultations with the AU and/or force contributors. ¶6. (SBU) However, DPKO's readiness to deploy immediately was tied to the provision of two additional battalions as force protection, which in turn hinged on construction of camps for their accommodation. Guehenno called this construction a "priority issue" and appealed twice for it in his presentation. He reported that both Joint Special Representative Adada and Force Commander Agwai would arrive in Sudan during the second half of June. Guehenno said the GNU bore responsibility for overcoming logistical obstacles to deployment of the Packages, including customs clearance (he pointed out that $16.6 million worth of equipment had yet to be cleared) and land and water rights. He declared, "Sudanese Government good will should not be wasted on practicalities of implementation." DPKO UPDATE ON SITUATION ON THE GROUND -------------- ¶7. (SBU) Despite progress on the hybrid operation, Guehenno warned that the security environment on the ground in Darfur remained volatile. He spoke in favor of a robust peacekeeping operation instead of a military solution, citing reports of Sudanese Armed Forces aerial bombardments which killed one person on May 19 during a raid on a water station and which destroyed a South Darfur village on June 9. Guehenno condemned the May 25 killing of an AMIS officer in his home in El Fasher, which led to a revised UN risk assessment. He acknowledged that the Sudanese rebel situation had become more complicated - including through the activity of even Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA) signatories and continued fragmentation of DPA non-signatory groups. He noted that there was "almost as much banditry as political fighting." ¶8. (SBU) He said that 150,000 persons were displaced during the first five months of 2007, further necessitating an immediate and unequivocal cease-fire, given "mixed signals" of Khartoum's commitment to do so. Guehenno enumerated security incidents involving humanitarian workers during the same period, including 55 carjackings, 31 convoy lootings, and 13 humanitarian operations re-locations, all of which resulted in "severely restricted" access to populations in need. Guehenno noted progress in implementing the March 28 Joint Communiqu on humanitarian access but pointed out that problems persisted in some areas, including sexual- and gender-based violence and hiring practices. ¶9. (SBU) Guehenno briefly addressed Comprehensive Peace Agreement implementation, noting "commendable efforts" by both sides to bridge key differences on education and communications policy and on contracting competition had been successfully addressed. However, he said progress was still needed on security sector reform, preparations for national elections and development activities. USUN NEW Y 00000490 003.2 OF 003 MEMBERS DIVIDED IN RESPONSE TO GNU ACCEPTANCE -------------- ¶10. (SBU) The U.S., UK, Italy, Peru and Panama expressed doubts about Khartoum's acceptance of the hybrid operation. PolMinCouns, drawing from reftel points, pointed out that while the U.S. would keep an open mind in Khartoum, "yes" did not always mean "yes" in the Sudan context and that the UNSC would seek such an unequivocal assurance during its June 17 visit. If that affirmation were not forthcoming, PolMinCouns warned, then the U.S. and the UK would pursue multilateral sanctions. Italian PR Spatafora asked what circumstance had changed President Bashir's mind now, since the details of the hybrid were well known to him months ago, yet his endorsement then had not been forthcoming. Peruvian PR Voto-Bernales said the measure of the GNU's sincerity would be in the extent of its cooperation on hybrid preparations. ¶11. (SBU) South African PR Kumalo and Chinese PR Wang were the most vociferous supporters of the GNU's acceptance, which Wang repeatedly characterized as a "golden opportunity" worthy of Council welcome. Speaking in English (something he does in the Security Council only when pressing a point), Wang accused some delegations and the UN Secretariat of treating the GNU as a "spoiler" and seeking to punish it, despite the "positive" step it had just taken. "To achieve our objective," Wang declared, "we must treat the Sudanese Government as our partner." Wang specifically criticized the U.S. threat of sanctions. Kumalo's message was the same, asserting that, "You cannot solve Darfur without the help of the Sudanese Government." He questioned the intentions of delegations suspicious of Sudanese hybrid acceptance, asking if the Council sought to help the people of Darfur or simply prove the GNU wrong. Russian PR Churkin concurred, adding that the Council "needed to start taking 'yes' for an answer" from Khartoum. Congolese PR Gayama also stressed that the Council needed to show more confidence in the GNU. ¶12. (SBU) French PR de La Sabliere, echoed by Slovakian PR Burian and Belgian PR and current Council President Verbeke, urged Members to maintain an open mind when they arrived in Khartoum on June 17. He acknowledged that the Sudanese parties were "no angels," but pointed out that a change in the GNU's attitude toward Darfur peacekeeping was worthy of note. He advised the Council to display unity instead of division on its Khartoum visit. South African PR Kumalo capitalized on this idea and proposed the Council issue a Press Statement supporting the GNU's hybrid acceptance, calling for a cease-fire, supporting the political process and looking forward to continued engagement with the AU and GNU. A heated debate over such a statement ensued, pitting the U.S. largely alone against Khartoum's defenders; and it was obvious that consensus on a written statement would not be possible. Verbeke ultimately delivered only elements of a statement that, per USUN amendment, welcomed Guehenno's briefing reporting GNU acceptance of the hybrid. The Chinese delegation in particular reacted negatively to this formulation when Verbeke delivered it. WOLFF

Share this cable

 facebook -  bluesky -