DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/23/07

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 TOKYO 002312

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 05/23/07


INDEX:

(1) Poll on Abe cabinet, political parties

(2) Poll on National Referendum Law

(3) Government, ruling coalition to reduce important bills at last
stage of current Diet session

(4) Ogata raps government's approach to facilitate US force
realignment with subsidies; Ruling bloc forcibly takes vote on
legislation

(5) Opinions on collective self-defense (Part 2): New Komeito's
policy chief Tetsuya Saito concerned that the party would be put in
jeopardy should it allow Japan to take action

(6) Battle between government, Minshuto heating up over pension
records again

ARTICLES:

(1) Poll on Abe cabinet, political parties

YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full)
May 22, 2007

Questions & Answers
(Figures shown in percentage. Parentheses denote the results of a
survey conducted in March.)

Q: Do you support the Abe cabinet?

Yes 49.6 (43.8)
No 36.8 (43.9)
Other answers (O/A) 3.5 (4.4)
No answer (N/A) 10.1 (7.9)

Q: (Only for those who answered "yes" to the foregoing question)
Give up to two reasons for your approval of the Abe cabinet.

I can appreciate its political stance 33.4 (27.4)
It's stable 14.9 (9.2)
The prime minister is trustworthy 23.2 (27.6)
There's a fresh image of the prime minister 40.2 (43.4)
I can appreciate its economic policy 6.2 (4.3)
I can appreciate its foreign policy 15.2 (15.1)
Because it's a coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and the New
Komeito 10.7 (10.2)
It's better than its predecessors 10.1 (10.4)
O/A+N/A 4.8 (3.9)

Q: (Only for those who answered "no" to the foregoing question) Give
up to two reasons for your disapproval of the Abe cabinet.

I can't appreciate its political stance 43.1 (44.4)
It's unstable 24.9 (32.0)
The prime minister is untrustworthy 25.2 (27.3)
The prime minister lacks political experience
16.7 (16.6)
I can't appreciate its economic policy 21.9 (19.3)
I can't appreciate its foreign policy 13.9 (10.7)
Because it's a coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and the New

TOKYO 00002312 002 OF 009


Komeito 14.2 (8.6)
It's worse than its predecessors 7.5 (10.7)
O/A+N/A 3.8 (3.9)

Q: What issues do you want the Abe cabinet to pursue on a priority
basis? Pick as many as you like from among those listed below, if
any.

Economic, employment measures 51.1 (50.0)
Fiscal reconstruction 19.2 (20.7)
Tax reform, consumption tax 27.4 (30.0)
Social security reform, including pension and healthcare systems
59.5 (61.0)
Low birthrate countermeasures, including childcare support
29.0 (30.6)
Educational reform 24.8 (24.1)
Administrative reform, including public service personnel cuts
17.6 (17.8)
Social divide, including income gaps 27.2 (26.9)
Yasukuni Shrine 8.4 (6.0)
Asia diplomacy, including China and South Korea
15.0 (17.6)
North Korea 29.4 (33.3)
Defense, security 13.9 (12.7)
Constitutional revision 11.5 (7.2)
Crisis management, including disaster prevention
11.0 (9.0)
Public security, crime prevention 26.6 (18.4)
Environmental protection 21.9 (18.4)
Food safety 15.0 (13.2)
O/A + nothing in particular + N/A 2.8 (2.8)

Q: Which political party do you support now? Pick only one.

Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 38.5 (36.4)
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 11.1 (11.3)
New Komeito (NK) 3.3 (2.1)
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 1.8 (1.8)
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 0.9 (0.7)
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0.3 (0.1)
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) 0.1 (0.1)
Other political parties --- (---)
None 42.4 (46.0)
N/A 1.6 (1.5)

Q: What's your impression of Prime Minister Abe's ability to get
things done?

He's done what he said 30.1 (19.5)
He's failed to do what he said 59.1 (71.9)
N/A 10.8 (8.7)

Q: What's your impression of Prime Minister Abe's leadership
ability?

