ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

UNCLAS TEL AVIV 001019 SIPDIS STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM NSC FOR NEA STAFF SECDEF WASHDC FOR USDP/ASD-PA/ASD-ISA HQ USAF FOR XOXX DA WASHDC FOR SASA JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR PA CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL FOR POLAD/USIA ADVISOR COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE FOR PAO/POLAD COMSIXTHFLT FOR 019 JERUSALEM ALSO ICD LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL PARIS ALSO FOR POL ROME FOR MFO SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: OPRC KMDR IS SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION -------------- SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: -------------- ¶1. Mideast ¶2. Iran-Britain Crisis -------------- Key stories in the media: -------------- All media reported that on Wednesday Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that his government would release the 15 detained British sailors and marines as a gift to the British people. The electronic media reported that this morning the freed Britons were on the way to London. Yediot bannered: "Ahmadinejad's Show." Leading media reported that the Prime Minister's Office has strongly denied that Israel relayed a message to Syria, accepting its calls to renew peace negotiations. The bureau responded to questions raised on Wednesday by a statement made by US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, following a meeting with Syrian President Bashar Assad. Pelosi was quoted as saying hat she had relayed a message from PM Ehud Olmert, to the effect that Israel was ready for peace talks with Syria. The Prime Minister's Office was quick to issue a denial, stating that "what was discussed with the House Speaker did not include any change in Israel's policy, as it has been presented to international parties involved in the matter." In a special statement of clarification, the bureau stressed that Olmert had told Pelosi that Israel continued to regard Syria as "part of the axis of evil and a party encouraging terrorism in the entire Middle East." Ha'aretz quoted sources at the Prime Minister's Office as saying that "Pelosi took part of the things that were said in the meeting, and used what suited her." The same sources explained that the decision to issue a statement of denial stemmed from questions from Israeli and foreign press regarding a change in Israel's official stance on negotiations with Syria. The media reported that President Bush and Vice President hurled harsh criticism at Pelosi over her visit to Syria. The Jerusalem Post reported that Bahraini FM Sheikh Khalid Bin Ahmed al-Khalifa told the Bahrain daily Al-Ayam on Tuesday that the Riyadh Arab League summit set up "panels to communicate with all influential parties, including Israel, to activate the Arab Peace Initiative." The Jerusalem Post cited the Bahrain News Agency quoting Khalifa as saying that the Arab League has formed "working teams to communicate with all parties, including Israel, the UN, the US, China, and the EU." He was quoted as saying that the team would make contacts with Israel "within a month," and that contacts with Israel would be made by countries "that have ties" with it, while the other Arab nations would contact the US and the EU member states. The Jerusalem Post reported that a source in the Prime Minister's Office denied knowledge of any working groups that would be calling Jerusalem. "We still haven't accepted the full initiative," the source, adding that there would be no formal reply until after the Prime Minister's Office returned from the weeklong Passover holiday. "But we have never said no to contact." Israel Radio quoted a senior Israeli defense official as saying that Israel respects the cease-fire with the Palestinians, but that it will not tolerate attacks against its soldiers. Leading media reported that an Islamic Jihad militant was killed and another was wounded during a pursuit along the Gaza Strip border. Israel Radio reported that the defense establishment will maintain its offensive initiative. Israel Radio cited The New York Times quoting senior US officials as saying that a major arms-sale package that the Bush administration is planning to offer Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf allies to deter Iran has been delayed because of objections from Israel, which says that the advanced weaponry would erode its military advantage over its regional rivals. Israel Radio reported that the Israeli Embassy in Washington declined to comment on the report. Hatzofe reported that PA Transportation Minister Saadi Al-Kunz intends to resume the activity of Dahaniyeh Airport in the Gaza Strip. The newspaper quoted an Israeli defense source as saying that the Palestinians will not receive a permit to run flights from the airport as long as rockets are launched at the Negev. Ha'aretz reported that Israel and the PA have agreed on opening trade passages to the Gaza Strip. A terminal for imports to Gaza will operate via the Kerem Shalom passage. The Palestinians will be able to import and export goods from Egypt and other countries via the Rafah passage alone. The plan, which is supported by the international community, is pending the approval of Olmert and Defense Minister Amir Peretz. The Jerusalem