Are politicians trying to control the public media in

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 RIGA 000561 SIPDIS SIPDIS E.O. 12958: N/A TAGS: PGOV PHUM LG SUBJECT: Are politicians trying to control the public media in Latvia? ¶1. Summary: Recent developments in the news service of Latvian National Television (LTV),in particular the downgrading of the director of a weekly analytical and investigative news program "De Facto" to a lower-responsibility position, raise concern about seeming desire of some politicians to censor and control public media that criticizes the ruling coalition. This latest move follows other actions widely viewed as politicized attempts to control LTV news products. These speculations of political interference were further fueled by an interview with former-PM Andris Skele who said that "public media should reflect public opinion" and public opinion should mirror the outcome of the most recent elections -- in which his People's Party (TP) did the best. It is too early to call this an organized assault on the public media, but it is worrying and something that post will monitor closely as it develops. End summary. ¶2. In June, the deputy head of LTV issued a decision to downgrade Arta Giga, director of the weekly analytical and inestigative news program "De Facto," for broadcasting an uncensored word and exceeding the show's time slot. Giga has not accepted the downgrade and has appealed the administration's decision. The case will be reviewed by a dispute committee in the fall. ¶3. Giga's downgrading raised concern of political experts and local, as well as international media organizations. The Latvian Association of Journalists published an open letter stating that "[Giga's] downgrade is one of the attempts to weaken and finally ruin the LTV news service made by the administration of the LTV over the last two years...it raises concern about possible political pressure on public mass media." "Reporters Without Borders" also issued a statement saying, "We are very disturbed by this transfer... it is a disproportionate response to minor offences, one that seems to reflect an underlying desire to restrict investigative journalists' access to popular programs." Latvian media and political experts also expressed concern. Dita Araja, deputy editor-in-chief of the public policy portal www.politika.lv believes that "[these d]evelopments are [part of] a targeted campaign aimed at ruining independence of the news service, carried out, most likely, on behalf of the ruling political parties, as the news service is more uncomfortable for politicians and not the LTV's administration." 
 ¶4. This is not the first time there has been concern about political interference with LTV news service. In 2005, the National TV and Radio Council (nominated and approved by parliament) reproached LTV news service for producing "negative" news. At the time, the head of the National TV and Radio Council Aivars Berkis (also member of a coalition party the Union of the Greens and Farmers (ZZS)) stated that "the nightly prime time news "Panorama" reports too many negative news stories, and in addition, journalists make their comments on these broadcasts." A number of leading coalition figures, including influential Ainars Slesers, leader of Latvia's First Party (LPP) and Aivars Lembergs, Ventspils Mayor, currently under charges of corruption, have repeatedly voiced their deep dissatisfaction with being criticized by LTV' nightly prime time news "Panorama" and the weekly investigative/analytical "De Facto." ¶5. More criticism of potential interference came in 2006 when the network administration replaced the head of the news service by a candidate not supported by the news service staff, leading to unhappiness among the staff. In February 2007, the deputy head of LTV suggested reorganizing the news service, in particular separating the weekly "De Facto" from the daily news (reporters currently work on both) without providing any additional resources. Although these plans were not approved, they were viewed as part of continued assault on the independence of LTV's news staff. ¶6. A July 17 interview with former-PM Andris Skele in "Latvijas Avize" newspaper included a few statements on the role of the public media that prompted concerns about further attempts of the ruling coalition to control and censor the public media. In the interview Skele first states that public television has stepped beyond any limits, implying that public television was overly critical of the coalition's presidential candidate Valdis Zatlers . Further, he revealed his vision on the role of public television: "if you [public television] receive state funding, then you should broadcast views according to their proportion in the society... the most accurate mirror of proportions is the body of the recently elected parliament, consequently such and such time should be given to right-wing parties, such and such time to left-wing parties and such and such time to nationalists." Although Skele does not have any formal position in government or within People's Party (which received the largest number of votes ni the last election),he is among the key players in Latvian politics. (Comment: It is important to note that his name has been mentioned in relation to a number of high level bribery and corruption cases investigated and reported by LTV's news service, particularly "De Facto.") ¶7. Latvian polls consistently show that the public ranks television as the most trusted institution and source of information in the country. By ratings, the most popular television news programs are RIGA 00000561 002 OF 002 LTV's "Panorama" and "De Facto." "De Facto" earned its reputation by the disclosure and investigation of an alleged high-level bribery/vote buying case in the Jurmala City Council, where the names of influential politicians like Skele and Slesers were mentioned. For its work on this case "De Facto" and its team have received official recognition. It was named best program in Latvia in 2006 and one of its journalists-anchors, Ilze Jaunalksne, received the State Department's Women of Courage Award for her fight against political corruption in Latvia. ¶8. Comment. Over the last two years the ruling coalition has been criticizing the mass media, in particular LTV's news service, for not being "objective" when reporting on work of the government and parliament. That has been followed by several actions which balance on a thin line between state's authority to control its institutions and political interference. While politicians everywhere complain about unfair press coverage, the pattern of activity over the past two years, the recent downgrading of the head of "De Facto" and the press interview by Skele suggest that it is possible that the balance is tipping toward political interference. Most likely that the situation will not change until the fall as summer holidays have slowed political and public life. However, new developments are expected in the fall when politicians and television return to their usual routine and Giga's case will be reviewed by the dispute committee. Post will continue to keep a close eye on developments in this area. BAILEY