He's displayed leadership 26.3 (16.1)
He's failed to display leadership 64.8 (77.5)
N/A 8.8 (6.3)

Polling methodology
Date of survey: May 19-20.
Subjects of survey: 3,000 persons chosen from among all eligible
voters throughout the country (at 250 locations on a stratified

TOKYO 00002312 003 OF 009


two-stage random sampling basis).
Method of implementation: Door-to-door visits for face-to-face
interviews.
Number of valid respondents: 1,803 persons (60.1% ).

(2) Poll on National Referendum Law

YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full)
May 23, 2007

Questions & Answers
(Figures shown in percentage)

Q: The National Referendum Law, which stipulates procedures to
revise the Constitution, has now been enacted in the current Diet
session. Do you appreciate this?

Appreciate very much 20.1
Appreciate somewhat 36.6
Don't appreciate very much 22.3
Don't appreciate at all 11.5
No answer (N/A) 9.5

Q: The National Referendum Law will come into effect after three
years, so a national referendum for constitutional revision will be
held in or after 2010. Do you think political parties should further
activate debates on the Constitution?

Yes 56.2
Yes to a certain degree 22.8
No to a certain degree 8.0
No 6.4
N/A 6.0

Q: The National Referendum Law makes those aged 18 and over eligible
to vote in a national referendum. However, unless the age for the
right to vote in elections and the adult age are changed to 18 and
over, the age of those eligible to vote in a national referendum
will be 20 and over. Do you think the age of those eligible to vote
in a national referendum should be 18 and over or should be 20 and
over?

18 and over 30.4
20 and over 52.7
Can't say which 14.6
N/A 2.0

Polling methodology
Date of survey: May 19-20.
Subjects of survey: 3,000 persons chosen from among all eligible
voters throughout the country (at 250 locations on a stratified
two-stage random sampling basis).
Method of implementation: Door-to-door visits for face-to-face
interviews.
Number of valid respondents: 1,803 persons (60.1% ).

(3) Government, ruling coalition to reduce important bills at last
stage of current Diet session

NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Full)
May 22, 2007

With only one month left before the end of the current Diet session,

TOKYO 00002312 004 OF 009


the government and ruling parties are in hurry to prioritize
important bills. Placing top priority on Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's
wishes, it is now certain that the Diet will pass a bill aimed at
implementing the realignment of US forces in Japan and that the
House of Representatives will approve a bill reforming the Social
Insurance Agency in May. The outlook is that with an eye on the
House of Councillors election in July the government and ruling
coalition will make a final decision on the handling of a bill
revising employment rules and a bill to revise the Political Funds
Control Law.

"I want to enact the bills as soon as possible after conducting
sufficient deliberations," LDP Upper House Caucus Secretary General
Toranosuke Katayama said in a general meeting, which was held before
deliberations on a set of three bills on educational reform at the
plenary session.

The Upper House Education, Culture and Science Committee will began
today deliberations on the bills, aiming at enacting them in
mid-June. Although Abe has cited them as top priority of his
cabinet, there is a sense of crisis in the LDP, with one senior
Upper House member saying, "We must speed up the pace of
deliberations as if we were a special committee."

The Upper House Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee will approve
the USJF realignment bill today and the Upper House plenary session
will pass it tomorrow. The committee is also expected to debate a
bill to revise the Iraq Special Measures Law. The ruling camp
expects that the Lower House Committee on Health, Labor and Welfare
will take a vote on the bill reforming the Social Insurance Agency
on May 25 and the Lower House will approve it before the end of May.
The ruling parties hope to see the enactment of the bill in
mid-June.

"The chief cabinet secretary won't be able to attend both sessions
on education and Iraq. His schedule for the final stage of the
ongoing Diet session is full," LDP Upper House Diet Affairs
Committee Chairman Tetsuro Yano said nervously. New Komeito Upper
House Diet Affairs Committee Chairman Hisashi Kazama underscored: "I
want the Lower House to send the bill to the Upper House by June
7."