Post reported that on Wednesday Ron Nachman, the Mayor of the West Bank settlement town of Ariel, denounced as "ridiculous" a report that the Defense Ministry was weighing the possibility of shortening the route of the security fence in the northern West Bank to exclude his city. Yediot reported that a glass wall will be erected around the Knesset building to protect it from gunfire. Maariv reported that Israel recently embarrassed the President of Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko, by telling him that it refused his request to visit Israel on Holocaust Day. The official reason is the crowded calendar of the acting president. However, Maariv wrote that in reality, Israel fears getting into diplomatic trouble that could strain its relations with Russia. Maariv quoted associates of former justice minister Haim Ramon as saying that he is seriously considering returning to the government. The newspaper said that Ramon is getting closer to the finance portfolio. The Jerusalem Post reported that fewer Israelis and Palestinians study each other's language. Ha'aretz reported that, according to a US Commerce Department report, Israel may remain on the list of patent infringing countries in 2007 if its pharmaceutical law is not amended. The daily said that, less than one month before publication of the US Priority Watch List, the US Commerce Department has publicized its 2007 report on the limitations of commercial activity in the US and other countries. The conclusion from the chapter on Israel is that if Israel fails to amend its legislation on the protection of proprietary data in the production of pharmaceuticals, and fails to extend the term of validity of patent protection of such information, it will again find itself on the Priority Watch List of patent-infringing countries. Ha'aretz and Maariv reported that the annual global quota of H1B visas to the US, commonly issued to technology workers sent to work there by their employers, was filled in a record single day. Applications for the visa could be submitted only on April 2 and 3 this year. The next application dates are in April 2008. Yediot reported that, starting next academic year, the Education Ministry will send outstanding managers of schools in the public sector to Harvard University for one-year extension studies. The Jerusalem Post quoted Mormon leaders as saying that they have finally found acceptance in Israel. All media reported that on Wednesday, the US dollar's rate reached a six-year low on the Tel Aviv market -- 4.135 shekels. -------------- ¶1. Mideast: -------------- Summary: -------------- Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in the independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz: "Rather than say 'no' to the Arab proposal, Olmert preferred to ignore it and continue to pass on messages to the 'moderate Arab states,' which rejected his overtures." Jonathan S. Tobin, Executive Editor of The Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia, wrote in the conservative, independent Jerusalem Post: "As long as outsiders encourage the Palestinians in their madness -- something the Rice-backed Saudi plan seems to be doing -- a day of peace for Israel such as the one the Irish now celebrate, will be put off even further." Block Quotes: -------------- ¶I. "Headlines Instead of Initiatives" Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in the independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz (4/5): "When the Prime Minister dropped his 'bomb' [an offer to meet with all Arab chiefs of state], a concrete proposal from the Arab League was ticking right under his feet. In the context of an exchange between 'heads of moderate states,' the summit suggested that a working delegation, organized by the League, meet with a similar Israeli delegation. The understanding that the League would determine the composition of that delegation was a given. Just as Arabs do not determine who is a moderate Jew, Israel cannot determine who is a moderate Arab. Peace talks are not a made-to-order program. Anyone who wants his picture taken with the Saudi King will have to ensure that the Syrian President fits into the frame. If the League invites Bashar Assad to appoint a representative to its team, Israel cannot bring a note from Uncle Sam saying that he does not permit us to play with 'rough characters.' Rather than say 'no' to the Arab proposal, Olmert preferred to ignore it and continue to pass on messages to the 'moderate Arab states,' which rejected his overtures." II. "The Misleading Analogy" Jonathan S. Tobin, Executive Editor of The Jewish Exponent in Philadelphia, wrote in the conservative, independent Jerusalem Post (4/5): "Last week's dramatic meeting between two Irish leaders was the sort of thing no one imagined possible.... Since so many are fixated on the Irish breakthrough and its relevance to the Middle East, it's worth taking the time to analyze that situation and to see just how misleading this analogy can be. Unlike the Israeli-Arab stand-off, where one side (the Palestinians) still refuses to accept the legitimacy of their opponents' existence as a separate state, the historic acceptance of a two-state solution in Ireland happened 85 years ago, not last week.... Unlike the Irish, who agreed to a historic partition for peace, the Palestinians have