DEMARCHE REQUEST: URGING THE CZECH REPUBLIC TO

UNCLAS STATE 027000 SIPDIS SENSITIVE SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL UNGA UNSC BM SUBJECT: DEMARCHE REQUEST: URGING THE CZECH REPUBLIC TO LEAD EFFORTS FOR A BURMA SPECIAL SESSION AT THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL ¶1. (U) This is an action request. Please see paragraphs 3-5. -------------- SUMMARY -------------- ¶2. (U) On February 26, Assistant Secretary Lowenkron and Assistant Secretary Silverberg attended an event on Burma hosted by the Czech Republic Embassy with former President Vaclav Havel, at which they asked the Czechs to lead the effort to sponsor a Human Rights Council (HRC) Special Session on Burma. The session would ideally take place immediately following the March 12-30 fourth regular session of the Council. Through consultations, the Department has established that the UK and Mexico would support a Special Session on Burma. Sixteen signatures of HRC members are needed to get a Special Session. The Czech Embassy expressed initial support, but noted that the decision would have to be taken by the Foreign Ministry. (Note: Current discussions within the EU are sympathetic but preference is for a country outside the EU to sponsor the resolution. End Note.) With the Czech Republic's lead effort confirmed, the Department will demarche other HRC countries asking for their support. We do not anticipate any major difficulties in obtaining the needed signatures. However, to pass a resolution at the Special Session, we will need 24 votes which will take a more intensive lobbying effort. As we will have a large observer delegation in Geneva for the three weeks of the regular HRC session just prior to a Special Session, we will concentrate our efforts there. We are considering a resolution that would: call attention to the situation on the ground and denounce the regime's lack of response to the request by the SYG for changes to Burmese policies, and stress the need for a political opening in Burma; call for appointment of a successor for former Special Envoy to Burma Razali (if SYG Ban has not yet appointed one by then); and create a follow-up investigative mission to visit Burma and the border to prepare a report on the human rights and humanitarian situation. End Summary. -------------- OBJECTIVES -------------- ¶3. (U) Department requests Embassy to urge the Czech government to lead efforts during the March session of the HRC in Geneva to sponsor a Special Session on Burma to take place immediately after the regular fourth session. Post should also appeal to the Czech government to take advantage of its remaining few months on the Council, before its term expires in June, to demonstrate internationally the GOCR's commitment to promote human rights. The U.S. further requests that the Czech Government introduce a strongly- worded resolution on the human rights situation in Burma during the Special Session that would accomplish several goals: A) Focus international attention on the appalling situation on the ground in Burma; B) Call on the UNSYG to appoint a strong Special Envoy with the mandate to facilitate a transition to democratic rule, better respect for human rights, and improved humanitarian conditions inside Burma through discussions with the Burmese regime, and to work with key countries in the region and beyond to develop concerted international pressure to promote national reconciliation in Burma. (Note: If a Special Envoy has already been appointed by the time of this resolution's introduction, the HRC could welcome that appointment. End Note.) C) Establish an assessment team or Commission of Inquiry to assess current conditions in Burma. This Commission of Inquiry would report its findings to the Council's fifth regular session in June ¶2007. In addition, holding a Special Session on Burma at the HRC would challenge the Council to fulfill its intended purpose and help improve the trajectory of that body, which with its near exclusive focus on Israel to date, has proven to be a serious disappointment. ¶4. (U) Embassy may pass to host government the following proposed draft language calling for the Special Session on Burma, to be circulated for signatures in the first week of the fourth session: HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Fourth Session 28 February 2007 Letter dated 28 February 2007 from the Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic to the United Nations Office at Geneva, addressed to the President of the Human Rights Council I hereby request, on behalf of the signatories listed in the enclosed document, that you convene, as provided for by the General Assembly resolution 60/251, a special session of the Human Rights Council on the human rights situation in Myanmar, to be held immediately after the fourth session of the Human Rights Council, preferably on the 2nd Day, April 2007. (Signed): Name Permanent Representative of the Czech Republic ¶5. (U) Embassy may also share the following possible draft resolution for adoption during the Special Session on Burma: The Human Rights Situation in Myanmar The Human Rights Council, Recalling that the General Assembly by its resolution 60/251 of 15 March 2006, decided that the Council should address situations of violations of human rights, including gross and systematic violations, and make recommendations thereon, Recalling all General Assembly and Commission on Human Rights resolutions on Burma, and relevant Security Council resolutions, such as 1674 (2006) on protection of civilians in armed conflict, 1325 (2000) on women in armed conflict, 1612 (2005) on children in armed conflict, and 1308 (2000) on HIV/AIDS. Recognizing the need of the Council to continue to be provided with clear, accurate and substantiated