ICELAND WILL SUPPORT BOWHEAD WHALE QUOTA IF IWC SCIENCE

UNCLAS REYKJAVIK 000144

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE

STATE FOR EUR/NB MAHER AND OES FIELD
USDOC FOR NOAA/NMFS HOGARTH AND MCCARTY
COPENHAGEN FOR ESTH HUB

E.O.12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV EFIS KSCA PREL IWC IC
SUBJECT: ICELAND WILL SUPPORT BOWHEAD WHALE QUOTA IF IWC SCIENCE
COMMITTEE APPROVES

REF: STATE 56397


1. (SBU) Summary: DCM and Econoff delivered reftel points to IWC
Commissioner Stefan Asmundsson who said that Iceland would support
the U.S. bowhead whale quota if the Science Committee approved it.
Asmundsson repeatedly stressed that Iceland is in favor of "the
sustainable use of whaling" and therefore would support Japan's
proposal if also determined to be sustainable. Iceland perceives
the Conservation Committee as "anti-use" and feels there is no
political will to support a Revised Management Scheme. Asmundsson
asked whether there would be a resolution against current whaling
operations and if so, would the USG support it. End Summary


2. (SBU) DCM and Econoff met with International Whaling Commission
Commissioner and Ministry of Fisheries Director of International
Affairs Stefan Asmundsson and one of his deputies, Hrefna
Karlsdottir on May 14 to deliver reftel points. Asmundsson
cordially began the meeting by announcing that because Iceland
supports the sustainable use of whaling, they will support the U.S.
bowhead quota renewal provided that "we are talking about
sustainable levels" and the Science Committee supports it.
Asmundsson stressed that it's not just about the number of whales
but the stock structure and said the worse case scenario would be
perhaps not a five year block quota but a one or two year quota.


3. (SBU) Asmundsson stated he put the US proposal in context with
the Japanese proposal. He said they were not directly linked, but
that Iceland would apply the same principles of sustainability to
both. Asmundsson said the Japanese had already been in to see him
but that he would not support the proposal if it were "just x number
of animals"; he stressed that Iceland only supported sustainable
whaling and the Japanese need to prove sustainability.


4. (SBU) Regarding a Revised Management Scheme, Asmundsson said he
saw no indication that progress will be made. He mused that "if
anyone has a good idea, we'd love to see it" but feels that without
a change in the present political situation nothing would happen.
Asmundsson said efforts should be focused on getting political
backing rather than working on a new compromise proposal.


5. (SBU) Asmundsson described the Conservation Committee as
"anti-use." He said in principle Iceland supports conservation but
they have problems with the basis for the work of the committee. He
said they tried to change the language of the committee's
establishment resolution and then worked for two years within the
committee to try to change its basis. He said Iceland can't take
part now in the committee without a change in the committee's
foundation then back-tracked and said they had not made a final
decision about whether they will ignore the committee or wait for
positive noises.


6. (SBU) Asmundsson asked whether we expect there to be a resolution
against current whaling operations and if so, would the USG support
it.


7. (SBU) Regarding Iceland's current commercial whaling operations,
Asmundsson said there had been no decision on increasing the quota,
but there was substantial interest in updating the existing whaling
legislation that dates from the 1940s. He said the last of the 200
minke sample for the research program would be caught this summer
and the data would be analyzed, but it was premature to close the
door on the research program altogether. Asmundsson said should
further information be needed then the program might continue and
also added that no decision had been made on implementing the fin or
sei whale portion of the original research plan announced in 2003.

VAN VOORST