Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07SEOUL219
2007-01-23 08:28:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Seoul
Cable title:
ROKG SUPPORTIVE OF US POSITION ON CLUSTER MUNITIONS
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHUL #0219 0230828 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 230828Z JAN 07 FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2498 INFO RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PRIORITY 0388 RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0476 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2019 RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1857 RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC//OSD/ISA/EAP// PRIORITY RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J2 SEOUL KOR PRIORITY RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J3 SEOUL KOR PRIORITY RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J5 SEOUL KOR PRIORITY RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA SCJS SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SEOUL 000219
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LCC SEOUL SEOUL KOREA PLEASE PASS TO J2, J5 AND SCJS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/23/2017
TAGS: MOPS PARM PREL KS
SUBJECT: ROKG SUPPORTIVE OF US POSITION ON CLUSTER MUNITIONS
REF: SECSTATE 6667
Classified By: A/DCM Joseph Y. Yun. Reasons 1.4 (b,d).
C O N F I D E N T I A L SEOUL 000219
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LCC SEOUL SEOUL KOREA PLEASE PASS TO J2, J5 AND SCJS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/23/2017
TAGS: MOPS PARM PREL KS
SUBJECT: ROKG SUPPORTIVE OF US POSITION ON CLUSTER MUNITIONS
REF: SECSTATE 6667
Classified By: A/DCM Joseph Y. Yun. Reasons 1.4 (b,d).
1. (U) This is an action request. Please see para 4.
2. (C) On January 23, Poloff delivered reftel demarche to
Kim Hye-jin of the Disarmament and Nonproliferation Division
of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT). Kim
said that the Republic of Korea (ROK) agreed that any
discussions about restricting cluster munitions (CM) should
be carried out through the already-established Convention on
Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) framework. While
emphasizing that ROKG interagency discussions are ongoing,
Kim said that both MOFAT and the Ministry of National Defense
are very worried that a CM ban would negatively impact
military defense capabilities and would be costly to
implement. Kim said that the ROKG would welcome future
military-to-military discussions on CM.
3. (C) Kim confirmed that the ROKG had not been invited to
attend the February Oslo conference, but that the Government
of Norway had offered the ROKG an observer seat. Kim said
that the ROKG is considering attending because they are
concerned that the CM issue will be co-opted just as the
landmine issue was in the Ottawa process. However, Kim
indicated that the ROKG does not wish to be the only
non-participating attendee and is concerned that ROKG
presence could be incorrectly interpreted as support for the
goals of the Oslo conference. In particular, Kim said that
the ROKG decision to send an observer will depend heavily on
whether the United States and other countries such as Japan
attend, and noted that a ROK-Japan-U.S.-Finland meeting about
the Oslo CM conference was planned for later this week in
Geneva.
4. (C) Action Request: Post requests that Department provide
a list of countries that plan to attend the Oslo conference
as participants and as observers to share with the ROKG as
soon as available. End Action Request.
STANTON
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LCC SEOUL SEOUL KOREA PLEASE PASS TO J2, J5 AND SCJS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/23/2017
TAGS: MOPS PARM PREL KS
SUBJECT: ROKG SUPPORTIVE OF US POSITION ON CLUSTER MUNITIONS
REF: SECSTATE 6667
Classified By: A/DCM Joseph Y. Yun. Reasons 1.4 (b,d).
1. (U) This is an action request. Please see para 4.
2. (C) On January 23, Poloff delivered reftel demarche to
Kim Hye-jin of the Disarmament and Nonproliferation Division
of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MOFAT). Kim
said that the Republic of Korea (ROK) agreed that any
discussions about restricting cluster munitions (CM) should
be carried out through the already-established Convention on
Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) framework. While
emphasizing that ROKG interagency discussions are ongoing,
Kim said that both MOFAT and the Ministry of National Defense
are very worried that a CM ban would negatively impact
military defense capabilities and would be costly to
implement. Kim said that the ROKG would welcome future
military-to-military discussions on CM.
3. (C) Kim confirmed that the ROKG had not been invited to
attend the February Oslo conference, but that the Government
of Norway had offered the ROKG an observer seat. Kim said
that the ROKG is considering attending because they are
concerned that the CM issue will be co-opted just as the
landmine issue was in the Ottawa process. However, Kim
indicated that the ROKG does not wish to be the only
non-participating attendee and is concerned that ROKG
presence could be incorrectly interpreted as support for the
goals of the Oslo conference. In particular, Kim said that
the ROKG decision to send an observer will depend heavily on
whether the United States and other countries such as Japan
attend, and noted that a ROK-Japan-U.S.-Finland meeting about
the Oslo CM conference was planned for later this week in
Geneva.
4. (C) Action Request: Post requests that Department provide
a list of countries that plan to attend the Oslo conference
as participants and as observers to share with the ROKG as
soon as available. End Action Request.
STANTON