It would be difficult to hold deliberations on a bill calling for
reviewing the minimum wage system, as well as for increasing the
employment system. A view is strong in the ruling coalition that the
bill should be passed even if the largest opposition party Minshuto
(Democratic Party of Japan) opposes in consideration of the Upper
House election. However, the Lower House Committee on Health, Labor
and Welfare will start a full-scale debate on the bill after the
Social Insurance Agency reform bill clears the Lower House. Some in
the Upper House say, "The Lower House should keep the bill."

The LDP and New Komeito will submit to the Diet a bill to revise the
Political Funds Control Law as early as next week after finalizing
it at their taskforce on the 25th. The dominant view in the ruling
camp is that they should play up their efforts to the public by
enacting it as early as possible after deliberating it for two days
in each Diet chamber.

In the ruling bloc, there is also a smoldering view calling for a
cautious debate with an eye on a discussion with Minshuto to modify
the bill. The expectation is that the main opposition party will
carefully make a decision based on intensive deliberations on the

TOKYO 00002312 005 OF 009


issue of "politics and money" at a Lower House Budget Committee
session on May 23.

Schedule for deliberations on important bills

USFJ realignment bill:

Diet approval on May 23.
Bill to revise the Juvenile Law

Diet approval on May 25.
Bill revising the Iraq Special Measures Law:

Lower House approval on May15.Diet approval in mid-June.
Three education reform bills:

Lower House approval on May 15Diet approval in mid-June
Bill to reform the Social Insurance Agency:

Lower House approval on May 8Lower House approval on May 29Diet
approval in mid-June
Bill to change the employment rules:

Start of Lower House deliberations on May 8Lower House approval in
early June?Diet approval in late June?
Bill to revise the Political Funds Control Law:

Start of Lower House deliberations in late May?Lower House approval
in mid-June?Diet approval in late June?
Bill to reform the civil service system:

Start of Lower House deliberations on May 15.
Bill unifying the pension programs:

No prospect for deliberations.

(4) Ogata raps government's approach to facilitate US force
realignment with subsidies; Ruling bloc forcibly takes vote on
legislation

AKAHATA (Page 2) (Abridged slightly)
May 23, 2007

A bill facilitating the realignment of US forces in Japan cleared
the House of Councillors Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee
yesterday with a majority approval by the Liberal Democratic Party
and the New Komeito. The ruling bloc forcibly took a vote on the
legislation only after 17 hours of deliberations in three days at
the committee. The Japanese Communist Party, the Democratic Party of
Japan (Minshuto or DPJ),and the Social Democratic Party opposed
it.

The US force realignment is designed to integrate US forces in Japan
and the Self-Defense Forces with the aim of creating new bases and a
system enabling them to deploy globally. The legislation centers on
plans to force Japan to bear the cost of relocating US Marine Corps
from Okinawa to Guam - an internationally unprecedented case - and
provide subsidies to base-hosting municipalities in reward for
bearing greater burdens.

In yesterday's session, JCP lawmaker Yasuo Ogata criticized the
legislation, saying: "The government's explanation that the burden
on Okinawa will decrease is a lie. It is clear that the US force

TOKYO 00002312 006 OF 009


realignment will cause damage throughout the country, forcing
Okinawa to bear a new burden." Ogata also insisted that the United
States must naturally bear the cost of relocating US troops to Guam,
its own territory, and that subsidies would cause rifts between
base-hosting municipalities and their residents, forcing them to
give in.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe indicated in the session that
the US force realignment was necessary for the security of Japan,
describing the subsidy plan as "natural." Ogata also grilled the
government over the project to build US military housing in Guam for
the troops from Okinawa at the expense of Japan, adding that a
housing unit would cost as much as 85 million yen. In response, Abe
simply said, "The figure is still being studied."

Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma in yesterday's session also indicated
that the government would implement the agreed-upon US force
realignment plans. At the same time, he said: "In the event local
governments oppose them, we will try to convince them as much as
possible. I wouldn't say categorically that we will not review
them." He was replying to a question by Yasuo Ogata.

Citing a plan to relocate US aircraft drills from such bases as
Kadena Air Base in Okinawa to mainland Japan, Kyuma said: "If
candidate municipalities refuse to accept them, we could either
force them or not force them."