yet to meaningfully do so, despite the plethora of peace deals that Israeli leaders have signed with them in the last 14 years.... Hamas is based in an extremist faith, not a belief in secular self-determination like Irish republicanism. Their oft-stated goal is simply the destruction of the State of Israel. Were they, or their more secular rivals in Fatah, merely interested in Palestinian statehood, they could have achieved that a long time ago.... As long as outsiders encourage the Palestinians in their madness -- something the Rice-backed Saudi plan seems to be doing -- a day of peace for Israel such as the one the Irish now celebrate, will be put off even further." -------------- ¶2. Iran-Britain Crisis: -------------- Summary: -------------- Senior Middle East affairs analyst Zvi Bar'el wrote on page one of the independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz: "[The diplomatic solution] will now be used by Iran as proof that even powers such as the US and Britain are limited in their ability to use force when it comes to a minor border incident." Defense and foreign affairs columnist Amir Oren wrote in Ha'aretz: "The ambush of the British sailors was an Iranian challenge, not the last one, to the US and its allies. Bush is opposed in principle to deals involving prisoner exchanges for hostages." Deputy Managing Editor Anshel Pfeffer wrote on page one of the conservative, independent Jerusalem Post: "Both US President George ¶W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair are aware of the acute danger Iran poses to world peace and Middle East stability, but neither has the credibility or public backing to launch another military campaign." Block Quotes: -------------- ¶I. "A Gift to Britain Is Iran's Gain" Senior Middle East affairs analyst Zvi Bar'el wrote on page one of the independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz (4/5): "Iran understood the advantages of a diplomatic solution. If the arrest [of the British sailors and marines] itself, which was carried out on the eve of a United Nations decision on sanctions, was meant to deliver the message that Iran is not afraid of sanctions and that it distinguishes between the nuclear issue with matters pertaining to its territorial sovereignty, the diplomatic solution is no less important. It will now be used by Iran as proof that even powers such as the US and Britain are limited in their ability to use force when it comes to a minor border incident -- and that the threat Iran poses is precisely in initiating local incidents that are not sufficiently important to lead to war. In addition to this gain, Iran can also offer Syria its own gains, at a time when its Foreign Minister, Walid Mualem, is rushing to announce the role Damascus played in the British sailors' release. It is doubtful whether Syria influences Iran on regional issues, but when the US House speaker is in Syria, delivering messages of peace between Israel and Syria, Tehran can give Damascus a bonus. It is doubtful whether this incident would impact Iran's determination to develop nuclear capabilities, a project considered an inalienable part of national strategy and pride." II. "Iran Challenges Bush" Defense and foreign affairs columnist Amir Oren wrote in Ha'aretz (4/5): "The ambush of the British sailors was an Iranian challenge, not the last one, to the US and its allies. Bush is opposed in principle to deals involving prisoner exchanges for hostages. He did not publicly voice his opposition to the release of Palestinian prisoners in exchange for Gilad Shalit. Nonetheless, a day before the British sailors were imprisoned, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice criticized her Italian counterpart, Massimo D'Alema, for releasing five Taliban captives for an Italian journalist abducted in Afghanistan. The London-Tehran deal sheds a strange light on Bush's declared principle. But had former US President Jimmy Carter not failed in his efforts to release the hostages from the US Embassy in Tehran in 1980, Reagan, who is admired by Bush, would not have become president, been commemorated with an aircraft carrier, and have authorized an arms deal in exchange for the hostages in Iran." III. "Iran Shows Up Britain's Weakness" Deputy Managing Editor Anshel Pfeffer wrote on page one of the conservative, independent Jerusalem Post (4/5): "It would seem that the British policy of increasing diplomatic pressure through the United Nations and the European Union and not offering the Iranians anything for the captives' release worked. On the other hand, the mullahs have gotten away with piracy on the high seas, thumbing their nose at the United States' closest ally. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seemed almost magnanimous when he announced his country's Easter 'gift' to Britain, and then receiving (on camera) protestations of gratitude. But Ahmadinejad also succeeded at a more fundamental level. The British and American response to the sailors' abduction proved how difficult it is for Western powers to face the threat his regime poses to the free world.... Both US President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair are aware of the acute danger Iran poses to world peace and Middle East stability, but neither has the credibility or public backing to launch another military campaign." JONES