Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
07ROME304
2007-02-13 14:36:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

EU AVIATION EMISSIONS DRAFT PROPOSAL--GOI VIEWS

Tags:  EAIR ECON EUN IT SENV 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6177
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHRO #0304 0441436
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 131436Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7182
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 1247
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY 0523
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES PRIORITY 0281
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0850
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 4319
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 0764
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1753
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 0489
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1879
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0166
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 2160
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 8348
RUEHMT/AMCONSUL MONTREAL PRIORITY 0136
RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 2301
UNCLAS ROME 000304 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR ECON EUN IT SENV
SUBJECT: EU AVIATION EMISSIONS DRAFT PROPOSAL--GOI VIEWS

REF: A. STATE 04858


B. 06 STATE 190254

C. 06 STATE 188369

-------
SUMMARY
-------

UNCLAS ROME 000304

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR ECON EUN IT SENV
SUBJECT: EU AVIATION EMISSIONS DRAFT PROPOSAL--GOI VIEWS

REF: A. STATE 04858


B. 06 STATE 190254

C. 06 STATE 188369

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (SBU) GOI representatives report a strong interest within
the EU and among the GOI technical authorities to have new EU
legislation addressing environmental pollution generally, and
aviation emissions specifically. From their comments, it
seems that neither the GOI nor the EU have determined a final
position on the content/substance of the regulations. For
this reason, post believes that USG can continue to influence
the aviation emissions debate. END SUMMARY.


2. (SBU) EconOffs met with Achille Vinci Giacchi, Diplomatic
Advisor to the Ministry of Transport, on January 30. He was
confident that there was enough time remaining to reach a
solution satisfying to both pro- and anti-emissions groups
before any EU regulations are enacted. He stated that
Italy's technical aviation authorities (ENAC--Italy's
aviation authority) will raise the matter within the ICAO
context and may find a solution there.


3. (SBU) Vinci Giacchi also thought that since larger
environmental control issues were more difficult to resolve,
some EU members sought to use aviation emissions as a way to
push the environmental agenda. With greater USG flexibility
on environmental issues generally, he said, the EU might be
less aggressive in its aviation emissions control efforts.
He noted that the date for international carrier compliance
with proposed EU aviation standards was still under
discussion, and that the EU might decide to extend the date
so far into the future that such regulation would be
meaningless.


4. (SBU) A/ECMIN also met with Massimo Gajani, Diplomatic
Advisor to the Ministry of EU Affairs, on February 9. Gajani
mentioned that environmental issues are a high priority in
the EU now; he believes that the proposed EU aviation
emissions regulation is a strategy to establish the EU as an
international leader on environmental policy. With many EU
and non-EU competing policy interests, including both
competition and environmental, Gajani thought that ultimately
heads of EU member states may need to decide the final form
of any aviation emissions regulation.


5. (SBU) Gajani mentioned that he and Vinci Giacchi will
write the GOI position paper on aviation emissions regulation
to be submitted to the EU. Gajani stated that they will bear
in mind USG views when preparing the position paper.
Ultimately, he said, the EU and the U.S. must work together.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


6. (SBU) Neither Gajani nor Vinci Giacchi could be drawn out
on whether or not the GOI supports the proposed EU
regulation. While Vinci Giacchi mentioned, in passing, a
possible ICAO role in deciding on an aviation emissions
regulation, both our interlocutors seemed to prefer
EU-drafted regulations. That said, both hinted at
disagreement both within the EU and the GOI on the means and
timetable for addressing aviation emissions. For this
reason, Post believes that the USG can continue to influence
the aviation emissions discussion in Europe in both Brussels
and Italy. END COMMENT.
SPOGLI