Iwakuni City in Yamaguchi Prefecture, home to Marine Corps Air
Station Iwakuni, held a referendum in March 2006 in which 90% of the
residents said "no" to a plan to accept the carrier-borne aircraft
from Yokosuka. Mayor Katsusuke Ihara also said: "The referendum
exposed overwhelming public opinion. It must be taken seriously
politically." Citing those events, Ogata pressed the government to
halt the relocation plan.

But Kyuma indicated that the government would push ahead with the
plan, saying: "Although we are aware that the mayor is in a
difficult position, we have asked (Iwakuni) to accept the relocation
plan."

Ogata also explained that a US aircraft relocation plan was called
off following a November 2006 Jacksonville, Florida, referendum in
which 60% of the residents expressed opposition. "The Japanese
government is forcing the relocation plan on a municipality despite
the fact that 90% of its residents are opposed to it. Such an
attitude has prompted even those who have accepted bases to harbor a
sense of distrust of the government," Ogata said.

(5) Opinions on collective self-defense (Part 2): New Komeito's
policy chief Tetsuya Saito concerned that the party would be put in
jeopardy should it allow Japan to take action

NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Full)
May 22, 2007

-- What is your view about the government's panel of experts to
discuss the question of the exercise of the right to collective
self-defense?

Saito: "I didn't want the government to establish the panel at this
point. Studying various cases is fine, but establishing it now gives
an impression that the government is rushing to constitutional
revision, given that debate on the Constitution is about to start

TOKYO 00002312 007 OF 009


with the national referendum bill specifying the procedures for
constitutional revision enacted recently. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
has said he wants to make constitutional revision a campaign issue
in the upcoming Upper House election. I consider the expert panel as
merely an advisory panel, as well as a tool for the prime minister
to sort out his ideas.

"As a coalition partner, our party continues to emphasize the need
for firmly upholding paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 9. Pacifism is
the foundation for Japanese economic growth. The Japanese Communist
Party and the Social Democratic Party assert, 'We won't allow any
changes in any word of a text,' but I don't think their assertion
will be of great help in terms of opposing constitutional revision.
Our party's position is that while maintaining the basic principles
of the current Constitution, we will contribute 'additions to the
Constitution' that would include new types of human rights."

-- Most panel members are in favor of exercising the right to
collective defense.

Saito: "I know such a viewpoint exists among them, but they are
sincere about conducting their research and studies, so I don't
think their discussion has a foregone conclusion. They (panel
members) have understood well our assertion that 'the government's
interpretation should not be changed so easily.' They will debate
precisely the four cases shown by the government (such as whether
the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) can intercept missiles targeting the
US or can protect US vessels if they come under attacks on high
seas)."

-- Don't you think the New Komeito is being slighted?

Saito: "I can't go as far as to say our party is being slighted
because it remains to be seen what conclusion (the panel) will come
up with. But misunderstanding could easily occur, so we are not
necessarily happy with its establishment. If we assume an attitude
that 'this case comes under the use of the right to collective
defense, but we tolerate it because it is like the case of using the
individual self-defense right,' our party's existence will be at
stake. That is indeed a life-or-death matter for the party."

-- When it comes to the four cases, which case do you think falls
under the use of the right to collective defense?

Saito: "If the government reinterprets the Constitution, it will
lose international confidence. There is no chance that over the same
case, the panel asserts that "Japan is allowed to take action even
though the case comes under the use of the right to collective
defense, while our party asserts that Japan is allowed to take
action because doing so is 'the exercise of the individual defense
right and allows Japan to do so.'

"A number of arguments are conceivable when it comes to intercepting
ballistic missiles aiming at the US. The remaining three cases could
be dealt with under the scope of the individual self-defense
right."

(6) Battle between government, Minshuto heating up over pension
records again

ASAHI (Page 2) (Excerpts)
May 23, 2007


TOKYO 00002312 008 OF 009


In the current Diet session, the problem of unidentified records of
pension premium payments is coming into focus in its final phase.
There are about 50 million unidentified records among those kept by
the Social Insurance Agency (SIA). With an eye on the upcoming House
of Councillors election, the battle between the ruling and
opposition parties over the pension issue now appears to be
intensifying.