information on the human rights situation in Myanmar, (1). Deploring the seriousness of the human rights and humanitarian situation in Burma, including the continued detention of over 1,100 political prisoners, the prolonged house arrest of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, continued attacks by members of the Myanmar military in ethnic minority regions against civilians, including women and children, as well as torture, arbitrary execution, forced labor, forced displacement, torture, rape and sexual violence against women, and the widespread recruitment and use of child soldiers; (2.) Expresses its grave concern that the restrictions by the Government of Myanmar placed on international humanitarian organizations contribute to increased hardship for the civilian population and calls on the Government of Myanmar to remove those restrictions; (3). Urgently calls upon the Government of Myanmar to release unconditionally all political prisoners, including Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, abolish forced labor, allow free access for international and humanitarian organizations to all parts of the country, and engage in a genuine political dialogue with all parties on a transition to democratic rule and respect for human rights; (4). Calls upon the Government of Myanmar to fully adhere to the Memorandum of Understanding of February 26 between the International Labor Organization and the Government of Myanmar that provides a mechanism to enable victims of forced labor to seek redress; (5). Expresses its grave concern regarding the decision by the Government of Myanmar not to permit the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar and the former Special Envoy of the Secretary-General to Myanmar to visit SIPDIS the country for almost three years, despite repeated requests; (6). Calls upon the Secretary General to appoint a Special Envoy to implement the Secretary General's good offices mission to facilitate a transition to democratic rule, better respect for human rights, and improved humanitarian conditions in Myanmar. (Alternative language: Welcomes the Secretary General's appointment of X as Special Envoy for Myanmar and expresses its strong support for the Special Envoy to promote national reconciliation in Myanmar. End alternative language.) (7). Decides to establish an assessment mission to examine current conditions in Myanmar, to be urgently dispatched to Myanmar and neighboring countries, and requests the mission to report to the Council at its fifth session. -------------- REPORTING DEADLINE -------------- ¶6. (U) Post should report the results of their efforts by cable slugged for DRL/MLGA Laura Jordan, EAP/MLS Aaron Cope, and IO/RHS Deepa Ghosh by March 9. -------------- BACKGROUND -------------- ¶7. (U) On January 12, the UN Security Council voted on a resolution on Burma tabled by the U.S. and UK. The vote was 9-3-3. Indonesia, Qatar, and the DRC abstained, while Russia, China, and South Africa voted against. The "no" votes of China and Russia blocked the resolution. Despite the veto of this resolution, all Council members, even those that abstained or opposed, expressed their deep concern about the situation in Burma. Several countries that abstained or opposed, including China, Russia, South Africa, and Indonesia, also expressed strong support for the appointment of a Special Envoy and for consideration of Burma in the HRC. ¶8. (SBU) Since Special Envoy Razali Ismail's resignation in January 2006, UN Under Secretary General Gambari had taken the lead in implementing the good offices mission. With the end of Gambari's appointment as Under Secretary General, Secretary General Ban is now considering the appointment of a new Special Envoy. We have urged the Secretary General to appoint an individual with suitable international stature and a willingness to deal firmly yet creatively with the Burmese generals. It is critical that the Special Envoy have a mandate that allows him or her to work with key actors in the region to promote national reconciliation in Burma rather than engage solely with the Burmese regime. We understand that Secretary General Ban plans to name a Special Envoy soon. ¶9. (SBU) Several UNSC members (including South Africa, Russia, and Indonesia), in their explanations of vote on the Security Council resolution, asserted that the UN should best deal with Burma in the HRC. Given the Burmese regime's serious and internationally recognized human rights problems, it clearly is appropriate for the HRC to address Burma. Although not a member of the HRC, the Department considered with allies the possible ways in which the HRC could most effectively raise this issue, and determined that a special session on Burma would be the best response. In addition, the United States remains committed to working through other UN bodies, such as ECOSOC and the ILO, to maintain international attention on the regime's repressive polices, including the use of forced labor, child soldiers, and sexual violence as a weapon against ethnic minorities. ¶10. (U) It is important that the regime receive a consistent message from the international community. Based on the extensive discussions on Burma at the UN Security Council and General Assembly, there is consensus on some fundamental steps the regime needs to take; these steps have also constituted the main message of UN U/SYG Gambari to the Burmese regime over the past year. These include the unconditional release of all political prisoners (including Aung San Suu Kyi),engagement in a genuine dialogue process that includes the National League for Democracy, an end to attacks on civilians in ethnic minority regions, and an end to restrictions on the international humanitarian organizations working in Burma. RICE