Benefits in 50 million cases left unpaid

In a meeting of the House of Representatives' Health, Labor and
Welfare Committee yesterday, Tadahiko Tanizawa, a lawyer who was
called by the Democratic Party of Japan (Minshuto) to give unsworn
testimony, said: "I want you to understand how 350 pension
subscribers to whom I provided legal consultation have been upset."
He cited this specific case.

A 78-year-old man who lives in Nishinomiya, Hyogo Prefecture,
applied with the SIA for pension benefits in 1994, when he turned

65. He had changed his place of work many times. He was told that
there was no record of his working at a trucking company for one
year and several months starting in 1949.

As a result of 10-year-long search efforts, this man finally found
in 2004 a pension record bearing his name but a different company
name from what he actually worked. He filed an application again
that year, and the record was proved to be his.

Based on accounting regulations, however, this man received only
five years' pay starting from the year when the record was
corrected, that is, from 1994 to 1999. He thus could not receive
full benefits, despite his being eligible.

Pursued by such examples in Diet deliberations, Ministry of Health,
Labor and Welfare (MHLW) Yanagisawa repeatedly said, "It is very
regrettable." But since he has just said: "In order to prevent such
cases, the SIA will conduct a survey when it receives an inquiry,"
triggering fierce reactions from the opposition camp.

As for eligible policyholders who have several pension records due
to repeated marriages and changes in job, a SIA official said:
"Before they begin to receive a pension, we will collect every
record in a thorough way so that they will be provided full
benefits." However, there are such cases as the man cited above. In
the case of those who received several policy numbers before the
agency introduced a system in 1997 to issue a single policy number
to each person enrolled in the basic pension scheme, unless they
file an application with the SIA, they will not be given a policy
number.

There are about 50 million cases of such pension records that have
been up in the air as of June 2006. In 28 million cases of them,
policyholders are at the pension eligible age or beyond.

Based on the view that "there should be more pension eligible
persons," Minshuto there has been calling on the government to
promptly conduct investigations. But the SIA remains unresponsive. A
senior member said, "It is conceivable that most of them are the
records of those who have already died before receiving pension
benefits." But the official added: "A few records of person
receiving a pension might be included in them. It is impossible to
find out everything, we cannot give clear-cut replies."


TOKYO 00002312 009 OF 009


Speculations, with eye on Upper House election

Minshuto regard the problem of pension records up in the air at the
Social Insurance Agency (SIA) as a "major weapon to shake up the Abe
administration," as a senior member said.

In the current Diet session, in the run-up to the Upper House
election, the main opposition party remains unable to score points
based on its appeal to the public by addressing the issue of
expanding income disparities. Its presence tends to be overshadowed
by the ruling camp, which holds two-thirds of all the Lower House
seats.

At such a time, the pension record problem has emerged. Secretary
General Yukio Hatoyama said: "This will be the top campaign issue in
the Upper House election. We will shed light on this," keeping in
mind the outcome of the 2004 Upper House election, in which Minshuto
defeated the Liberal Democratic Party as a result of underlining the
need to address the pension issue.

Even so, momentum is not fully gathering, compared with the
situation three years ago. As a member of the Diet Affairs Committee
said, "Since people knows little about the SIA issue, they are not
angry. Informing them of the fact should be the most effective
strategy," the opposition is ready to pursue the ruling coalition at
every opportunity.

Minshuto has decided that if the ruling parties try to steamroll a
vote on a bill to reform the SIA, it will put up an all-out
resistance, with a submission of a non-confidence motion against
MHLW Minister Yanagisawa.

Meanwhile, the ruling camp is hoping to put an end to the pension
record issue, one member saying: "SIA reform and the pension issue
are two different matters." Although cautious views are deep-seated
in the LDP Upper House Executive, as one saying, "If we forcibly
take a vote, the result might be a repetition of the outcome in the
2004 Upper House election." But a senior MHLW official expressed
expectation for forcible vote on the bill.

SCHIEFFER